| Reference: | 中文書目
王洪鈞(2000)，《新聞報導學》。台北：正中。
沈征郎(1992)，《實用新聞編採寫作》。台北：聯經。
李森堙(1998)，《廣播Call-in節目的對話文體分析》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
林珍良(1994)，《新聞言說結構對資訊處理策略影響之研究》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
施祖琪(2001)，《新聞風格影響因素探析：以綜合月刊為例》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
荊溪人(1991)，《新聞編輯學》。台北：台灣商務。
胡傳厚主編(1977)，《編輯理論與實務》。台北：學生書局。
馬西屏(1998)，《標題飆題》。台北：三民。
徐昶(1992)，《新聞編輯學》。台北：三民。
翁維薇(2000)，《新聞訪問之追問研究—以模糊及迴避回答為例》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
張文強(1999)，《報社組織知識儲存與分享之研究》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。
陳秉璋(1985)，《社會學理論》。台北：三民。
陳曉開(1995)，《新聞編輯的專家與生手解題表現研究》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
程之行(1988)，《新聞寫作》。台北：台灣商務。
鄭貞銘(1990)，《新聞採訪與編輯》。台北：三民。
臧國仁主編(1994)，《新聞學與術的對話》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所。
臧國仁(1998)，《新聞報導與真實建構：新聞框架的理論觀點》，傳播研究集刊第三集。台北：國立政治大學傳播學院。
臧國仁、施祖琪(1999)，＜新聞編採手冊與媒介組織特色—風格與新聞風格＞，《新聞學研究》，60: 1-38。
劉郁青(2001)，《新聞寫作連貫性之研究》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
鍾蔚文(1992)，《媒介真實到主觀真實：看新聞，怎麼看？看到什麼？》。台北：正中。
蘇蘅(1986)，《傳播研究調查法》。台北：三民。
Baskette, F.K., Sissors, J.Z., & Brooks, B.S.著，薛心鎔譯(1987)，《現代新聞編輯學》(The art of editing)。台北：中央日報。
Brooks, Brain S., Kennedy, G., Moen, Daryl R. & Ranly, Don著，李利國、黃淑敏譯(1995)，《新聞採訪與寫作》(News Reporting & Writing)。台北：周知文化。
E. D. Gagne, C. W. Yekovich, & F. R. Yekovich著，岳修平譯(1998)，《教學心理學－學習的認知基礎》。台北：遠流。
Jensen, Klaus B. & Jankowsik, Nicholas W. (Ed.)，唐維敏譯(1996)，《大眾傳播研究方法—質化取向》。台北：五南。
英文書目
Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de, and Dressler, Wolfgang Ulrich (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. New York: Longman.
Bhatia, Vijay K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Campbell, K. S. (1995). Coherence, Continuity, and Cohesion. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL quarterly, 16(4): 479-488.
Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (Ed.) (1999). Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A. (Eds.) (1985). Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1977). Text and Context. London: Longman.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1988). News Analysis. Hillsdale, New Jersey: L. Erlbaum.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1997). The study of discourse. In van Dijk, Teun A. (Eds.), Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.
Donnelly C. (1994). Linguistics for Writers. New York: State University of New York Press.
Eggins S. & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. In van Dijk, Teun A. (Ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.
Ellis, D. G., Hamilton, M. & Aho, L. (1983). Some issues in conversation coherence. Human Communication Research, 9(3): 267-282.
Ellis, D. G. (1992). From Language to Communication. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodman, S. & Manners, P. (1997). Making it ‘real’: Words and pictures in television news. Language & Communication, 17(1): 53-66.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan R. (1990). Language, Context, and Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, S. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast Talk. New Delhi: Sage.
Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension. Newark Delaware: IRA.
Haynes, J. (1989). Introducing Stylistics. London: Unwin Hyman.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Littlefair, A. B. (1991). Reading All Types of Writing. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ostman, Jan-Ola. (1997). Coherence through understanding through discourse patterns: focus on news reports. In W. Bublitz; U. Lenk; & E. Ventola (Ed.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Reah, Danuta (1998). The Language of Newspapers. London: Routledge.
Sanders T. & Spooren W. (1997). Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In W. Bublitz; U. Lenk; & E. Ventola (Ed.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge, Mass. :Blackwell.
Schwarz, M. N. K. & Flammer A. (1981). Text structure and title – effects on comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(1): 61-66.
Seidlhofer, B. & Widdowson, H. (1997). Coherence in summary: the context of appropriate discourse. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk & E. Ventola (Ed.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Stepp, Carl Sessions (1990). Editing for Today’s Newsroom: New Perspectives for a Changing Profession. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stevenson R. & McDonald S. (2000). Interpreting pronouns and connectives: interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(3): 225-262.
Tracy, Karen. (1983). The issue-event distinction: A rule of conversation and its scope condition. Human Communication Research, 9(4): 320-334.
Ventola, E. (1997). Semiotic spanning at conferences: Cohesion and coherence in and across conference papers and their discussions. In W. Bublitz; U. Lenk; & E. Ventola (Ed.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in Applied Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
Williams, J. M. (2000). Style—Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. New York: Longman.
Yin, R.K.(1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. New York: Sage. |
