Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30268
|
| Title: | 會計基礎評價模型之實證研究--考慮線性資訊動態
An Empirical Study of the Accounting Based Valuation-- With Linear Information Dynamics |
| Authors: | 洪佩嫆
Hong, peiyung |
| Contributors: | 張清福
Chang, chingfu
洪佩嫆
Hong, peiyung |
| Keywords: | 剩餘淨利
線性資訊動態模型
residual income
Ohlson model
linear information dynamics
panel data model |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-11 17:34:02 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以Ohlson (1995) model為發展基礎，並將盈餘定義為（１）剩餘淨利及（２）盈餘水準，分別就此二種不同定義下的盈餘，以年度盈餘時間序列來測試其是否符合線性資訊動態假設，及針對各模式對股權價值估計與預測之結果做比較，探討何種評價方法或模式對於估計真實價值、解釋價格及預測報酬之效果較佳。
研究結果發現，我國上市公司之剩餘淨利及盈餘水準時間序列皆符合線性資訊動態假說。剩餘淨利線性資訊動態模型較能正確預估次一期的盈餘。相較於單獨以帳面價值來估計股價，考慮線性資訊動態模型所建立之各評價模型所預測之估計股價皆未能正確預測權益價值及解釋權益價值之波動。在投資策略方面，因剩餘淨利模型之投資績效最為穩定，在該模型之投資策略下，V/P比率愈低（高）之投資組合獲得之平均股票報酬愈低（高），代表股價愈是被低估的投資組合可賺取更多之投資報酬，這說明剩餘淨利模型預測次期投資報酬之能力最佳，投資人可以其做為建立投資策略的參考。
Based on Ohlson (1995) model, this study specifies earnings variables as both residual income and earnings levels to test the linear information dynamic (LID) models per se and the ability of competing valuation models to value the contemporaneous stock prices. A comparison of future stock return predicting capability of competing models is also conducted.
By using both residual income time series and earnings levels time series for examining the issue on the firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE), the empirical results support Ohlson’s information dynamics. However, when estimated as a time series, the linear information models using either residual income or earnings levels variables provide value estimates no better than book value does alone. From the investment strategy aspect, the superior predictive ability of the residual income valuation model with respect to future stock returns demonstrates that high (low) V/P ratios gets high (low) investment returns. It implies that the underpriced portfolio makes high investment returns. Accordingly, the residual income valuation is good for estimating returns on the following year and is therefore a valuable investment reference.. |
| Reference: | Abarbanell, J., and V. L. Bernard. 1992. Tests of analysts` overreaction/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. Journal of Finance: 1181-1207.
Bar-Yosef, S., J. L. Callen, and J. Livnat. 1996. Modeling dividends, earnings, and book value equity: An empirical investigation of the Ohlson valuation dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies 1: 207-224.
Beaver, W. 1997. Financial reporting: An accounting revolution, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Callen J. L. and M. Morel. 2001. Linear accounting valuation when abnormal earnings are AR (2). Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 16: 191-203.
Dechow, P., A. Hutton, and R. Sloan. 1999. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 1-34.
Easton, P., and T. Harris. 1991. Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 19-36.
Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuations and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
Gode, D. and J. A.Ohlson. 2006, A unified valuation framework for dividends, free-cash flows, residual income, and earnings growth based models. Working paper, New York University.
Greene, W. H. 2000, Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition.
Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251-1271.
Karathanassis, G. A. 2003. An empirical investigation of the traditional and the clean surplus valuation models. Managerial finance 29. Accounting & Tax Periodicals: 55-66.
Ota, K. 2001. A test of Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical evidence from Japan. The International Journal of Accounting 37 (2): 157-182.
Lee, C. M. C., Myers, and B.Swaminathan. 1999. What is the fundamental value of the Dow? The Journal of Finance 54(5): 1693-1740.
Lev, B. 1989. On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research: 153-192.
Lo, K. and T. Lys. 2000. The Ohlson model: Contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance: 337-367.
Myers, J. N. 1999. Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics. The Accounting Review 74 (1): 1-28.
Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2) 61-87.
―――. 2001. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation: An empirical perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research 18(1): 107-120.
Ou, J. A. and S. H. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock return. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(4): 295-329.
Watts, R. L. 1974. Accounting objectives. Working paper, University of Rochester.
吳仁杰，2002，時間序列及橫斷面評價模式應用之比較，中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
沈寧衛，2002，產業股價與報酬之研究---會計基礎評價模式之應用，國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士在職專班未出版論文
林冠宏，2004年，公司資訊揭露與價值攸關性之研究，國立政治大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
曹壽民、金成隆、藍心梅、陳俊雄，2001，會計基礎評價模式在台灣股市適用性之研究，2001會計理論與實務研討會論文集，東吳大學會計系編印。
許崇源、彭火樹、劉正田，1998，Feltham and Ohlson會計基礎評價模式及線性資訊模式之辨正與測試，1998會計新環境國際研討會論文集，東吳大學會計系編印。
陳志愷，1992，盈餘反應係數探索性之研究-台灣股票市場之實證分析，國立政治大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
溫政斌，2001，臺灣上市公司暫時性盈餘屬性之研究，中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
廖怡茲，2001，股利政策與會計資訊對權益評價之影響，國立中興大學企業管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
89353024
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0893530242 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 305 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
