English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118658/149719 (79%)
Visitors : 80358793      Online Users : 21
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159457


    Title: 新竹地區私立幼兒園教保服務人員專業成長與工作幸福感與組織效能關係之研究
    A Study on the Relationship among Early Childhood Educators’ Professional Development, Job Satisfaction, and School Effectiveness in Hsinchu Area
    Authors: 林秀惠
    Contributors: 秦夢群
    林秀惠
    Keywords: 幼兒園
    教保服務人員
    專業成長
    工作幸福感
    組織效能
    Private kindergarten
    Early childhood educators
    Professional development
    Job satisfaction
    School effectiveness
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 17:09:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討新竹地區私立幼兒園教保服務人員之專業成長、工作幸福感與組織效能三者之間的關係。近年來,幼教現場面臨人力資源短缺、網路社群媒體影響,以及政府各項政策實施的衝擊,尤其在新竹地區高所得與高教育背景的家長族群壓力下,教保工作挑戰日益嚴峻。教保服務人員的專業發展與心理福祉已成為提升教育品質的關鍵因素。然而,針對學齡前幼兒教保服務人員之研究相對有限,尤以同時納入「專業成長」、「工作幸福感」與「組織效能」三變項進行實證探討者更為稀少,因此本研究針對此一實務需求加以深入分析。
    本研究採問卷調查法,以新竹縣市私立幼兒園中服務於2至6歲幼兒之教保服務人員為對象,採分層抽樣發出問卷397份,回收有效問卷338份。研究工具經專家效度檢核,並採用授權標準化量表,包含專業成長、工作幸福感與組織效能三部分。所得資料以SPSS進行統計分析,包括描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析與多元逐步迴歸分析。
    研究結果顯示,教保服務人員在專業成長(M = 3.62)、工作幸福感(M = 3.72)與組織效能(M = 3.83)三者整體感知皆達中上程度,其中以「教學專業知能」、「正向情感」與「家長與社區支持」構面得分最高。背景變項分析顯示,年齡、服務年資、最高學歷、薪資與園所規模等因素對專業成長與工作幸福感具有顯著影響。整體而言,30歲以下、服務年資21年以上、學歷為碩士及以上、薪資45,001元以上,並任職於11班以上園所者,其得分顯著較高,顯示個人資歷與組織條件對其職場感受與專業發展具重要影響。相關分析結果指出,專業成長與組織效能之間呈顯著中度正相關(r = .484, p < .001),工作幸福感與組織效能亦呈中度正相關(r = .476, p < .001),而專業成長與工作幸福感之間則為高度正相關(r = .759, p < .001),三者彼此關係密切且穩定。多元迴歸分析結果顯示,專業成長與工作幸福感對組織效能具顯著預測力(R² = .256, p < .001),其中「工作成就」為最穩定的預測因子,對整體組織效能(β = .319)、學校行政管理(β = .151)、幼兒學習表現(β = .188)及家長與社區支持(β = .190)均具顯著正向影響。「班級經營與輔導」亦可有效預測組織效能各向度,而「專業支持」與「同儕合作成長」則對家長與社區支持具有解釋力,顯示教學能力、組織支持與人際互動對幼兒園效能具關鍵性。
    綜合研究結果,提出三方面實務建議:首先,建議教育行政主管機關鬆綁收費限制,提升薪資福利與職場友善程度(如提供家庭照護資源),以提升教保服務人員的幸福感與留任意願。其次,建議園所經營者建構專業支持環境,促進同儕合作與進修發展,並藉由差異化課程建構園所品牌與提升家長認同。最後,建議教保服務人員持續強化專業知能與正向情感,發展良好人際互動與心理韌性,建構支持性專業社群,提升整體教學與職場效能。此外,因本研究採橫斷式設計,僅能說明變項間關聯,無法推論其因果關係,建議後續研究可採縱貫式設計進行長期追蹤,進一步掌握變項變化歷程與因果邏輯。另本研究侷限於新竹地區私立幼兒園,建議未來可擴大樣本範圍與研究對象,結合質性訪談與混合研究法,以提升研究解釋力與外部效度。
    This study aimed to explore the relationships among professional development, job satisfaction, and school effectiveness of early childhood educators in private kindergartens in the Hsinchu area. In recent years, the field of early childhood education has encountered challenges such as workforce shortages, the impact of social media, and the implementation of diverse government policies. These challenges are especially intensified in Hsinchu, where families tend to have higher incomes and higher levels of education. The professional development and job satisfaction of early childhood educators have become critical factors for enhancing educational quality. However, research focusing on early childhood educators, particularly studies that simultaneously examine professional development, job satisfaction, and school effectiveness, remains limited. This study was therefore conducted in response to this practical need.
    A questionnaire survey was administered to early childhood educators working with children aged 2 to 6 in private kindergartens across Hsinchu City and County. A total of 397 questionnaires were distributed, and 338 valid responses were collected. The research instruments, including scales measuring professional development, job satisfaction, and school effectiveness, were validated by experts and based on standardized, authorized scales. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, including descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression.
    The findings revealed that participants reported moderately high levels of perceived professional growth (M = 3.62), job satisfaction (M = 3.72), and school effectiveness (M = 3.83), with the highest scores in the dimensions of “professional teaching competencies,” “positive emotions,” and “parent and community support.” Analysis of background variables indicated that age, years of service, highest academic degree, salary level, and kindergarten size significantly affected perceptions of professional growth and work well-being. Specifically, educators under 30 years old, with over 21 years of service, holding a master’s degree or above, earning over NT$45,001 monthly, and working in large-sized kindergartens (11 or more classes) reported significantly higher scores. Correlation analysis indicated a moderate positive relationship between professional development and school effectiveness (r = .484, p < .001), and between job satisfaction and school effectiveness (r = .476, p < .001), while professional development and job satisfaction showed a strong positive correlation (r = .759, p < .001). Multiple regression analysis showed that professional development and job satisfaction significantly predicted school effectiveness (R² = .256, p < .001). Among the predictors, “sense of achievement” emerged as the most stable factor, significantly influencing overall school effectiveness (β = .319), school administration (β = .151), children's learning performance (β = .188), and parent/community support (β = .190). Additionally, “classroom management and guidance” significantly predicted multiple dimensions of school effectiveness, while “professional support” and “peer collaboration” were predictors of parent and community support. These results highlight the crucial role of teaching ability, organizational climate, and interpersonal interaction in shaping kindergarten effectiveness.
    Based on the findings, three practical recommendations are proposed. First, it is suggested that education authorities relax tuition regulations and improve compensation and benefits for early childhood educators to enhance their job satisfaction and retention. Supportive workplace policies, such as access to domestic care personnel, are also encouraged to help married staff balance work and family demands. Second, kindergarten administrators are advised to foster supportive professional environments, strengthen platforms for peer collaboration and communication, and encourage teachers to engage in professional development and curriculum design. Such practices can promote a sense of achievement and parental recognition through differentiated curriculum branding. Finally, educators are encouraged to continuously enhance their professional competencies and emotional positivity, develop interpersonal skills and psychological resilience, and build supportive professional communities, thereby improving teaching quality and workplace effectiveness. This study employed a cross-sectional design, which limits causal inference. It is recommended that future research adopt longitudinal approaches to track variable trajectories and establish causal relationships. Moreover, as the sample was limited to private kindergartens in Hsinchu, generalization to other regions or educational systems should be made cautiously. Future studies may expand the sampling scope and integrate qualitative or mixed-method approaches to enhance depth and external validity.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    王穎莉(2010)。我國幼兒教師專業成長研究綜述。教育集刊,8-10。
    朱岱英(2023)。科技壓力、專業學習社群與教師專業成長之研究:以「優派創新教學社群」為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學。
    朱曉紅、楊慧娟(2018)。二十一世紀以來我國卓越幼兒教師專業成長研究述評:基於CiteSpace III的可視化分析。陝西學前師範學院學報,34(4),115-121。
    呂錘卿、林生傳(2001)。國民小學教師專業成長指標及現況之研究。教育學刊,17,45-64。
    周淑婕(2022)。桃園市國小教師在職進修動機與專業成長之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高苑科技大學。
    胡佩琳(2020)。臺中市國民小學教師對公開授課態度及教師專業成長關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。
    師遠賢(2010)。論幼兒教師職責的兩種特性。教育集刊,11-12。
    張秀瑩(2008)。國民小學校長讀書會團隊學習與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
    劉月仙(2022)。新北市私立幼兒園園長轉型領導、教保服務人員幸福感與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
    蘇亭瑋(2018)。高雄市國民小學校長空間領導與教師工作幸福感關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
    新竹縣教育局(2023年09月02日)。竹縣培力初任教師不遺餘力首推學習護照提升教育品質。縣府新聞。https://www.hsinchu.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=153&s=253858
    Hcceiu(2024年02月26日)。教育亂世的求生之道 ~「112學年度精進~教師專業成長與發展系列一」將會告訴您。新竹縣教師會。http://www.hcceiu.org.tw/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1592

    二、英文部分
    Acton, R., & Glasgow, P. (2015). Teacher wellbeing in neoliberal contexts: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 99-114.
    Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. S. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College Record, 103(5), 760-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00134
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
    Bennett, N., Crawford, M., & Cartwright, M. (Eds.) (2003). Effective educational leadership. The Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580300200431
    Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548-556). Elsevier.
    Bosker, R. J., & Witziers, B. (1995). A meta analytical approach regarding school effectiveness: The true size of school effects and the effect size of educational leadership (ED392147). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED392147.pdf
    Brophy, J. (1986). Classroom management techniques. Education and Urban Society, 18(2), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124586018002005
    Chi, H., Yeh, H., & Wu, S. F. (2014). How well-being mediates the relationship between social support and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(4), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n4p117
    Coldwell, M. (2017). Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: A path model approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.015
    Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Department of Education.
    Creemers, B., Scheerens, J., & Reynolds, D. (2000). Theory development in school effectiveness research. The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 297-312). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203454404-18
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 197-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
    Day, C., & Sachs, J. (Eds.) (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Open University Press.
    Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2014). The effects of a short-term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behaviour and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 234–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.947024
    Derrick, J. (2013). ‘Practitioner learning’ not ‘professional learning’: Towards a non-technocratic model of autonomous development for post-compulsory sector teachers. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2013.819266
    Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
    Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
    Döş, İ. (2014). Some model suggestions for measuring effective schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1454-1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.415
    Doyle, W. (1986). Content representation in teachers’ definitions of academic work. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027860180402
    Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Jasini, A. (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917751229
    Fitz-Gibbon, C., & Koch an, S. (2000). School effectiveness and education indicators. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 257-282). Routledge.
    Glasman, N., & Binianimov, I. (1981). Input–output analyses of schools. Review of Educational Research, 51, 509–539.
    Glickman, C. D. (1993). Restructuring policy for America’s school. NASSP Bulletin, 77(549), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659307754913
    Gray, J. (1990). The quality of schooling: Frameworks for judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 38(3), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1990.9973850
    Jesson, D., & Gray, J. (1991). Slants on slopes: Using multi‐level models to investigate differential school effectiveness and its impact on pupils’ examination results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345910020305
    Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
    Hall-Kenyon, K. M., Bullough, R. V., MacKay, K. L., & Marshall, E. E. (2014). Preschool teacher well-being: A review of the literature. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(3), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0595-4
    Harding, J. F., Connors, M. C., Krauss, A. F., Aikens, N., Malone, L., & Tarullo, L. (2019). Head Start teachers’ professional development, well-being, attitudes, and practices: Understanding changes over time and predictive associations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(3-4), 324-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12327
    Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162-1194. https://doi.org/10.1086/227799
    Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345960070101
    Hung, H. T., & Yeh, H. C. (2013). Forming a change environment to encourage professional development through a teacher study group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.009
    Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America (ED077551). ERIC.
    Jeon, L., Buettner, C. K., & Grant, A. A. (2018). Early childhood teachers’ psychological well-being: Exploring potential predictors of depression, stress, and emotional exhaustion. Early Education and Development, 29(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1341806
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
    Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Columbia University Press.
    Longaretti, L., & Toe, D. (2017). School leaders’ perspectives on educating teachers to work in vulnerable communities: New insights from the coal face. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n4.2
    McCallum, F. (2021). Teacher and staff wellbeing: Understanding the experiences of school staff. In M. L. Kern & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of positive education (pp. 715-740). Palgrave Macmillan.
    McCallum, F., & Price, D. (2010). Well teachers, well students. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 4(1), 19-34.
    Messer, B. L., & Dillman, D. A. (2011). Surveying the general public over the internet using address-based sampling and mail contact procedures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 429–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr021
    Morgan, C., & Neil, P. (2001). Teaching modern foreign languages: A handbook for teachers. Routledge.
    Mortimore, P. (1991). School effectiveness research: Which way at the crossroads? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345910020304
    Mushayikwa, E., & Lubben, F. (2009). Self-directed professional development – Hope for teachers working in deprived environments? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.003
    Narea, M., Treviño, E., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Miranda, C., & Gutiérrez-Rioseco, J. (2022). Understanding the relationship between preschool teachers’ well-being, interaction quality and students’ well-being. Child Indicators Research, 15, 533-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09876-3
    O’Sullivan, C., Ryan, S., O’Sullivan, L. (2021). Teacher well-being in diverse school and preschool contexts. In T. R. N. Murphy & P. Mannix-McNamara (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher well-being and diversity: Understanding teaching-learning practice (pp. 163-187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1699-0_8
    Owen, S. M. (2014). Teacher professional learning communities in innovative contexts: ‘ah hah moments’, ‘passion’ and ‘making a difference’ for student learning. Professional Development in Education, 41(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.869504
    Owen, S. (2016). Professional learning communities: building skills, reinvigorating the passion, and nurturing teacher wellbeing and “flourishing” within significantly innovative schooling contexts. Educational Review, 68(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1119101
    Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725
    Raudenbush, S. W. (1989). The analysis of longitudinal, multilevel data. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 721-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90024-4
    Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4), 307-335. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986020004307
    Retallick, J., & Butt, R. (2004). Professional well-being and learning: A study of teacher-peer workplace relationships. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 85-99.
    Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness: The international dimension. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 232-256). Routledge.
    Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (1999). The future agenda of studies into the effectiveness of schools. In R. J. Bosker, B. P. M. Creemers, & S. Stringfield (Eds.), Enhancing educational excellence, equity and efficiency (pp. 223-251). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4253-3_10
    Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000). The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 134-159). Routledge.
    Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Hopkins, D., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 206-231). Routledge.
    Rhodes, C., Nevill, A., & Allan, J. (2004). Valuing and supporting teachers: A survey of teacher satisfaction, dissatisfaction, morale and retention in an English local education authority. Research in Education, 71(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.71.7
    Roffey, S. (2012). Pupil wellbeing – Teacher wellbeing: Two sides of the same coin? Educational & Child Psychology, 29(4), 8-17.
    Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Open University Press.
    Sammons, P. (1996). Complexities in the judgement of school effectiveness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(2), 113–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361960020201
    Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. Office for Standards in Education.
    Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101(2), 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
    Schweitzer, P. J. (1984). On the existence of relative values for undiscounted Markovian decision processes with a scalar gain rate. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 104(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(84)90031-3
    Sharp, D., Cole, M., Lave, C., Ginsburg, H. P., Brown, A. L., & French, L. A. (1979). Education and cognitive development: The evidence from experimental research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 44(1/2), 1-112.
    Sharrocks, L. (2014). School staff perceptions of well-being and experience of an intervention to promote well-being. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2013.868787
    Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59.
    Sockett, H. (1993). The moral base for teacher professionalism: Professional ethics in education. Teachers College Press.
    Soini, T., Pyhältö, K., & Pietarinen, J. (2010). Pedagogical well‐being: Reflecting learning and well‐being in teachers’ work. Teachers and Teaching, 16(6), 735-751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2010.517690
    Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402
    Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y
    Stevenson, D. W. (1978). Rhetoric and law: Designing a program in communication for law students. College Composition & Communication, 29(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc197816334
    Sullivan, B., Roche, M., Glenn, M., & McDonagh, C. (2021). Practitioner enquiry and action research for teacher well-being. In T. Murphy & P. Mannix-McNamara (Eds.), Teacher well-being across borders (pp. 13-43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1699-0_2
    Teddlie, C., Falkowski, C., Stringfield, S., Desselle, S., & Garvue, R. (1984). Louisiana school effectiveness study: Phase two. Louisiana State Department Education.
    Tsouloupas, C. N., Carson, R. L., Matthews, R., Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Exploring the association between teachers’ perceived student misbehaviour and emotional exhaustion: the importance of teacher efficacy beliefs and emotion regulation. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903494460
    Turner, C. L. (1993). Teachers’ perceptions of effective classroom management within an inner-city middle school. Paper presented at Mid-South Educational Research Association.
    Willms, J. D. (1992). Monitoring school performance: A guide for educators. Falmer.
    Wolf, S., & Peele, M. E. (2019). Examining sustained impacts of two teacher professional development programs on professional well-being and classroom practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86(2), 102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.003
    Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34(2), 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
    Wu, H., Gao, X., & Shen, J. (2019). Principal leadership effects on student achievement: a multilevel analysis using Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 data. Educational Studies, 46(3), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1584853
    Yoo, J., & Carter, D. (2017). Teacher emotion and learning as praxis: Professional development that matters. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 8-52.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    學校行政碩士在職專班
    111911007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111911007
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100701.pdf2090KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback