English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51725999      Online Users : 618
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33384


    Title: 語法與語句處理對於中文關係子句接應代詞之影響
    The Grammar and Processing of Resumptive Pronouns in Chinese Relative Clauses
    Authors: 甯俐馨
    Ning, Li Hsin
    Contributors: 林千哲
    何萬順

    Lin,Chien Jer
    Her,One Soon

    甯俐馨
    Ning, Li Hsin
    Keywords: 接應代詞
    關係子句
    語句處理
    花園路徑效果
    resumptive pronouns
    relative clauses
    processing
    garden-path effect
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:26:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在從語法及語句處理的觀點探討中文關係子句中接應代詞(resumptive pronouns) 的現象。在語法上,本研究認為中文的接應代詞屬於詞基生成 (base-generated) 元素而非句法變項 (syntactic variables) 。接應代詞的出現受限於派生簡約原則 (derivational economy) 及合法度 (grammaticality) 的要求,唯有當間隙型關係子句 (gap relatives) 為非法時,接應代詞才是必要的;在其他情況下,接應代詞在中文裡為選擇性的策略之一。在語句處理上,本研究施測了三份合法度問卷並進行了兩項線上閱讀測驗。合法度的判別及線上的閱讀反應時間顯示,接應代詞之所以不被喜歡是因為接應代詞本身會引發花園路徑效果 (garden path effect) (在此為主要子句假象 (main-clause illusion) 的形成)。然而,接應代詞在間隙型關係子句為非法或引發花園路徑效果 (在此為重建困難 (difficult reconstruction) 所造成) 時卻變得較受喜愛。當間隙型關係子句涉及到複雜結構或複雜語句處理領域 (在此指的是重建複雜 (intricate reconstruction) ) 時,中文母語使用者並不會偏好使用間隙(gap)或是接應代詞來形成關係子句。這些研究結果意味著中文接應代詞不僅受限於合法度的要求,也受制於語句可處理性 (processability) 的程度,亦即有無受到花園路徑效果所影響。
    This thesis examines resumptive pronouns in Chinese relative clauses from the perspectives of grammar and processing. In the grammar, it is claimed in this research that resumptives in Chinese are base-generated pronouns rather than syntactic variables. Their occurrence can be predicted via derivational economy and grammaticality. Resumptives in Chinese are obligatory only when the gap relatives are ungrammatical. Otherwise, resumptives are optional. As for processing, three grammaticality judgments and two on-line self-paced reading tasks were conducted. The grammaticality judgments and the on-line reading times show that resumptives were dispreferred because they induced a garden-path effect (the main-clause illusion). However, resumptives became preferred when the gap relatives resulted in ungrammaticality or led to a garden path, thus inducing the difficulty of reconstruction. There was no preference for gaps or resumptives when the gap relatives involved complex structures or complicated processing domains (the intricate reconstruction). These results suggest that resumptives in Chinese are related not only to the issue of grammaticality but also to that of the processability (i.e. the garden-path effect).
    Reference: Alexopoulou, T. (2006). Resumption in relative clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 24, 57-111.
    Alexopoulou, T., & Keller, F. (2002). Resumption and locality: A crosslinguistic experimental study. Paper presented at the 38th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
    Alexopoulou, T., & Keller, F. (2003). Linguistic complexity, locality and resumption. Paper presented at the WCCFL 22.
    Alexopoulou, T., & Keller, F. (2007). Locality, cyclicity, and resumption: At the interface between the grammar and the human sentence processor. Language, 84(1), 110-160.
    Aoun, J. (2000). Resumption and last resort. D.E.L.T.A., 16, 13-43.
    Aoun, J., Choueiri, L., & Hornstein, N. (2001). Resumption, movement and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(3), 371-403.
    Aoun, J., & Li, Y.-H. A. (2003). Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of Wh-constructions Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Asudeh, A. (2004). Resumption as Resource Management. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Standford University.
    Asudeh, A. (2007). Three kinds of resumption. Paper presented at the Resumptive Pronouns at the Interfaces, Paris.
    Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437-458.
    Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. M. (1984). Grammars as mental representations of language. In W. Kintsch, J. R. Miller & P. G. Polson (Eds.), Method and tactics in cognitive science (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Carnie, A. (2002). Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Chao, W., & Sells, P. (1983). On the interpretation of resumptive pronouns. Proceedings of NELS, 13, 47-61.
    Chen, W.-P. (1989). Functional Uncertainty and Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished MA Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
    Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    Clark, H. H., & Malt, B. C. (1984). Psychological constraints on language: A commentary on Bresnan and Kaplan and on Givón. In W. Kintsch, J. R. Miller & P. G. Polson (Eds.), Method and tactics in cognitive science (pp. 191-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology: University of Chicago Press.
    Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. California: SAGE Publications.
    Dickey, M. W. (1996). Constraints on the sentence processor and the distribution of resumptive pronouns. UMOP19: Linguistics in the Laboratory.
    Engdahl, E. (1985). Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions. Linguistics, 23, 3-44.
    Erteschik-Shir, N. (1992). Resumptives pronouns in islands. In H. G. a. M. Rochement (Ed.), Island Constraints. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Foder, J. D. (1983). Phrase structure parsing and the island constraints. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 163-223.
    Foder, J. D., & Frazier, L. (1980). Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? Cognition, 8, 418-459.
    Fox, B. A. (1987). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language, 63(4), 856-870.
    Frazier, L. (1987a). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Frazier, L. (1987b). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5, 515-559.
    Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93-126.
    Gu, G. (2001). A study of resumptive pronouns. Unpublished Dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government & Binding Theory (2 ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Haiman, J. (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59, 781-819.
    Hawkins, J. A. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75(2), 244-285.
    Her, O.-S. (2006). Justifying part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei. Lingua, 116, 1274-1302.
    Her, O.-S., & Ning, L.-H. (2008). On the (non)issue of parasitic gaps in Chinese.Unpublished manuscript.
    Houng, C. C.-L. H. (1986). The relative clause construction in Chinese: Noun phrase accessibility and other issues. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin.
    Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90, 3-27.
    Huang, C.-R. (1992). Certainty in functional uncertainty. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 20(2), .247-287.
    Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531-574.
    Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). Phrase structure, lexical integrity and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Teachers` Association, 19(2), 53-48.
    Huang, C.-T. J. (1999). Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 29(4), 423-510.
    Huang, C.-T. J. (2007). Handout 3 (revised): Argument structure.Unpublished manuscript.
    Huang, C., & Ahrens, K. (1999). The function and category of gei in Mandarin ditransitive constructions. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 27(2), 1-26.
    Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
    Keenan, E. L., & Hawkins, S. (1987). The psychological validity of the accessibility hierarchy. In E. L. Keenan (Ed.), Universal grammar: Fifteen essays. London: Routledge.
    King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580-602.
    Kwon, N. (2004). Processing of relative clause sentences in Korean. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2004).
    Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Li, Y.-H. A. (1989). Constituents constraints in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 3rd Ohio Conference on Chinese Linguistics.
    Li, Y.-H. A. (2007). Syntax of overt and covert pronouns.Unpublished manuscript.
    Liao, H.-C. (1999-2000). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy revisited: a view from ergative languages. Working Papers in Linguistics, 31, 121-142.
    Lin, C.-J. (2007a). Processing (in)alienable possessions at the syntax-semantics interface. Paper presented at the Workshop on Linguistic Interfaces (OnLI), University of Ulster, Northern Ireland.
    Lin, C.-J. (2007b). The psychological reality of head-final relative clauses. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Relative Clauses, Academic Sinica,Taipei.
    Lin, C.-J. (2008a). Distinguishing linguistic and processing explanations of grammar. In J. Myers (Ed.), Search of Grammar: Empirical Methods in the Study of Linguistic Knowledge (tentative book title).
    Lin, C.-J. (2008b). Garden path and the comprehension of head-final relative clauses.Unpublished manuscript.
    Lin, C.-J., & Bever, T. G. (2006). Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 254-260.
    Lin, C.-J., & Bever, T. G. (2007). Processing head-final relative clauses without garden paths. Paper presented at the International Conference on Processing Head-final Structures.
    Lin, J. (2005). Does wh-in-situ license parasitic gaps? Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 298-302.
    McCawley, J. D. (1992). Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 20(2), 211-245.
    McCloskey, J. (1990). Resumptive pronouns, A`-binding and levels of representation in Irish. In R. Hendrick (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 23: The Syntax and Semantics of Modern Celtic Languages. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
    McCloskey, J. (2006). Resumption. In M. Everaert & H. v. Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (pp. 94-117). Oxford: Blackwell.
    McDaniel, D., & Cowart, W. (1999). Experimental evidence for a Minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition, 70, B15-B24.
    McKee, C., & McDaniel, D. (2001). Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 9(2), 113-156.
    Meral, H.-M. (2004). Resumptive pronouns in Turkish. Unpublished MA Thesis, Bogazoci University.
    Miyamoto, E., & Nakamura, M. (2003). Subject/Object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. Paper presented at the WCCFL 22.
    Postal, P. (1971). Cross-over Phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Rizzi, L. (1986). Null subjects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501-558.
    Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    Shlonsky, U. (1992). Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 443-468.
    Stowe, L. A. (1986). Parsing Wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227-245.
    Suñer, M. (1998). Resumptive restrictive relatives: A crosslinguistic perspective. Language, 74(2), 335-364.
    Su, Y. C. (2004). Relatives of Mandarin children. Paper presented at the GALANA, Hawaii.
    Ting, J. (1998). Deriving the bei-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 7, 1-34.
    TIng, J., & Chang, M. (2004). The category of gei in Mandarin Chinese and grammaticalization. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 45-74.
    Ting, J., & Huang, Y.-C. (2008). Some remarks on parasitic gaps in Chinese. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 34(1), 27-52.
    Tsai, W.-T. D. (1997). On the absence of island effects. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New series 27, 125-149.
    Tsao, F.-f. (1988). The Function of Mandarin Gei and Taiwanese Hou in the Double Object and the Passive Constructions. In R. L. Cheng & S. F. Huang (Eds.), The Structure of Taiwanese: A Modern Synthesis (pp. 165-208). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
    Xu, L. (1990). Are they parasitic gaps? In J. Mascaro & M. Nespor (Eds.), Grammar in Progress: Glow Essays for Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
    Xu, Y.-C. (2003). A Study on Form Word `De` and its Related Matters. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Fu Dan University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    95555001
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095555001
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    500101.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2933View/Open
    500102.pdf130KbAdobe PDF21627View/Open
    500103.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2918View/Open
    500104.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2886View/Open
    500105.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2878View/Open
    500106.pdf66KbAdobe PDF21426View/Open
    500107.pdf31KbAdobe PDF21074View/Open
    500108.pdf25KbAdobe PDF21476View/Open
    500109.pdf260KbAdobe PDF21670View/Open
    500110.pdf139KbAdobe PDF21327View/Open
    500111.pdf388KbAdobe PDF21153View/Open
    500112.pdf18KbAdobe PDF2877View/Open
    500113.pdf29KbAdobe PDF21397View/Open
    500114.pdf482KbAdobe PDF21546View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback