English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113869/144892 (79%)
Visitors : 51885909      Online Users : 560
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/32501
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32501


    Title: 家中手足比較訊息與手足關係之研究—以學業表現為例
    Authors: 呂信慧
    Contributors: 李美枝博士
    呂信慧
    Keywords: 社會比較
    學業比較
    手足關係
    自我評價維護模式
    集體主義
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 13:16:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文是探討同住一屋簷下的手足有學業表現差異時,父母基於要讓成績較差的孩子有進步動力與仿效對象,會對孩子說出比較話語(即明白指出優者和劣者,且要求劣者向優者學習的話),而對受比較者的影響。此種手足比較形式有別於西方社會常見的主動社會比較與被動-強迫式比較,乃命名之為「被動-第三者比較」。在上述前提下,研究者關心的問題有三個:(1)父母說比較話語的現實面(2)孩子在被動-第三者比較情境產生的認知和情緒反應(3)孩子在被動-第三者比較情境產生的認知、情緒反應與手足關係。研究者藉由Tesser理論形成相關假設,再加入華人文化的特色,期待研究結果貼近本土現象。
    本文共有兩個研究。研究一,採取問卷調查法(家中手足比較現象調查表)和訪談法,施測於國小生、國中生和高職生,以瞭解父母說比較話語和比較向度之盛行率、被動-第三者比較的話語內容和情境與優者和劣者的認知、情緒反應。研究二,利用研究一的訪談結果修改原先問卷,施測於國小生和國中生,進一步瞭解一般孩子於被動-第三者比較情境產生的認知和情緒反應,與被動-第三者比較情境產生的認知、情緒反應與手足關係。發現如下的重要研究結果:
    1約有七成的孩子曾聽父母說過被動-第三者比較話語。
    2「學業表現」和「行為規矩」是最常被比較的向度。
    3父母比較話語的多數內涵均是「明白指出優者,明白指出劣者,且要求劣者要學習優者」。
    4孩子於被動-第三者比較情境產生的認知與情緒反應,較西方測量的項目多。
    4優者表現出「勝不驕」的華人文化特色。
    5研究結果符合Tesser理論,均是優者越感到得意,手足關係越差,劣者則是越感到生氣,手足關係越差。
    6但是,若以具華人文化特色的認知和情緒反應預測手足關係,則研究結果呈現不同面貌。認知反應方面,孩子越接納父母的價值觀,且嫉妒手足擁有好的親子關係與學業表現,則比較訊息可能對手足關係不具威脅性。情緒反應方面,當孩子感到越強烈的他人焦點情緒,則比較訊息可能對手足關係較不具威脅性。研究者從文化二元論觀點解釋這個現象。並依據研究結果提供在應用層面和未來研究方向的建議。
    In Taiwan, parents used to compare their children’s academic performance with each other. The comparison includes “who is better in academic performance”, “who is worst in academic performance”, and “demanding the children who did poorly to learn their sibling who did better in academic performance”. Such comparison is different from social comparison and forced comparison, because the subject of the comparison is parent and the object of the comparison is children. And then, it is named passive-third comparison .
    In this thesis, I studied three questions. First, to investigate the prevalence of the passive-third comparison. And then, to understand children’s emotion and cognition in the passive-third comparison. In the last, how children’s emotion and cognition in the passive-third comparison to influence sibling’s relationship.
    I take self-evaluation maintenance model to explore these questions. Moreover, I conducted two studies to test the hypothesis.
    There are three main findings. First, the passive-third comparison in Taiwan are high prevalence. Second, children in the passive-third comparison feel more other-focused emotion(eg. shame and embarrassed) and think of other-focused thought. The last is children’s emotion and cognition in the passive-third comparison could influence sibling relationship. However, the findings are different from the past studies in USA. Therefore, to discuss these findings are from culture view.
    Reference: 第七章 參考文獻
    第一節 中文資料:
    王嘉琳(1995):〈知識基模對嫉妒情緒中的認知評估的影響〉。台大心研所碩士論文。
    中國時報(1997):〈寇世斌對寇世勳又愛又恨〉。
    中國時報(2000):〈一人一條路:成敗得失 難說〉。
    朱瑞玲,劉蓉果:〈文化與日常生活情緒的認知評估〉。「情感、情緒與文化」學術研討會,中央研究院民族學研究所主辦,台北南港,2000年9月29日至30日
    李美枝(1998):〈手足與朋友關係的內涵與功能〉。台北市:行政院國科會。
    林正山(1997):〈台灣升大學重考生的自我平價與情緒困擾〉。政大心研所碩士論文。
    林以正(1999):〈華人的社會比較:比較什麼?與誰比較?為何比較?〉。見楊國樞(主編):《本土心理學研究》,93-125。台北:桂冠。
    林惠雅(1999):〈母親信念、教養目標與教養行為(一):內涵意義之探討〉。見葉光輝(主編):《家庭心理學:系統思維觀點的探討與應用》,143-179。台北:五南出版社。
    余巧芸(1996):〈兒童之手足關係研究(I) : 知覺、期望、問題與策略〉。台北市:行政院國科會科資中心。
    余巧芸(1998):〈少年犯罪矯治機構兒童、青少年的手足關係研究紀要—以彰化少年輔育院為對象〉。輔仁學誌,28,87-118。
    周婉湘(2000):〈父母以負向言語管教之情境及孩子的因應策略 大學生的文字回溯報告〉。台大心研所碩士論文。
    洪福建(1992):〈大學生與異性交往中的自我差距與情緒經驗〉。台大心研所碩士論文。
    胡先縉(1988):〈中國人的面子觀〉。見黃光國(主編):《中國人的權力遊戲》。台北:巨流。
    徐富珍(1998):〈社會比較的效果:對個人情感、認知及行為之影響研究〉。政大心研所博士論文。
    梁珪瑜(1996):〈父母說負向言語之動機及影響 父母與國中生之觀點的差異比較〉。台大心研所碩士論文。
    曹中瑋(1996):〈大專學生嫉妒心理之分析〉。見楊國樞(主編):《本土心理學研究》,72-112。台北:桂冠。
    黃光國(1988):〈科舉制度下的權力遊戲:《儒林外史》中「范進中舉」的社會行為分析〉。見黃光國(主編):《中國人的權力遊戲》,141-167。台北:巨流。
    楊中芳(1989):〈試論中國人的道德發展:一個自我發展的觀點〉。見楊國樞(主編):《中國人的心理與行為》,1-47。台北:遠流出版公司。
    楊中芳(1991):〈試論中國人的自己:理論與研究方向〉。見楊中芳、高尚仁(主編):《中國人•中國心—人格與社會篇》,94-145。台北:遠流出版公司。
    楊國樞(1988):〈中國人的性格與行為:形成及蛻變〉。見楊國樞(主編):《中國人的蛻變》,373-418。台北:桂冠。
    楊國樞(1992):〈中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點〉。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):《中國人的心理與行為—理念及方法篇》,87-129。台北:桂冠。
    楊國樞(1993):〈我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學?〉。見楊國樞(主編):《本土心理學的開展》。台北:桂冠。
    楊國樞(1996):〈社會取向與個我取向心理與行為的家庭教化歷程〉。台北:行政院國科會。
    雷庚玲(1997):〈雙親對子女的言語傷害:一、父母說負向言語之分類架構及本土盛行率〉。台北:行政院國科會。
    熊秉真(2000):〈環境的堆砌與塑造〉。見熊秉真(著):《童年憶往—中國孩子的歷史》,79-128。台北:麥田出版。
    廖玲燕(2000):〈台灣本土社會讚許量表之編制及其心理歷程分析〉。台大心研所碩士論文。
    蔡芬芳(1997):〈自尊對自利歸因的影響:自我概念內容結構的交互作用〉。台大心研所碩士論文。
    第二節 英文資料:
    Beach, S. R. & Tesser, A.(1995). Self-esteem and the extended self-evaluation maintenance model: The self in social context. In M. H. Kernis(Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. New York: Plenum Press.
    Beach, S. R. H., Tesser, A., Fincham, F. D., Jones, D. J., Johnson, D., and Whitaker, D. J. (1998). Pleasure and pain in doing well, together: An investigation of performance-related affect in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 923-938.
    Brody, D. H., Stoneman, Z., and McCoy, J. K. (1994). Forecasting sibling relationships in early adolescence from child temperaments and family processes in middle childhood. Child development, 65, 771-784.
    Campbell, J. D. & Tesser, A. (1985). Self evaluation maintenance processes in relationships. In S. L. Wheeler & D. Perlman(Eds.), Understanding personal relationships(Vol. 1)(pp. 107-135). London: Sage.
    Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York: Plenum Press.
    Corter, C.,Abramovitch, R., and Pepler, D. J. (1983). The role of the mother in sibling interaction. Child development, 54, 1599-1605.
    Dunn, J. (1992). Sisters and Brothers: Current issues in developmental research. In F. Boer & J. Dunn(Eds.), Children’s sibling relationships-Developmental and clinical issue(pp. 1-18). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., and Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, The handbook of social psychology(pp. 915-979).
    Harkness, S. & Super, C. (1995). Culture and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein(Ed.), Handbook of parenting(Vol 2): Biology and ecology of parenting(pp. 211-234).
    Kowal A. & Kramer L. (1997). Children’s Understanding of Parential Treatment. Child Development ,68 ,113-126.
    Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., and Kurokawa, M.(2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and emotion, 14(1), 93-124.
    Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R.(2000). The Pursuit of Happiness and the Realization of Sympathy: Culture Pattern of self, Social relations, and well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh(Eds). Culture and subjective well-being, p.113-161. Cambridge, Mass..
    Leung, A. K. D. & Robson, Wm. L. M. (1991). Sibling rivalry. Clinical pediatrics, 30(5), 314-317.
    Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self : implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
    Mesquita, B. & Frijda, N. H.(1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological bulletin, 112(2), 179-204.
    Ruble, D. N., Feldman, N. S. &Boggiano, A. K. (1976). Social comparison between young children in achievement situations. Developmental Psychology, 12, 192-197.
    Ruble N. Diane, Feldman S. Nina, and Boggiano K. Ann (1980).’Developmental Analysis of the Role of Social Comparison In Self-Evaluation’ Developmental psychology, 16 ,105-115.
    Russell, J. A. & Yik, M. S. M.(1996). Emotion among the Chinese. In M. H. Bond(Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford University Press.
    Santrock W. J., Readdick A. C., and Pollard L. (1980). Social Comparison Processes In Sibling And Peer Relation. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 137 , 91-107.
    Salovey P. & Rodin J. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 780-792.
    Salovey P.(1991). Social-comparison processes in envy and jealousy. In I. Suls & T. A. Wiles (Eds.), Social comparison: contemporary theory and research(pp. 261-286). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.
    Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C.(1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813-838.
    Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C.(1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 475-488.
    Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Family niches. In F. J. Salloway(Ed.), Born to rebel : birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives 1st ed(pp. 83-118). New York : Pantheon Books.
    Schunk, D. H. & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influences on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 77(3), 313-322.
    Scherer, K. R.(1997). The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 902-922.
    Tesser, A. (1980). Self-esteem maintenance in family dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 77-91.
    Tesser, A. & Paulhus, D. (1983). The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation maintenance strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 672-682.
    Tesser, A. (1986). Some effects of self-evaluation maintenance on cognition and action. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins(Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp.435-464). New York: Guilford Press.
    Tesser, A., Millar, M., and Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: the pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 49-61.
    Tesser, A. & Collins, J. E.(1988). Emotion in social reflection and comparison situations: intuitive, systematic, and exploratory approaches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 695-709.
    Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 21), 181-225.
    Tesser, A., Pilkington, C. J., and Mcintosh, W. D. (1989). Self-evaluation maintenance and the mediational role of emotion: the perception of friends and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 442-456.
    Tesser, A.(1990). Smith and Ellsworth’s appraisal model of emotion: A replication, extension, and test. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 16(2), 210-223.
    Tesser, A. (1991a). Social versus clinical approaches to self psychology: The self-evaluation maintenance model and Kohutian object relations theory. In R. C. Curtis(Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology(pp. 257-281). New York: Guilford Press.
    Tesser, A. (1991b). Emotion in social comparison and reflection processes. In I. Suls & T. A. Wiles (Eds.), Social comparison: contemporary theory and research(pp. 117-145). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.
    Tesser, A.(1999). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In R. F. Baumeister(Ed.), The self in social psychology(pp. 446-460). Psychology Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    88752011
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0887520112
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52011201.pdf39KbAdobe PDF21037View/Open
    52011202.pdf40KbAdobe PDF2728View/Open
    52011203.pdf50KbAdobe PDF21030View/Open
    52011204.pdf44KbAdobe PDF2816View/Open
    52011205.pdf203KbAdobe PDF22547View/Open
    52011206.pdf103KbAdobe PDF21775View/Open
    52011207.pdf45KbAdobe PDF21604View/Open
    52011208.pdf204KbAdobe PDF2904View/Open
    52011209.pdf219KbAdobe PDF21190View/Open
    52011210.pdf64KbAdobe PDF2929View/Open
    52011211.pdf56KbAdobe PDF21422View/Open
    52011212.pdf41KbAdobe PDF2744View/Open
    52011213.pdf46KbAdobe PDF2969View/Open
    52011214.pdf120KbAdobe PDF2911View/Open
    52011215.pdf50KbAdobe PDF2937View/Open
    52011216.pdf117KbAdobe PDF2902View/Open
    52011217.pdf51KbAdobe PDF2969View/Open
    52011218.pdf118KbAdobe PDF21225View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback