English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51823938      Online Users : 531
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/21660


    Title: 前蘇聯與俄羅斯對朝鮮半島政策之研究
    Other Titles: The Former Soviet Union and Rusia`s Policy to the Korean Peninsula
    Authors: 王承宗
    Wang, Cheng-Chung
    Keywords: 投資合作;債務;經貿關係;統一;聯合聲明;勢力中心;國家利益;友好條約;對外政策;認知;國際會議
    investment cooperation;debt;economic-trade relation;unification;treaty of friendship;foreign policy;perception;international conference
    Date: 1999-01
    Issue Date: 2008-12-31 12:34:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自戈巴契夫實施新思維外交政策後，結束東西方冷戰狀態；同時開展蘇聯與亞太地區的新關係，其中包括對朝鮮半島的政策。蘇聯於一九九０年和南韓建交，成為當時唯一與南北韓建立外交聯繫的大國；莫斯科的目在與漢城發展密切的經貿投資關係，但並未放棄對平壤的政治、軍事支持，儘管平壤對克理姆林宮的作為十分不滿。 一九九一年俄羅斯繼承蘇聯，並繼續與南韓維繫密切的政經關係，便迫切殷望漢城提供經濟、投資合作，顯現對朝鮮半島重南輕北的政策。其結果使莫斯科逐漸喪失對平壤的影響力，及毀損雙方密切的經濟、政治、軍事關係。莫斯科向漢城的一面政策，並未爭取到其企盼的巨量經濟合作機會。一九九四年之後，俄國開始調整對兩韓策略；由於俄國本身政經情勢持續惡化，對外聲望和實力嚴重受損，連帶對朝鮮半島的作用也相對削弱。
    After Gorbachev promoted his “New thinking” foreign policy, the cold war ended and the former Soviet Union began to develop new relations with the Asia-Pacific, including the Korean peninsula. The former Soviet Union opened diplomatic relations with South Korea in 1990, becoming the only big power to have formal contacts with the two Koreas. Developing intense trade and investment cooperation with Seoul became a major goal for Moscow. At the same time ,the Kremlin never abandoned its politicalmilitary support of Pyongyang, despite North Korea’s unhappiness with Gorbachev’s behaviour. Russia inherited the Soviet Union’s foreign obligations and international status in 1992, and continued to retain intense political-economic relations with South Korea. Moscow’s policy to the Korean peninsula seems to favor Seoul at the expense of Pyongyang. Consequently, Moscow has lost influence over North Korea. Russia’s pro=Seoul policy did not earned her economic cooperation, however. Thus after 1994, Russia was forced to revise its foreign policy regarding the two Koreas.
    Relation: 問題與研究 38(1),17-33
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係研究中心] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    17-33.pdf1356KbAdobe PDF2716View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback