English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118209/149242 (79%)
Visitors : 74463934      Online Users : 123
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158543


    Title: 宏觀經濟事件下公眾注意力與金融市場反應:來自日本與美國Google趨勢的實證分析
    Public Attention and Financial Market Reactions to Macroeconomic Events: Evidence from Google Trends in Japan and the United States
    Authors: 澤竜輝
    Sawa, Tatsuki
    Contributors: 朱琇妍
    Chu, Shiou-Yen
    澤竜輝
    Sawa, Tatsuki
    Keywords: Google趨勢
    投資人注意力
    宏觀經濟事件
    行為財務學
    市場反應
    Google Trends
    Investor Attention
    Macroeconomic Events
    Behavioral Finance
    Market Reaction
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 14:17:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文運用 Google 趨勢(Google Trends)資料,探討日本與美國在重大宏觀經濟事件(如央行會議與CPI公布)期間,公眾關注度與金融市場反應之間的關係。透過分析事件前後的搜尋量變化,研究旨在量化投資人注意力,並評估其對資產價格變動(包含匯率、股票指數與公債殖利率)的預測能力。事件研究法的實證結果顯示,尤其是在日本,針對直觀且具政策相關性的關鍵字之搜尋活動,能作為市場反應的領先指標。這可能與日本市場資訊傳遞較慢、散戶參與度較高的特性有關。本研究指出,數位注意力資料中所蘊含的行為信號,有助於理解市場如何處理經濟資訊,並對行為財務學、注意力資產定價理論及資訊經濟學領域提供實質貢獻。
    This thesis investigates the relationship between public attention and financial market reactions to major macroeconomic events in Japan and the United States by utilizing Google Trends data. By analyzing changes in search volumes surrounding central bank meetings and CPI announcements, the study aims to quantify investor attention and examine its predictive power for asset price movements across exchange rates, stock indices, and government bond yields. A series of event-study regressions reveal that Google search activity—particularly for intuitive and policy-relevant keywords—can serve as a leading indicator of market responses, especially in Japan, where information diffusion is slower and retail investor participation is higher. The findings suggest that behavioral signals embedded in digital attention data provide valuable insights into how markets process economic information, contributing to the fields of behavioral finance, attention-based asset pricing, and information economics.
    Reference: Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
    Antweiler, W., & Frank, Z. (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1259–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x
    Atago, N. (2025). Why BOJ Communication Still Baffles the Market. Mizuho Research Institute.
    Baker, S., Bloom, N., & Davis, J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
    Baker, S., Bloom, N., & Davis, J. (2018). The effect of central bank communication on asset prices: Evidence from unscheduled Federal Reserve announcements (IMF Working Paper WP/18/136). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/06/13/The-Effect-of-Central-Bank-Communication-on-Asset-Prices-Evidence-from-Unscheduled-Federal-45985
    Barber, B., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/odean/papers%20current%20versions/all%20that%20glitters.pdf
    Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and asset prices. American Economic Review, 103(3), 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.623
    Chen, G., Kim, K., Nofsinger, J., & Rui, O. (2004). Behavior and performance of emerging market investors: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 12(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-4431(03)00047-4
    Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2009). Predicting the present with Google Trends. Google Research. https://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2011/ptp.pdf
    Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In search of attention. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x
    Gergaud, O., & Ginsburgh, V. (2017). Success: Talent, intelligence, and beauty. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-64379-4
    Hirose, Y., & Kamada, K. (2004). A new technique for identifying the effects of monetary policy shocks: The case of Japan (IMES Discussion Paper No. 2004-E-10). Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan. https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/04-E-10.pdf
    Hong, H., & Stein, J. (1999). A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2143–2184. https://www.nber.org/papers/w6556
    Lucas, R. (1972). Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
    Orphanides, A. (2023). Communication challenges at the zero lower bound: Lessons from Japan. Journal of Central Banking, 19(1), 43–67.
    Peng, L., & Xiong, W. (2006). Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 563–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.05.003
    Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). (2019). The limits of BOJ forward guidance: Evidence from text analysis (RIETI Discussion Paper Series 19-E-023).
    Reuters. (2024, December 15). BOJ’s Ueda says even slight change in wording can shake markets. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com
    Reuters. (2025, March 5). Critics say focus on “underlying inflation” clouds BOJ policy intent. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com
    Shirai, S. (2013). Monetary policy and forward guidance in Japan: An evaluation. Asian Economic Policy Review, 8(2), 210–235.
    Sims, C. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1
    東京証券取引所. (2023). 株式分布状況調査(2022年度末). 日本取引所グループ. https://www.jpx.co.jp/markets/statistics-equities/examination-distribution/index.html
    金融庁. (2023). NISAの概要と拡充について. https://www.fsa.go.jp/policy/nisa2/about/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
    112266009
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112266009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程 (IMES)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    600901.pdf2243KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback