 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 118295/149332 (79%)
Visitors : 78132160
Online Users : 162
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159530
|
| Title: | 量刑偏差產生的社會、文化及法律溯因與改進路徑
Social, Cultural, and Legal Causes and Improvement of Sentencing Bias |
| Authors: | 胡昌明
Hu, Chang-Ming |
| Contributors: | 政大法學評論 |
| Keywords: | 同案同判;量刑偏差;裁判心理;法律文化;法律的抽象性;社會結構特徵;思維定勢;利益考量;自由裁量權;案例指導制度
Treating like cases alike;Sentencing deviation;Adjudication psychology;Legal culture;Abstraction of law;Social structural features;Mindset;Interest consideration;Discretion;Case guidance |
| Date: | 2024-09 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-09-16 11:12:50 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 法律面前人人平等是現代司法的基本原則，這一原則在刑法中具體體現為量刑的均衡。同案同判是法律獲得安定性，民眾感受司法公平的基本要求。司法實踐中，由於法律規範本身的抽象性，法條語言文字的模糊性，法官個人經歷差異、各種利益考量以及在中國的法律文化中，等級關係和社會態度等傳統影響等，導致產生量刑偏差。量刑偏差對法律的確定性、公正性和社會正義觀構成了極大的挑戰，因此需要透過推動量刑規範化、約束法官自由裁量權、完善司法解釋和案例指導工作，增強法官的同質化水準等措施，降低社會、文化等法外因素對裁判的影響，提高量刑的均衡水準。
Equality before the law is a fundamental principle of modern justice, crucial for ensuring balanced sentencing in criminal law. Treating like cases alike is essential for maintaining legal stability and fostering public confidence in judicial fairness. However, in judicial practice, the abstract nature of legal norms, the vagueness of statutory language, and differences in judges’personal experiences, along with various interest considerations, can lead to sentencing deviation. Additionally, in Chinese legal culture, traditional influences such as hierarchical relationships, social attitudes, and other factors further contribute to such deviation. Sentencing deviation significantly challenges legal certainty, fairness, and social justice. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce the impact of social, cultural, and other extralegal factors on judicial decisions and improve sentencing balance. This can be achieved through measures such as promoting the standardisation of sentencing, restraining the discretionary power of judges, improving judicial interpretation and case guidance, and enhancing homogeneity among judges. |
| Relation: | 政大法學評論, 178, 1-35 |
| Data Type: | article |
| DOI 連結: | https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202024090178001 |
| DOI: | 10.53106/102398202024090178001 |
| Appears in Collections: | [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
