Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31878
|
| Title: | 兩性平權之研究─以女性警官陞遷為例 |
| Authors: | 王芳美 |
| Contributors: | 孫本初博士
楊永年博士
王芳美 |
| Keywords: | 女警官
陞遷
玻璃天花板
兩性平權
Female police officers
Promotion
Glass-ceiling effects
Gender equality |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-14 12:27:16 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著婦女就業情形的普遍，兩性議題也愈顯得重要，欲落實兩性平權，法律是最根本之道，從近年政府制定「兩性工作平等法」及「性別平等教育法」對於推進兩性平權，均具有劃時代的意義。所謂「玻璃天花板效應」（glass ceiling effect），就是一種不易被察覺的、人為的或組織的偏差所造成的無形阻礙，使得女性在事業生涯方面，無法獲得與男性公平競爭的機會。本研究藉由對玻璃天花板、陞遷、性別角色等相關理論與實務之檢視，對我國女性警官陞遷潛藏之問題進行探討，期能依據研究結果，提出一些建議，以供女性警官個人及有關機關參考。
在研究方法方面，本研究係採用問卷調查法為主，以我國女性警官為普測對象，取得回收有效問卷525份。研究問卷內容包含影響陞遷之「社會心理」構面、「歧視偏差」構面、「系統結構」構面與「陞遷發展」構面及女性警官個人基本資料等量表。問卷調查所得資料運用電腦統計套裝軟體SPSS for Windows 10.0版，以描述性統計分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及Pearson積差相關等統計分析方法進行資料處理：
本研究經由實證分析之後，歸納結論如下：
一、就各構面之認知程度而言：其同意程度依次為影響陞遷之「社會心理」構面，其次是「陞遷發展」構面，再次是「歧視偏差」構面，最後為「系統結構」構面。
二、就各構面之認知差異情形而言：在「社會心理」構面上，因年齡、婚姻、子女數、教育程度、警官年資、職務官階、服務單位、有無進修、現任職位及代理主管的不同而有顯著差異存在；在「歧視偏差」構面上，因婚姻、職務官階、工作內容、現任職位及代理主管的不同而有顯著差異存在；在「系統結構」構面上，因工作照顧、教育程度、職務官階、有無進修及代理主管的不同而有顯著差異存在；在「陞遷發展」構面上，因有無進修、現任職位及代理主管的不同而有顯著差異存在。
三、就各構面之相關分析而言：本研究所探討的四個構面的關連非常強，不論是整體或是其各個的因素之間均達顯著水準的正相關。
With the rise of female employment rate in workplace, gender issues have been of higher importance in recent years. To realize gender equality in workplace, legislation serves to be the most fundamental solutions of all. Following the enactment of the Gender Equality in Employment Law and the Gender Equality Education Law, Taiwan female employees have seen landmark on their workplace status. But the so-called glass-ceiling effects, are less perceivable, man-made or organizational bias still persist, which deprive female employees of an equal opportunity as those bestowed on their male counterparts. In this study, the author will discuss the obstacles posed for Taiwan’s female police officers in their quest organizational positions based on the observation from the theoretical and practical sides of glass-ceiling effects, promotional and gender roles, and will further propose suggestions for improvements for female police officers.
Methodologically, this study uses questionnaire survey research, with female police officers as subjects and results in 525 successful samples. Contents of the questionnaire include facets of promotional importance, such as socio-psychology, discrimination bias, systematic structures, promotional development and personal information. With the analysis of descriptive statistics, t-test, one way ANOVA and the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient supported by SPSS for Windows 10.0, information gathered from the results of questionnaire is processed:
After empirical analysis, our conclusions are:
1.On the acknowledgement level of each facet: respondents find most of their agreements on the importance of obstacles to their promotion, are socio-psychology, promotional development, discrimination bias and systematic structure.
2.On the perceptional difference of each facet: on the socio-psychological aspect, there are differences according to the age, marital status, children number, educational level, years of working as police officer, rank, current position, deputy supervisor, further education. On the discrimination bias facet, there are differences according to marital status, rank, job description, current position and deputy supervisor. On the systematic structure facet, the differences exists among respondents of different educational level, rank, further education and deputy supervisor. On the promotional development facet, there are differences according to further education, current position and deputy supervisor.
3.On the correlation analysis of each facet: the four facets discussed in the study has strong correlations, no matter individual factor or integral whole has all reached a high standard level of positive relationship. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
刁筱華譯
1996（Rosemarie Tong），《女性主義思潮》，台北：時報。
公務人員終身學習入口網站電子報
2004，第八期（http//lifelonglearn.cpa.gov.tw）。
王大方
1996，《玻璃天花板：管理女性v.s女性領導》，台北：時報文化。
王素琴
1996，《兩性工作平等立法之淺探》，勞資關係月刊，第167期。
王麗容
1995，《婦女與社會政策》，台北，巨流圖書公司。
Dreher,G.& Ash,R.A.
1990 “A Comparative Study of Mentoring among Men and Women in Managerial, Professional, and Technical Positions.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75（5）.
Fagenson,E.A.
1990 “At the Heart of Women in Management Research: Theoretical and Methodological approaches and their Biases.” Journal of Business Ethics, 9（4-5）,267-274.
Gibelman,M.
2000 “The Nonprofit Sector and Gendert Discrimination: A Preliminary Investigation into the Glass Ceiling.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10（3）.
Goldstein,E.L.＆Gilliam,P.
1990 Training System Issues in the Year 2000.American Psycbologist.
Guy,M. E. “Women in Management.”In S.W.Hayes & R.C.Kearney（eds.）
1990 Public Personnel Administration:Preblem and Prospects, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.
行政院青年輔導委員會
Hull,R.& Umansky P.H.
1996 “An Examination of Gender Stereotyping as an Explanation for Vertical Job Segregation in Public Accounting.”Accounting organizations and society,22（6）.
Kanter,R. Moss
1977 Men and Women of the Corporation.,New York：Basic Books.
Karsten, M.F.
1994 Management and Gender:Issues and Attitudes.Westport:An Imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group,Inc.
Levesque,J.D.
1989 People in Organizations：A Guide Solving Critical Human Resource Problems.Sacramento,Calif：American Chamber of Commerce Publishers.
Lynch,M.＆Post,K.
1996 “What Glass Ceiling?” Public Interest,124.
2003，《飛雁專案》，青輔會九十二年度女性培力計畫。
Lynch,K.K.
1989 Grounding research in experience：A Case Study of Women Administrators.The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Maslow A.H.
1943 “A Theory of Human Motivation,”Psychological Review,July：320-396.
McClelland,D.C.,Atkinson,J.W.,Clark,R.A.＆Lowell,E.L.
1953 The Achievement Motive,New York：Appleton-Century-Corfts.
Miriam D.& Woodward,D.
1998 Negotiating the Glass Ceiling, London: Falmer Press.
Morgan,L.A.
1998 “Glass-Ceiling Effect or Cohort Effect? A Longitudinal Study of the Gender Earnings Gap for Eagineers, 1982 to 1989.” American Sociological Review,63.
行政院主計處
Morrisn,A.M.,White,R.P.,Van Velsor,E.
1992 The Center for Creative Leadership,Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach the Top of America,s Largest Corporation? Updated Ed.,Reading, Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Moseley-Braun,C.
1994 “Affirmative Action and the Glass Ceiling.”The Black Scholar,25,p.p.7-15.
Naff,K.C.
1992 “Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling.”:A Career Guide for Women in Government National Capital,Area Chapter,American Society for Public Administration.,NCAC/ASPA Washington,DC.
Naff,K.C.
1993 “A Glass Ceiling Found.”Public Manager,22（1）.
Naff,K.C.
1997 “Colliding with a Glass Ceiling: Barriers to the Advancement of Women and Minorities.”in Carolyn Ban & Norma M. Riccucci（eds.）Public Personnel Management:Current Concerns-Future Challenges 2nd ed.,Longman Pub Group.
2001，國情統計通報：各級學校女性學生概況，（www.dgbas.gov.tw）。
Newman,M.A.
1993 “Career Advancememt:Does Gender Make a Difference?”American Review of Public Adiminstration,23（4）.
Ollenburger,J.C.& Moore,H.A.
1992 A Sociology of Women:The Intersection of Patriarchy,Capitalism & Colonization,New Jeresey:Prentice-Hall,Inc.
Pierlman,R.＆Pike M.
1994 Sex Discrimination in the Labour
Market：the Case for Comparable Worth.Manchester,UK：Manchester University Press.
Quinn,R.
1988 Beyond Rational Management.San Francisco：Jossey-Bass.
Rhode,D.L.
江明修
1989 Justice and Gender：Sex Discrimination and the Law.Cambridge,MA：Harvard University Press.
Rubinstein,M.F.＆Firstenberg,I.R.
1999 The Minding Organization：Bring the Future to the Present and Turn Creative Ideas into Business Solutions.,New York：John Wiley＆Sons,Inc.
Snyder,R.A.,Verderber,K.S.,Lynn L.& Byers,M.
1994 “A Reconsideration of Self and Organization Referent Attitudes as’Causes’of the Glass Ceiling Effect”Group & Organization Management,17（3）.
Stacy A.J.＆Freedman,S.
1976 “Equity Theory Revisited ：Comments and Annotated Bibliography,”in L. Berkowitz,ed.,Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,New York：Academic Press.
Stivers,C.
1993 Gender Images in Public Adminstration：Legitimacy＆the Administrative State C A：Sage.
Stroh,L.K.,Brett,J.M.＆Reilly,A.H.
1997，《公共行政學》，台北：五南出版公司。
1992 “All the Right Stuff：A Comparison of Female and Male Managers’ Career Progression”Journal of Applied Psychology,77（3）：251-260.
Skinner B.F.
1969 Contingencies of Reinforcement,New York：Appleton-Crofts.
Snyder R.A.；Verderber,K.S.；Langmeyer,L.＆Byers,M.
1994 “A Reconsideration of Self and Organization Referent Attitudes as, Causes, of the Glass Ceiling Effect”Group＆Organization Management,17（3）,P.P.206-278.
Simon H.A.
1976 Administrative Behavior,3rd ed.,New York：Macmillan.
Simon H.A.
1960 The New Science of Management Decision, New York：Harper ＆Row.
Stivers,C.
江紀正
1993 Gender Images in Public Administration：Legitimacy and the Administrative State.Newbury Park,Ca.：SAGE Publications,Inc.
Vroom V.H.
1964 Work and Motivation,New York：Wiley.
White,M.C.
1981 “Achievement,self-concept,Personality Trait,and Leadership ability: A Review of Literature on Sex Differences.” Psychological Reports,48.
Zachariasiewicz,R.
1993 Breaking the Glass Ceiling: a Review of U.S. Department of Labor Efforts.”Credit World,3.
2001，文官制度與無形上限-以我國公務機關為例，國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
朱津寧
2000，《全方位．新女子兵法》，聯經出版設社。
呂佳瑩
2003，組織權力、組織網絡、主管與部屬關係與女性文官升遷速率之影響研究，第七屆全國公共行政博碩士生論文。
呂玉瑕
1980，〈社會變遷中臺灣婦女之事業觀：婦女角色意識與就業態度的探討〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》，第50期。
1983，〈婦女就業與家庭角色、權力結構之關係〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》，第56期。
吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、賴維堯
1996，《行政學（一）》，台北：國立空中大學印行。
李美枝
1984《女性心理學》，台北：大洋出版社。
1988《性別角色面面觀》，台北：聯經出版公司。
官如玉譯
1993，《女主管的自我養成》，台北：允晨文化公司。
林俊宏
2002，師徒的概念及影響互動歷程之因素－由本土組織觀點探討。
林忠正
1995，〈勞動市場的性別歧視與對策〉，發表於女性人力資源開發與勞動權益保障學術研討會，台北：中國國民黨中央婦女工作會婦女政策研究發展中心、現代婦女基金會主辦。
林麗珊
2003，《女性主義與兩性關係》，五南圖書出版。
胡幼慧
1995，《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，台北：巨流圖書公司。
孫本初
2001，《公共管理》，台北：智勝文化。
高淑貴、伊慶春
1988，《已婚職業婦女照顧問題之研究》，台北：行政院研考會。
陳皎眉
1986，《性別角色態度、個人現代性與逃難事業成就傾向及工作滿意程度的關係》，台大婦女研究室專輯報告。
1997，「婦女運動的的回顧與省思」，載於陳皎眉、江漢聲、陳惠馨合著，兩性關係，台北：國立空中大學，333-358。
陳德禹
2002，《行政管理》，台北：三民書局。
黃小鳳
2001，性別角色刻板印象，晉升者性別及平權意識喚起對晉升決策的影響，國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文。
黃煥榮
2000，組織中玻璃天花板效應之研究：行政院部會機關女性陞遷之實証分析，國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
單麗珠
1991，勞動市場兩性平等雇用之研究，中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
焦興鎧
1999，「私部門高階女性力資源之開發及運用－美國『玻璃天花板委員會』報告初探」，經社法制論叢，24期，311-348。
傅肅良
1987，《考詮制度》，台北，三民書局。
楊永年
2003，《管理風格先天因素之研究》，第六屆國軍軍事社會科學學術研討會，7；9。
楊秀珍
1986，《改進當前行政機關升遷考核制度之研究》，行政院人事行政局編印。
張苙雲
1989，《行政組織內的個人事業生涯發展》，中央研究院民族研究所集刊，第66期：1-30。
張麗雪
1997，平等就業機會政策之研究－性別歧視理論與平等理論之觀點，國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
劉麗雯
1989，臺灣省政府女性主管事業生涯發展之研究，私立東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
劉毓秀
1994，93年婦女政策白皮書－婦女政治參與政策，行政院婦女權益促進委員會。
蔡淑鈴、瞿海源
1988，〈性別與成就抱負〉，《中國社會學刊》，第十二期。
賴維堯
1996，〈高級文官生涯特徵：我國與歐美日比較研究〉，載於彭錦鵬主編，《主官體制之比較研究》，台北，南港：中央研究院歐美研究所。
戴瑞婷
1978，台北市古亭區、松山區已婚婦女就業者之研究，國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
蘇秀慧
2001，玻璃天花板效應，4月8日，民生報。
顧燕翎編
1997，《女性主義：理論與流派》，台北：女書文化公司。
蕭奕蕙
1999，性別角色期待的枷鎖：擺盪於家庭與工作之間的女性公務人員，國立政治大學社會學系碩士論文。
西文部分
Andrew, C.;Coderre,C.& Denis,A.
1990 “Stop or Go: Reflections of Women Managers on Factors Influencing Their Career Development.” Journal of Business Ethics, 9（4-5）.
Arrow,K.
1973 The Theory of Discrimination.In O.Ashenfelter and A.
Ree(eds.).Discrimination in Labor Markets pp.3-33.Princeton ,N.J.：Princeton University Press.
Atkinson,J.W.,＆Feather,N.T.（Eds.）
1966 A Theory of Achievement Motivation,New York：John Wiley＆Sons.
Becker,G.S.
1964 Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education., New York: National Bureau of Ecomomic Research.
Carol,M.B.
1993 “A glass ceiling found. ”Public Manager,22（1）pp.7-15.
Clayton,P.A.
1969 “An Emperical Test of A New Theory of Human Need,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,Vol.4 No.1,February：142-175.
Department of Labor
1997 The Glass Ceiling Initiative: Are There Cracks in the Ceiling? Washington, D.C.:U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
91921063
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091921063 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 429 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
