Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33395
|
| Title: | 從隱喻與轉喻的觀點看人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現
Lexical Manifestation of Human Thinking Process in Mandarin:A Metaphoric and Metonymic Account |
| Authors: | 高惠珊
Gao, Hui-shan |
| Contributors: | 賴惠玲
Lai, Huei-Ling
高惠珊
Gao, Hui-shan |
| Keywords: | 思考過程
隱喻
轉喻
認知語意機制
thinking process
metaphor
metonymy
cognitive mechanism |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 16:28:19 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探究有關「思考｣ 的中文辭彙，藉以一窺人類思考過程的全貌，並進一步透過隱喻與轉喻等認知語意機制 (參看Kövecses and Radden 1998, Lakoff 1993, Ruiz de Mendoza 2000, Diez Velasco’s 2003等人之論著)，分析人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現。
首先，我們修改認知心理學中所提的訊息處理模型 (參看Palmer and Kimchi 1986, Sternberg 1969, and Neisser 1967等人之論著)，根據修改過後的模型，得到人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現可分為七種類型。在進一步分析後發現，有關「思考｣ 的中文辭彙所牽涉的認知語意機制包括Lakoff (1993)提出的隱喻類型，Kövecses & Radden (1998)及Diez Velasco’s (2003)提出的轉喻類型，及Ruiz de Mendoza (2003)所提出來的隱喻和轉喻的交互模式，而本研究另外發現需透過三重轉喻及兩個新的隱喻和轉喻的交互模式才能完整建立起人類思考過程的中文辭彙體現的字面語意與其象徵語意之間的連結。
In this study, we intend to claim that the backstage cognition of thinking process, through linguistic manifestation, can be explicitly detected with six dynamic continuing stages. In addition, each stage reifies itself with linguistic expressions of concrete observable parts or organs of body, which in turn demonstrate that lexical manifestation of thinking is heavily based on such mechanisms as metaphor and metonymy. (cf. Kövecses and Radden 1998, Lakoff 1993, Ruiz de Mendoza 2000, Diez Velasco’s 2003).
First of all, we refine the information processing model proposed in cognitive psychology (cf. Palmer and Kimchi 1986, Sternberg 1969, and Neisser 1967). Based on the refined model, the Mandarin lexical reification of thinking is claimed to fall into six stages corresponding to six types. A special case linking two or more stages is observed as the seventh type.
Then, we probe into the linguistic data from the seven types of thinking. The analysis discovers that a full explanation of those linguistic data from the six stages of the thinking process requires the activation of some types of metaphor. We have also found metonymy provides mental access to thinking activities.
As to the interaction of metonymy, the three types of double metonymy are not sufficient to account for the lexical manifestation of thinking. Triple metonymy also needs to be employed to explain the meaning derivations of the data.
Finally, it is found that the three interaction models of metaphor and metonymy are insufficient to cover all the possible interactions of cognitive mechanisms behind the lexical manifestation of thinking in Mandarin. This study reveals two new interaction models not mentioned by Ruiz de Mendoza (2000). |
| Reference: | 1. English Version
Ashcraft, Mark H. 1994. Human memory and cognition. Human memory and cognition
Atkinson, R. and Shiffrin, R. 1968. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2), ed by K Spence and J Spence. New York: Academic Press.
Best, John B. 1999. Cognitive psychology. Brooks/ Cole Wadsworth
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hagne, Mouton.
________.1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
________.1980. Rules and Representations, Blackwell, Oxford.
Dijk, T.A. van and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York.
Fortescue, Micheal. 2001. Thoughts about thought. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 15-45.
Ho, Chio-yueh (何秋月). 2003. A Semantic Study of Auditory Perception Metaphors in Chinese. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: Providence University.
Jäkel, Olaf. 1995. The metaphorical conception of the mind: “Mental activity is manipulation”. Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, ed. by Taylor, J. R. and R. E. Maclaury, 197-229. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kess, Joseph F. 1992. Psycholinguistics : psychology, linguistics, and the study of natural language. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Pub. Co.
Kövecses and Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguisitcs 9-1, 37-77.
Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor: Metaphor and thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202-51. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
________. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Neisser, Ulric. 1967. Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliff: Prentice-Hall.
Palmer, S. E., and Kimchi, R. 1986. The information processing approach to cognition. Approaches to cognition: Contrasts and controversies, ed. by Knapp, T. J., and Robertson, L. C., 37-77. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Piaget, J. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Radden, Günter. 2003. How metonymic are metaphors. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective, ed. by Barcelona A., 93-108. Berlin; New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony, 284-297. Cambridge, England: At the University Press.
Rips, L. J. and Conrad, F. G.. 1989. The folk psychology of mental activities. Psychological Review, 96, 187-207.
Ruiz de Mendoza. 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective, ed. by Barcelona A., 109-132. Berlin; New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza and Diez Velasco. 2003. Patterns of conceptual interaction. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, ed. by Dirven R. and PÖrings R., 489-532. Berlin; New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
Sapir, E. 1944. Grading: A study in semantics. Philosophy of Science, 11, 93-116
Sternberg, S. 1969. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s Method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
Stevenson, Rosemary J. 1993. Language, thought, and representation. Chichester, England ; New York : J. Wiley & Sons.
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, Li-zhong (蔡立中). 1994. The Metaphor of Body-Parts in Chinese. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: National Tsing Hua University.
Watson, J.B. 1925. Behaviorism. New York, Norton.
Webster’s World Dictionary of The American Language. 1997. The Official Dictionary of the Associated Press.
Whorf, B.L. 1941. The relation of habitual thought and behaviour to language, Language, Culture and Personality, ed. by L. Spier, 75-93. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Yang, Chun-ting (楊純婷). 2000. Synaesthetic Words in Mandarin: Perceptual Metaphor and Metaphorical Extension. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: National Chung Cheng University.
Yen, Chao-tai (顏兆泰). 2000. A Semantic Study of Chinese Metaphors Derived from Visual Perception. M. A. Thesis. Taipei: Fu Jen Catholic University.
Yu, Ning. 2003. Chinese metaphors of Thinking. Cognitive Linguistics 14, 141-165.
________. 2004. The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 663-686.
Zhung, Feng Ya (鍾風雅). 2002. A Semantic Study of Mandarin Perception Verbs Kan, Ting and Wen. M.A. Thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
2. Chinese Version
CKIP(中央研究院平衡語料庫)
成語典[The Dictionary of Idioms], 天母書城. Cheng Yu Dian [Dictionary of Chinese Idioms]. TianMu Books.
辭海[Chinese Dictionary],智揚出版社 Ci Hai [Chinese Dictionary]. ZhiYang Press.
形音義規範字典[Chinese Dictionary], 2003, 五南出版社 Xing Yin Yi Guifan Zidian [Form Pronunciation and Meaning of Chinese Character Dictionary]. WuNan Press
常用字引申義辭典[Chinese Dictionary], 1992, 吉林 人民出版 新華發行 Chang Yong Zi Yin Shen Yi Cidian [Definition of Common Phrases Dictionary]. Jilin: People Press.
東方國語辭典[Chinese Dictionary], 1994, 臺北市 東方出版社 Dongfang Guoyu Cidian [Mandarin Dictionary]. Taipei: Dongfang Press.
新編國語日報辭典[Chinese Dictionary], 2000, 國語日報 Xinbian Guoyu Ribao Cidian [Revised Mandarin Dictionary]. Mandarin Daily News Press.
現代漢英字典[A Chinese-English Dictionary], 1988, 萬人出版社 Xindai Han Ying Zidian [Modern Chinese-English Dictionary]. Wanren Press.
3. Online Resources:
Academia Sinica balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese
http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~tibe/2-words/modern-words/
Dictionary of Chinese Idioms
http://140.111.34.46/chengyu/sort_pho.htm
Chinese-English Dictionary of Modern Usage
http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/Lindict/
Mandarin Dictionary
http://140.111.34.46/dict/ |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
91555009
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550091 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
