Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33124
|
| Title: | 消費者新奇追求動機、新奇屬性及產品新奇性對消費者態度之影響--以旅遊產品為例
The effects of novelty seeking, novel attributes and product novelty on consumer’s attitude: Using tourism product as an example |
| Authors: | 許鈞凱 |
| Contributors: | 張卿卿
許鈞凱 |
| Keywords: | 新奇追求
新奇屬性
產品新奇性
資訊超載
旅遊市場
旅遊產品
novelty seeking
novel attributes
product novelty
information overload
tourism market
tourism product |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 15:33:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 摘要
本研究從新奇追求動機探討遊客對旅遊產品的態度會被什麼因素所影響。許多學者提到，遊客對於新奇追求的差異，會影響他們選擇不同觀光活動及旅遊目的地的決策，因此旅遊行程有否提供遊客新奇的體驗（亦即新奇屬性）或是基於旅遊產品本身的新奇性，應能吸引不同新奇追求程度的遊客前往旅遊。然而以往關於新奇屬性的研究多針對實體產品，鮮少從服務性產品的面向做探討，文獻中對旅遊產品新奇性的描述亦甚少著墨，因此本研究藉由操弄新奇屬性和產品新奇性，從旅遊產品的角度觀察對於不同新奇追求程度的遊客之態度會產生什麼影響。
研究結果發現，旅遊行程加入新奇屬性或是產品新奇性較高的旅遊產品並不一定能讓遊客對有較好的印象。當面對無新奇屬性的旅遊行程或低新奇性產品（團體旅遊）時，低新奇追求的遊客相較於高新奇追求的遊客有更好的態度，但其同時對有新奇屬性的旅遊行程及高新奇性產品（自由行）也抱持同樣的好感；而面對有新奇屬性的旅遊行程或高新奇產品（自由行）時，高新奇追求的遊客則相對較有提升好感的趨勢。值得注意的是，當旅遊產品為高新奇性（自由行）並同時搭配具有新奇屬性的旅遊行程後，反而會使消費者發生資訊過載的情形進而提高學習成本，導致消費者對產品的評價混淆甚至產生負面態度。
因此，如果廠商想要在市場上推出新產品，以適度的新奇性做為產品設計的主軸是較為理想的選擇，例如自由行對於高、低新奇追求程度的消費者都具有一定的吸引力，或是團體旅遊搭配具有新奇屬性的旅遊行程亦是保險的組合方式。要注意的是，過多的新奇資訊同時也會增加消費者的學習成本，一旦造成消費者的資訊超載，反而會造成負面的效果。
This research focuses on what factors based on novelty seeking will be influencing tourists’ attitude toward the tourism product. Many scholars have already mentioned that different degree of novelty seeking among tourists may influence their choices of different sightseeing activities and trip destination. Therefore, whether the travel programs provide novel experiences to the tourists(namely novel attributes) or any novelty of the product itself should be able to attract tourists with different degree of novelty seeking. However, researches on novel attributes in the past mostly put emphasis on substantial products and seldom discussed on service products. In addition, there is a lack of literature regarding product novelty as well. For these reasons, the purpose of this research is to observe the factors which influence attitudes of tourists with different degree of novelty seeking by means of manipulating novel attributes and product novelty.
The result of this research shows that travel journey with novel attributes or just a tourism product with high degree of novelty don’t necessarily make better impressions on tourists. When facing travel journey with no novel attributes or just a product with low degree of novelty (package tour), tourists with low degree of novelty seeking show more favor towards the product than those with high degree of novelty seeking, but they as well have positive attitude when there is travel journey with novel attributes or just a product with high degree of novelty (semi-independent travel). On the other hand, the tourists with high degree of novelty seeking comparatively tend to show preference for the travel journey with novel attributes or just a product with high degree of novelty (semi-independent travel). Here what calls our attention is that, when the tourism product is with high degree of novelty (semi-independent travel) and is combined with the travel journey with novel attributes at the same time, it may cause information overload for consumers thus raise their learning cost instead. This even causes consumers to produce negative or confused attitude when evaluating the product.
Hence, for the (tourism product) suppliers who want to release new products to the market, I suggest that product design should be emphasize on adding appropriate novelty. For example, semi-independent travel attracts consumers with both high and low degree of novelty seeking; tour package with novel attributes is also safe for tourists. What we should be aware of is that too much novel information increases consumer’s learning cost, and once it causes consumer’s information to overload, it may cause negative effect instead. |
| Reference: | 中文部份
中川翔詠（2001）。《行家帶你遊東京—16條電車逍遙遊路線》。台北：如何
王昭正、陳怡君譯（2002）。《旅遊與觀光概論》。台北：弘智。（原書 Gillian Dale & Helen Oliver, Travel and Tourism.）
朱志娟（2003）。《新奇屬性效果對產品的評價》。中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，81: 163-194。
朱熙庭(2004)。《原住民觀光文化園區遊1客之新奇追求與旅遊行為之研究》。中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
呂嬌容（2003）。《新奇屬性對產品評價之影響－以個人產品涉入與消費者創新性為干擾因素》，元智大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林東封（2003）。《旅遊電子商務經營管理》。台北市：揚智。
林琍羨（2001）。《消費者購買海外旅遊產品前資訊搜集策略研究》。世新大學觀光學系研究所碩士論文。
師若浩（2002）。《新奇屬性與利益資訊對產品評價的影響》。大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
容繼業（1996）。《旅行業理論與實務》。台北市：揚智。
郭乃文、楊岱容譯（2005）。《觀光與環境》。台北：五南。（原書Andrew Holden, Environment and Tourism.）
陳君惠（2001）。《在東京邂逅偶像劇—90齣經典日劇景點大公開》。台北：如何
黃筱威（2000）。《東京台北逛雜貨》。台北：朱雀文化。
楊佳和（2006）。《旅遊產品線上購買動機與購買涉入之研究》。靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
蔡麗伶譯（1990）。《旅遊心理學》。台北：揚智文化。（原書E. J. Mayo, L. P. Jarvis, The Psychology of Leisure Travel.）
劉美琪、許安琪、漆梅君、于心如（2000）。《當代廣告—概念與操作》。台北：學富文化。
賴宜彥（2004）。《從產品複雜性、新奇屬性，談困惑對基模不一致下情感評估反應之影響—以運動服與筆記型電腦為例》。輔仁大學織品服裝學研究所碩士論文。
戴育旻（2006）。《從廣告價值觀點檢視網路廣告中的強迫性感受對廣告效果之影響》。國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。
謝智謀、王怡婷譯（2001）。《觀光消費行為—理論與實務》。台北：桂魯有限公司。（原書Swarbrooke, J., & Horner, S. Consumer Behaviour in Tourism.）
蕭富藍（2006）。《訊息類型、身份相似性，及先驗知識對於旅遊網站所連結旅遊部落格效果之影響》。國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。
英文部份
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454.
Andrew Lepp, Heather Gibson, 2003, Tourist roles, perceived risk and international tourism, Annals of tourism research, 30(3), 606-624.
Banwari Mittal, (2004), Lack of attribute searchability: some thoughts. Psychology and Marketing, 21(6), 443
Bello, Daniel C., Etzel, Michael J.(1985). The role of novelty in the pleasure travel experience. Journal of travel research, 24(1), 20-26.
Bettman. James R.（1979）, An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley Publishing Co.
Broniarczyk, Susan M. and Joseph W. Alba (1994), “The Role of Consumers’ Intuitions in Inference Making,” Journal of ConsumerResearch, 21 (December), 393–407.
Carpenter, Gregory S, Glazer, Rashi, Nakamoto, Kent. (1994), Meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation: The dependence on irrelevant attributes, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1),.3 , 339-351
David M. Hardesty, William O. Bearden, Jay P. Carlson. Journal of Retailing. Greenwich: Apr 2007. 83(2), 199-210.
Hirschman, Elizabeth C.(1980), Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283.
Farrell, Joseph and Carl Shapiro (1988), “Dynamic Competition with Switching Costs,” Rand Journal of Economics, 19(1), 123–137.
Friestad, Marian, Wright, Peter (1994), The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31
Goossens, C., 2000, Tourism Information and Pleasure Motivation, Annals of Tourism Research, 27(2),301–321.
Huber, Joel and John W. McCann (1982), “The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (August), 324–333
Jacoby, Jacob (1977), Information load and decision quality: Some contested issues, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 569.
Janet Chang, Geoffrey Wall, and Shi-Ting(Tim) Chu(2006), Novelty seeking at aboriginal attractions, Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 729-747.
Jeff Jiang, Mark E. Havitz, and Robert M. O’Brien(2000), Validating the international tourist role scale, Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 964-981.
Jeong, S., and S. Park 1997, A Cross-Cultural Application of the Novelty Scale, Annals of Tourism Research, 24:238–240.
Jiang, J., M. Havitz, and R. O’Brien, 2000, Validating the International Tourist Role Scale, Annals of Tourism Research, 27:964–981.
Johnson, E. J., & Russao, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542-550.
Johnson, Eric J. and John W. Payne (1985), “Effort and Accuracy in Choice,” Management Science, 31 (April), 395–414.
Johnson, R. D., & Levin, I. P. (1985). More than meets the eye: The effect of missing information on purchase evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 169-177.
Kardes, F. R., Kim, J., & Lim, J. (1994). Moderating effects of prior knowledge on the perceived diagnosticity of beliefs derived from implicit versus explicit product claims. Journal of Business Research, 29, 219-224.
Keller, Kevin Lane and Richard Staelin (1987), “Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (September), 200–213.
Keneeth F Hyde, Rob Lawson (2003), The Nature of Independent Travel. Journal of Travel Research, 42(1), 13.
Keng, K. A., & Chang, J. L. (1999). Determining tourist role typolo-gies: An exploratory study of Singapore vacationers. Journal of Travel Research, 37(4), 382-390.
Klein, L. R. (1998). Evaluating the Potential of Interactive Media through A New Lens: Search versus Experience Goods. Journal of Business Research, 41, 195-203.
Lee, T., and J. Crompton, 1992, Measuring Novelty Seeking in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 19:732–751.
Lehmann, Donald R. (1999), “Consumer Behavior and Y2K, ”Journal of Marketing (“Fundamental Issues and Directions for Marketing,” ed. George S. Day and David B. Montgomery), 63 (5), 14–18.
Meyers-Levy, Joan and Alice M. Tybout (1989), “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 39–54.
Miller, G. A.(1956), The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, Psychological Review, 81-97
Mo, C., D. R. Howard, and M. Havitz (1993), Testing on international tourist role typology, Annals of tourism research, 20(2), 319-335
Mo, C., D. R. Howard, and M. Havitz, 1994, Segmenting Travel Markets with the International Tourism Role (ITR) Scale. Journal of Travel Research, 33(1):24–31.
Mukherjee, Ashesh and Wayne D. Hoyer (2001), The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(December), 462-472.
Moscardo and Pearce, 1999, Understanding Ethnic Tourists, Annals of Tourism Research, 26:416–434.
Nowlis, Stephen M. and Itamar Simonson (1996), “The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 33(1), 36–46.
Ross, William T. and Elizabeth H. Creyer (1992), Making inferences about missing information: the effects of existing information, Journal of consumer research, 19, 14-25
Sandra L. and David B. Klenosky (2001), Travel-Style preferences for visiting a novel destination: a conjoint investigation across the novelty-familiarity continuum, Journal of travel research, 40(November), 172-182
Scammon, Debra. L.（1977）, Information Load and Consumers, Journal of Consumer Reasearch, 14(December), 68-72.
Simonson, Itamar, Ziv Carmon, and Suzanne O’Curry (1994), “Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice,” Marketing Science, 13 (Winter), 23–40.
Tae-Hee Lee and John Crompton (1992), Measuring novelty seeking in tourism, Annals of tourism research, 19(4), 732-751
Vincent-Wayne Mitchell, Vassilios Papavassiliou(1999), Marketing causes and implications of consumer confusion. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 8(4), 319.
Yamamoto, D., and Gill, A. M.(1999), Emerging trends in Japanese package tourism, Journal of travel research, 38(2), 134-143.
Yiannakis, A., and H. Gibson ( 1992), Roles tourists play, Annals of tourism research, 19(2), 287-303.
線上部份
交通部觀光局。〈中華民國94年國人旅遊狀況調查〉。http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/statistics/File/200512/94%B0%EA%A4H%A4%A4%BAK.htm
全球華文行銷知識庫。www.cyberone.com.tw |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
廣告研究所
94452012
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094452012 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [廣告學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
