English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114351/145400 (79%)
Visitors : 53032802      Online Users : 293
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/25611


    Title: 美國國會彈劾柯林頓總統個案研究
    Other Titles: The Impeachment of President William J. Clinton: A Case Study
    Authors: 鄒念祖
    Tzou, Byron N.
    Keywords: 美國憲法;彈劾總統;柯林頓總統;約翰生總統;尼克森總統;獨立檢察官
    The Constitution of the United States;President William J. Clinton;President Andrew Johnson;President Richard Nixon;Independent Counsel
    Date: 1999-05
    Issue Date: 2009-01-15 09:42:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一九九八年初獨立檢察官在調查瓊斯的民事訴訟案中，發現民主黨藉柯林頓總統作偽證、妨礙司法、及濫用職權，乃向眾議院報告，眾議院司法委員會決議控告柯林頓四項罪名，案經眾議院討論，議員多以黨的認同作為討論及投票的取向，對該四項罪名接納兩項，以二百二十八對二百零六票認定柯林頓犯有偽證罪，以二百二十一對二百一十二票認定其妨礙司法罪，並將案情於一九九九年一月十一日送達參議院。 參議院依憲法自訂審判程序，聽取檢方及被告的控詞及辯護，聽取證人的證詞，參院也辯論過應否打消彈劾以及應否申誡，共和民主兩黨議員多從政治立場與角度辯詳及詮釋憲法對彈劾的寓意與目的。二月十二日唱名投票，對偽證罪之控告，四十五票贊成有罪，五十五票反對；對妨礙司法罪，贊成與反對票數相等，均為五十票。時共和黨議員只有五十五人，而彈劾則需六十七票方可成立，參院在兩項罪名上均未能湊足使柯林頓去職的票數，因之彈劾案到此結束。
    On January 11, 1999, Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr reported to the House of Representatives that President Clinton had committed crimes related to witness Monica Lewinsky`s perjury in the civil law suit of Jones v. Clinton. The House began the impeachment process by passing two charges of perjury and obstruction of justice against Clinton. The Senate, after receiving these charges, set down rules for the impeachment trial. Senators listened to the charges brought by the prosecutors (the Representatives of the House) and the responses of the President`s lawyers. They deposed witnesses, interpreted the impeachment clause of the constitution, discussed substituting a censure for impeachment, and argued whether or not Clinton had committed any crime. Law scholars also debated the role that the Senate plays and the procedures it uses during impeachment trial. Finally, on February 12, 1999, the Senate rejected the charge of perjury by a 55 to 45 vote and the obstruction of justice by a 50 to 50 vote. The G. O. P., who had only 55 members in the senate, failed to get 67 votes necessary to remove Clinton from office.
    Relation: 問題與研究,38(5),17-30
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係研究中心] 期刊論文
    [問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    17-30.pdf1101KbAdobe PDF2998View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback