Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33120
|
Title: | 從廣告價值觀點檢視網路廣告中的強迫性感受對廣告效果之影響 Exploring the influence of intrusiveness on the effectiveness of internet advertising: Advertising Value model as the theoretical framework |
Authors: | 戴育旻 Dai,Yu-Min |
Contributors: | 張卿卿 Chang,Chingching 戴育旻 Dai,Yu-Min |
Keywords: | 網路廣告 強迫性感受 插播式廣告 廣告價值 反感論 internet advertising intrusiveness Interstitial Advertising Value Reactance |
Date: | 2005 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 15:33:03 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 一向強調使用者自主性的網路媒體,卻也出現插播式廣告(Interstitial)這種強迫閱聽眾接收的形式,這種情形引發了研究者的興趣。相較於傳統媒體,已經賦予閱聽人部分自主權的情形底下,廣告主又想藉由形式的操弄強迫閱聽人接收,這可能引起的負面態度相對傳統媒體來說可能更為嚴重。因此,本研究首先欲探討插播式廣告的使用是否有其他優點,例如強迫接收的形式,會吸引更多注意的緣故而留下較深刻的印象,而讓廣告主在可能導致閱聽人反感的風險下仍願意使用。其二,插播式廣告的使用是否必然引起閱聽人產生被迫收看的感受,以及察覺到廣告主意欲操弄的意圖,進而降低說服效果。換言之,插播式廣告能否藉由提供閱聽人娛樂價值,因而避免負面態度的產生。
結果發現,相對橫幅廣告來說,插播式廣告的確能吸引較多的注意,但並不會留下較深刻的記憶。其次,插播式廣告是否會引起操弄意圖推論、強迫性感受,進而降低說服效果,關鍵在於如果廣告能夠提供娛樂價值,那麼閱聽人並不會做出操弄意圖推論,也不會感覺到自己是被迫收看廣告的,當然不會進一步降低廣告態度。反之,若不提供其他價值,則會導致閱聽人做出操弄意圖推論,以及產生強迫性感受,因而進一步降低廣告態度。
最後,我們以一個交換的觀點來貫穿整篇文章,決定閱聽人是否產生操弄意圖推論或強迫性感受,關鍵在於閱聽人付出以及得到了多少價值,如果能讓閱聽人感受到自己所獲得的價值多過所付出的代價,那麼閱聽眾是會原諒行銷者的操弄。 Comparing with other forms of media, the internet empowers audience with more freedom to choose what to see. However, it also emerged a new type of advertisement called, interstitial, which is commonly known as pop up. This kind of internet advertising forces audience to see advertisement whether they want or not. This phenomenon interests me to see what kind of effect this it will create for viewers., Since the audience once had the privilege to choose what they wanted to see, one of which is now seemed to be taken away from them, will this create negative feelings of the audience?
Firstly I would like to know if there’re any advantages for advertisers to use this kind of internet advertising under the risk of disfavor. I postulates that interstitial may draw more attention and leave more impression than a banner does because of its format. Secondly, interstitial will not necessarily cause intrusiveness and inferences of manipulative intent (IMI), if the advertisement can provide other form values such as information or entertainment.
The result supports my hypothesis partially. Firstly, interstitial does draw more attention than a banner. However, except for making people more impressed, no other difference has been found. Secondly, if interstitial contains entertaining value, it will not make audience feel intruded, IMI. ,and hostile attitude toward that advertisement. Whereas it will cause intrusiveness and IMI if the interstitial advertisement forces audience to see it without having any rewards. In this case it will reduce the advertising attitude in the audience.
Finally, we can use an ‘exchange of ideas’ to sum up the main idea of this paper. The audience will devote their efforts and time to processing the given message, if the interstitial can reward the audience with more than what they pay for. They will also forgive the advertisers for manipulating them. The key to decide whether the audience feels intruded or knows of IMI depends on how much the audience give and receive. |
Reference: | 中文部分 呂允中(1998)。《互動式多媒體的特性對於廣告價值、廣告態度、品牌態度以及購買意願的影響》。成功大學企管所碩士論文。 林宏遠(2001)。《遙距臨場感對WWW廣告效果的影響》。台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所碩士論文。 朱怡璇(2005)。《從個體的享樂與實用消費價值,探討廣告訴求呈現、產品功能屬性對廣告廣告效果的影響—以科技產品為例》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。 李景浩(2005)。《參考價格的效果:以消費者認知需求程度探討》。政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。 耿慶瑞(2000)。〈WWW互動廣告的互動層次〉。《廣告學研究》,15:161-180。 耿慶瑞(2002)。〈WWW互動廣告效果之研究〉。《管理學報》,19[1]:1-39。 黃俊嘉(2000)。《網路廣告互動功能對廣告效果影響之研究-以標題式廣告為例〉。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文。 許順富(1999)。《網路廣告特性類型與廣告效果之探討》。國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 姜佩德(2001)。《網路互動程度與訊息涉入度對商業網站廣告效果的影響》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 陳盈汝(2000)。《強迫性感受網路廣告的效果研究》。中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 張帆(2002)。《豐富式媒體型態網路廣告設計屬性之效益分析—產品創新性之干擾效果》。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 黃聖哲(2002)。《從產品知識與說服知識的差異,探討比較式手法對閱聽人廣告態度的影響》。政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。
黃見雯(2000)。《廣告基調與媒體內容基調一致性對廣告效果之影響─媒體內容觀賞涉入及自我概念一致性干擾效果之探討》。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。 蔡佩珊(2004)。《網路廣告效果評估方式之探討》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。 賴乃綺(2001)。《誘因贈獎式網路廣告效果研究》。政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。 錢玉芬、王奕晴(2005)。〈海峽兩岸網路廣告中價值觀之比較研究〉。《廣告學研究》,24:31-55。 英文部分 Brehm, Williams, Jack. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York : Academic Press. Campbell, M.C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225-254. Chang, C.C. (2000). Processing Ads in a competitive context. Annual Meeting of the Association for education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Cho, Chang-Hoan. (1999). How advertising works on the www: modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 33-50. Cho, Chang-Hoan, Lee, Jung-Gyo, Marye Tharp. (2001). Different forced-exposure levels to banner advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research. 41(4), 45-56. Chan, Yun Yoo, Kim, Kihan. (2005). Processing of animation in online banner advertising: the roles of cognitive and emotional responses. Journal Of Interactive Marketing. 19(4), 18-34. Clancey, Maura. (1994). The television audience examined. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(4), 76-76. Clee Mona A., Wicklund, Robert A.. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389-405. Diao, FangFang, Sundar, S. Shyam. (2004). Orienting response and memory for web advertisements: exploring effects of pop-up window and animation. Communication research, 31(5), 537-567. Ducoffe, R. H.. (1995). How consumers assess the value of advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 17(1), 1-18. Ducoffe, R. H.. (1996). Advertising Value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 3(5), 21-35. Duncan, Calvin P., James, E. Nelson. (1985). Effects of humor in a radio advertising experiment. Journal of Advertising. 14(2), 33-64. Eagly, H. A., Wood, W. & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opioion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 424-435. Edwards, Steven M., Li, Hairong, Lee Joo-Hyun. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95. Everett, M., Rogers, Marcel, M., & Aflbritton. (1995). Iinteractive comniunication technologies in business organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 32 (2), 177-95. Friestad, Marian, Wright, Peter. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 2l(1), 1-31. Ghose, S. & Dou, W. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (2), 29- 44. Ha, Louisa. (1996). Observations: advertising clutter in consumer magazines: dimensions and effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 76-84 Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68. Houston, Franklin S., Jule, B., & Gassenheimer. (1987). Marketing and exchange. Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 3-18. James, R., Coyle, Esther, Thorson. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in Web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77. Jee, Joonhyung, Lee, Wei-Na. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of perceived interactivity: an exploratory study. Journal of interactive Advertising, from http://www.jiad.org/vol3/no1/jee/index.htm Kahneman, Daniel. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall. Kenneth, C. C. Yang. (2003). Internet users` attitudes toward and beliefs about internet advertising: an exploratory research from Taiwan. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 15(4), 43-65. Krugman, Dean M., Johnson, Keith F. (1994). Differences in the consumption of traditional broadcast and VCR movie rentals. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,35(2), 213-32. Li, Cong, Meeds, Robert. (2005). Different forced-exposure levels of internet advertising: An experimental study on pop-up ads and interstitials. American Academy of Advertising. Conference. Proceedings. Lubbock: 200-208. Li, Hairong, Edwards, Steven, M., & Lee, Joo-Hyun. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 37-48. MacKenzie, Scott, B., & Lutz, Richard J.. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65. McCoy, Scott, Everard, Andrea, Galletta, F. Dennis, & Polak, Peter. (2004). A study of the effects of online advertising: a focus on pop up and in-line ads. Retrieved September 9, 2004, from http://mis.temple.edu/research/documents/GallettaPopupAdStudy.pdf McQuail, Dennis. (1987). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. London: Sage. Mitchell, Andrew A., Olson, Jerry C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332. Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T.. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuation by enhancing message-relevent cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915-1926. Qimei, Chen, Sandra, J. Clifford, & William, D. Wells. (2002). Attitude toward the site II:new information. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(2), 33-45. Reed, Matthew. (1999). Going beyond the banner ad. Marketing London, 29, 25-26. Rettie, R. (2001). An exploration of flow during internet use. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2), 103-113. Robertson, Thomas S., Rossiter, John R.. (1974). Children and commercial persuasion an attribution theory analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(1), 13-21. Rust, R.T., Varki, S. (1996). Rising from the ashes of advertising. Journal of Business Research, 37(3), 173-191. Steuer, Jonathan. (1992). Defining virtual reality: dimension determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. Terence, A. Shimp. (1981). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising.10(2), 9-16. Yuan, Gao, Marios, Koufaris, & Ducoffe, Robert H.. (2004). An experimental study of the effects of promotional techniques in web-based commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(3), 1-20. Liu, Yu-Ping. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 207-216. Zeithaml, Valarie. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3), 2-20.
線上資料 John, Bowen. (2004). Analyst View: The emergence of rich media. Retrieved October 24, 2005, from Red Herring the business of technology web site:http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=7262&hed=Analyst+View%3a+The+emergence+of+rich+media Wegert, Tessa. (2002) “Why nix effective formats?” Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://www.clickz.com/experts/media/media_buy/article.php/1442031 〈創市際市場研究顧問公司網站新聞室〉。上網日期:2005年7月12日。取自:創市際市場研究顧問公司網站:http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_07_22.html 〈資策會網頁網路脈動〉。上網日期:2005年8月2日。取自:資策會電子商務應用推廣中心網頁:http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.aspx?news_id=3833 〈資策會網頁網路脈動〉。上網日期:2005年9月3日。取自:資策會電子商務應用推廣中心網頁:http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=3689&SearchString=&title=&article=產品類別 〈資策會網頁網路脈動〉。上網日期:2001年10月2日。取自:資策會電子商務應用推廣中心:http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=1739&SearchString=&title=電子郵件&article= |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 廣告研究所 93452010 94 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093452010 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [廣告學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|