政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/20853
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51728354      在线人数 : 343
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/20853


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20853


    题名: 課堂內師生問答互動之研究：國小數學課問答互動中教師教學信念與教學處理的關係
    其它题名: A Study on Question/Answer Interaction between Teacher and Student: Relationship between Teachers` Beliefs and Their Teaching Strategies
    作者: 張佩瑛;蔣治邦
    关键词: 教學信念 ; 教學處理;Teacher belief ; Teaching strategy
    日期: 2000-06
    上传时间: 2008-12-31 10:56:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究透過「教學信念量表」的施測，選取「傳統取向」與「進步取向」教學信念的中年級國小數學教師各20名，在四種學生數學表現情境之下，進行教學處理的訪談，以探討教師教學信念與教學處理的關係。結果顯示：當面對一個程度比較差的學生表現出錯誤解答時，「進步取向」教師較常用「提示思考」類型的教學處理，而「傳統取向」教師較常用「示範觀察」類型的教學處理；當學生表現出錯誤解答時，「傳統取向」教師對程度較好的學生較常用「提示思考」類型的教學處理，而面對程度較差的學生使用「示範觀察」類型的教學處理；當學生以非標準化步驟獲得正確解答時，兩種教學信念的教師多採用「接納了解」類型的教學處理。進一步地探討，發現「傳統取向」教師較常使用教師講解策略，而「進步取向」教則較常提供同儕討論的機會；探視教師對各類教學處理所提供的理由，本研究建議兩種教學信念的教師，對各種教學處理的觀點及功能有不同的認知，而導致教學處理偏好的差異。 Through the administration of a Teacher Belief Inventory, 40 math teachers in middle grades of elementary schools were selected, 20 with traditional beliefs, and the other 20 with progressive beliefs. All participating teachers were interviewed individually under four situations. In each situation, one student (either with high or low achievement) was presented, who either got an incorrect answer on a problem or got a correct answer with non-standard procedures. Teachers were requested to report their responses on the student’s performance and their reasons behind their responses in each situation. The goal of this study was to explore the relationship between a teachers’ belief and his or her teaching strategy. The results showed that：（1）As a lower math level student presented the wrong solution, the teachers with traditional beliefs more often took a “demonstration to imitate” type of teaching strategy, and the teachers with progressive beliefs more often took a “hint to think” type of teaching strategy.（2）As the student presented the wrong math solution, the teachers with traditional beliefs more often took a “hint to think” type of teaching strategy for a higher math level student, but a “demonstration to imitate ” type of teaching strategy for a lower math level student. （3）As the student presented the correct math solution with non-standard procedures, the teachers with both types of teaching beliefs took an “ approval in understanding “ type of teaching strategy. （4）The teachers with traditional beliefs frequently give lectures, while the teachers with progressive belief encourage discussions with fellows. From the analysis of teachers’ reasons for their chosen responses, this study suggested that teachers with two different types of teaching beliefs had different viewpoints about teaching techniques. As a consequence, teachers were in favor one kind of teaching strategy over the others.
    關聯: 教育與心理研究, 23(1), 99-121
    Journal of Education ＆ Psychology
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[心理學系] 期刊論文
    [教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2764检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈