Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159091
|
| Title: | 連結數位化與永續的未來：基於心智海綿理論探討組織雙軸轉型
Bridging Digital and Sustainable Futures: An Exploration of Organizational Twin Transformation from a Mindsponge Theory Perspective |
| Authors: | 郝珮涵
Hao, Pei-Han |
| Contributors: | 周致遠
Chou, Chih-Yuan
郝珮涵
Hao, Pei-Han |
| Keywords: | 雙軸轉型
心智海綿理論
永續創新
轉型策略
組織決策
Twin Transformation
Mindsponge Theory
Sustainable innovation
Transformational strategy
Organizational decision-making |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-09-01 15:04:13 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 雙軸轉型，即數位轉型與永續轉型的整合及交互作用，已成為組織應對快速變動的市場環境與日益嚴峻的法規要求之關鍵策略。然而，儘管雙軸轉型展現出巨大的潛力，其推動過程往往牽涉多重利害關係人與資源協調，具高度複雜性。本研究以一間臺灣民營銀行為質性個案，透過訪談、現場觀察及公開資料，並以心智海綿理論為分析視角，探討組織在雙軸轉型中的決策機制、資源整合與協作模式。研究結果顯示，數位導向與永續導向專案在驅動動機與績效衡量上存在差異，組織應依轉型階段動態評估策略的融合與取捨。從理論角度而言，本研究將心智海綿理論擴展至組織層級，建構整合不同轉型邏輯的決策框架。從實務角度上，本研究提供平衡各方觀點的選擇依據，協助組織在瞬息萬變的環境中奠定穩健前行的基石，開創永續共榮的局面。
Twin transformation, the integration and interplay of digital and sustainability transformations, has become a critical strategy for organizations to address rapidly changing market environments and increasingly stringent regulatory requirements. Despite its vast potential, implementing twin transformation often entails high complexity, involving multiple stakeholders and extensive coordination of resources. This study uses a qualitative case of a Taiwanese private bank, drawing on interviews, field observations, and public data, and applies the mindsponge theory to examine decision-making, resource integration, and collaboration in twin transformation. Findings reveal distinct motivations and performance metrics between digital- and sustainability-oriented projects, underscoring the need for dynamic evaluation of strategic integration and trade-offs across transformation stages. Theoretically, the study extends the mindsponge theory to the organizational level, offering a framework to reconcile divergent transformation logics. Practically, it proposes decision criteria to balance diverse stakeholder perspectives, fostering resilience and innovation while building a foundation for sustainable, mutually beneficial growth. |
| Reference: | Aqlan, F., & Al-Fandi, L. (2018). Prioritizing process improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.004
Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., Nieminen, H., & Kankainen, T. (2024). Assessing digital capabilities for digital transformation—The MIND framework. Information Systems Journal, 35(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12519
Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., & Tapanainen, T. (2020). Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P., & Jaskiewicz, T. (2017). Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.081
Baldassarre, B., Konietzko, J., Brown, P., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N., Karpen, I. O., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Addressing the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models by prototyping: A tool for planning and executing small-scale pilots. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120295
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Belotto, M. J. (2018). Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2622–2633.
Bianchini, S., Damioli, G., & Ghisetti, C. (2023). The environmental effects of the “twin” green and digital transition in European regions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 84(4), 877–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7
Bourne, H., & Jenkins, M. (2013). Organizational values: A dynamic perspective. Organization Studies, 34(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467155
Breiter, K., Crome, C., Oberländer, A. M., & Schnaak, F. (2024). Dynamic capabilities for the twin transformation climb: A capability maturity model. Information Systems Frontiers, 26, 2205–2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10520-y
Brunetti, F., Matt, D. T., Bonfanti, A., Longhi, A. D., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: Strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 697–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0309
Buchanan, A., & Kern, M. L. (2017). The benefit mindset: The psychology of contribution and everyday leadership. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i1.538
Christmann, A.-S., Crome, C., Graf-Drasch, V., Oberländer, A. M., & Schmidt, L. (2024). The Twin Transformation Butterfly. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00847-2
Costanza, D. P., Blacksmith, N., Coats, M. R., Severt, J. B., & DeCostanza, A. H. (2016). The Effect of Adaptive Organizational Culture on Long-Term Survival. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9420-y
De Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., & Terzi, S. (2017). A Maturity Model for Assessing the Digital Readiness of Manufacturing Companies. In H. Lödding, R. Riedel, K.-D. Thoben, G. von Cieminski, & D. Kiritsis (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing (pp. 13–20). Springer International Publishing.
Diodato, D., Huergo, E., Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Rentocchini, F., & Timmermans, B. (2023). Introduction to the special issue on “the twin (digital and green) transition: Handling the economic and social challenges.” Industry and Innovation, 30(7), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2023.2254272
El Hilali, W., El Manouar, A., & Janati Idrissi, M. A. (2020). Reaching sustainability during a digital transformation: A PLS approach. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(1), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2019-0083
Foerster-Metz, U. S., Marquardt, K., Golowko, N., Kompalla, A., & Hell, C. (2018). Digital transformation and its implications on organizational behavior. Journal of EU Research in Business, 2018, 340873. https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.340873
Fürstenau, D., Baiyere, A., & Kliewer, N. (2019). A dynamic model of embeddedness in digital infrastructures. Information Systems Research, 30(4), 1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0864
Ghosh, S., Hughes, M., Hodgkinson, I., & Hughes, P. (2022). Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach. Technovation, 113, 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102414
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021). Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers. Computers in Industry, 132, 103522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103522
Graf-Drasch, V., Kauffeld, L., Kempf, L., Oberländer, A. M., & Teuchert, A. (2023). Driving twin transformation—The interplay of digital transformation and sustainability transformation. Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2023), 255. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2023_rp/255
Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817
Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003
Guinan, P. J., Parise, S., & Langowitz, N. (2019). Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.005
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Heavin, C., & Power, D. J. (2018). Challenges for digital transformation – towards a conceptual decision support guide for managers. Journal of Decision Systems, 27(sup1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2018.1468697
Heyes, G., Sharmina, M., Mendoza, J. M. F., Gallego-Schmid, A., & Azapagic, A. (2018). Developing and implementing circular economy business models in service-oriented technology companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.168
Holmström, J. (2022). From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework. Business Horizons, 65(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.03.006
Huang, J., & Koroteev, D. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for planning of energy and waste management. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101426
Iyigun Meydanli, I., & Polat, M. (2022). Roadmapping process implementation: Challenges for a large-scale company. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3024747
Konopik, J., Jahn, C., Schuster, T., Hoßbach, N., & Pflaum, A. (2022). Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: A conceptual framework. Digital Business, 2(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100019
Kunkel, S., & Matthess, M. (2020). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: Putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.022
Kwilinski, A. (2023). The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Digital Transformation: Bibliometric Analysis. Virtual Economics, 6(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.03(4)
Lee, J. H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S.-H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.020
Li, H., Wu, Y., Cao, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.036
Li, L. (2022). Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007
Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F., & Valero, F. (2021). Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343
Maffei, A., Grahn, S., & Nuur, C. (2019). Characterization of the impact of digitalization on the adoption of sustainable business models in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 81, 765–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.191
Mantello, P., Ho, M.-T., Nguyen, M.-H., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2023). Machines that feel: Behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01837-1
Margherita, A., Espindola, A., & de Sá Freire, P. (2024). Digital transformation and green operations: A successful entrepreneurial journey at portobello shop. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 11786–11795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3431700
Maroufkhani, P., Desouza, K. C., Perrons, R. K., & Iranmanesh, M. (2022). Digital transformation in the resource and energy sectors: A systematic review. Resources Policy, 76, 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102622
McMullen, J. S., & Kier, A. S. (2016). Trapped by the entrepreneurial mindset: Opportunity seeking and escalation of commitment in the Mount Everest disaster. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 663–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.09.003
Montresor, S., & Vezzani, A. (2023). Digital technologies and eco-innovation. Evidence of the twin transition from Italian firms. Industry and Innovation, 30(7), 766–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2023.2213179
Myshko, A., Checchinato, F., Colapinto, C., Finotto, V., & Mauracher, C. (2024). Towards the twin transition in the agri-food sector? Framing the current debate on sustainability and digitalisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452, 142063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142063
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Bayat, R., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Afrasyabi, H., & Chau, K. (2017). Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management—A case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.172
Naumann, C. (2017). Entrepreneurial mindset: A synthetic literature review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050308
Nguyen, M.-H., La, V.-P., Le, T.-T., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2022). Introduction to Bayesian Mindsponge Framework analytics: An innovative method for social and psychological research. MethodsX, 9, 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101808
Nguyen, M.-H., Vuong, Q. H., Ho, M.-T., & Le, T.-T. (2021). Mindsponge mechanism. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3887262
Olsson, P., Galaz, V., & Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society, 19(4), Article 1. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06799-190401
Paasivaara, M., Behm, B., Lassenius, C., & Hallikainen, M. (2018). Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: A case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(5), 2550–2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8
Pan, X., Mangla, S. K., Song, M., & Vrontis, D. (2024). Climate policy uncertainty and entrepreneur eco-investment behavior for green growth—Moderate effect analysis of twin transition. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 8459–8468. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3383475
Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
Rahn, J., Jaudas, A., & Achtziger, A. (2016). To plan or not to plan—Mindset effects on visual attention in decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 9(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000056
Rehman, S. U., Giordino, D., Zhang, Q., & Alam, G. M. (2023). Twin transitions & industry 4.0: Unpacking the relationship between digital and green factors to determine green competitive advantage. Technology in Society, 73, 102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102227
Roetzel, P. G. (2019). Information overload in the information age: A review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development. Business Research, 12(2), 479–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0069-z
Rumar, K. (1985). The role of perceptual and cognitive filters in observed behavior. In L. Evans & R. C. Schwing (Eds.), Human Behavior and Traffic Safety (pp. 151–170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_8
Sciberras, M., & Dingli, A. (2023). Research analysis—Triangulation approach. In Investigating AI Readiness in the Maltese Public Administration (Vol. 568, pp. 31–32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19900-4_9
Secundo, G., Massaro, A., Vecchio, P. D., & Garzoni, A. (2024). An entrepreneurial university ecosystem for sustaining the twin transition through a complex adaptive system approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 10966–10983. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3405021
Singh, B., Srivastava, A. P., Chatterjee, S., Durana, P., & Kliestik, T. (2024). Assessing digital capability for twin transition and profitability: From firm and people perspectives with leadership support as moderator. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34, 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12698
Spaltini, M., Terzi, S., & Taisch, M. (2024). Development and implementation of a roadmapping methodology to foster twin transition at manufacturing plant level. Computers in Industry, 154, 104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.104025
Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A., & Biesbroek, G. R. (2017). Transformational change: Governance interventions for climate change adaptation from a continuous change perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(4), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1168288
Truant, E., Giordino, D., Borlatto, E., & Bhatia, M. (2024). Drivers and barriers of smart technologies for circular economy: Leveraging smart circular economy implementation to nurture companies’ performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122954
Uhrenholt, J. N. (2022). Towards the twin transformation: A view on designing circular and digital organisations [Doctoral dissertation, Aalborg Universitetsforlag]. https://doi.org/10.54337/aau515133454
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210024914
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Vuong, Q. H. (2016). Global mindset as the integration of emerging socio-cultural values through mindsponge processes: A transition economy perspective. In J. Kuada (Ed.), Global Mindsets (1st ed., pp. 109–126). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736396
Vuong, Q. H., & Napier, N. K. (2015). Acculturation and global mindsponge: An emerging market perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.06.003
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
Williams, S. L. (2011). Engaging values in international business practice. Business Horizons, 54(4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.02.004
Yang, K.-P., Hsiung, H.-H., & Chiu, Y.-J. (2015). The comfort zone of the value circumplex for entrepreneurship: A structural analysis. Career Development International, 20(6), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-07-2014-0087
Yeow, A., Soh, C., & Hansen, R. (2018). Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.09.001
Zimmer, M. P., & Järveläinen, J. (2022). Digital–sustainable co-transformation: Introducing the triple bottom line of sustainability to digital transformation research. In D. Kreps, R. Davison, T. Komukai, & K. Ishii (Eds.), Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination (Vol. 656, pp. 100–111). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_10 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理學系
112356020 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112356020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [資訊管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 602001.pdf | | 2314Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
