Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30330
|
| Title: | 準強制性會計師輪調與盈餘反應係數之關聯性研究 |
| Authors: | 賴盈真 |
| Contributors: | 周玲臺
賴盈真 |
| Keywords: | 強制性會計師輪調
會計師事務所所間輪調
審計品質
盈餘反應係數
會計師任期
會計師回任 |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-11 17:40:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究主要探討準強制性會計師輪調機制與客戶公司審計品質(以盈餘反應係數為代理變數)的關聯性，並藉由檢視在此機制下有進行會計師輪調之公司與未進行會計師輪調之公司的盈餘反應係數、會計師輪調後後續年度的盈餘反應係數以及採行所間/所內會計師輪調的盈餘反應係數來檢視準強制性會計師輪調機制對審計品質的潛在影響力，進而瞭解該機制的實施成效。
本研究發現，雖然迴歸結果顯示有進行會計師輪調樣本之盈餘反應係數大於未進行會計師輪調樣本的盈餘反應係數，投資大眾認為有進行會計師輪調之公司其審計品質優於未進行會計師輪調之公司，與本研究之預期方向相符；但由於結果並未達顯著水準，表示在投資人心中，準強制性會計師輪調機制並未對公司審計品質造成太大的影響。就輪調之後續年度審計品質變化而言，在輪調後第一年及第二年的盈餘反應係數較輪調當年度為低；雖然結果不顯著，卻顯示市場認知的審計品質在會計師輪調後初期有下降的現象，可能是投資人認為繼任會計師在查核初期對受查者事業的不熟悉，將導致審計品質下降所致。
就事務所間輪調與事務所內輪調之效果而言，本研究的實證結果指出投資人認為在應輪調年度採行會計師所間輪調較所內輪調更能提昇審計品質，但結果亦不顯著。至於在所間輪調下，事務所規模是否會影響審計品質之問題探討，根據所間輪調樣本的營運狀況與財務比率，本研究發現選擇將查核會計師由非四大會計師事務所更換至四大會計師事務所的公司擁有較佳的營運狀況與財務體質，與大眾直覺及預期相符。
This study is mainly discussing the association between quasi-mandatory auditor rotation system in Taiwan and the audit quality (use earnings response coefficient, ERC, as proxy) of company by examining the ERC of companies that do not rotate their audit-partner versus companies that rotate their audit-partner under this system, analyzing the change of ERC in the follow-up years after audit-partner rotation, and comparing the difference of ERC between audit-firm rotation and audit-partner rotation.
The empirical results indicate that, although insignificant, investors perceive the audit quality of companies which rotate their audit-partner is better than the audit quality of the companies that do not rotate. This means, in investors’ thought, the quasi-mandatory auditor rotation system doesn’t work in audit quality promotion. For the change of the audit quality in the years after audit-partner rotation, this study finds out the audit quality the market perceived will go down in the first and the second year after audit-partner rotation due to the successors’ unfamiliarity with their clients. Furthermore, the result insignificantly points out that the public think audit-firm rotation is more useful in audit quality improving than audit-partner rotation.
As to the question that whether the scale of audit firm influence audit quality, the evidence from the operation data and financial ratio of audit-firm rotated sample in this study suggests that the companies which rotate their audit-partner from non-Big4 to Big4 have superior operational performance and sounder financial condition than companies rotate their audit-partner in other ways. This result is consistent with the intuition of the public and the expectation of this study. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
李秀霞，1995，審計品質與盈餘反應係數之研究，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
李宣進，1996，再探審計品質與盈餘反應係數之關連，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
李建然與林秀鳳，2005，會計師任期與異常應計數之關連性研究，管理評論，第二十四卷第四期（十月）：103-126。
李建然與陳振芳，2004，審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理－以五大事務所組別為觀察標的，會計評論第38期(一月)：59-80。
余景仁，2001，事務所/會計師更換與盈餘管理關聯性之研究，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
林嬋娟與林孝倫，2007，會計師輪調制度，會計研究月刊，第258期（五月）：88-95。
吳彥宜，2005，我國強制性會計師輪調制度與審計品質之關連性研究，國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
馬君梅與謝永明，2007，事務所內自發性會計師更換對公司盈餘品質之影響，東吳經濟商學學報，第56期（三月）：79-105。
郭子緯，2006，會計師任期與審計品質認知，私立銘傳大學會計學系碩士論文。
戚務君、廖益均、黃惠琦，2004，強制性合夥會計師輪調制度與異常應計金額之關連性研究。
陳育成、莊勝傑，2008，會計師輪調與回任影響審計品質之實證，2008國立雲林科技大學國際會計學術研討會發表論文。
陳義麟，1998，認知的審計品質與盈餘反應係數之實證研究，國立中正大學會計學系碩士論文。
張文瀞，2001，審計品質對上市公司盈餘管理之影響，當代會計，第二卷第二期：195-214。
張俊賢，2003，強制性輪調對審計品質之影響，國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
黃珮娟，2004，會計師事務所與審計品質之關聯性研究，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
楊雅雯，2004，會計師之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係-績效調整後裁決性應計金額與應計項目估計誤差之衡量，私立輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。
蔡美玲，2006，會計師任期與盈餘反應係數之實證性研究國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
蔡檳全，2005，事務所內會計師輪調與審計品質之研究，私立中國文化大學會計學系碩士論文。
賴春田，2000，會計師的業務、責任及會計師事務所組織的演變，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蘇裕惠，2005，會計師任期與審計品質，當代會計，第六卷第二期（十一月)：187-220。
蘇裕惠與彭日欣，2005，從各國會計師輪調制度看會計師之獨立性與審計品質-國際篇，會計研究月刊，第232期（三月）：96-101。
英文部分
AICPA. 1992. Statement of Position Regarding Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms of Publicly Held Companies. New York.
Arrunada, B. and C. Paz-Ares. 1997. Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination. International Review of Law and Economics Vol. 17: 31-61.
Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 22, No. 2: 71-97.
Becker C. L., M. L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 1-24.
Brody, R. G. and S. A. Moscove. 1998. Mandatory Auditor Rotation. National Public Accountant (May): 32-36.
Carcello, J. V. and A. L. Nagy. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 23, No. 2: 55-69.
Carey, P. and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 81, No. 3: 653-676.
Casterella, J., W. R. Knechel, and P. L. Walker. 2002. The Relationship of Audit Failures and Auditor Tenure. Working Paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Chen, C., C. Lin, and Y. Lin. 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 25, No. 2:415-445.
Chi, W. and H. Hung. 2004. Discretionary Accruals, Audit-Firm Tenure and Auditor Tenure: An Empirical Case in Taiwan. 2004 AAA Annual Midyear Auditing Section Conference (Clearwater, U. S. A.).
_______, H. Hung, Y. Liao, and H. Xie. 2008. Mandatory Audit-Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Working Paper, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung, H. and S. Kallapur, 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review Vol. 78, No. 4: 931-955.
Davis, L. R., B. Soo, and G. Trompeter. 2002. Auditor Tenure, Auditor Independence and Earnings Management. Working Paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Independence, Low-Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 3 (August): 113-127.
__________. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 3 (December): 183-199.
Dechow, P. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 18: 3-42.
Frankel, R., J. Marilyn and K. Nelson. 2002. The Relations between Auditors’ Fee for Non-Audit Services and Earning Quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 77 (Supplement): 71-105.
Geiger, M. A. and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 21, No. 1: 67-78.
Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 88, No. 2: 585-612.
Gul, F, S. Lynn, and J. Tsui. 2002. Audit Quality, Management Ownership, and the Information of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. Vol. 17 No. 1: 25-49.
Hackenbrack, K. E. and C. E. Hogan. 2002. Market response to earnings surprises conditional on reasons for an auditor change. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 19, No. 2: 195-223.
Higgs, J. L. and T. R. Skantz. 2006. Audit and nonaudit fees and the market’s reaction to earnings announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 25, No. 1: 1-26.
International Federation Accountants (IFAC). 2003. Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting. New York: IFAC.
Johnson V. E., I. K. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 19, No. 4: 637-660.
Knchel, W. R., V. Naiker, and G. Pacheco. 2007. Does auditor industry specialization matter? Evidence from market reaction to auditor switches. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 26, No. 1: 19-45.
Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 22, No. 1: 109-126.
Krishnan, J., H. Sami, and Y. Zhang. 2005. Does the provision of nonaudit services affect investor perceptions of auditor independence? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 24, No. 2: 111-135.
Mansi, S. A., W. F. Maxwell, and D. P. Miller. 2004. Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 42 (Supplement): 755-793.
Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review Vol. 78, No. 3: 779-799.
Palmrose, Z. 1986. Litigation and Independent Auditors: The Role of Business Failures and Management Fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 90-113.
Petty, R. and S. Cuganesan. 1996. Auditor Rotation: Framing the Debate. Australian Accountant (May): 40-41.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. 2002. Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms: Will It Improve Audit Quality? New York, NY: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP.
Teoh, S. H. and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review Vol. 68, No. 2: 346-366.
Tirole, J. 1986. Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization Vol. 2 No. 2: 181-214. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
95353014
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0953530141 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 331 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
