English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118575/149625 (79%)
Visitors : 79393650      Online Users : 65
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159248


    Title: 雙軌轉型之個案分析
    A Case Study on Dual Transformations
    Authors: 林昕潁
    Lin, Hsin-Yin
    Contributors: 邱奕嘉
    Chiu, Yi-Chia
    林昕潁
    Lin, Hsin-Yin
    Keywords: 雙軌轉型
    雙元性組織
    探索與利用
    研華科技
    Dual Transformations
    Ambidextrous Organization
    Exploration and Exploitation
    Advantech
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 16:06:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 面對數位化與智慧化浪潮席捲全球市場,傳統以硬體設計生產為主的工業電腦廠商,僅透過產品的銷售已難以維持競爭優勢。如何在穩定核心業務的同時,發展新興成長動能,已成為維持競爭優勢的關鍵課題。雙軌轉型(Dual Transformation)主張企業應透過「轉型A」強化既有核心業務,並同時啟動「轉型B」以探索全新成長引擎。而為實現雙軌策略之協同發展,企業組織亦需具備雙元性(Ambidexterity),即同時發展探索(exploration)與利用(exploitation)之能力。
    本研究以全球工業電腦領導品牌研華科技為個案,探討其如何應用雙軌轉型策略,並透過雙元性組織設計支持企業轉型與成長。透過質性之個案研究法,閱讀並以文獻探討為理論基礎,構建「雙軌策略 × 雙元性組織」之分析框架。得出研究命題:一、企業進行核心業務優化時,需改變「產品導向」的思維,轉向「價值導向」。二、平台化與生態系打造為企業突破成長瓶頸,為推動第二成長曲線之關鍵途徑。三、企業新事業之孵化與核心業務轉型可透過結構性雙元組織設計與高階賦能之策略統籌,以在雙元性的「探索」與「利用」取得動態平衡。
    整體而言,本研究貢獻在於整合雙軌轉型與雙元性組織兩大理論脈絡,提出企業策略轉型與組織調整的整合分析視角,可供面臨高度不確定環境的科技製造業作為參考,並提供企業在推動轉型時的組織設計建議。
    Amid the global wave of digitalization and intelligent transformation, traditional industrial PC manufacturers, which have long relied on hardware design and production, are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain their competitive edge through product sales alone. The ability to stabilize core businesses while simultaneously developing new growth engines has become a critical issue for sustaining competitiveness. The concept of Dual Transformation suggests that companies should reinforce their core business through “Transformation A” while launching “Transformation B” to explore entirely new growth opportunities. To successfully implement these dual strategies, organizations must also possess ambidexterity—the capability to pursue both exploration and exploitation simultaneously.
    This study adopts Advantech, a global leader in the industrial PC industry, as a case to investigate how the company applies the dual transformation strategy and leverages organizational ambidexterity to support its growth and transformation. Using a qualitative case study approach and drawing on theoretical foundations from prior literature, this research develops an analytical framework that integrates the logics of dual transformation and organizational ambidexterity. The study proposes three main propositions: (1) To optimize the core business, companies must shift from a “product-oriented” to a “value-oriented” mindset. (2) Platform development and ecosystem orchestration are key pathways for overcoming growth bottlenecks and achieving a second growth curve. (3) The incubation of new businesses and the transformation of core operations can be facilitated through structural ambidexterity and strategic empowerment by top management to achieve dynamic balance between exploration and exploitation.
    Overall, this study contributes by integrating the dual transformation and organizational ambidexterity frameworks, offering a comprehensive analytical lens on strategy and organizational design. The findings provide strategic and structural implications for technology-based manufacturing firms facing high environmental uncertainty.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1. 吳學良、董夢杭、鮑慧文(2016)。研華科技:組織成長與精實。中山管理評論,24卷4期,761~789頁。
    2. 周宜芳譯(2024)。打造「雙元組織」,讓既有業務與創新目標並駕齊驅。哈佛商業評論全球繁體中文版。擷取日期:2025年5月13日,取自:https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/23516/the-ambidextrous-organization
    3. 邱伃坪(2017)。工業用電腦品牌經營策略之研究 – 以研華科技為例 [碩士論文,國立中山大學]。
    4. 林麗冠譯(2010)。白地策略:打造無法模仿的市場新規則。天下文化。(Mark Johnson, 2010)
    5. 林麗雪譯(2019)。雙軌轉型:既有業務再升級+發掘市場新缺口,翻轉創新的兩難。寶鼎出版社。(Scott D. Anthony, Clark G. Gilbert, Mark W. Johnson, 2017)
    6. 郭思餘譯(2018)。研究方法:質化與量化方法之應用。台北:雙葉書廊。(Neuman, W. Lawrence, 2016)

    英文文獻
    1. Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.
    2. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.
    3. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    4. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. HarperBusiness.
    5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
    6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
    7. Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In Strategies and implementation (pp. 167–188). New York: North Holland.
    8. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 91–112.
    9. Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to quantitative research and data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18.
    10. He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494.
    11. Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449–470.
    12. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
    13. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
    14. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
    15. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.
    16. Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 5(3), 65–72.
    17. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). SAGE.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    112364111
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112364111
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    411101.pdf3631KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback