Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158525
|
| Title: | 適應挑戰性的新環境：台灣中國研究學科的演變
Adapting to a Challenging New Environment: Taiwan's Evolving China Studies Field |
| Authors: | 姜安娜
Boland, Briana |
| Contributors: | 王信賢
Wang, Hsin-Hsien
姜安娜
Boland, Briana |
| Keywords: | 中國
中國研究
研究方法
典範轉移
China
China Studies
Research Methodology
Paradigm Shift |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-08-04 14:12:49 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文探討臺灣的中國研究領域如何因應當前全球中國研究所面臨的重大挑戰。近年來，由於中國加強政治控制、限制資料與田野調查的取得，以及學術交流空間日益收縮，使得中國愈來愈難以作為研究對象。這樣的變局構成中國研究領域的典範轉移，進一步重塑研究中國所使用的方法與研究議程。本文透過對二十七位臺灣學者進行的深度訪談與焦點小組座談，分析臺灣中國研究社群如何因應這一新階段的挑戰。
為了定位臺灣的中國研究發展，本文回顧該領域的歷史脈絡，並分析當前研究機構的生態系統，進一步說明臺灣學界如何開展中國研究。透過呈現臺灣中國研究所面臨的獨特挑戰與優勢，以及與國際中國研究領域的共通點，本文指出臺灣中國研究正於研究方法與研究議題兩方面發生轉變。一方面，愈來愈多研究採用數位技術與資料導向方法，進行遠距觀察中國的研究；另一方面，研究主題亦逐漸聚焦於中國的國際角色與對臺灣的影響。本文主張，在全球中國研究面臨高度政治化與受限環境之際，臺灣的中國研究社群為全球學界提供了值得借鑑的經驗。
This thesis examines how the China studies field in Taiwan is responding to the significant challenges now facing China research globally. In recent years, China has become increasingly difficult to study due to tightened political controls, restrictions on data and fieldwork access, and shrinking space for academic exchange. This changing environment constitutes a paradigm shift in the field of China studies, reshaping both the methods and the research agenda used to understand China. Drawing on qualitative interviews and focus group discussions with twenty-seven Taiwanese scholars, this thesis analyzes how Taiwan’s China research community is adapting to this new period.
To situate Taiwan’s China studies field, this thesis examines its historical development and the current ecosystem of research institutions, offering a primer on the context in which Taiwan’s scholarly community approaches China research. Highlighting the unique challenges and strengths of Taiwan’s China studies—as well as areas of commonality with broader international field—demonstrates that Taiwan’s field is evolving both in terms of methods and research agenda, featuring more digital and data-driven methods that examine China from a distance, and a shift in focus towards China’s global profile and impact in Taiwan. Ultimately, this thesis argues that Taiwan’s China studies community offers valuable lessons for the global field as it navigates a more restrictive and politically charged research environment. |
| Reference: | AIT. 2024. “U.S.-TAIWAN EDUCATION INITIATIVE FACTSHEET 2024.” American Institute in Taiwan. March 5, 2024. https://www.ait.org.tw/u-s-taiwan-education-initiative-factsheet-2024/.
Babbie, Earl R. 2016. The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
Barnes, Barry. 1982. T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. Columbia University Press.
Baum, Emily, and Yingyi Ma. 2023. “China Studies in an Uncertain Age.” American Council of Learned Studies (ACLS). https://www.acls.org/resources/china-studies-in-an-uncertain-age-2/.
Blanchette, Jude. 2022. “The Edge of an Abyss: Xi Jinping’s Overall National Security Outlook.” China Leadership Monitor, September 2, 2022. https://www.prcleader.org/post/the-edge-of-an-abyss-xi-jinping-s-overall-national-security-outlook.
Brussee, Vincent. 2025. “Mitigating Missingness in Analysing Chinese Policy and Implications for the Fragility of Our Knowledge Base.” The China Quarterly 261 (March):234–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741024000948.
Cerny, Michael B, and Rory Truex. 2024. “Under Pressure: Attitudes Towards China Among American Foreign Policy Professionals.” Working Paper. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/61362c444f878116b514ec49/t/675727341f3f295563cd8a47/1733764917153/Cerny+%26+Truex+%282024%29+-+Working+Paper+-+Under+Pressure.pdf.
Chen, Kuan-Hsing. 2010. Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Durham NC: Duke University Press Books.
Chen, Titus C. 2014. “The Cold War Origins of the Sino-American Conference on Mainland China: An Obscure Legacy of Chen-Tsai Wu in Trans-Pacific China Studies.” Issues & Studies 50 (1): 89–121. https://doi.org/10.7033/ISE.201403_50(1).0004.
CMP Staff. 2021. “Telling China’s Story Well.” China Media Project. April 16, 2021. https://chinamediaproject.org/the_ccp_dictionary/telling-chinas-story-well/.
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/basics-of-qualitative-research/toc.
Devlin, Kat, and Christine Huang. 2020. “In Taiwan, Views of Mainland China Mostly Negative.” Pew Research Center. May 12, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/05/12/in-taiwan-views-of-mainland-china-mostly-negative/.
Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. 2025. “Taiwan Independence vs. Unification with the Mainland (1994/12~2024/12).” Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. January 13, 2025. https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7801&id=6963.
Focus Group Four. April 11, 2025. https://iir.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7477&id=33494.
Focus Group One. March 17, 2025. https://iir.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7477&id=33042.
Focus Group Three. April 9, 2025. https://iir.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7477&id=33467.
Focus Group Two. March 21, 2025. https://iir.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7477&id=33162.
Fravel, M. Taylor, Melanie Manion, and Yuhua Wang. 2021. “A ‘China in the World’ Paradigm for Scholarship.” Studies in Comparative International Development 56 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09317-w.
Friedberg, Aaron L. 2022. Getting China Wrong. Cambridge, UK: Polity
Glaser, Bonnie S. 2023. “Taiwan’s Most Pressing Challenge Is Strangulation, Not Invasion | German Marshall Fund of the United States.” German Marshall Fund. November 9, 2023. https://www.gmfus.org/news/taiwans-most-pressing-challenge-strangulation-not-invasion.
Greer, Tanner. 2022. “Why We Need the Center for Strategic Translation.” Palladium, November 14, 2022. https://www.palladiummag.com/2022/11/14/why-we-need-the-center-for-strategic-translation/.
Greitens, Sheena Chestnut, and Rory Truex. 2020. “Repressive Experiences among China Scholars: New Evidence from Survey Data.” The China Quarterly 242 (June):349–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741019000365.
Hart, Brian. 2025. “China Escalates Cross-Strait Military Activity Under Taiwan President William Lai.” Center for Strategic and International Studies. February 14, 2025. https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-escalates-cross-strait-military-activity-under-taiwan-president-william-lai.
Howell, Jude, and Jane Duckett. 2019. “Reassessing the Hu–Wen Era: A Golden Age or Lost Decade for Social Policy in China?” The China Quarterly 237 (March):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741018001200.
Hua, Shiping, ed. 2022. Paradigm Shifts in Chinese Studies. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8032-8.
“Interpret: China.” n.d. Interpret: China. Accessed June 5, 2025. https://interpret.csis.org/about/.
Interview Eight. April 1, 2025.
Interview Eleven. April 17, 2025.
Interview Fifteen. May 15, 2025.
Interview Five. March 25, 2025.
Interview Four. March 19, 2024.
Interview Fourteen. May 14 ,2025.
Interview Nine. April 1, 2025.
Interview One. March 11, 2025.
Interview Seven. March 29, 2025.
Interview Seventeen. June 4, 2025.
Interview Six. March 29, 2025.
Interview Sixteen. May 16, 2025.
Interview Ten. April 9, 2025.
Interview Thirteen. April 30, 2025.
Interview Three. March 12, 2025.
Interview Twelve. April 30, 2025.
Interview Two. March 12, 2025.
Kennedy, Scott. 2022. “It’s Moving Time: Taiwanese Business Responds to Growing U.S.-China Tensions.” Center for Strategic and International Studies. October 4, 2022. https://www.csis.org/analysis/its-moving-time-taiwanese-business-responds-growing-us-china-tensions
Kennedy, Scott. 2024. Growing Consensus on China: Real or Imagined? | CSIS Events. Center for Strategic and International Studies. December 17, 2024. https://www.csis.org/events/growing-consensus-china-real-or-imagined.
Knott, Eleanor, Aliya Hamid Rao, Kate Summers, and Chana Teeger. 2022. “Interviews in the Social Sciences.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6.
Kou, Chien-Wen. 2014. “The Changing Role of the Institute of International Relations in Taiwan’s China Studies: Trajectories and Dynamics.” Issues & Studies 50 (1): 9–53. https://doi.org/10.7033/ISE.201403_50(1).0002.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuo, Kaiser, and Jude Blanchette. 2023. “Jude Blanchette on the Select Committee and the American Moral Panic over China.” Sinica Podcast. March 9, 2023. https://thechinaproject.com/podcast/jude-blanchette-on-the-select-committee-and-the-american-moral-panic-over-china/.
Lardy, Nicholas R. 2019. The State Strikes Back: The End of Economic Reform in China? Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Laudan, Larry. 1978. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. University of California Press.
Leu, Guan-yi, and Mu-min Chen. 2024. “A Review of China Studies in Taiwan: History, Development and Main Contributions.” China Report, November, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241297256.
Lin, Rebecca. 2023. “TSMC and Fubon Support the First International Think Tank Headquartered in Taiwan.” CommonWealth Magazine, February 19, 2023. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3382.
Liu, Philip Hsiao-Pong. 2014. “Gathering Scholars to Defend the Country: The Institute of International Relations before 1975.” Issues & Studies 50 (1): 55–88. https://doi.org/10.7033/ISE.201403_50(1).0003.
Luce/ACLS Advisory Group. 2021. “China Studies in North America.” American Council of Learned Studies (ACLS). https://www.acls.org/news/new-report-china-studies-in-america/.
MacFarquhar, Roderick, and Michael Schoenhals. 2008. Mao’s Last Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
McCourt, David M. 2022. “Knowledge Communities in US Foreign Policy Making: The American China Field and the End of Engagement with the PRC.” Security Studies 31 (4): 593–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2022.2133629.
O’Brien, Kevin J. 2011. “Studying Chinese Politics in an Age of Specialization.” Journal of Contemporary China 20 (71): 535–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.587157.
Office of Joaquin Castro. 2024. “Castro, Gallagher, Baldwin Introduce Open Translation Center Act to Strengthen Translations of Open-Source Materials from China, Russia, and Other Nations of Strategic Interest.” April 11, 2024. https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/castro-gallagher-baldwin-introduce-open-translation-center-act-to-strengthen-translations-of-open-source-materials-from-russia-china-and-other-nations-of-strategic-interest.
Saldaña, Johnny. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi | Singapore | Washington DC: SAGE Publications.
Scott, Liam. 2023. “China News Outlet Closure Reflects Political Sensitivities Over Beijing, Leadership Says.” Voice of America, December 11, 2023. https://www.voanews.com/a/china-news-outlet-closure-reflects-political-sensitivities-over-beijing-leadership-says-/7393531.html.
Shambaugh, David. 2023. “The Evolution of American Contemporary China Studies: Coming Full Circle?” Journal of Contemporary China 33 (146): 314–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2237918.
Shao, Hsuan-Lei, Sieh-Chuen Huang, and Yun-Cheng Tsai. 2018. “How the Taiwanese Do China Studies: Applications of Text Mining.” Journal of Data Mining & Digital Humanities 2018 (May). https://doi.org/10.46298/jdmdh.4178.
Sharma, Yojana. 2023. “Researchers Must Navigate Thorny New Data Security Laws.” University World News. September 11, 2023. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230911121720828.
Shih, Chih-yu. 2014. “China, China Scholarship and China Scholars in Postcolonial Taiwan.” China: An International Journal 12 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2014.0004.
“Studying China in the Absence of Access: Rediscovering a Lost Art.” 2024. Washington DC: John Hopkins SAIS China Research Center. https://scgrc.sais.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/32026_JOHNS_HOPKINS.COVER_SP.pdf.
The Economist. 2025. “China’s Stunning New Campaign to Turn the World against Taiwan.” The Economist, February 9, 2025. https://www.economist.com/international/2025/02/09/chinas-stunning-new-campaign-to-turn-the-world-against-taiwan.
Truex, Rory. 2024. “Researching China in Hard Times.” PS: Political Science & Politics 57 (1): 146–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000641.
Urry, John. 1973. “Thomas S. Kuhn as Sociologist of Knowledge.” The British Journal of Sociology 24 (4): 462–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/589735.
U.S. Department of State. 2008. “The Cairo Conference, 1943.” Department of State, The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/wwii/107184.htm.
Wang, Maya. 2024. “‘We Can’t Write the Truth Anymore’ Academic Freedom in Hong Kong Under the National Security Law.” Human Rights Watch. September 24, 2024. https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/09/24/we-cant-write-truth-anymore/academic-freedom-hong-kong-under-national-security-0.
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2024. “The Case Against the China Consensus.” Foreign Affairs, September 16, 2024. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/case-against-china-consensus.
Wong, Chun Han. 2024. “China Is Becoming Much Harder for Western Scholars to Study - WSJ.” Wall Street Journal, September 8, 2024. https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-is-becoming-much-harder-for-western-scholars-to-study-c76a7b9e?st=yvdsdgoahhkks90&reflink=article_whatsapp_share.
Wu, Xiaohan, Margaret E. Roberts, Rachel E. Stern, Benjamin L. Liebman, Amarnath Gupta, and Luke Sanford. 2025. “Addressing Missingness in Serialized Bureaucratic Data: The Case of Chinese Courts.” Sociological Methods & Research, June. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251340610.
Wu, Yi-jung. 2015. “Think Tanks in Taiwan.” In Policy Analysis in Taiwan, edited by Yu-Ying Kuo, 111–22. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447308317.008.
Yang, Lin. 2023. “China to Limit Access to Largest Academic Database.” Voice of America, March 30, 2023. https://www.voanews.com/a/china-to-limit-access-to-largest-academic-database-/7029581.html.
“中共政治菁英資料庫.” n.d. 國立政治大學 中共政治菁英資料庫. Accessed June 3, 2025. https://cped.nccu.edu.tw/index.aspx.
吳介民. 2022. “【學人開講】中國研究在臺灣的未來.” 國家科學及技術委員會人文社會科學研究中心, January 26. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GAiadjT7bI.
吳玉山, and 王信賢. 2019. 從一所看一學科：政大東亞所與臺灣的中國大陸研究. 五南. https://www.wunan.com.tw/bookdetail?NO=14665.
李宗義, 張弘遠, and 許雅淑. 2010. “社會學與中國研究：臺灣的位置(1955-2005).” 東亞研究 41 (1): 33–75. https://doi.org/10.30402/EAS.201001_41(1).0002.
林和立. 2024. “中共的變與不變 中國政治研究，需要典範轉移嗎?” 當代中國研究通訊 Contemporary China Newsletter 37 (December):18–21.
林培瑞 Link, Perry. 2024. “星星還在那裡— 研究中國面臨「典範轉型」嗎?” 當代中國研究通訊 Contemporary China Newsletter 37 (December):4–7.
林庭瑤. 2024. “習近平病了嗎？AI不只算出臉部BMI和腰圍 還發現他走路變成「小碎步」.” 風傳媒, December 19, 2024. https://www.storm.mg/article/5295527.
楊開煌. 2000. “台灣 「中國大陸研究」 之回顧與前瞻.” 東吳政治學報, no. 21, 71–105.
沈有忠. 2017. “21世紀國際政治變遷下臺灣的「中國大陸研究」.” 全球政治評論, no. 60 (October), 33–50.
王信賢. 2000. “當代西方「中國研究」之新制度典範分析.” 中國大陸研究 43 (8): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.30389/MCS.200008_43(8).0002.
王信賢. 2024. “「沒有中國的中國研究」：全球變局下，台灣中國研究的重構與新定位.” 端傳媒 Initium Media, June 9, 2024. https://theinitium.com/opinion/20240610-opinion-taiwan-china-studies-restructuring.
王敏而. 2022. “霧鎖中國：二十大之後，台灣的「中國研究」還能怎麼做？” 轉角國際 UDN Global, December 9, 2022. https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8664/6826118.
蔡文軒 and 寇健文. 2018. “揉合區域研究與學科導向的中國研究：以當代東亞所學術社群的英文著作為例.” 東亞研究 49 (2). https://doi.org/10.30402/EAS.201812_49(2).0003.
陳至潔. 2024. “中國研究技藝的挑戰與創新.” 當代中國研究通訊 Contemporary China Newsletter 37 (December):8–12.
陶逸駿. 2024. “「新冷戰下的中國研究」專題引言.” 當代中國研究通訊 Contemporary China Newsletter 37 (December):2–3.
黃兆年. 2024. “牆再高、浪更遠 從世界體系看中國研究的發展趨勢.” 當代中國研究通訊 Contemporary China Newsletter 37 (December):13–17. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
111926047 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111926047 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 604701.pdf | 7191Kb | Adobe PDF | 1 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
