English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51733006      Online Users : 599
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32890


    Title: 幼兒就學準備度相關因素之研究
    The factors influencing young children school readiness
    Authors: 施玠羽
    Shih, Chieh Yu
    Contributors: 徐聯恩
    施玠羽
    Shih, Chieh Yu
    Keywords: 幼兒就學準備度
    幼兒園品質
    家長參與
    父母社經地位
    school readiness
    educational quality
    parents participation
    socioeconomic status
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 14:47:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在於瞭解幼兒就學準備度之內涵,並以實證方式進行幼兒學前教育經驗、幼兒園品質、家庭背景、家長參與的現況瞭解,以及與幼兒就學準備度之間的差異情形、相關情形、預測情形。依隨機抽樣方式,以問卷調查進行兩階段實施,第一階段,抽取632位文山及萬華區小ㄧ學童為研究對象,進行幼兒就學準備度的施測,可用率為75.5%,共477位學童;第二階段根據學童分布的141家公私立幼兒園(幼稚園或托兒所),進行幼兒園品質調查,可用率為51.8%,共計73家幼兒園。本研究採用量化方法,以SPSS 14.0套裝軟體進行分析,包括獨立樣本t考驗、卡方分配、單因子變異數分析、Scheff’e事後比較、皮爾森基差相關、多元逐步回歸等方式做資料的處理。
    研究結果顯示:1、幼兒園屬性及類型對就學準備度有顯著差異,就讀私立幼兒園者其就學準備度高於就讀公立幼兒園者;就讀不同幼兒園類型的孩子其就學準備度有顯著差異。2、幼兒就讀幼兒園年數與學準備度呈現正相關。3、幼兒園品質與就學準備度的無顯著相關。4、家庭背景中的「每月收入」、「父母教育程度」、「父母職業類型」、「父母社經地位」皆與幼兒就學準備度有顯著差異。5、幼兒園與小學時期家長參與呈正相關,兩時期的家長參與與就學準備度也呈現正相關。6、「家庭每月收入」、「幼兒園時期家長參與」、「就讀幼兒園年數」對就學準備度達顯著預測性。
    另外其他研究發現部分:1、幼兒園及小學時期家長參與度中偏高。2、幼兒就讀幼兒園類型與家庭環境及區域分佈有關,且家庭背景會影響幼兒園類型選擇。3、幼兒進入小學後就學準備度「學業成績」方面表現不錯,「生活適應」方面表現中等。4、家長參與和家庭背景因素呈現正相關,父母教育程度、職業、社經地位、家庭每月收入月高的家庭,家長的參與程度會越高。5、各類型的幼兒園其幼兒園品質有顯著差異。
    本研究並根據研究結果提出建議,以提供家長、學校、政府機關以及未來研究者之參考。
    The main purpose of this study is to understand the concept of school readiness, and examine the experience of early childhood education, the educational quality in ECE (early childhood education), the background of family, parents participate, and the relationships of these items. This study adopts literature analysis and questionnaire investigation to achieve the goal.
    This study are 2 steps, the first step, 632 first grade elementary school students in Wenshan district and Wanhua district of Taipei City, and 477 samples were received, making the return rate of 75.5%. The second step, basing on 141 early childhood education centers the children attended in last year, and 73 samples were received, making the return rate of 51.8%. The sample results were analyzed by means, standard deviations, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Person’s product-moment correlation and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
    Depending on the result, the conclusions are as fallows:
    1. The children study in private center is better than in public. And the school readiness of children in different types childcare centers has obvious different.
    2. The correlation analysis found that there is moderate positive relationship between “How long are children in childcare centers” and “early childhood school readiness”.
    3. The correlation analysis found that there is no moderate relationship between “the educational quality in ECE” and “early childhood school readiness”.
    4. There were significantly different perceptions towards school readiness to different background family.
    5. The correlation analysis found that there is moderate positive relationship between parents participate in early childhood time and elementary school time. “The parents participate in two step” and early childhood school readiness” also show positive relationship.
    6. The income of the family per month, the participation of parents in early childhood time and how long children in childcare centers are were appropriate indicators in predicting early childhood school readiness.
    Otherwise, there are other researches results are discovered as follows:
    1. The participation of parents in early childhood time and elementary school time are obviously high.
    2. Family backgrounds can affect the choice of the type of the early childhood centers, and the type of the early childhood centers are concerned with family backgrounds and which areas they are in.
    3. After children enter the elementary school, their school readiness in” study achievements “are good, and in “live hood adaption” show average.
    4. There were moderate positive relationship between “the participation of parents” and “the factors of family backgrounds”, the higher level of education of their parents, their occupations, their position of social and economics and the income per month, the participation of parents show higher.
    5. There were significantly different perceptions between types of early childhood centers and their qualities.
    According to previous conclusions, the researcher proposes some suggestions for parents, school, administration and researchers in the future.
    Reference: 【中文部份】
    周新富(1999)。國中生家庭背景、家庭文化資源、學校經驗與學習結果關係之硏
    究。高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    周新富(2003b)。家長參與子女教育之研究與實務。國民教育研究學報,11,
    69-92。
    邱皓政(2006)。量化硏究與統計分析 : SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析,臺
    北 : 五南。
    林天祐(1997)。學校經營與教育品質。教育資料與研究19,28。
    林生傳(2000)。教育社會學。高雄:復文。
    林怡青(2002)。教育機構服務品質之研究:以我國大專校院學生事務處為個案分
    析。台北大學公共行政系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    林義男(1988)。國小學生家長社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報,
    16,157-211。
    林憲治(2004)。國小學童的家庭環境與閱讀態度對於寫作表現之相關研究。國立
    嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    吳清山和黃旭鈞(民84)。提昇教育品質的一股新動力-談全面品質管理及其在
    教育上的應用。教育資料與研究,2,74-83。
    吳武典、林繼盛(民71):家庭與學校聯繫程度與兒童學業成就和生活適應之關
    係。教育心理學報,15,127-138。
    柯淑慧(2004)。外籍母親與本籍母親之子女學業成就之比較研究-以基隆市國小
    一年級學生為例。國立台北師範學院幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,台北:未出版。
    柯貴美(2004)。家長教育參與。台北市:商鼎。
    洪怡君(2006)。父母對幼兒的學校準備度觀點與其教養行為之相關研究。國立台
    北教育大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    徐聯恩與劉蓁(2006)。幼兒園評鑑觀念之改變與量表發展。論文發表於台灣師範
    大學所舉辦之「教育評鑑國際學術研討會」,台北市。
    徐聯恩與施玠羽(2006)。幼兒學習標準:美國經驗及其涵義。政治大學2006幼
    兒教育專業、品質與卓越學術研討會論文集,台北市。
    康淑雲(2004)。臺北市幼稚園家長教育選擇之調查研究。台北教育大學幼兒教育
    研究所碩士論文,台北,未出版。
    孫清山、黃毅志(1996)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。台灣社會學刊,19,95-139。
    曹俊德(2005)。學前教育機構主管轉型領導、專業發展與幼兒教育品質關係之研
    究。政治大學教育研究所博士論文,台北,未出版。
    陳啟光、蔡政和、李元墩(2000)「高等教育行政服務品質衡量之研究」,長榮學
    報,第四卷,第一期,15-32。
    陳怡華(2000)。國小學生家庭環境、閱讀動機與國語科學業成就之關係研究。高
    雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,高雄:未出版。
    陳碧容(2003)。外籍新娘子女家庭環境與學校生活適應之相關研究--以台灣地區
    東南亞籍新娘為例。國立台北護理學院嬰幼兒保育研究所碩士論文,台北:未
    出版。
    陳淑芳(2002)。美國《發展合宜實務指引》的發展和修訂對我國幼稚園課程標準
    修訂之啟示。取自:www.ntttc.edu.tw/shufang。
    張郁雯(1997)。學習準備度評鑑計畫。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果
    報告,計畫編號:NSC86-2413-H-030-006。
    楊國賜等(2001)全國幼兒教育普查計畫,教育部委託研究。
    鄭淵全(1997)。社經地位、能力、學校教育過程與國小學生學業成就之關係—
    功能典範與衝突典範之探究。高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,高雄:未出
    版。
    鄭佳玲(2000)。台南市幼稚園教育「家長參與」之研究。台南教育大學國民教育研究所,台南:未出版。
    臺北市政府教育局網站:http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/
    臺北市政府社會局網站:http://www.bosa.tcg.gov.tw/
    黃文俊(2003)。家庭環境、文化資本與國小學生學業成就之相關研究。國立嘉義
    大學/國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    黃意舒(2004)。幼稚園課程之幼兒基本學習能力研究。行政院國家科學委員會專
    題研究計畫成果報告。NSC 90-2413-H-133-005。
    黃毅志(2003)。「台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估。教育研
    究月刊,49(4)。
    黃美香(2004)。高雄縣市公私立幼稚園家長參與班級活動之調查研究。屏東教育
    大學國民教育研究所,屏東:未出版。
    黃凱霖(1995)。父母效能感、父母參與以及子女學業成就的關係。台灣師範大學
    教育研究所,台北:未出版。
    蔡春美(1993)。幼稚園與小學銜接問題調查研究。台北師院學報,6,665-730。
    翟本瑞 ( 2002 )。家庭文化資本對學校教育影響之研究:以農業縣山區小學為
    例。教育與社會研究,4,181-195。
    賴清標(1992)。如何安排有益兒童學習的家庭環境。幼兒教育年刊,5,71-79。賴保禎(1994)。家庭環境診斷測驗。台北:心理。
    盧美貴(2003)。我國五歲幼兒基本能力與能力指標建構研究。教育部國民教育司。
    盧美貴(1993)。幼稚園與小學課程銜接問題之研究。幼兒教育學報,2,215-246。
    謝美慧(1999)。英國幼兒基本學力測驗初探。教育研究資訊,7 (5),128 - 137。
    謝孟穎(2002)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。國立嘉義大學國民
    教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    簡楚瑛(2006)。從教育/幼教品質之定義看其對幼稚園評鑑制度之啟示。基礎教
    育學報,15,1,37-50。
    蘇建文等(1998)。發展心理學。台北:心理。
    【英文部份】
    Arnett,J.(1989).Caregivers in day-care centers:Does training matter?
    Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,v10, n4,pp541-552.
    Ackerman, D.J. & Barnett, W. S.(2006)。Prepared for kindergarten: what
    does “Readiness” mean? National Institute for Early Education
    Research.
    Burke J.F. & Burke W.M.(2005).Student-ready schools. Childhood
    Education.: Annual Theme,81(5),281-285.
    Bryant(2000).Cognition and language relating quality of center-based
    child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally.
    Child Development.71(2).339.
    Child Mental Health Foundations and Agencies Network[FAN](2001). A good
    beginning: sending America’s children to school with the social and
    emotional competence the need to succeed. Chapel Hill: University of
    North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
    Currie, J. (2005). Health disparities and gaps in school readiness. The
    Future of Children, 15(1), 117-138.
    Crone, D. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1999). Age and schooling effects on
    emergent literacy and early reading skills. Journal of Educational
    Psychology, 91, 604-614.
    Cryer,D.(1999).Defining and assessing early childhood program quality.
    in suzanne helburn(Ed.), The silent crisis in U.S. child care[Special
    issue].The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
    Science, 563,pp39-55.
    Dossett D. & Munoz M. A.,(2000). Educational reform in the accountability
    era: The impact of prior achievement and socio-economic conditions on
    academic performance ?
    Dorn, S. (1998). The political legacy of school accountability system.
    Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6(1),1-34.
    Daniels, S. (1995). Can pre-school education affect children`s
    achievement in primary school? Oxford Review of Education, 21, 163-178.
    Early Childhood Education And School Readiness Workshop (2002).NIEER
    Frede,E.C.(1995).The role of program quality in producing early childhood
    program benefits.The Future of Children,5(3),115-132.
    Faith, L. P., Alison, Y. B., Kenneth, W. G., Carol, R., & Lenore, P. (1999).
    Parent-child relationship, home learning environment, and school
    readiness. School Psychology Review, 28(3),413-425.
    Gredler, G.R.(1992).School readiness: assessment and educational issues.
    Clinical Psychology Publishing Company, Inc., 4 Conant Square, Brandon
    Graue, M. E(1993).Ready for what? : constructing meanings of readiness for
    kindergarten. Albany, N.Y.
    Howes & Smith(1995).Relations among child-care quality,
    teacher-behavior, children’s play activities, emotional security and
    cognitive activity in child care. Early Childhood Research
    Quarterly,10(4),381-404.
    Harradine, C. C., & Clifford, R. M. (1996). When are children ready for
    kindergarten? Views of families, kindergarten teachers, and childcare
    providers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
    Educational Research Association, New York.
    Helburn,S.W. & Howes,C.(1996).Child care cost and quality.The Future
    of Children,6(2),62-82.
    Kagan, S.L., Moore, E., and Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (1995). Reconsidering
    children`s early learning and development: Toward Shared Beliefs and
    Vocabulary . Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
    Kagan, S. L. (1990). Readiness 2000: Rethinking rhetoric and
    responsibility. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 272-279.
    Kim J., Murdock T. & Choi D.(2005). Investigation of parents` beliefs about readiness for kindergarten: An examination of National Household Education Survey (NHES: 93). Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 3-17.
    La Paro, K.M. & Pianta, R.C. (2000). Predicting children’s competence
    in the early school years: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational
    Research; 70(4).
    Love, J. M. (2001). Instrumentation for State Readiness Assessment:
    Issues in measuring children’s early development in learning. Paper
    presented at the Assessing the State of State Assessments Symposium,
    Atlanta, GA, December 12-14. 2001.
    Love, J. M. (1995). Conception of readiness for ECLS and HSLS.
    Unpub-lished memorandum. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research,
    Inc.
    Love,J. M., Aber,J. A., & Brooks-Gunn,J. (1994). Strategies for
    Assessing community progress toward achieving the first national
    educational goal. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc
    Lin H.L., Lawrence F.R. & Gorrell J.(2003). Kindergarten teachers’ views
    of children`s readiness for school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,
    18, 225-237.
    Meisels, S. J. (1998). Assessing readiness. Center for the Improvement
    of Early Reading Achievement(CIERA). University of Michigan- Ann Arbor.
    M R. Burchinal, J E. Roberts, R R, Jr., S A. Zeisel, E Neebe & D
    Bryant(2000),Cognition and Language Relating Quality of Center-Based
    Child care to early cognitive andlanguage development longitudinally.
    Child Development.71(2).339.
    Maxwell,K.L.,Bryant,D.M.,Ridley,S.M., & Keyes-Elstein,L.(2001).North
    Carolina’s kindergartners and schools:Executive summary.Chapel
    Hill:University of North Carolina,Frank Porter Graham Child
    Development Institute.
    Magnuson K.A., Meyers M.K. & Ruhm C. J. (2004).Inequality in preschool
    education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal,
    41(1), 115-157.
    Maxwell K.L. & Clifford R.M.(2004).School readiness assessment. YC Young
    Children, 59(1), 42-46.
    NAEYC(1995) School readiness, A Position statement of the National Association For the Education of Young Children.
    Nelson R.F. (2005).The Impact of Ready Environments on Achievement in
    Kindergarten. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19(3), 215-221.
    Phillips, D. A., McCartney, K., and Scarr, S.(1987). Child-care quality
    and children’s development. Developmental Psychology,23,537-544.
    Phillipsen, Burchinal, Howes, and Cryer (1997). The prediction of process
    quality from structural features of child care. Early Childhood
    Research,132.
    Peisner-Feinberg, E.S., Burchinal, M.R., Clifford, R.M., Culkin, M.L.,
    Howes, C., Kagan, S.L., Yazegian, N. (2001). The relation of preschool
    child-care quality to children’s cognitive and social development
    trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72 (5),
    1534-1553.
    Pelletier J. & Brent J.M.(2002).Parent participation in children`s school
    readiness: The effects of parental self-efficacy, cultural diversity
    and teacher strategies. International Journal of Early Childhood,
    34(1),45-60.
    Rimm-Kaufman S.E.; Pianta R.C.; Cox M.J.(2000).Teachers` judgments of
    problems in the transition to kindergarten. Childhood Research
    Quarterly,15. 147-166.
    Scott-Little C.,Kagan S.L. & Frelow V.S. (2006). Conceptualization of
    readiness and the content of early learning standard: The intersection
    of policy and research? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21,153-173.
    Spitzer S., Cupp R., & Parke R.D.(1995). School entrance age, social
    acceptance, and self-perceptions in kindergarten and 1st grade.
    Childhood Research Quarterly,10(4), 433-450.
    Suzanne W. Helburn (1996). Cost, quality, and child outcomes in child
    care Centers: Technical Report. Denver, CO: Department of Economics,
    Center for Research in Economic and Social Policy, University of
    Colorado.
    Schorr, L. B. (1997).Judging interventions by their results.In S.L.
    Kagan, S. Rosenkoetter, & N. E. Cohen (Eds.), Considering child-based
    results for young children: Definitions, desirability, feasibility,
    and next steps (pp.36–47). New Haven, CT: Yale Bush Center in Child
    Development and Social Policy.
    Skinner, D., Bryant, D., Coffman, J., & Campbell, F.(1998) Creating Risk
    and promise: children`s and teachers` co-constructions in the cultural
    world of kindergarten. The Elementary School Journal, 98,(4). 297-310.
    Vandell & Wolfe(2002).Child Care Quality:Does It Matter and Does It
    Need to be Improved?ED441941.
    Whitebook, M., Howes, C., & Phillips,D.(1990).Who cares:Child care
    teachers and the quality of care in American:Final report of the
    National Child Care Staffing Study. Oakland, CA:Child Care Employee
    Project. ED323031.
    Wesley P.W. & Buysse V.(2003).Making meaning of school readiness in
    schools and communities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18,
    351-375.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    幼兒教育所
    94157003
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094157003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700301.pdf49KbAdobe PDF21071View/Open
    700302.pdf198KbAdobe PDF21105View/Open
    700303.pdf171KbAdobe PDF21193View/Open
    700304.pdf981KbAdobe PDF21325View/Open
    700305.pdf4503KbAdobe PDF21830View/Open
    700306.pdf1748KbAdobe PDF21557View/Open
    700307.pdf2596KbAdobe PDF21345View/Open
    700308.pdf534KbAdobe PDF21160View/Open
    700309.pdf393KbAdobe PDF21383View/Open
    700310.pdf450KbAdobe PDF21104View/Open
    700311.pdf354KbAdobe PDF21127View/Open
    700312.pdf176KbAdobe PDF21076View/Open
    700313.pdf53KbAdobe PDF21083View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback