English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51815028      Online Users : 263
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30220
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30220


    Title: 平衡計分卡對員工認知及行為之影響-以服務部門(SSU)為探討對象
    Authors: 萬柏洲
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    萬柏洲
    Keywords: 平衡計分卡
    服務部門
    員工認知與行為
    the balanced scorecard
    the service department
    the effects of employees’cognition and behavior
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:28:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 平衡計分卡目前已成功的推行於各類型的組織中,且亦有越來越多組織透過將平衡計分卡進一步推展至共用服務單位的方式,讓總公司、各策略性事業單位及共用服務單位能有效的加以整合,進而將全組織的資源聚焦於策略執行上。
    本研究之主要目的是希望探討當組織服務部門於推行平衡計分卡後,對其員工的認知與行為可能產生影響,並基於個案公司兩種不同類型的服務部門特色,希望進一步探討不同類型(即有無產生外部收入)之服務部門,在推行平衡計分卡後,對其員工認知與行為的影響是否會產生差異。
    本研究實證結果發現:個案公司的服務部門員工普遍皆能認知到平衡計分卡對其自身所帶來的影響與改變,但目前仍尚未將其對平衡計分卡的認知轉化為具體的行動。此外,本研究亦發現有產生外部收入之服務部門,在推行平衡計分卡後,對其員工的認知與行為的影響程度會較未產生外部收入的服務部門更深。
    The balanced scorecard has been implemented successfully in all types of organizations. In order to integrate the corporate headquarters, strategic business units (SBUs) and shared service units (SSUs) effectively and therefore focus all resources on implementing companies’strategies, more and more organizations apply balanced scorecard to their shared service units.
    The main purpose of this study is to discuss the possible effects on employees’cognition and behavior after organizations’service departments put balanced scorecard into practice. Furthermore, based on the case company which have applied balanced scorecard to their two different featured service apartments, further study will discuss whether there are differences on employees’ cognition and behavior between departments with/without external revenues.
    The study shows that most employees in the case company’s service departments can sense the influences and changes toward themselves after the departments applying balanced scorecard, yet they still have not transferred cognition into concrete behavior. In addition, the study also finds out the employees of the service department with external revenues have deeper influences on their cognition and behavior than those in the non-external revenue service departments.
    Reference: 中文部分
    吳安妮,2003,平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(上),會計研究月刊,第211期(6月):45-54。
    ______,2003,平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(下),會計研究月刊,第212期(7月):78-93。
    吳安妮與劉俊儒,2001,員工面、內部營運面及顧客面對財務績效影響之實證研究,台灣管理學刊,第1卷第1期(8月):125-150。
    吳佩霙,2004,推行平衡計分卡對組織、員工及績效影響之研究-以某個案公司為例,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    林雅婷,2006,實施平衡計分卡對員工認知評價與組織績效影響,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    周齊武、Haddad、吳安妮與施能錠,2001,探索實施平衡計分卡可能遭遇之問題,會計研究月刊,第183期(2月):63-74。
    周齊武、Haddad、吳安妮與李惠娟,2002,平衡計分卡於服務部門之應用-以資訊部門為例(三),會計研究月刊,第194期(1月):85-90。
    丁淑華,2000,民營化變革認知與離職意願關係之研究-以中華電信員工為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    杜新偉,1999,組織變革中員工反應態度的調查研究-以中華電信公司民營化為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    林東清與羅世輝,1994,使用者抗拒資訊系統的多層模式研究,管理學報,第11卷第2期:183-205。
    劉世南與許友耕,2001,組織變革歷程干預行動與員工反應改變之縱貫研究,「生活社會新視界理論與實踐的對話」學術研討會。
    李蔚局,2007,台灣原廠汽車維修產業研究與事業經營策略分析,國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文。
    于泳泓,2002,平衡計分卡導入與企業變革管理,會計研究月刊,第200期(7月):126-136。
    龍芳,2005,影響平衡計分卡運作評價之相關因素研究-以台北某醫學中心為例,台北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。
    英文部分
    Butler, A., S. R. Letza, and B. Neale. 1997. Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. Long Range Planning (April): 242-253.
    Chow, C. W., K. M. Haddad, and J. E. Williamson. 1997. Applying the balanced scorecard to small companies. Management Accounting (August): 21-27.
    Clinton, D. B., and C. H. Ko. 1997. JIT and the balanced scorecard: Linking manufacturing control to the management control. Management Accounting (September): 18-24.
    Epstein, M. J., and J. F. Manzoni. 1997. Translating strategy into action. Management Accounting (August): 28-36.
    Epstein, M. J., and P. S. Wisner. 2001. Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management 11: 1-10.
    Eccles, R. G., and N. Nohria. 1992. Beyond the hype-rediscovering the essence of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Inamdar, N., R. S. Kaplan, and K. Reynolds. 2002. Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations. Journal of Healthcare Management 47 (May): 179-195.
    Kaplan, R. S. 1988. The importance of field research. Management Accounting (April): 26.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures the drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70: 71-79.
    ________, and ________.1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    ________, and ________. 2001. The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    ________, and ________. 2003. Strategy Maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    ________, and ________. 2006. Alignment: Using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Kotter, J. P., and L. A. Schlesinger. 1979. Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review 57: 106-114.
    Kerr, D. 2003. Accountability by numbers-how the Lone Star State,s auditor introduced a balanced scorecard management system. Journal of Accountancy 195(June): 61.
    McGowan, S. A. 1998. Perceived benefits of ABCM implementation. Accounting horizons 12(March): 30-51.
    Martinsons, M., R. Davison, and D. Tse. 1999. The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems 25: 71-88.
    Malina, M. A., and F. H. Selto. 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13: 47-90.
    Niven, R. P. 2002. Balanced scorecard step by step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Oliveira, J. 2001. The Balanced Scorecard: An integrative approach to performance evaluation. Healthcare financial management (May): 42-46.
    Salterio, S., and A. Webb. 2003. The balanced scorecard-rhetoric versus research: A properly implemented program can help articulate and communicate strategy. CA Magazine 136 (August): 39.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    95353021
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095353021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2386View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback