English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51628578      Online Users : 496
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/29970
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29970


    Title: 服務品牌延伸效果之研究-延伸商品類別、契合度及成效之影響
    Authors: 林蓓莉
    Contributors: 樓永堅
    林蓓莉
    Keywords: 品牌延伸
    服務業
    契合度
    Brand extension
    Service industry
    Fitness
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 16:58:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 產業競爭白熱化,產品創新成為勝敗關鍵,因此企業不斷推陳出新,造成產品生命周期縮短,市場上的競爭愈加激烈,企業如何使產品在消費者心中留下鮮明的印象呢?品牌是一個十分重要的、可操作的資產。對消費者而言,品牌降低了搜尋成本及風險、象徵產品的品質,同時也可喚起消費者的認同。對企業而言,品牌可防止仿冒,維持產品的獨特性,對抗削價競爭的壓力。
    過去關於品牌延伸的研究已有許多,但大部份的研究多在探討「產品」品牌的延伸,實務上常見到的「產品」與「服務」交叉延伸的手法,卻少有研究探討此種延伸策略成效的影響因素,因此引發了本研究的興趣,希望從商品特性的角度,探討消費者對於產品品牌延伸與服務品牌延伸的評價有何差異,並且探討契合度、延伸成效等變數,對於商品特性影響力的調節效果。
    正式研究採用實驗法來衡量消費者對於品牌延伸評價的差異,以文字操弄各品牌延伸之成功與失敗,受測產品為實際品牌丹堤咖啡店,以政治大學的大學生為主要的研究對象,並採用統計套裝軟體SPSS 10.0以進行資料分析及研究假設之驗證。實驗結果顯示:

    1. 品牌延伸至「產品導向」商品時,消費者對於延伸商品與母品牌的評價皆較好;品牌延伸至「服務導向」商品時,消費者對於延伸商品與母品牌的評價皆較差。
    2. 高契合度的品牌延伸對於消費者之延伸商品評價有著正向影響,低契合度對於消費者之延伸商品評價有著負向影響。
    3. 高契合度的品牌延伸,不僅使得延伸商品的正面評價愈容易回饋到母品牌上,增強消費者對於母品牌的正面評價;在高契合度下,延伸商品的負面評價,也更容易回饋到母品牌上。
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    1. 陳振燧 (民85),「顧客基礎的品牌權益衡量與建立之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    2. 柯宜君 (民89),「消費者認知之產品品質、服務品質及價格對滿意度及忠誠度之影響-於三種有形性比重不同服務業之比較」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    3. 紀琇蓉 (民90),「不同形式之產品線延伸以及所有權狀態對品牌評價的影響」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    4. 張茂嵩 (民91),「契合度與產品知識對品牌策略效果之影響」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    5. 陳姿君 (民91),「品牌延伸對母品牌反饋效果影響因素之研究」,國立嘉義大學銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。
    6. 沈雲驄、湯宗勳合譯(1998),品牌行銷法則,David A. Aaker 著,商業週刊出版股份有限公司。
    7. 邱皓政(民90),「社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析—SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」,五南圖書出版公司,台北。
    二、英文部份
    1. Aaker, David A. and Kevin L. Keller (1990), "Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions," Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), 27-41.
    2. Aaker, David A.(1990), “Brand Extensions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” Sloan Management Review, 31 (Summer), 47-56.
    3. Barone, Michael J., Paul W. Miniard, and Jean B. Romeo (2000), "The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 386-400.
    4. Batt, Rosemary (1999), "Work Organization, Technology, and Performance in Customer Service and Sales," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52 (July), 539-64.
    5. Boush, David M. and Barbara Loken (1991), "A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation," Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (February), 35-50.
    6. Broniarczyk, Susan M. and Joseph W. Alba (1994), "The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension," Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 214-28.
    7. Campbell, Margret C., and Ronald C. Goodstein (2001), “The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Evaluation of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (December), 439-449.
    8. Cohen, Joel B. and Kunal Basu (1987), "Alternative Models of Categorization: Towards a Contingent Processing Framework," Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 455-72.
    9. Garvin, David A. (1984), “What Does Product Quality Really Mean,” Sloan Management Review, 26 (Fall), 25-43.
    10. G.Lynn Shostack,”Breaking Free from Product Marketing (1977),” Journal of Marketing, 41 (April), 73-80.
    11. Iacobucci (1998), "Services: What Do We Know and Where Shall We Go? A View from Marketing," Advances in Services Marketing and Management, 7(May), 1-96.
    12. John, Loken and Joiner(1998), “The Negative Impact of   Extensions:Can Flagship Products Be Diluted?” Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 19-32.
    13. Keller, Kevin L. (1998), “Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity,” Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    14. Kotler, Philip (2003), Marketing Management, Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
    15. Larsson, Rikard and David E. Bowen (1989), "Organization and Customer: Managing Design and Coordination," Academy of Management Review, 14 (April), 213-33.
    16. Laurent, Gilles and Jean-Noel Kapferer(1985), ”Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp.41- 53
    17. Loken, Barbara and John Deborah Roedder (1993), "Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact?" Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 71-84.
    18. Lovelock, Christopher C. (1983), “Classifying Service to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights,” Journal of Marketing, 47 (3), 9-20.
    19. Milberg, Sandra J., Whan Park, and Michael S. McCarthy (1997),”Managing Negative Feedback Effects Associated with Brand Extension: The Impact of Alternative Branding Strategies,” Journal of CustomerPsychology, 6 (2), 119-140.
    20. Olshavsky, R.L. (1985), “Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision Making: An Integrated Theoretical Perspective,” Perceived Quality, 3-29.
    21. Park, C. Whan, Sandra Milberg, and Robert Lawson (1991), “Evaluation of brand extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (September), 185-193.
    22. Ries, A.L. and J. Trout (1986), Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    23. Shostack, G. Lynn (1977), "Breaking Free from Product Marketing," Journal of Marketing, 41 (April), 73-80.
    24. Smith D.C. and C.W. Park (1992), “The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (Aug), 296-313.
    25. Tauber, Edward M. (1981), “Brand Franchise Extensions: New Products Benefit from Extension Brand Name,” Business Horizons, 24 (1), 36-41.
    26. Tauber, Edward E. (1988), "Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in a Cost Control World," Journal of Advertising Research, 28 (August/September), 28-32.
    27. Van Riel, Allard C.R., Jos Lemmink, and Hans Ouwersloot (2001), "Consumer Evaluations of Service Brand Extensions," Journal of Service Research, 3 (February), 220-231
    28. Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Mary J. Bitner (1996), Services Marketing, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    29. Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988). “Consumer Perception of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (July), 2-22.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    92355030
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923550301
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2199View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback