Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31679
|
| Title: | 家庭作業完成時間與頻率對學習成就的影響之研究－TIMSS 2003台灣數學科資料的階層線性模式分析
The Effects of homework time and homework frequency on academic achievement: A hierarchical linear modeling analysis using the TIMSS 2003 mathematics data of Taiwan |
| Authors: | 洪川富
Hung, Chuan Fu |
| Contributors: | 邱美秀
Chiu, Mei Shiu
洪川富
Hung, Chuan Fu |
| Keywords: | 家庭作業完成時間
家庭作業頻率
階層線性模式
學習成就
homework time
homework frequency
Hierarchical Linear Modeling
academic achievement |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-14 11:17:21 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以TIMSS 2003台灣數學科資料為資料來源，使用階層線性模式為統計分析方式，探討國小四年級及國中二年級，學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率，對於學生數學學習成就的影響。研究結果顯示：在國小四年級，學生數學家庭作業完成時間與學生數學學習成就為負相關；教師指派數學家庭作業頻率與學生數學學習成就之間為正相關，但並不顯著。在國中二年級，學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率，對學生數學學習成就皆有正向的影響。在國小四年級中，學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率的交互作用，對學生數學學習成就為負相關，但不顯著。在國中二年級中，學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率的交互作用，對學生數學學習成就為正相關，但不顯著。
The research was to explore the effects of mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency on mathematics achievement in the fourth and eighth grades, using TIMSS 2003 Taiwan mathematics data as the resources and Hierarchical Linear Modeling as the statistical analysis method. The results showed that in the fourth grades, mathematics homework time had a negative relationship with mathematics achievement while mathematics homework frequency had a positive, but non-significant, relationship with mathematics achievement. In the eighth grades, both mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had positive effects on mathematics achievement. In the fourth grades, the interaction between mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had negative, but non-significant, effects on mathematics achievement while in the eighth grades, the interaction between mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had positive, but non-significant, effects on mathematics achievement. |
| Reference: | 李志強（1999）。教師行為、父母親管教態度與國小學童學習壓力之關係。台南師院學生學刊，20，1-36。
吳清山（1989）。國小高年級學生家庭作業現況之調查研究。台北市立師範學院學報，20，105-142。
何琦瑜（2005）。放學後的生活：補習。天下雜誌，335，31-35。
林天佑、李郁然（2002）。美英兩國家庭作業政策與規定。國教新知，48(4)，1-7。
林尚俞（2004）。桃園縣國民小學家庭作業實施現況之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
林思宇（2006年3月16日）。我的同學都在補。聯合晚報，第5版。
林海清（2005）。學生課後學習面面觀。研習資訊，22(5)，6-15。
林義男（1988）。國小學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報，11，95-141。
邱皓政（2002）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例與解析。台北市：五南。
胡金枝（1994）。國小資優生的學習動機、批判思考與其國語科學業成就之關係。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
徐嘉怡（2001）。花蓮縣國民小學家庭作業施行狀況之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。
高新建（1997）。階層線性模型的基本概念與模型。測驗統計簡訊，15，1-10。
高新建、吳幼吾（1997）。階層線性模型在內屬結構教育資料上的應用。教育研究資訊，5(2)，31-50。
張玉茹（1996）。國民中學學生英語學習動機、英語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
張春桂（2004）。國小學童課後補習狀況與家長決策行為之探討－以台南市為例。國立台南大學教師在職進修社會科教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
張芳全（2006）。影響數學學習成就因素在結構方程式模型檢定：以2003年台灣國二生TIMSS資料為例。國立台北教育大學學報，19(2)，163-196。
張芳全（2007）。台灣、美國及日本之國二學生家庭作業與數學學習成就關係比較。教育資料集刊，34，285-316.
張秋男（主編）（2005）。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2003。台北市：國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心。
張淑媛（2002）。高職學生人格特質、情緒智力與學習成就：以高雄市立海青工商為例。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
黃雪萍（2001）。國小高年級學童參加校外數學補習之背後因素與對補習學習影響之研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台東縣。
黃琪媚（2004）。國中生的父母親管教方式、制握信念、學習壓力與學習成就之研究。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化縣。
黃瑩君（譯）（1995）。Rosemond, J. K.（著）。家庭作業靠邊站。台北市：新苗。
新苗編譯小組（譯）（2001）。Rosemond, J. K.（著）。不愛做功課的小孩。台北市：新苗。
新苗編譯小組（譯）（2005）。Rosemond, J. K.（著）。如何誘導孩子做功課。台北市：新苗。
溫福星（2006）。階層線性模式：原理、方法與應用。台北市：雙葉。
劉明松、張韶霞（2001）。國小學童家庭結構及父母教養方式與學業成就關係之研究。樹德科技大學學報，3(1)，61-77。
劉奕佩（2007）。家庭社經地位、父母參與、父母期望與國小六年級學生英語學習成就之相關研究。國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
黎瓊麗（2004）。國小學童英語學習動機、學習策略與學習成就之相關性研究：以屏東地區國小為例。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東縣。
劉寶（2003）。桃園縣國小高年級學童父母管教態度、成就動機與學習壓力相關之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
駱明慶（2005）。教師特質對學生學習成就的影響。國立台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
魏禹綸（2006）。國小高年級學童科學學習動機、科學學習策略與科學學習成就之相關研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
蘇麗貞（2003）。不同導向教學方式對健康與體育學習成就之影響。國立屏東師範學院體育學系碩士論文，未出版，屏東縣。
Aksoy, Y., & Link, V. R. (2000). A panel analysis of student mathematics achievement in the U. S. in the 1990s: Does increasing the amount of time in learning activities affect mathematics achievement. Economics of Educational Review, 19, 261-277.
Bowen, N. K., & Bowen, G. L. (1998). The mediating role of educational meaning in the relationship between home academic culture and academic performance. Family Relations, 47, 45-51.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
Burnett, P. C., & Fanshawe, J. P. (1997). Measuring school-related stressors in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 415-428.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Cool, V., & Keith, T. Z. (1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 28-44.
Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 70-83.
Cooper, H., Robison, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143-153.
Corno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 278-292.
Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25, 27-30.
Coulter, F. (1979). Homework: A neglected research area. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 21-33.
De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2000). Homework and student math achievement in junior high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 130-157.
Deslandes, R., Royer, E., Potvin, P., & Leclerc, D. (1999). Patterns of home and school partnership for general and special education students at the secondary level. Exceptional Children, 65, 496-506.
Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162-173.
Farrow, S., Tymms, P., & Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 323-341.
Fehrman, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Reimers, T. Z. (1987). Home influence on school learning: Direct and indirect effects of parental involvement on high school grades. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 330-337.
Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harding, R. C. (1979). The relationship of teacher attitudes toward homework and the academic achievement of primary grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
Hendrix, V. L., Sederberg, C. H., & Miller, V. L. (1990). Correlates of commitment/alienation among high school seniors. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 129-135.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 195-209.
Institute of Education Sciences (2007). Frequently asked questions about the assessment: What is the schedule for TIMSS 2007? Retrieved September 29, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/faq.asp?FAQType=9
Iversen, G. R. (1991). Contextual analysis. Newbury Part, CA: Sage.
Keith, T. H. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 248-253.
Keith, T. Z. (1988). Using path analysis to test the importance of manipulable influences on school learning. School Psychology Review, 17, 637-643.
Keith, T. Z., & Benson, M. J. (1992). Effects of manipulable influences on high school grades across five ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 85-93.
Keith, T. Z., & Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207-226.
Keith, T. Z., Diamond-Hallam, C., & Fine, J. G. (2004). Longitudinal effects of in-school and out-of-school homework on high school grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 187-211.
Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P. S., & Singh, K. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22, 474-496.
Martin, M. O. (2005). TIMSS 2003 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 technical report (Eds.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mau, W. C., & Lynn, R. (2000). Gender differences in homework and test scores in mathematics, reading and science at tenth and twelfth grade. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 2, 119-125.
Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B., & Lindsay, J. J. (2000). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 295-317.
Natriello, G., & McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 59, 18-31.
Paschal, R. A., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 97–104.
Peng, S. S., & Wright, D. (1994). Explanation of academic achievement of Asian American students. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 346-352.
Pezdek, K., Berry, T., & Renno, P. A. (2002). Children’s mathematics achievement: The role of parents’ perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 771-777.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis models (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling[computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.
Smith, T. E. (1990). Time and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 539-558.
Smith, T. E. (1992). Time use and change in academic achievement: A longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 725-747.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372-388.
Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement: Still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 115-145.
Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26-50.
Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students’ self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 432-444.
Tymms, P. B., & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1992). The relationship of homework to A-level results. Educational Research, 34, 3-10.
Vazsonyi, A. T., & Pickering, L. E. (2003). The importance of family and school domains in adolescent deviance: African American and Caucasian youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 115-128.
Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
95152012
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095152012 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 399 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
