Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32962
|
| Title: | 成就目標與學習行為的關係
The Relationship of Achievement Goals and Learning Behaviors |
| Authors: | 李仁豪
Ren-Hau Li |
| Contributors: | 余民寧
Min-Ning Yu
李仁豪
Ren-Hau Li |
| Keywords: | 成就目標
考試焦慮
學習策略
情緒調節
結構方程模式
achievement goals
test anxiety
learning strategy
emotion regulation
structure equation model |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 14:58:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 摘 要
本研究主要目的在於：
一、探討成就目標理論最新的發展趨勢。
二、探討考試焦慮在自我調節的學習策略中的內涵意義。
三、探討成就目標、學習策略、考試焦慮三者對學業表現的影響。
四、建構出成就目標、學習策略、考試焦慮、學業表現四者間的因果模式。
五、歸納研究結果，做為老師教學與輔導之參考，並對未來相關研究提出建議。
本研究採問卷調查方式，以多階段叢集抽樣方式進行，分別在全省北中南東四區各抽取3至4個縣市，每個縣市再隨機抽取一個學校，共抽得14個學校，每個學校再隨機抽取國一、國二、國三各一班，共計樣本1332人。調查工具有三，其一為Elliot & McGregor（2001）編製的「成就目標量表」、其二為改編自吳靜吉、程炳林（民81）修訂Pintrich, Smith, & McKeachie（1989）所編的「激勵的學習策略量表」（MSLQ）而成的「學習策略量表」、其三為余民寧（民92）所編製的「考試焦慮量表」。調查所得資料以描述統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、多元回歸分析、典型相關分析及結構方程模式SEM加以處理。
本研究得到以下結論：
一、國中生具有多種成就目標，教師需妥善引導。
二、國中生情緒調節能力稍弱，而以男生、高年級、北部學生最差。
三、認知焦慮較情緒焦慮對數學成績的影響力大，女生尤其較男生具有更高的認知焦慮。但是情緒焦慮對一年級的影響較其他年級大。
四、國中一年級學生相對於其他年級有較多的目標導向及較高的情緒焦慮，而在認知焦慮上各年級無差異。
五、在四種成就目標上，都是高焦慮組較高。在學習策略上，高焦慮組在一般認知、資源經營策略上較高，但在情緒調節上則以低焦慮組較高。在數學成績的比較上，低焦慮組較高。
六、對數學成績最具預測效果的因素有四：趨向精熟目標、認知評價過程及資源經營策略、考試焦慮中的認知焦慮。
七、逃避精熟目標、認知焦慮、情緒調節三者關係密切
八、考試焦慮與學習策略間具負向回饋圈特性，可以解釋兩者間無關的事實。
九、成就目標與學習行為的關係模式經修正後可適配，但模式不夠精簡。
最後，根據研究結果提出各項建議，以供教學實務上及未來研究參考。
關鍵詞：成就目標、學習策略、考試焦慮、情緒調節、結構方程模式
The Relationship of Achievement Goals
and Learning Behaviors
Abstract
The purpose of the present research is to:
一、discuss the recent development trends of achievement goals theory.
二、discuss the implication of test anxiety in self-regulatory learning strategy.
三、discuss the influence of achievement goals, learning strategies, and test anxiety on academic performance
四、construct the structure equation model (SEM) among achievement goals, learning strategies, test anxiety, and academic performance
五、induce the outcomes of the present research to submit a little suggestion as reference to teaching, guidance, and future related research
The present research adopted a questionnaire survey in multiple-staged cluster sampling. First of all, sampling 3~4 cities or counties for each of four regions in Taiwan (including the north, the central, the south, and the east regions of the country). Then one junior high school was sampled for each cities and counties mentioned above. Finally, 14 schools were sampled. For each of those schools, one class of each grade was sampled, yielding a total of 1332 junior high school students. The tools of the present questionnaire survey were three. The first one was “achievement goals inventory” made by Elliot & McGregor (2001). Another one was “motivated strategies for learning questionnaire” (MSLQ) made by Pintrich, Smith, & McKeachie (1989), but the present research use its Chinese version revised by Wu & Cherng (1992). The other was “test anxiety inventory” made by Yu (2003). The raw data collected after the survey was handled with descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple regression analysis, canonic correlation and structure equation model (SEM).
The conclusions of the present research are:
一、Junior high school students have multiple achievement goals, so teachers have to guide them carefully.
二、In contrast to the other three learning strategies, junior high school students have weaker emotion regulation strategy, specifically, male, senior, and the north junior high school students were the weakest.
三、Cognitive test anxiety has more influence on math than what the emotionality component does. Females have higher cognitive test anxiety than male, and emotionality component has more influence on juniors than the others.
四、In contrast to the other two grades, juniors have more diverse achievement goals and higher emotionality component, however, there is no difference of cognitive test anxiety among three grades.
五、Regarding the comparison between high and low test anxiety groups, the high one scored higher in multiple achievement goals, and general cognition, resource management of the learning strategies, but scored lower in emotion regulation of the learning strategies and math.
六、The best effect predictors of math scores were mastery-approach achievement goal, and cognitive appraisal process, resource management of the learning strategies, cognitive test anxiety.
七、Mastery-avoidance achievement goal, cognitive test anxiety, and emotion regulation of the learning strategies were closely related.
八、There is a negative feedback loop between test anxiety and learning strategy, which explains the low correlation between test anxiety and learning strategy.
九、SEM for the relationship of achievement goals and learning behaviors can fit the raw data collected well after modification by modification index, but the model is not parsimonious enough.
Finally, according to the outcome, the present research submits a little suggestion for future research, and gives some advice for the practice of teaching.
Key words: achievement goals, learning strategy, test anxiety, emotion regulation, structure equation model |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
向天屏（民88）。國中小學生成就目標導向、學習策略、自我跛足策略與學業成就關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
余民寧（民76）。考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成績之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
余民寧（民86）。有意義的學習－概念構圖之研究。台北：商鼎。
余民寧（民92）。考試焦慮量表。未出版。
李國禎（民89）。國中學生對教師有效教學行為的知覺與其學習策略、學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳靜吉、程炳林（民81）。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，39輯，59-78頁。
馬信行（民88）。教育科學研究法。台北：五南。
陳嘉成（民90）。中學生之成就目標導向、動機氣候知覺與學習行為組型之關係。教育與心理研究，24期，167-190頁。
陳正昌、程炳林（民90）。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用（二版）。台北：五南。
郭郁智（民89）。國民中學學生學習策略、批判思考能力與學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭昭明（民85）。認知心理學。台北：桂冠。
魏麗敏（民85）。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommends two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
American Psychiatric Association (1995). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder: DSM-IV. International version with ICD-10 codes, 4th edn. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goal in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivational process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Archambeault, B. (1992). Personalizing study skills in secondary students. Journal of Reading, 35, 468-472.
Atkinson, J. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Bargh, J. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706-722.
Baumann, J. F., & Bergeron, B. S. (1993). Story map instruction using children’s literature: Effects on first graders’ comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behaviors, 25, 407-437.
Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 149-167.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42.
Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., & Bordeleau, L. (1998). A developmental study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students’ self-regulated learning. British Journal of Education Psychology, 68, 309-319.
Bulgren, J. A., Hock, M., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1995). The effects of instruction in a paired associates strategy on the information mastery performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 22-37.
Cacioppo, J., Priester, J., & Berntson, G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extention have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5-17.
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. （2002）. Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270-296.
Collins, C. (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading, 34, 510-516.
Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. Elementary School Learning,85, 5-20.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory,motivation, and school achievement: An integrative view. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
Davey, G. C. L. (1994). Trait factors and ratings of controllability as predictors of worrying about significant life stressor. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 379-384.
Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. （1992）. Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290-299.
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learing. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C., & Elliott, E. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. Heatherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley.
Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
Eccles, J. （1983）. Expectancies, value & academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence(Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
Elliot, A (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of achievement motivation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 243-279), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
Forster, J., Higgins, E., & Idson, L. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115-1131.
Gersten, R. (1998). Recent advances in instructional research for students with learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 162-170.
Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School Psychology Review, 31, 350-366.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goal: When they are adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1-21.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 638-645.
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77.
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33-46.
Higbee, J. L., & Thomas, P. V. (1999). Affective and cognitive factors related to mathematics achievement. Journal of Developmental Education, 23, 8-20.
Hodapp, V., & Benson, J. (1997). The multidimensionality of test anxiety: A test of different models. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 10, 219-244.
Houck, M. T. (1984). The effects of sex, race, and text anxiety on standardized test performance of middle school pupils. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 70A.
Jones, C. H., Slate, J. R., Blake, P. C., & Holifield, S. D. (1992). Two investigations of the academic skills of junior and senior high school students. High School Journal, 76, 24-29..
Levin, M. E., & Levin, J. R. (1990). Scientific mnemonics: Methods for maximizing more than memory. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 301-321.
Levin, J. R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies and classroom learning: A twenty-year report card. Elementary School Journal, 94, 235-244.
Lewis, J. C. & Hoover, H. D. (1987). Differential prediction of academic achievement in elementary and jounior high school by sex. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20, 975-978.
Lucangeli, D., Coi, G., & Bosco, P. (1998). Metacognitive awareness in good and poor math problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 219-244.
Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520-540.
Maehr, M. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 299-315). New York: Academic Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, R., & Lowell, E. （1953）. The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21, 89-102.
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710 -718.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goal: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230-248.
Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Newbegin, I., & Owens, A. (1996). Self-esteem and anxiety in secondary school achievement. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 521-530.
Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conception of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
Oostdam, R., & Meijer, J. (2003). Influence of test anxiety on measurement of intelligence. Psychological Reports, 92, 3-21.
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 7-15.
Pekrun, R. (1992a). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41, 359-376.
Pekrun, R. (1992b). Expectancy-value theory of anxiety: Overview and implications. In D. G. Forgays, T. Sosnowski, & K. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Anxiety: Recent developments in self-appraisal, psychophysiological and health research (pp. 23-41). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143-163). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.
Pekrun, R., Molfenter, S., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2000). Emotion, learning, and achievement in university students: Longitudinal studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Phillips, B. N., Martin, R. P., & Meyers, J. (1972). School-related interventions with anxious children. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2). NY: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr, & C. Ames (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement.(Vol. 6, pp. 117-160). CT: JAI.
Pintrich, P. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
Pintrich, P. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research and applications (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., & McKeachie, W. J. (1989). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Mich: National center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL), School of Education, The University Michigan.
Prins, P. J. M. & Hanewald, G. J. F. P. (1997). Self-statements of test-anxious children: Thought-listing and questionnaire approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 440-447.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles－an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Ruthig, J. C., Hladkyi, S., Hall, N. C., Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. ( 2002). Profiling voluntary course withdrawal among college students: A longitudinal study with motivational implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Schunk, D. H. & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skills acquisition: Goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 251-260.
Schutz, P. A. & Davis, H. A. (2000). Emotions and self-regulation during test taking. Educational Psychologist, 35, 243-256.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 13, 271-280.
Sharma, S., & Rao, U. (1983). The effects of self-esteem, test anxiety and intelligence on academic achievement of high school girls, Personality Study and Group Behaviour, 3, 48-55.
Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientations: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
Smith, M., Duda, J., Allen, J., & Hall, H. (2002). Contemporary measures of approach and avoidance goal orientations: Similarities and differences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 155-190.
Titz, W. (2001). Emotionen von studierenden in lernsituationen [University students’ emotions at learning]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Tobias, S. (1985). Test anxiety: Interference, defective skills, and cognitive capacity. Educational Psychologist, 20, 135-142.
Turner, J. E., & Schallert, D. (2001). Expectancy-value relationships of shame reactions and shame resiliency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 320-329.
Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P. K., & Meyer, D. K. (1998). Students’ reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758-771.
Vandewalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015.
Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25-50.
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171..
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. F. (1985). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 315-329). New York: Macmillan.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learning strategies in students with LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 110-120.
Zajonc, R. (1998). Emotion. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.) (pp. 591-632). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pon, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Education Psychology, 80, 284-290. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
90152029
91 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090152029 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
