Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32877
|
| Title: | 學前教師資訊科技融入教學現況及其相關因素之研究
A study of the relationship between technology integration instruction and influence factors in Kindergarten and Nursery |
| Authors: | 古孟玲
Ku,Meng-Lin |
| Contributors: | 簡楚瑛
Chien,Chu-Ying
古孟玲
Ku,Meng-Lin |
| Keywords: | 學前教師
園所長
資訊科技融入教學
資訊素養
preschool teacher
preschool principal
technology integration instruction
information literacy |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 14:45:53 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討學前教師資訊科技融入教學現況及其相關影響因素。首先瞭解學前教師資訊科技融入教學之定義、內涵與現況；其次分析不同背景變項及內外在因素對學前教師資訊科技融入教學之差異情形；第三，分析影響資訊科技融入教學因素與資訊科技融入教學之相關；最後影響學前教師資訊科技融入教學因素對學前教師資訊科技融入教學各層面之預測力。
本研究透過文獻分析，以及問卷調查法來了解資訊科技融入教學的現況，及其相關影響因素。本研究之母群體為台北縣市幼稚園、托兒所教師及園所長，採分層抽樣進行取樣，老師和園長各發出480份問卷，老師的有效問卷為51%，園長的有效問卷為58.1%。使用工具為自編「學前教師資訊科技融入教學之應用量表」、「影響學前教師資訊科技融入教學因素之量表」及「園所長對資訊科技融入教學態度之量表」，問卷回收後，使用SPSS 12.0 for windows套裝軟體進行描述性統計、信度分析、效度分析
、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Scheffé多重比較、皮爾森積差相關、逐步多元迴歸來分析資料。本研究主要結論如下：
壹、在園所電腦基本資料分面
一、台北縣市之園所資訊設備非常普及
貳、在學前教師資訊科技融入教學方面
一、大部分的老師均有進行資訊科技融入教學
二、資訊科技融入教學的模式以「教學前準備」和「教學中活動」表現
最佳
三、資訊科技融入教學的程度以「資訊科技的初步應用」表現最佳
四、「園所屬性」、「園所位置」、「教學經驗」、「教育程度」、
「電腦課程經驗」和「研習時數」對學前教師資訊科技融入教學均
有顯著影響
參、影響資訊科技融入教學因素方面
一、「教學信念」是影響學前教師資訊科技融入教學最大的因素
二、「資訊素養」是影響學前教師資訊科技融入教學的次要因素
三、學前教師的資訊素養以「基本軟體知能」最佳
四、學前教師的資訊素養以「電腦在教學上的應用」最差
五、「園所屬性」、「園所位置」、「教育程度」、「電腦課程經驗」
和「研習時數」對影響學前教師資訊科技融入教學之因素均有顯
著影響
肆、在影響園所長對資訊科技融入教學態度方面
一、園所長對資訊科技融入教學的看法均表示認同
二、園所長願意投入資訊科技融入教學之意願高
三、「園所屬性」和「園所位置」均會對園所長資訊科技融入教學產生
顯著影響
伍、學前教師資訊科技融入教學與影響資訊科技融入教學因素兩者關係方
面
一、「影響資訊科技融入教學之內外在因素」與「學前教師資訊科技融
入教學」呈現正相關
二、「影響資訊科技融入教學之因素」對「學前教師資訊科技融入教
學」具有預測力
最後研究者根據研究結果，分別對園所長、學前教師、師資培育機構、研習機構以及後續相關研究提出建議，以期對未來資訊科技融入學前教育有所助益。
關鍵詞：學前教師、園所長、資訊科技融入教學、資訊素養
The main purpose of this study was to:(1) Understand definition, connotation and current situation of technology integration instruction. (2) Explore technology integration instruction data between different backgrounds and influence factors. (3) Analyze the relationships between influence factors and technology integration instruction. (4) Explore the predictive power of influence factors on the part of technology integration instruction.
To accomplish these purposes, the methods were adopted literature review and questionnaire, which served as the basis of this study. In questionnaire aspect, was executed public and private kindergartens and nursery schools in Taipei city and county. This research was executed by questionnaire survey. “Preschool teachers technology integration instruction questionnaire",“influence factors of technology integration instruction questionnaire”and“Principals’ attitude on technology integration instruction questionnaire”were designed from literature by myself to collect data. By means of stratified random sampling.The samples include 480 principals (effective return rate is 58.1%) and 480 teachers (effective return rate is 51%).The questionnaire data analyzed statistically by description statistics,reliability analysis,
t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé posteriority comparison, Person-moment correlation analysis, stepwise multiple regression analysis through the use of SPSS 12.01 for windows. The major results were summarized as follows:
A.In the aspect of technology equipment
a.Technology equipment in Taipei city and county are very
universal.
B.In the aspect of technology integration instruction
a.In the main of preschool teachers are implement technology
integration instruction.
b.It’s usually implement technology integration instruction
on “prepare of teach” and “teaching”.
c.The best dimension is “technology preliminary application”.
d.“Taipei city and county”, “public and private”,
“teachers’ years of teaching”, “educational degree of
teachers",“computer’s learning experience”and
“research and study hours” have significant influences on
preschool teachers implement technology integration
instruction.
C.In the aspect of influence factors of technology integration
instruction
a.The best influence factors of technology integration
instruction is“Teaching-belief”.
b.The second influence factors of technology integration
instruction is“Information Literacy”.
c.The best information literacy in preschool teachers is
“basic software knowledge”.
d.The worst information literacy in preschool teachers is
“computer use in instruction”.
e.“Taipei city and county",“public and private”,
“educational degree of teachers”, “computer`s learning
experience"and“research and study hours” have significant
influences on influence factors of technology integration
instruction.
D.In the aspect of principals’ attitude on technology
integration instruction
a.All of the principals are identification with technology
integration instruction.
b.The best part of principals are willing invest in technology
integration instruction.
c.“Taipei city and county” and “public and private” have
significant influences on principals’ attitude on
technology integration instruction.
E.In the aspect of relationships between technology integration
instruction and influence factors of technology integration
instruction
a.There was positive correlation existed between “influence
factors of technology integration instruction” and
“technology integration instruction”.
b.“Influence factors of technology integration instruction”
did promote“technology integration instruction”.
In the last part, the researcher, based on the findings, proposes some suggestions for the principals, the preschool teachers, the teacher training institutions, the research and study institutions and the future researchers, hope to benefit accelerant technology integration instruction in preschools in the future.
Key words: preschool teacher, preschool principal, technology
integration instruction, information literacy |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
王全世 (2000)。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育，80，23-31。
王筱涵 (2004)。台北市國民小學實施資訊科技融入教學之研究。國立台北教育大學國民教育政策與管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
王寀蕙 (2001)。國小教師電腦融入教學素養及其專業成長活動之研究。國立台北教育大學國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
方顥璇 (2003)。幼兒用電腦好不好？。幼教資訊，154，2-10。
方顥璇 (2004)。公立幼稚園實行資訊教育之個案研究。國立臺北師範學院學報，17(1)，51~78。
李文政、周淑惠 (1999)。電腦於幼兒教育之應用。教學科技與媒體，44，47-56。
李雪莉 (2000)。教師運用資訊網路能力調查。天下雜誌2000年教育特刊海闊天空Ⅳ-網上學習：如何幫孩子成長向前，29，94-102。
何榮桂 (1998)。從教育部之資訊教育推展策略看未來中小學資訊教育的願景。資訊與教育，68，2-13。
何榮桂 (2001)。如何實施九年一貫新課程之資訊教育。輯於國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所(主編)，電腦融入教學 (頁3-5)。台北市：國立教育資料館。
何榮桂 (2002)。台灣資訊教育現況與發展-兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育，87，28-29。
何榮桂、藍玉如 (2000)。落實教室電腦教師應具備之資訊素養。資訊與教育，77，23-27。
余清華(譯)(1994)。Esther, R. Steinberg著。電腦輔助教學：理論與實踐 (Computer-
assissted instruction : a synthesis of theory, practice, and technology)。台北：松崗。
林慧芬 (1998)。從幼教老師電腦網路使用現況與需求探討幼教老師專業成長的管道。幼兒教育年刊，10，91-106。
林子雯 (2001)。幼教新風潮-幼兒資訊教育。國教世紀，196，35-40。
吳德邦、馬秀蘭和徐志誠 (1998)。台灣中部地區幼稚園教師對電腦經驗與態度之研究，幼兒教育年刊，10，53-79。
吳明隆編著 (2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。台北：知城。
吳明清 (2002) 。教育研究-基本觀念與方法之分析。台北：五南。
吳珍萍 (2004)。台北市公立幼稚園教師資訊科技融入教學之研究。國立台北教育大學幼兒教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
邱貴發 (1990)。電腦整合教學的概念和發法。台灣教育，479，1-8。
邱瓊慧 (2001)。中小學資訊科技融入教學之實踐。資訊與教育，88，3-9。
邱皓政 (2006)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析 (第二版)。台北：五南。
陳裕隆 (2000)。電腦融入教學面臨的困難與挑戰。資訊與教育，77，29-35。
陳泰安 (2001年12月)。高雄市國中教師資訊素養之研究。論文發表於中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。2005年10月17日，擷取自 http://www.nknu.edu.tw/~gise/17years/F19.doc
陳泰安 (2002)。九年一貫課程教師資訊素養能力之出探。資訊與教育，91，50-59。
陳怡君 (2001)。國民小學職前教師電腦融入教學素養之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳怡玲 (2002)。從托育政策談幼教人員資訊素養-以台中縣立案托兒所為例。東海大學公共事務碩士在職專班未出版之碩士論文。
陳碧君 (2003)。開啟影音新〝視〞界。幼教資訊，154，19-25。
陳佳伶 (2003)。幼教老師之電腦素養與電腦使用現況分析研究-以高雄市公立幼稚園為例。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳秋吟 (2003)。國小低年級教師實施資訊科技融入教學歷程之研究。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
教育部 (1999)。國民中小學教師資訊基本素養指標。2005年9月29日，擷取自http://content.edu.tw/primary/info_edu/tp_tt/content/nerc-1/law/teacher_point.htm
崔夢萍 (2001)。國小教師電腦融入教學態度及其相關因素之研究。台北市立師範學院學報，32，169-194。
曾錦達 (2001)。電腦融入各科教學與師資培訓。國民教育，42(1)，27-31。
梁珀華 (1998)。幼兒與電腦－淺談電腦在幼兒教育上的應用。幼教資訊，97，47-49。
梁珀華、王靖宜、崔峨嵋 (2004，3月)。幼兒與科技：資訊科技融入幼稚園主題教學之研究。論文發表於嬰幼兒發展與保育學術研討會，台中縣。
曾錦達 (2001)。電腦融入各科教學與師資培訓。國民教育，42(1)，27-31。
葉燈超 (2003)。從教師資訊能力談「資訊科技融入學科教學」之困境及因應之道~以內湖高工為例。資訊與教育，95，69-79。
張奕華 (2003)。APA出版手冊第五版本─文末參考文獻之格式。教育資料與研究，51，106-114。
張奕華 (2001)。APA第五版文末參考文獻之格式：以網路資源為例。教育研究月刊，91，74-81。
張雅芳 (2003)。教師運用科技之相關因素探討。教育研究月刊，116，41-49。
張國恩 (1999)。資訊科技融入各科教學之內涵與實施，資訊與教育，72，2-9。
張國恩 (2002)。從學習科技的發展看資訊融入教學的內涵。北縣教育，41，16-25。
張雅芳 (2003)。教師運用科技之相關因素探討。教育研究月刊，116，41-49。
張慶勳 (2001)。國小推行資訊教育之現況與困境。國教天地，114，58-66。
溫嘉榮、吳明隆 (1999)。新時代資訊教育的理論與實務應用。台北：松崗。
劉明洲 (1994)。科技變動下國小教師應有的資訊素養。國教園地，49，35-39。
劉世雄 (2000)。國小教師運用資訊科技融入教學策略之探討，資訊與教育，78，60-66。
劉世雄 (2001)。資訊科技運用於教學的省思。教學科技與媒體，57，88-94。
廖衾儀 (2003)。電腦融入幼兒教育之探討。幼教資訊，154，11-18。
蔡禹亮 (1993)。國小高年級學童資訊素養教學之研究，教育社會學通訊，32，23-27。
盧秀琴、姚乃丹 (2001)。資訊教育融入國小課程的應用與省思。國民教育，42(6)，19-24。
謝琇玲、陳碧姬、郭閔然 (2002)。由教師資訊素養談資訊融入教學之道，資訊與教育，92，87-95。
顏龍源 (2000)。主題化的電腦融入教學概念。資訊與教育，80，32-40。
二、英文部分
Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (1998). The teaching with technology instrument: Effectively measuring where teachers are and planning for Staff development. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(8), 35-39.
Barakzai, M. D., & Fraser, D. (2005). The effect of demographic variables on achivement in and satisfaction with online coursework. Journal of Nursing Education 44(8), 373-380.
Brownell, G.., & Brownell, N. (1992). Designing tomorrow : Preparing teachers as change agents for the classroom of the future. Computers In the Schools, 8, 147-149.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003a). Strip mining for gold: Research and policy in educational technology-a response to " Fool`s Gold" [Electronic version]. Educational Technology Review, 11(1), 7–69. Retrieved September 21, 2005, from http://www.aace.org/pubs/etr/issue4/clements2.pdf
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003b). Young children and technology:What does the research say? Young Children, 58(6), 34-40.
Clements, D. H., Nastasi, B. K., & Swaminathan, S. (1993). Young children and computers: Crossroaads and directions from research. Young Children, 48(2),56-64.
Coughlin, E. (1999). Professional competencies for the digital age classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(3), 22-27.
Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology:Some things you should know. Learning and leading with Technology, 27(3), 10-12.
Davis, B. C., & Shade, D. D. (1994). Integrate, don`t isolate!Computers in early childhood curriculum. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED376991)
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second- order barriers to change:Strategies for technology integration. Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61.
Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5-13.
Healy, J. M. (1999). Failure to connect. New York: Touchstone.
Haugland, S. W. (2000). Early childhood classrooms in the 21st century: Using computers to maximize learning. Young Children, 55 (1), 12-18.
Johnson, D. L. (1997). Integration technology in the classroom:The time has come. Computers in The Schools, 13, 1-6.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for school. New Jersey:Merrill.
Levine, J. (1998). Planniing strategically for technology integration. In S. McNeil,
J. D. Price, S. Boger-MeHall, B. Robon, & J. Willis(Eds.),Technology and Teacher Education (pp.293-295). Charlottesville, VA:Association for the
Advancement of Computing on Education.
Michael, D. (2004, December 7). Development Risk:The Hazards of Computers in Childhood (chapter 2) .Retrieved from October 1, 2005, from
http://www.allianceforchildhood.net/projects/computers/computers_reports_fools_gold_2.htm
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation:A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (1996). NAEYC position statement: technology and young children-ages three through eight. Young children, (51)6, 11-16.
Shazia, M. (2000). Factors affecting teachers` use of information and communications
technology:a view of the literature. Journal of information Technology for
Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-341.
Sadera, W.A., & Hargrave, C. (1998). Preservice teachers` preconceptions about the role of the computer in Learning and Teaching. In J. Willis, B. Robin, & D.A. Wills(Eds.), Technology and Teacher Eduction (pp.799-804). Charlottesville, VA：Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Sheingold, K. (1986). The microcomputer as a symbolic medium. In P.F. Campell, & G. G. Fein (Eds.), Young children and microcomputers (pp.309-330). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sprague, D. & Dede, C. (1999). If I teach this way, am I doing my job?Constructivism
in the classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(1), 6-17.
Silvia, M. P. (2004). Measuring pre-kindergarten teachers` perceptions:Compliance with the high scope program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18(4)
, 321.
Williams, S. M., & Ogletree, S. M. (1992). Preschool children’s computer interest and competence: Effects of sex and gender role. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 135-143.
Veen, W. (1993).How teacher use computer in instructional practice:Four case studies in a dutch secondary school, Computer and Education, 21(2), 1-8.
Wang, C.S., & Li, C.C. (2000). An assessment framework for information technology integrated instruction. Paper presented at ICCE(Internatiomal Conference in Education)/ICCAI(International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction)2000.Taipei,Taiwan.
Youngman, M. & Harrison, C. (1998). Multimedia portables for teachers pilot project report. Coventry:British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
幼兒教育所
93157001
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093157001 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
