| Reference: | 中文部份
王振源（2001）。兩岸軟體開發人員創造力影響因素比較之探討。桃園：中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
王欽毅（2002）。兒童期初發型與青春期初發型品行疾患之男性受刑人在性格與行為上的比較。台南：成功大學行為醫學研究所碩士論文。
孔維愉（2004）。殯葬禮儀服務人員之人格特質、殯葬管理條例知覺、工作生活品質、專業承諾、工作倦怠、工作士氣與留職意願之關聯性研究—以台北市殯葬禮儀服務人員為例。嘉義：南華大學生死學研究所碩士論文。
朱瑞玲、李黛蒂（1983）。評定式愛式性格量表之初步修訂報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，30，40-52。
朱慶龍（2002）。五大人格特質、工作價值觀和工作滿意三者相互關係之研究。台北：政治大學心理系研究所碩士論文。
江雪萍（2004）。護理人員人格特質與自我壓力感受之相關性探討-以中部地區ICU護理人員為例。台中：中國醫藥大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
江學華（2002）。國籍飛航機師組織文化、人格特質與飛航安全績效之關係研究台南：成功大學工業管理科學系碩士論文。
李明峰（2000）。性格特質、情緒智力與主管領導對緊急救難組織彈性績效影響之研究－以台灣地區消防機關為例。高雄：義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
李建道（2001）。創造力人格、工作環境認知與研發績效關聯性研究。台中：中興大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
李秋燕（1999）。台灣企業外派大陸人員人格特質、生涯發展傾向、駐外動機及駐外適應對留任意願之研究。高雄：中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
沈聰益（2002）。人格五因素模式預測保險業務員銷售績效的效度─NEO-PI-R量表之跨文化檢驗與人際特質架構之實證探討。新竹：交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
林一真（1985）。於不同文化慎用強迫選擇式人格量表。中國測驗年會學會測驗年刊，32，113-124。
周惠莉（2002）。五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究。桃園：中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
周惠莉（2002）。五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究。桃園：中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
胡家欣（1999）。大學生的休閒認知，涉入與體驗-兼論人格特質的影響。高雄：高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文。
孫君儀（2001）。主題遊樂園基層服務人員人格特質、情緒智力與工作表現關係之研究－以劍湖山世界為例。嘉義：南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳江水（2002）。國中學生家庭環境人格特質社會技巧與學業成就之相關研究。彰化：彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳彰儀、李明霓、顏志龍（2004）。網路應徵者填寫測驗的作假行為：情境因素與測驗類型的影響。中華心理學刊，46，4，349-359。
陳彰儀、胡昌亞（2005）。網路測驗情境中觸發類型與測驗目的對作假意圖與人格測驗分數的影響。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫：未出版。
陳廣山（1999）。人格特質與人口統計變數對網路購物知覺風險、降低知覺風險策略之影響。新竹：交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
張軒正（2002）。在電腦施測情境中，促發、警告、時間限制對降低社會期許之效果。台北：政治大學心理系碩士論文。
廖玲燕（2000）。台灣本土社會讚許量表之編製及其心理歷程分析。台北：台灣大學心理系碩士論文。
盧智勤（2003）。空軍基地後勤部隊之人格特質、組織文化及領導行為與工作滿足對飛安績效影響之研究－以空軍新一代戰機部隊為例。嘉義：南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
蕭翰澤（2004）。研發人員人格特質與對主管向下影響策略期望關係之研究-以台灣地區TFT-LCD產業為例。台中：朝陽科技大學業工程與管理系研究所碩士論文。
鍾紀瑋（2003）。駕駛人風險行為與人格特質對汽車車體險損失影響之研究。台北：銘傳大學經濟學系保險經營與金融經濟碩士在職專班碩士論文。
簡嘉誠（2000）。領導風格型態、創造力人格特質搭配對組織承諾與創新績效影響關係之研究桃園：中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部份
Baron H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49-56.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium:what do we know and where do we go next? Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
Bass, B. M. (1957). Faking by sales applicants of a forced choice personality inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 403-404.
Bartram, D. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 25-39.
Berkshire, J. R., Highland, R.W. (1953). Forced-choice performance rating:A methodological study.Pesonnel Psychology, 6, 355-378.
Bernardin, H. J. (1987). Development and validation of a forced choice scale to measure job-related discomfort among customer service representatives. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 162-173.
Bowen, C. C., Martin, B. A. & Hunt, S. T. (2002). A Comparison of Ipsative and normative Approaches for Ability to Control Faking in Personality Questionnaires. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10(3), 240-259.
Cattell, R. B. (1944). Psychological measurement normative,ipsative,interactive.
Psychological Review, 51, 292-303.
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. H uman Performance, 18, 267-307.
Clemans, W. V. (1966). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs, 14, 1-56.
Closs, S. J. (1996). On the factoring and interpretation of ipsative data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 41-47
Cornwell, J. M. & Dunlap, W. P. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 61, 89-100.
Dunnette, M. D., McCartney, J., Carlson, H. C. & Kirchener, W. K. (1962). A study of faking behavior on forced-choice self-description checklist. Personnel Psychology, 15, 13–24.
Gordon, L. V. (1951). Validities of the forced-choice and questionnaire methods of
personality measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 407-412.
Graham, K. E., McDaniel, M. A., Douglas, E. F. & Snell, A. F. (2002). Biodata Validity Decay and Score Inflation with Faking: Do Item Attributes Explain Variance Across Items? Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 573-592
Harland, L. K. (2002). Forced-choice personality tests in management development contexts: an experimental study of test-taker reactions. Midwest Academy of Management Meetings.
Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L.& McCloy, R. A.(2006).Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 9-24.
Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measuresPsychological Bulletin, 14, 167-184.
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209-244.
Humphreys, L. G.. (1957). Characteristics of type concepts with special reference to Sheldon’s typology. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 218-228.
Jackson, D. N., & Payne, I. R. (1963). Personality scale for shallow affect. Psychological Reports, 13, 687–698.
Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13, 371-388.
Johnson, C. E., Wood, R. & Blinkhorn, S. F. (1988). Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 153-162.
Layon, R. I. (1966). A free-choice version of the EPPS. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 202-205.
McCloy, R. A., Heggestad, E. D., Reeve, C. L. (2005). A silk purse from the sow`s ear: retrieving normative information from multidimensional forced-choice items. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 222-248.
McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive
measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 812-821.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Balanced Inventory of Desirability Responding(BIDR) reference manual for version 6.
Phillips, J. M. (1998). Effect of realistic job previews on multiple organizational
outcomes: A meta-analysis . Academy of Management Journal, 41, 673-690.
Premack, S. L. & Wanous, J. P. (1985). A mata-analysis of realistic job preview Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 706-719.
Radcliffe, J. A. (1963). Some properties of ipsative score matrices and their relevance for some current interest tests. Australian Journal of Psychology, 15, 1-11.
Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 754-775.
Rossé, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L. & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634–644.
Saville, P. & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 219-238.
Tenopyr, M. L. (1988). Artificial reliability of forced-choice sca\\es. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 749-751.
Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Dyomina, N. V., Morewitz, C. L. & Reilly, R. R.(2006). Forced-Choice Personality Tests: A Measure of Personality and Cognitive Ability? Human Performance, 19, 175-200.
Villanova, P., H., Bernardin, J., Johnson, D. L. & Dahmus, S. A.(1994). The validity of a measure of job compatibility in the prediction of job performance and turnover of motion picture theater personnel Personnel Psychology, 47, 73-90.
Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D. S.(1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement,59, 197-210.
Wigfield, D. & Janman, K. (1991). Seeing ourselves as others see us. Guidance and Assessment Review, 7(5), 3-5. |
