政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/31812
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51789217      在线人数 : 665
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31812


    题名: 字彙分析教學對高中生單字習得影響之研究
    A Study of the Effect of Word Analysis Instruction on Vocabulary Acquisition in a Taiwanese Senior High School
    作者: 徐鍬鳳
    Hsu, Chiou-feng
    贡献者: 張郇慧
    Chang , Hsun-huei
    徐鍬鳳
    Hsu, Chiou-feng
    关键词: 字彙
    字彙分析
    教學
    英語教學
    vocabulary
    word analysis
    instruction
    English teaching
    日期: 2003
    上传时间: 2009-09-14 12:17:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 論文提要內容：
    本研究旨在探討字彙分析教學對台灣高中生學習生字、強化已習得之單字和推測字意三方面之影響。本研究結果希望對英文老師在教單字上有很大的啟示作用和幫助。
    共有146位仁愛高中二年級學生參與這項研究，他們被分為實驗組和控制組；學期初，受試者接受英文能力測驗和單字前測，依據英文能力測驗成績，實驗組和控制組又細分為高低分兩組群。受試者在接受單字前測後，施以不同之單字教學：實驗組之教學方法包含字彙分析而控制組則否。18週後，他們接受單字後測。除接受後測外，實驗組還接受問卷調查和訪談。
    研究結果顯示實驗組在學習生字、強化已習得之單字和推測字意三方面之進步均大於控制組。在學習生字方面的進步，實驗組和控制組平均數差異檢定已達到顯著水準（t = 2.777, p = .006）。此外，以英文程度而言，在學習生字、強化已習得之單字和推測字意三方面，高分組表現均優於低分組；在學習生字方面的進步，實驗高分組和控制組高分平均數差異檢定已達到顯著水準（t = .4529, p = .000）；低分組群則否（t = .249, p = .804）。經問卷調查分析和訪談，實驗組對字彙分析教學大部分持正面看法，高低分組群看法也大致上相似；在字尾使用、利用字首、字根、字尾推測字義和字彙分析法強化已習得單字三方面，高分組較低分組持更肯定之看法。本文根據研究結果，提出英語教學上之應用以及未來研究之建議。
    Abstract
    The purpose of the study is to explore the effect of Word Analysis Instruction on Taiwanese senior high school students’ vocabulary acquisition in learning new words, in consolidating previously learned words, and in inferring word meanings. It is hoped that the results of the study can give suggestions and inspirations to English teachers in vocabulary development.
    Involved in this study were 146 second graders at Jen-ai Senior High School. They were divided into the experimental and the control groups. At the beginning of the semester, all subjects took an English proficiency test and a vocabulary pretest. According to their scores in the English proficiency test, they were further divided into high and low proficiency levels. After the vocabulary pre-test, the experiment began. The experimental and the control groups received different vocabulary instructions: the instruction of the former involved word analysis, but that of the latter did not. After 18 weeks, all of the subjects took a vocabulary post-test. In addition to the vocabulary test, the experimental group was also asked to fill in a questionnaire. Later, some interviews were conducted.
    The results of the studies reveal that the experimental group made more progress than the control group in acquiring new words, in consolidating previously learned words, and in inferring word meanings. With regard to acquiring new words, the former significantly outperformed the latter (t = 2.777, p = .006). Besides, in terms of proficiency levels, the experimental high subgroup made more progress than the experimental low one. Regarding learning new words, the experimental high subgroup significantly outperformed the control one (t = .4529, p = .000), but there was no statistical difference between the low proficiency subgroups (t = .249, p = .804). Also, the questionnaire and interview results show that most of the subjects in the experimental group were positive about Word Analysis Instruction and that the high and low proficiency levels share similar points of view; in use of suffixes and vocabulary consolidation, high proficiency subjects tend to hold a more positive view than low proficiency ones. Based on the above results, some pedagogical implications for English teachers and suggestions are provided at the end of the study.
    參考文獻: REFERENCES
    Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words. London: CILT.
    Ausubel, D. A. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame’enui, E. J., Olejink, S. (2002) Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37 (2), 150-176.
    Besoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading 7, 15-32.
    Blachowicz, C., & Fisher, P. (1996). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    Breen, L. C. (1960). Vocabulary development by teaching prefixes, suffixes and root derivatives. Reading Teacher, 14, 93-97.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
    Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1991). Vocabulary and language teaching. New York: Longman.
    Carton, A. S. (1971). Inferencing: A process in using and learning language. In. P. Pimsleur and T. Quinn (eds.), The Psychology of Second Language Learning (pp. 45-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    College Entrance Examination Center. (2002). Senior high school word list.
    College Entrance Examination Center. (2003). The English scholastic achievement test. [Electronic version].
    Cornog, M. W. (1998). Merriam-Webster`s vocabulary builder. Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated.
    Fan, L. M. (2004). A study of vocabulary in senior high school English textbooks. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
    Fountain, R. L. (1979). Word making and word taking: A game to motivate language learning. RELC Journal: Guidelines, 1, 76-80.
    Fred, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual difference in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
    Graves, M. F., & Hammond, H. K. (1980). A validated procedure for teaching prefixes and its effect on students` ability to assign meanings to novel words. In M. L. Kamil & A.J. Moe (Eds.), Perspective reading research and instruction. Twenty-ninth yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 184-188).
    Haynes, M. (1984). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem and B. P. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL ’83: The Question of Control (pp. 163-176). Washington, DC:P TESOL.
    Hanson, I. W. (1966). First-grade children work with variant word endings. The Reading Teacher, 19, 505-507, 511).
    Honeyfield, J. (1977). Word frequency and the importance of context in vocabulary learning. RELC Journal 8, 35-42.
    Huang, T. L. (1997). The necessity of improving research on vocabulary teaching. The Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium. The Crane Publish Co., Ltd.
    Irwin, J. W., & Baker, I. (1989). Promoting active reading strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Johnson, D.D., & Pearson, P.D. (1978). Teaching reading vocabulary. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Jiang, J. Y. (2001). Effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on senior high school students with different English Achievement. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung.
    Keen, D. (1994). Developing vocabulary skills (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle.
    Laufer, B., & Sim, D. D. (1985). Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of clues in EFL reading. English Teaching Forum 23, 7-10, 20.
    Li, E. L. (1997). A study of the effects of word analysis on vocabulary teaching and learning in senior high school. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    Lin, T. F. (2000). The teaching of vocabulary in Taiwan: A review. Selected Papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching. The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
    Liu, N., & Nation, I. S. P. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal 16, 33-42.
    Lu, M. C. (2002). A study of the effects of vocabulary strategy instruction on senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    Moore, D. W. (1987). Vocabulary. In D.E. Alvermann, D.W. Moore, & M.W. Conley (Eds.), Research within reach secondary school reading (pp. 64-79). Delamare: International Reading Association, Inc.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Nation, I. S. P., & Coady, J. (1988). Vocabulary and reading. In Cater and McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 97-110). London: Longman.
    Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
    Nicole, J. E., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H. (1984). Building vocabulary through prefix instruction. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
    Otterman, L. M. (1955). The value of teaching prefixes and word-roots. Journal of Educational Research, 48, 611-616.
    Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. Modern Language Journal, 79, 15-28.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp199-227).
    Shepherd, J. R. (1973). The relations between knowledge of word parts and knowledge of derivatives among college freshman. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
    Shih, W. H. (2002). The effects of applying phonics instruction and word analysis to vocabulary teaching in EFL classes. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
    Sloat, C., & Taylor, S. (1996). The structure of English words (4th ed.). Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
    Sternberg, R. J. & J. S. Powell. (1983). Comprehending verbal comprehension. American Psychologist 38, 878-893.
    Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56 (1), 72-110.
    Stauffer, R.G. (1942). A study of prefixes in the Thorndike list to establish a list of prefixes that should be taught in the elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 35 (6), 453-458.
    Stockwell, R., & Minkova, D. (2001). English words: History and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Templeton, S. (1983). Using the spelling/meaning connection to develop word knowledge in older students. Journal of Reading, 27, 8-14.
    Thompson, E. (1958). The `master word approach` to vocabulary training. Journal of Developmental Reading 2 (I), 62-66.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1941). The teaching of English suffixes. New York: Columbia Univeristy, Teachers College.
    Wilkins, R. (1972). Linguistics and Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
    White, T. G., Sowell, J., & Yahagihara, A. (1989). Teaching elementary students to use word-part clues. The Reading Teacher, 42, 302-308.
    Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22 (1), 66-81.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    909510021
    92
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0909510021
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2547检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈