English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114104/145136 (79%)
Visitors : 52227412      Online Users : 420
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/32999
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32999


    Title: 父母教養行為、依附關係與成年雙胞胎個人化之關係
    The Relationships between Parental Rearing Behaviors, Attachment Relationship and Individuality among Adult Twins
    Authors: 蔡維欣
    Contributors: 葉玉珠
    蔡維欣
    Keywords: 成年雙胞胎
    個人化
    父母教養行為
    依附關係
    Adult twins
    Individuality
    Parental Rearing Behaviors
    Attachment Relationship
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 15:03:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討人口變項、父母教養行為、依附關係與雙胞胎的個人化之關係。本研究以76位成年雙胞胎為研究參與者(男性31人,女性45人),所使用的工具包括「雙胞胎個人化量表」、「雙胞胎父母教養行為量表」及「雙胞胎依附關係量表」。資料分析以描述統計、單因子單變量變異數分析、單因子多變量變異數分析及多元迴歸等統計方法進行分析。
    本研究的主要發現如下:
    一、 在現況方面,本研究之成年雙胞胎在個人化及依附關係的的得分偏高。在父親及母親教養行為的類別以父母親使用較多「情感支持」行為的成年雙胞胎居多;依附關係的類別則以屬於「安全天堂」及「趨近尋求」等安全依附關係的成年雙胞胎人數最多。
    二、 不同人口變項的成年雙胞胎,其個人化程度有差異。不同年齡、雙胞胎本身的社經地位在個人化的有顯著差異。而不同性別、父母的社經地位、胎性、雙胞胎排行、家中手足總數的成年雙胞胎在個人化則沒有顯著差異。
    三、 經歷不同父親及母親教養行為的成年雙胞胎,其個人化的程度有差異,即父親及母親「情感支持」教養行為較多,整體「個人化」及「分化」的程度較高;父親「拒絕」教養行為使用較多,則「獨立」的程度較低。
    四、 不同依附關係的成年雙胞胎,其個人化的程度沒有差異。
    五、 父親「情感支持」教養行為、母親「情感支持」教養行為、「趨近尋求」依附關係、「安全天堂」依附關係,對個人化的表現有正向預測效果。其中以父親「情感支持」行為的預測效果最好。
    六、 父親「拒絕」教養行為、父親「一致性」教養行為、母親「拒絕」教養行為、母親「一致性」教養行為、「分離抗拒」依附關係對個人化的表現有負向預測效果。其中以父親「拒絕」教養行為為主要預測變項,其次是母親「拒絕」教養行為。
    最後,根據本研究之主要發現提出若干建議,以供雙胞胎父母與未來研究之參考。

    關鍵詞:成年雙胞胎、個人化、父母教養行為、依附關係
    The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between adult twins’ parental rearing behaviors, attachment relationship, demographic variables and their individuality. The participants were 76 adult twins (31 males and 45 females). The employed instruments included Individuality Inventory for Twins, Parental Rearing Behavior Inventory for Twins, and Attachment Relationship Inventory for Twins. The applied analysis methods were Descriptive Statistics, One-way Multivariate Analysis of Variance, One-way Analysis of Variance, and Multiple Regression.
    The main findings of this study were as follows:
    1. The adult twins in this study had an above-average level of individuality and attachment relationship. As for the categories, most twins belonged to the attachment of “safe heaven” and “proximity seeking,” and most twins belonged to the parental rearing behavior of “emotional warmth”.
    2. The adult twins’ age and socioeconomic status had significant effects on their performance of individuality. However, the adults twins’ gender, zygosity, birth order of twins, number of siblings, and their parents’ socioeconomic status had no significant effects on their performance of individuality.
    3. The adult twins who experienced different parental rearing behaviors had varied level of individuality. More specifically, those who experienced more parental behaviors of “emotional warmth” outperformed their counterparts in overall individuality and the index of “differentiation,” while those who experienced less “rejection” behaviors from their fathers outperformed their counterparts in the index of “independence”.
    4. Adult twins with different attachment relationship did not differ in their performance of individuality.
    5. Father’s and mother’s rearing behaviors of “emotional warmth” and the attachment of “proximity seeking” and “safe heaven,” especially father’s rearing behaviors of “emotional warmth,” could positively predict the adult twins’ performance of individuality.
    6. Father’s and mother’s rearing behaviors of “rejection” and “consistency” and the attachment of “separation protest,” especially father’s rearing behaviors of “rejection,” could negatively predict the adult twins’ performance of individuality.
    Finally, after discussion, some suggestions were proposed for the parents of twins and future research.

    Keywords: Adult Twins, Individuality, Parental Rearing Behaviors, Attachment Relationship.
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    中國時報(2004年11月8日)。雙多胞胎的福利需求。上網日期:2007年1月4日,檢自:http://www.cylaw.org.tw/content/posts_detail.asp?post_id=21
    李惠姬(2002)。屈光度遺傳率之擴充式雙胞胎研究。國立臺灣大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    尹承俊、歐陽瑞琳、洪掁耀(1998)。同卵雙胞胎的語言發展問題:個案研究。聽語會刊,13,61-77。
    祈美安(2000)。母親於照顧孿生嬰兒經驗過程中之母育角色與調適。國立陽明大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    徐畢卿、羅文倬、龍佛衛(1999)。雙親教養態度中文版之信效度研究。謢理研究,7(5),479-488。
    張珏(1995)。雙胞胎事典。臺北:號角出版社。
    郭柏秀(2002)。青少年吸菸與喝酒之雙胞胎追蹤研究。國立臺灣大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式理論與應用。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    劉佳閔(1994)。幼兒依附關係、語文智能、及人際智能與心智理論能力之關係。國立政治大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    蔡佳靜(2002)。國小學童出生序與社會興趣、自我概念之相關研究。國立臺北教育大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    魏珮文(2003)。「關係」對大學女生個體化過程之影響-另一段邁向成熟長大的路。國立政治大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    鍾筱萍(2004)。通勤家庭中父母管教方式、親子互動關係與子女憂鬱及焦慮表現之相關。國立政治大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    臺北市雙胞胎協會(2006)。雙胞胎協會簡介。2007年5月8日,檢自:http://groups.msn.com/tptwins/page45.msnw?fc_p=%2F%E9%9B%99%E8%83%9E%E8%83%8E%E5%8D%94%E6%9C%83%E7%B0%A1%E4%BB%8B。
    羅櫻鑫(1999)。胖與廋:一對分離教養雙胞胎的故事。國立臺東師範學院碩士論文,未出版,臺東。
    二、 英文部分
    Ainslie, R. C. (1997). The psychology of twinship. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc.
    Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar. M. C., Waters. E., & Wall. S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
    Anderson, A. S., & Fleming, W. M. (1986). Late adolescents’ identity formation: Individualtion from the family of origin. Adolescence, 21(84), 785-796.
    Adelman, M. B., & Siemon, M. (1986). Communicating the rational shift: Separating among adult twins. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 6(1), 96-109.
    Arridell, W. M., Savavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., & Eisemann, M., et al. (1999). The Development of a Short Form of the EMBU: Its Appraisal with Students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 613–628.
    Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
    Becker, W. C. (1964). Consequences of different kinds of parental disciplines. In M. L. Hoffman and L. W. Hoffman (Eds.). Review of child development research (pp. 169-208). New York: Russell Sage.
    Blos, P. (1967). The second individuation process in adolescence. Psychanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 162-186.
    Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. Attachment (2nd ed.). London: Hongarth Press.
    Bowlby, J. (1985). Attachment and loss: Vo3. Loss: Sadness and depression (2nd ed.). England: Pelican Books.
    Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. USA: Basic Books.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). Some familial antecedents of responsibility and leadership in adolescents. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Boss (Eds.), Leadership and Interpersonal Behavior (pp. 239-271). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Burlingham, D. T. (1946). Twins. the Psychoanalytic study of the child, 2, 61-75.
    Claridge, G., Canter, S., & Hume, W. I. (1973). Personality differences and biological variations: A study of twins. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Cowan, P. A., Powell, D., & Cowan C. P. (1998). Parenting interventions: A family systems perspective. In Child Psychology in Practice.W. (Damon, I. E. Sigel, & K. A. Renninger., pp. 3-72). (Handbook of Child Psychology, No. 4), New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Choi, K. H. (2002). Psychological separation—individuation and adjustment to college among Korean American students: The roles of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(4), 468-475.
    Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487–496.
    Eisemann, M., Recinos, L. A. Gaszner, P., Peter, M., Battagliese., & G. Kállai, et al. (1999). The Development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 613–628.
    Elder. G. H. Jr. (1962). Structrual variations in the child rearing relationship. Sociometry, 25(3), 241-262.
    Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
    Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Glenn (1966). Opposite sex twins. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 34, 636-638.
    Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
    Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5., pp. 151-180). London: Jessica Kingsley.
    Hetherington, E. M., & Frankie, G. (1967). Effects of parental dominance, warmth, and conflict on imitation in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(2), 119-125.
    Hy, L. X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development. (Personality and clinical psychology series.). New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
    Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Tavecchio, L. W. C. (1991). The development of attachment theory as a Lakatosian research program: Philosophical and methodological aspects. In L. W. C. Tavecchio & M. H. van Ijzendoorn. (Eds.). Attachment in Social Networks (pp. 3-31). New York: Elsevier Science Company, INC.
    Kampmeier, C., & Simon, B. (2001). The role of independence and
    differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 448-462.
    Kline, R. B. (1998) ). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
    Loevinger, J.(1995)。自我的發展:概念與理論(Ego development: Conceptions and theories)(李維譯)。臺北市:桂冠。(原作1976年出版)
    Levine, D. N. (Ed.). (1971). George Simmel: on Individuality and social forms. Chicago and London: the University of Chicago Press.
    Lichtenstein, P., Ganiban, J., Neiderhiser, J. M., Pedersen, N. L., Hansson, K., & Cederbald, M., et al. (2003). Rememberd Parental Bonding in Adult Twins: Genetic and Environmental Influences. Behavior Genetics, 33(4), 397-408.
    Lin, C. Y. C., & Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61(2), 429-433.
    Lytton. H., Conway. D., & Sauvé. R. (1977). The impact of twinship on parent-child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 97-107.
    Mahler M. S., Pine., F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of human infant. New York: Basic Books.
    Markus, M. Th., Lindhout, I.E., Boer, F., Hoogendijk, T.H.G., & Arrindell, W.A.(2003). Factors of perceived parental rearing styles: The EMBU-C examined in an sample of Dutch primary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 503–519.
    Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary(2007/2/27). Retrieved Feburary 27, 2007, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
    Miliora, M. T. (2003). “Losers” and “winners” within an intertwin dyad: A case of a twinship selfobject relationship of a twin. Clinical Social Work Journal, 31(3), 263-274.
    Mounts, N. S. (2002). Parental Management of Adolescent Peer Relationships in Context: The Role of Parenting Style. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 58-69.
    Orr, D. W. (1941). A psychoanalytic study of a fraternal twin. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 5, 284–296.
    Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1-10.
    Pearlman, E. M. (1990). Seperation-individuation, self-concept, and object relations in fraternal twins, identical twins, and singletons. Journal of Psychology, 124(6), 619-628.
    Prainsack, B., & Spector, T. D. (2006). Twins: A cloning experience. Social Science & Medicine. 63, 2739-2752.
    Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s reports of parental behavior, an inventor. Child Development, 36, 413-424.
    Schave, B., & Ciriello, J. (1983). Identity and intimacy in twins. New York: Praeger.
    Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518-527.
    Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
    Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2005). Handbook of positive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Stephen, J. D., Preston, L. A., O’Brien, S. P. & DiLalla, D. L. (1990). Individuality and Relatedness of the Self: An Autophotographic Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71(6), 1268-1278.
    Stewart, E. A. (2000). Towards the social analysis of twinship. British Journal of Sociology , 51(4), 719-737.
    Stewart, E. A. (2003). Exploring twins: Towards a social analysis of twinship. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    Tancredy, C., Fraley, R. (2006). The nature of adult twin relationships: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 78-93.
    Trinke, S. J., & Bartholomew, K. (1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 603–625.
    Wang, S., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2003). Do child-rearing values in Taiwan and the United States reflect cultural values of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(6), 629-642.
    Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession. Interanational Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89-79.
    Withrow, R., & Schwiebert, V. L. (2005). Twin loss: Implications for counselors working with surviving twins. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83, 21-28.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育研究所
    94152028
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152028
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    202801.pdf15KbAdobe PDF21093View/Open
    202802.pdf17KbAdobe PDF2827View/Open
    202803.pdf41KbAdobe PDF2896View/Open
    202804.pdf26KbAdobe PDF2835View/Open
    202805.pdf53KbAdobe PDF22196View/Open
    202806.pdf341KbAdobe PDF23292View/Open
    202807.pdf663KbAdobe PDF21283View/Open
    202808.pdf236KbAdobe PDF2829View/Open
    202809.pdf124KbAdobe PDF2978View/Open
    202810.pdf34KbAdobe PDF21453View/Open
    202811.pdf188KbAdobe PDF21260View/Open
    202812.pdf226KbAdobe PDF24812View/Open
    202813.pdf120KbAdobe PDF21066View/Open
    202814.pdf306KbAdobe PDF2786View/Open
    202815.pdf109KbAdobe PDF21375View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback