English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51735650      Online Users : 621
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30013


    Title: 技術機會主義與公司績效之關係
    Authors: 林秋霞
    Chiou Shia Lin
    Contributors: 陳建維
    林秋霞
    Chiou Shia Lin
    Keywords: 技術機會主義
    公司績效
    市場導向
    技術變動性
    網路外部性
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:03:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 技術的變動日新月異,創新技術的出現可能完全取代產業中原有的技術,而技術在企業中所扮演的角色,已漸漸從支援輔助性工具的角色,成為企業競爭策略中一項重要的關鍵資源,為了提高公司績效或促進新產品發展,企業應擬定適當的技術策略,而技術策略的擬定會受到公司所擁有的資產與能力的影響,因此企業是否擁有這項能力來協助技術策略的制定便很重要,而技術機會主義便代表了組織意識並回應技術改變的能力。因此本研究擬探討技術機會主義與公司績效的關係,並納入權變因素,以探討其對技術機會主義與公司績效的影響。
    本研究針對台灣一千大製造業所作的問卷調查研究分析結果顯示:
    1.技術機會主義有助於企業的技術採用與公司績效的提升。
    2.當公司之市場導向愈大時,會使技術機會主義對公司績效的正向效果減弱。
    3.當環境中技術變動性愈大時,會使技術機會主義對公司績效的正向效果增強。
    4.當環境之網路外部性愈強時,會使技術機會主義對公司績效的正向效果減弱。
    本研究站在企業的角度,探討企業的技術機會主義與技術採用的關聯,引申其與公司績效間的關係,並加入外在環境及內部策略導向的調節變數,以探討績效表現的變動方向及程度。由於過去的文獻多著墨在影響技術採用的因素上,但鮮少探討技術採用與績效間的關係,因此本研究結果可提供企業技術策略制定與評估之參考。
    Business history offers many examples of industries in which radical technologies emerged and eventually overwhelmed established technologies. Technology is no longer just an enabler of business processes but is increasingly becoming the core of the firm’s business strategy. Technological opportunism, a sense-and-respond capability of firms with respect to new technologies, is an important determinant of technology adoption. To assess the contribution of technological opportunism in explaining firm’s performance, this study also includes moderated variables in the model.
    Using data collected from manufacturing industry by mail questionnaire, the empirical results show as follow:
    1.Technological opportunism has a positive effect on firm performance.
    2.Increases in the level of a firm’s market orientation weaken the relationship between technological opportunism and performance.
    3.Increases in the level of technology turbulence strengthen the relationship between technological opportunism and performance.
    4.Increases in the level of network externalities weaken the relationship between technological opportunism and performance.
    Although there have been numerous studies which focused on determinants of the adoption of technological innovations, little research has been done on the relationship to performance. Over the years more and more organizations have invested heavily in new technologies in order to stay competitive in their given industries. This study on the position of a firm examines the effect of technological opportunism on organizational performance. The goal of this study is to provide guidance to managers who must make decisions regarding the adoption of technological innovations.
    Reference: 中文部分
    李明軒,邱如美合譯(1999),競爭優勢,天下遠見出版,譯自Michael E. Porter(1985), Competitive Advantage.
    林婉玲(民國91年),“零售業多角化策略與市場導向對績效影響之研究-環境不確定性之觀點”,國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
    張洪瑞(民國89年),“企業採用創新技術之關鍵評估因素研究—以WAP應用為例”,國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    張紹勳(民國90年),“電子商店之關係品質模式----融合交易成本理論及科技接受模式的觀點”,國立政治大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
    許麗玲(民國89年),“資訊系統整合度下,情境變項對企業產銷互動之影響”,國立中央大學資訊管理系博士論文。
    康嘉豪(民國90年),“組織慣性、資源存量與專案特性評估對技術取得方式影響之研究”,國立中央大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    莊文郁(民國91年),“企業採用新資訊科技之影響因素研究—以ADSL為例”,國立雲林科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
    陳冠宇(民國91年),“策略導向、進入障礙與關係網絡連結”,私立東海大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    陳建宇(民國92年),“台灣中小企業創業導向、組織資源與能力對企業績效影響之研究”,國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)碩士論文。
    蔣維理(民國90年),“成功的新產品開發模式研究”,國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班論文。
    蔡千茲(民國90年),“台灣電子產業技術發展階段模式之研究---採技術能力與技術策略互動觀點”,國立交通大學經營管理研究所博士論文。
    蔡耀輝(民國91年),“產品創新程度與新產品發展績效決定因素之研究”,私立東海大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    魏緒誠(民國91年),“市場導向與關係網絡之聯結”,私立東海大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    盧嘉振(民國89年),“台灣小型製造業技術策略、創新績效與組織績效關係之研究—CEOs外部環境認知節制效果之驗證”,國立成功大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    英文部分
    Aiken, L. S. and S. G. West (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park. CA: Sage Publications.
    Arthur, W. B. (1996), “Increasing Returns and the New World of Business,” Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 100-09.
    Balakrishnan, S. (1996), “Benefits of Customer and Competitive Orientations in Industrial Markets,” Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 257-69.
    Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, 791-800.
    Brown, R. (1992), “Managing the S Curves of Innovation,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(1), 61-72.
    Calantone, R. J., J. B. Schmidt, and X. M. Song(1996), “Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison,” Marketing Science, 15(40), 341-58.
    Cervera, A., A. Molla, and M. Sanchez (2001), “Antecedents and Consequences of Market Orientation in Public Organisations” European Journal of Marketing, 35, 1259-86.
    Chandy, R. and G. J. Tellis (1998), “Organizing for Radical Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35(November), 474-87.
    Choi, J.P. (1994), “Network Externalities, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 167-82.
    Christensen, C. M. (1997), The Innovators’ Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Cooper, R. G. (1982), “New Product Success in Industrial Firms,” Industrial Marketing Management, 11, 215-23.
    ------- (1984), “How New Product Strategies Impact on Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1, 5-18.
    Covin, J. G. and D. P. Slevin (1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hospital and Benign Environments,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
    Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organization Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators,” Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 550-90.
    Day, G. S. (1990), Market Driven Strategy, New York: Free Press.
    ------ and R. Wensley (1988), “A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority,” Journal of Marketing, 52, 1-20.
    Deshpande, R., J. U. Farley, and F. E. Webster (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 23-37.
    Ettlie, J. E. and W. P. Bridges (1982), “Environmental Uncertainty and Organizational Technology Policy,” IEEE Trans. On Organizational Management, 29(1), 2-10.
    Farrell, J. and G. Saloner (1986), “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation,” The American Economic Review, 76(5), 940-55.
    Gatignon, H. and Jean-Marc Xuereb(1997), “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 77-90.
    ------ and Robertson T.S.(1989), “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 53, 35-49.
    Gerbing, D. W. and J. C. Anderson (1988), “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25(May), 186-92.
    Gima, K. A. (1995), “An Exploratory Analysis of The Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance-- A Contingency Approach,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 275-93.
    Greenley, G. E. (1995), “Forms of Market Orientation in UK Companies,” Journal of Management Studies, 32(January), 47-66.
    Grover, V., M. Goslar, and A. Segars (1995), “Adopters of Telecommunications Initiatives: A Profile of Progressive US Corporations,” International Journal of Information Management, 15(1), 33-46.
    Han, J. K., N. Kin, and Hong-Bumm King (2001), “Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One- or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 65(January), 1-14.
    Hofer, C. W. and D. E. Schendel (1978), Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, Minn: West Publishing.
    Irwin, J. G., J. J. Hoffman, and S. W. Geiger (1998), “The Effect of Technology Adoption on Organization Performance: Organizational Size and Environmental Munificence as Moderators,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6(January), 50-64.
    Isenberg, D. J. (1987), “The Tactics of Strategic Opportunism,” Harvard Business Review, 65(March/April), 92-97.
    Jaccard, J. J., C. K. Wan, and R. Turrisi (1990), Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park. CA: Sage Publications.
    Jaworski, B.J. and A.K. Kohli (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53-71.
    Kahn, K. B. and J. T. Mentzer (1994), “Norms That Distinguish Between Marketing and Manufacturing,” Journal of Business Research, 30, 111-18.
    Katz, M. and C. Shapiro (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,” The American Economic Review, 75, 424-40.
    ------ (1986), “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 822-41.
    Kimberly, J. and M. Evanisko(1981), “Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative innovations,” Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
    Kohli, A.K. and B.J. Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 1-18.
    Kotler, P. (1988), Marketing Management. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Kwaku, Atuahene-Gima (1995), “An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance: A Contingency Approach,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(September), 275-93.
    Lawton, L. and A. Parasuraman (1980), “The Impact of the Marketing Concept on New Product Planning,” Journal of Marketing, 44(Winter), 19-25.
    Leavitt, H. and T. Whisler (1958), “Management in the 1980,” Harvard Business Review, November, 41-48.
    Loch, C. H. and B. A. Huberman (1999), “A Punctuated-Equilibrium Model of Technology Diffusion,” Management Science, 45(February), 160-78.
    Majumdar, S. K. (1995), “Does New Technology Adoption Pay? Electronic Switching Patterns and Firm-Level Performance in US Telecommunications,” Research Policy, 24(September), 803-22.
    Martin, J. (1995), The Great Transition: Using the Seven Disciplines of Enterprise Engineering to Align People, Technology and Strategy, American Management Association.
    Matsuno, K., J. T. Mentzer, A. Ozsomer (2002), “The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 66(July), 18-32.
    Mckee, D. O., P.R. Varadarajan, and W. M. Pride (1989), “Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 53(July), 21-35.
    Meyer, A. and J. Goes(1988), “Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal, 31, 897-923.
    Miles, R. E. and C. C. Snow (1978), “Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process,” New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Miller, D (1987), “The Structural and Environmental Correlates of Business Strategy,” Strategic Management Journal, 8(1), 55-76.
    ------ and P. Friesen (1982), “Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum,” Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25.
    Moore, G. and I. Benbasat (1992), “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
    More, R. A. (1992), “Managing New Technology Adoption,” Business Quarterly, Spring, 69-74.
    Narver, J. C. and S. F. Slater (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 54(October), 20-36.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Pisano, G. P. (1990), “The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(March), 153-76.
    Porter, M. E. (1980), “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors,” New York: Free Press.
    ------ (1985), “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,” New York: Free Press.
    Prescott, J. E. (1986), “Environment as a Moderator of Strategy-Performance Relationship,” Academy of Management Journal, 10(6), 523-51.
    Raju, P. S., and S. C. Lonial (1995), “Market Orientation and Performance in the Hospital Industry,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(Winter), 34.
    ------ (2001), “The Impact of Quality Context and Market Orientation on Organization Performance in A Service Environment,” Journal of Service Research, 4(November), 140-54.
    Robbins, S. P. (1990), Organizational Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Rogers, E. M. (1983), “Diffusion of Innovations,” New York: Free Press.
    Schilling, M. A. (2002), “Technology Success and Failure in Winner-take-all Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities,” Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387-98.
    Shapiro, C., and H. R. Varian (1998), Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Harvard Business School Press.
    Shermata, W. A. (1997), “Barriers to Innovation: A Monopoly, Network Externalities, and the Speed of Innovation,” Antitrust Bulletin, 42(Winter), 937-73.
    Slater, S. F. and J.C. Narver (1994), “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?” Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 46-55.
    Song, X. M., and M. M. Montoya-Weiss (1998), “Critical Development Activities for Really New Versus Incremental Products,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(March), 124-35.
    -------(2001), “The Effect Perceived Technological Uncertainty on Japanese New Product Development,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80.
    Souder, W. E. and X. M. Song (1997), “Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in US and Japanese Electronics Firms,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 21-34.
    Srinivasan, R., G.L. Lilien, and A. Rangaswamy (2002), “Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business,” Journal of Marketing, 66(July), 47-60.
    Stacey, G. and W. Ashton (1990), “A Structured Approach to Corporate Technology Strategy,” Innovational Journal of Technology Management, 5, 389-407.
    Sultan, F and L. Chan (2000), “The Adoption of New Technology: The Case of Object-Oriented Computing in Software Companies,” IEEE Trans. On Engineering Management, 47(1), 106-26.
    Thong, J. Y.L. (1999), “An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Business,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187-214.
    Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial of Organizational, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam(1986), “Measure of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approach,” Academy of Management Review, 1(4), 801-14.
    Webster, F. E. Jr. (1988), “Rediscovering the Marketing Concept,” Business Horizons, May, 29-39.
    Weill, P. and M. H. Olson (1989), “Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications,” MIS Quarterly, March, 3-17.
    Weiss, A. M and J. B. Heide (1993), “The Nature of Organizational Search in High Technology Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30(May), 220-33.
    Zahra, S. A. and D. O. Neubaum (1998), “Environmental Adversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of New Ventures,” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 3(Fall), 123-40.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    90351023
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090351023
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2324View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback