政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/32500
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51630319      Online Users : 535
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32500


    Title: 自我建構與主觀幸福感：自尊與相融和諧的角色
    Self-construals and Subjective Well-being: The Roles of Self-esteem and Fitting Harmony
    Authors: 簡晉龍
    Contributors: 李美枝
    簡晉龍
    Keywords: 自我建構
    獨立自我
    相依自我
    自尊
    相融和諧
    主觀幸福感
    self-construals
    independent self
    interdependent self
    self-esteem
    fitting-harmony
    subjective well-being
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 13:15:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 人生在世，無不期望幸福，而目標的達成是一個人幸福的來源。從文化與自我相互建構的觀點，不同文化下的人擁有不同自我建構（獨立自我vs.相依自我），而追求不同的目標，因此其幸福感的來源基礎應當有所不同。過去的文獻都指出，華人社會是一個集體主義的社會（相對於北美的個人主義），華人的自我是一種相依式的自我；與他人的相融和諧應當是華人重要的幸福感來源。然而，筆者假設：在文化交流頻繁的情況下，當代華人應當同時具有兩種自我建構的特色，一方面，獨立自我可能透過整體自尊而獲得其幸福感，相依自我則以與他人的相融和諧為其幸福感來源。筆者也對自尊的概念作一初步的釐清，認為相融和諧也可以成為個人整體自尊來源，進而影響個人主觀幸福。筆者讓425位參與者接受自我建構（包括獨立自我與相依自我）、整體自尊、相融和諧、以及主觀幸福感（包括生活滿意、正向情緒、負向情緒）等量表的施測，結果發現：當代以台灣為代表的華人，確實兼有相依自我與獨立自我建構的特色，而徑路分析的結果也支持了前述的假設。本研究也發現：自我建構量表的因素分析結果，獨立自我的部分可以抽成兩個因素，一為自我表達，一為追求獨立；進行階層迴歸分析後，發現除了相依自我外，善於自我表達也是有助於與人相融和諧的因素。最後，筆者除了對本研究的反省與限制作一討論外，也提出一些未來可能的研究方向。
    Subjective well-being (SWB) or happiness, which is acquired from achieving one’s goals, is the ultimate motivator for all humans. The theory of self-construals states that people from different cultures have different self-construls (independent vs. interdependent), and pursue different cultural imperatives or everyday life tasks (goals). It has been pointed out that Chinese people have interdependent self-construl, which emphasizes fitting in and maintaining harmonious relationships with important others. However, the author hypothesized that the two views of the self might coexist in Chinese people in Taiwan in the face of the vast-scale cultural invasion from the West. The independent self was proposed to be the predictor of SWB, acting through the mediating variable of global self-esteem, whereas the interdependent self to be predictor of SWB, acting through the mediating variable of fitting-harmony (which means fitting in and maintaining harmonious relationships with important others). It was also hypothesized that fitting-harmony might be an important domain on which self-esteem is contingent; therefore, self-esteem is expected to mediate the effect on SWB for those higher in fitting-harmony.
    425 participants completed the self-construl scale, self-esteem scale, fitting-harmony scale, and SWB scale. It was found that the two self-views coexist in Chinese people in Taiwan and the results of path analyses supported the hypotheses described above. Moreover, the result of exploratory factor analysis of self-construal scale showed that the items for independent self could be divided into two factors: self-expression and independence-pursuit. In addition to interdependent self, self-expression was also a significant predictor of fitting-harmony. The results, limitations, and future directions were discussed.
    Reference: 李美枝（1993）：〈從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限〉。《本土心理學研究》（台北），1期，頁242-266。
    李美枝（2002）：〈中國人社會取向的本土契合度〉。從「現代到本土」學術研討會宣讀論文。
    吳經熊（1983）：《內在悅樂之泉源》。台北：東大。
    韋政通（1986）：《中國的智慧》。台北：水牛。
    徐富珍（1998）：〈社會比較的效果:對個人情感、認知、及行為之影響研究〉。國立政治大學心理系博士論文。
    翁淑緣（1985）：〈青少年的自尊以及相關變項的研究〉。《政大教育與心理研究》，8，頁79-114。
    許烺光（1981）：《中國人與美國人》。徐隆德（1988）（譯）。台北：巨流。
    陸洛（1997）：〈中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討〉。《國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文與社會科學》。八卷，一期，頁115-137。
    陳正昌、程炳林（1998）：《SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量上的運用》。台北：五南。
    黃光國（1988）：〈人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲〉。見黃光國（編）《中國人的權力遊戲》，頁7-55。台北：巨流。
    楊中芳（1991）：〈試論中國人的「自己」：理論與研究方向〉。見楊中芳、高尚仁（編）《中國人、中國心——人格與社會篇》。台北：遠流出版公司。
    楊中芳（1994）：〈中國人真是集體主義的嗎？是論中國文化的價值體系〉。楊國樞（編）《中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點》。台北：桂冠。
    楊國樞（1980）：〈生活素質的心理學觀〉。《中華心理學刊》，卷22，二期，頁11-24。
    楊國樞（1988a）：〈中國人的性格與行為：形成及蛻變〉。楊國樞（著）：《中國人的蛻變》。台北：桂冠。
    楊國樞（1988b）：〈台灣民眾之性格與行為的變遷〉。楊國樞（著）：《中國人的蛻變》。台北：桂冠。
    楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華（1992）：〈中國人的個人傳統性與現代性：概念與測量〉。楊國樞、黃光國（編）：《中國人的心理與行為（一九八九）》。台北：桂冠。
    楊國樞（1993a）：〈中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點〉。楊國樞、余安邦（編）：《中國人的心理與行為—理念及方法篇（一九九二）》。台北：桂冠。
    楊國樞（1993b）：〈傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存？〉。楊國樞（編）：《中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點》。台北：桂冠。
    樊景立、鄭伯壎（1997）：〈華人自評式績效考核中的自謙偏差：題意、謙虛價值及自尊的影響〉。《中華心理學刊》，卷39，2期，頁103-118。
    錢憲民（1996）：《快樂的哲學：中國人生哲學史》。台北：紅葉文化。
    Argyle, M. (1987). 施建彬、陸洛譯（1997）：《幸福心理學》，台北：巨流。
    Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D.(1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.
    Baron, R. & Byrne, D. (2000). Social Psychology(9th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
    Baumeister, R. F.(1993). Preface. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum.
    Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (1995). Self-esteem and the extended self-evaluation maintenance model. In H. M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 145-170). New York: Plenum.
    Blascovich, J. & Tomaka, J.(1990). Measures of self-esteem. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightman(Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes(pp. 161-194). New York: Academic Press.
    Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
    Brewer, M. B., & Gardner W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.
    Burger, J. M. (1993). 林宗鴻譯（1997）：《人格心理學》，台北：揚智。
    Bushman, B. J. & Baumeister, R. F.(1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229.
    Buss, D. M. (2000). The evolution of happiness. American psychologist. 55(1), 15-23.
    Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American psychologist, 31, 117-124.
    Campbell, J. D., & Lavallee, L. F. (1993).Who am I ? The role of self-concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low self-esteem. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp.3-20). New York: Plenum.
    Cantor, N. & Sanderson, C. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108(3), 593-623.
    Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
    Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
    Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(1), 130-141.
    Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
    Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
    Goodwin, C. J. (1995). 鄭默、鄭日昌譯（2002）：《心理學研究—方法與設計》。台北：五南。
    Heatherton, T. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2000). Interpersonal evaluations following threats to self: Role of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 725-736.
    Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, S. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599-615.
    Heine, S. J. & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the west feel more invulnerable than the east? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 595-607.
    Heine, S. J. & Lehman, D. R. (1997a). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 389-400.
    Heine, S. J. & Lehman, D. R. (1997b). Cultural construction of self-enhancement: an examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1268-1283.
    Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.
    Heine, S. J. (2001). An exploration of cultural variation in self-enhancing and self-improving motivations. Invited article to appear in the Nebraska Symposium of Motivation, (2001).
    Hwang, K. K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical constructionand methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30(2), 155-178.
    Kashima, E. S. & Hardie, E. A. (2000). The development and validation of the relational, individual, and collective self-aspects (RIC) scale. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 3(1), 19-48.
    Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245-1267.
    Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (2000). The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M.(1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
    Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., Bouchler, H. C., Maslach, C., & Gan, Y. (2002). The construct of individuation: More complex in collectivist than in individualist cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 300-310.
    Lu, L. (1995). The relationship between subjective well-being and psychosocial variables in Taiwan. The journal of social psychology, 135(3), 351-357.
    Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997a). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(2), 181-187.
    Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997b). Personality and happiness: Is mental health a mediator? Personality and Individual Differences,22(2), 249-256.
    Lu, L. (1999). Personal or environmental causes of happiness: A longitudinal analysis. The journal of social psychology. 139(1), 79-90.
    Lu, L., Robin, G., Kao, S. F., Weng, T. H., Hu, C. H., Chern, J. G., Huang, S. W., & Shih, J. B. (2001). Two ways to achieve happiness: When the East meets the West. Personality and individual differences, 30, 1161-1174.
    Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(3), 616-628.
    Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational process in well-being. American psychologist, 56(3), 239-249.
    Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
    Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
    Markus, H. R., Mullally, P., & Kitayama, S. (1997). Selfways: Diversity in modes of cultural participation. In U. Neisser & D. Jopling(Eds.), The conceptual self in context: Culture, experience, self-understanding (pp.13-61). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-contruals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310.
    Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of personality, 67(1), 157-184.
    Oishi, S. (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals and cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Oishi, S., & Diener, Ed. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 27(12), 1674-1682.
    Pavot, W., Diener, E., Randall, C., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of personality assessment, 57(1), 149-161.
    Pavot, W. & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life sale. Psychological assessment, 5(2), 164-172.
    Ratner, C. (1993). A sociohistorical psychological approach to contextualism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.). Varieties of Scientific Contexualism(pp. 169-186). Reno, NV: Context Press.
    Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., & Lee, H. K. (1996). Variarions in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: conformatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 1037-1054.
    Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.
    Seligman, M. E. P., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., & Gillham, J. (1995). The Optimistic Child. New York: Harper Collins.
    Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
    Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
    Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., & Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpackaging cultural influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(3), 315-341.
    Suh, E. M. (2000). Self, the hyphen between culture and subjective well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Takano, Y., & Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on individualism / collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311-341.
    Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
    Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkwowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York: Academic press.
    Tesser, A. (1991). Emotion in social comparison and reflection processes. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 117-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
    Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649-655.
    Trafimow, D., Silverman, E. S., Fan, R. M., & Law, J. S. F. (1997). The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the private self and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(1), 107-123.
    Trianis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
    Triandis, H. C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon, (Eds.). Individualism and collectivism: Theory , method, and applications (pp.41-51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Uleman, J. S., Rhee, E., Bardoliwalla, N., Semin, Gun, & Toyama, M. (2000). The relational self: Closeness to ingroups depends on who they are, culture, and the type of closeness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 1-17.
    Yang, K. S. (1996). The Psychological Transformation of the Chinese People as a Result of Societal Modernization. The Handbook of Chinese Psychology(Vol. 31, pp.479-498). Hong Kong, Oxford University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    88752009
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0887520091
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52009101.pdf8KbAdobe PDF21141View/Open
    52009102.pdf11KbAdobe PDF21027View/Open
    52009103.pdf13KbAdobe PDF21077View/Open
    52009104.pdf11KbAdobe PDF21077View/Open
    52009105.pdf18KbAdobe PDF23941View/Open
    52009106.pdf58KbAdobe PDF25981View/Open
    52009107.pdf67KbAdobe PDF22142View/Open
    52009108.pdf35KbAdobe PDF21318View/Open
    52009109.pdf24KbAdobe PDF21604View/Open
    52009110.pdf28KbAdobe PDF22361View/Open
    52009111.pdf37KbAdobe PDF22335View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback