資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158523
|
| 題名: | 馬英九政府對中國大陸的避險策略
Ma Ying-jeou Administration’s Hedging Strategy Towards Mainland China |
| 作者: | 鄭琇妤
Cheng, Hsiu-Yu |
| 貢獻者: | 袁力強
Yuan, Li-chiang
鄭琇妤
Cheng, Hsiu-Yu |
| 關鍵詞: | 馬英九政府
兩岸關係
避險策略
現狀維持
Ma Ying-jeou administration
Cross-Strait relations
Hedging strategy
Status quo |
| 日期: | 2025 |
| 上傳時間: | 2025-08-04 14:12:24 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 自1949年中華民國政府自中國大陸戰略撤退以來，台灣與中華人民共和國之間的關係一直是印太地區乃至全球極為重要的議題。時至1996年，台灣民主化進程加劇了兩岸間的緊張局勢，美台關係亦隨之惡化。2008年，馬英九當選中華民國總統，國民黨重新執政，兩岸關係隨之出現重大變化，緊張情勢得以緩解，雙方開始就多項議題進行溝通與協商，並由此和平維繫現狀。本文旨在探討馬英九政府（2008–2016年）如何成功維持兩岸和平穩定的現狀。
本研究採用Kuik Cheng-Chwee與Gilbert Rozman所提出之「權力－回應光譜」（Power-Response Spectrum）作為分析架構，透過網路與圖書館取得之次級資料與文獻進行質性研究。同時，作者亦訪談一位與馬英九合作逾15年的關鍵人士，藉此補充研究之深度。
研究結果顯示，「避險策略」（hedging strategy）與維繫兩岸和平現狀之間具有高度關聯。雙方在「九二共識」的基礎上進行互動、溝通、協商與建立互信，是達成和平現狀的關鍵因素。因此，作者認為馬英九政府藉由採取避險策略，成功維持了兩岸關係的和平現狀。
The Republic of China’s relations with the People’s Republic of China have always been a very important issue for not only the Indo-Pacific region, but also the world since the KMT’s strategic retreat from the mainland in 1949. Fast forward to 1996, the democratization of Taiwan resulted in more severe cross-strait tension, the U.S.-Taiwan relations also deteriorated. In 2008, Ma Ying-jeou won the presidential election and brought the KMT back to the office, the situation quickly changed again, the cross-strait tension settled, the two sides started to communicate and negotiate a series of issues, the status quo was thus maintained peacefully. This thesis intends to find out how did the Ma administration (2008-2016) successfully maintained the status quo between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait peacefully.
The author adopted the “Power-Response Spectrum” created by Kuik Cheng-Chwee & Gilbert Rozman to compose qualitative research on secondary data and literature accessed via internet and library. Together with the qualitative research, the author also conducts an in-depth interview with an important figure who has been working closely with Ma for more than 15 years.
The analysis showed a strong correlation between adopting hedging strategy and maintaining a peaceful status quo between Taipei and Beijing. The key to achieve this is the interaction, communication, negotiation and mutual trust between Taipei and Beijing based on the acknowledgment of the “1992 Consensus.” Thus, the author concludes that Ma administration’s adoption of hedging strategy successfully maintained a peaceful status quo. |
| 參考文獻: | Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Bock, J., & Parilla, H. (2024). Why Countries Abandon Taiwan: Indicators for a Diplomatic Switch. Global Taiwan Brief, 9(16). https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/08/why-countries-abandon-taiwan-indicators-for-a-diplomatic-switch/
Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. (n.d.). Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association. https://www.koryu.or.jp/en/business/gctf/20210310/
Chang C. F. (2010, January). Gains and Losses-The give and take of the ECFA. Taiwan Panorama. https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/Articles/Details?Guid=63a6f0da-ccd1-4782-87ce-74edef392b89&langId=3&CatId=7&srsltid=AfmBOooTJEJUmxwcJeLJIfTPr8x_l_CaWVuSYIfL92Y6ZIdDPs90lFkX
Chang, K. I., & Kazunobu, H. (2014). Details in the China-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement. Journal of Economic Integration, 29(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/43150574
Chao, C. S. (2019). Liang an ni jing: jir du Lee Teng-hui, Chen Shui-bian, Ma Ying-jeou, Tsai Ing-wen de dui zhi ce lue 兩岸逆境：解讀李登輝、陳水扁、馬英九、蔡英文的對治策略. Commonwealth Publishing Group.
Chen, D. P. (2017). US-China rivalry and Taiwan’s mainland policy: Security, Nationalism, and the 1992 Consensus. Springer.
Chen, D. P., & Paris-Rodriguez, K. (2024). The Role of the 1992 Consensus and Taiwan’s 2024 Presidential Elections. East-West Center Occasional Papers. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/role-1992-consensus-and-taiwans-2024-presidential-elections
Chen, I. H. (2010, August 12). A Commentary: Beijing Voices Only One Side of 1992 Consensus. Kuomintang Official Website. http://www1.kmt.org.tw/english/page.aspx?type=article&mnum=112&anum=8458
Ciorciari, J. D., & Haacke, J. (2019). Hedging in international relations: an introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz017
Copper, J. F. (2008). Taiwan’s failed president. Asian Affairs an American Review, 34(4), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.3200/aafs.34.4.179-192
Document 2: ROC White Paper, “Relations across the Taiwan Strait” (Concluding Statements), 5 July 1994. (1999). Asian Affairs: An American Review, 26(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/30172772?seq=1
Drun, J. (2022, September 21). The KMT Continues to Grapple with its “1992 Consensus.” Global Taiwan Institute. https://globaltaiwan.org/2022/09/the-kmt-continues-to-grapple-with-its-1992-consensus/
EPA minister arrives in Paris for COP21 - Focus Taiwan. (2015, December 5). Focus Taiwan - CNA English News. https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/201512050015
Gambia severs diplomatic ties with Taiwan. (2013, November 15). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-24951115
Garver, J. (1997). Face Off: China, the United States, and Taiwan’s Democratization. University of Washington Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcwnxc5
General Policy Archives (1994-2008). (1994, July 29). Mainland Affairs Council, Republic of China (TAIWAN). https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=8A319E37A32E01EA&sms=2413CFE1BCE87E0E&s=D6A36C53F3FB9CC1
Gilley, B. (2010). Not So Dire Straits. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2010-01-01/not-so-dire-straits
Goh, E. (2008). Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies. International Security, 32(3), 113-157. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113
Guan yu tai niu jing ji he zoo xie ding ANZTEC關於臺紐經濟合作協定 ANZTEC. (n.d.). Tai Wan ECA/FTA Zong Ru Kou Wang zhan臺灣ECA/FTA總入口網站. https://fta.trade.gov.tw/fta_newzealand.html
He, K. (2008). Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic interdependence and Balance of power Strategies in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 489–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108092310
Ho, S. Y. (2020). Cross-Strait Relations. In Dynamics of Democracy in Taiwan: The Ma Ying-jeou Years, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09787-2
Hsiao, H. T. 蕭旭岑 (2018). Ba nian zhi zheng hui yi lu八年執政回憶錄. Commonwealth Publishing Group.
Hsieh, P. L., & Tsai, P. (2017). The 2015 Ma-Xi meeting in Singapore. In Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (pp. 252–279). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004348691_010
Huang, X. S. 黃旭昇 (2015, December 4). Xia Li Yan: Ma Xi Hui Yuan Ding Dai Hao MAXIM 夏立言：馬習會原訂代號MAXIM. CNA. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/201512040377.aspx
Khan, H. (2007). Trends in Taiwan’s approach towards China in the Chen Shui-Bian era. Strategic Studies, 27(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/45242425
Koga, K. (2018). The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan’s Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia’s Power Shift. International Studies Review, 20(4), 633–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix059
Kuik, C. C. (2008). The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159–185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41220503
Kuik, C. C. (2021). Getting hedging right: a small-state perspective. China International Strategy Review, 3(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5
Kuik, C. C., & Rozman, G. (2015). Introduction to “Light or Heavy Hedging: Positioning between China and the United States.” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 2015, 26. http://www.keia.org/sites/default/files/publications/introduction_-_light_or_heavy_hedging.pdf
Lee Teng-hui (7th - 9th terms). (n.d.). Office of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan). https://english.president.gov.tw/Page/86
Liu, S. R. (2012). An Analysis and Prospect of President Ma’s Cross-Strait Policy. Prospect & Exploration, 10(12). https://www.mjib.gov.tw/FileUploads/eBooks/6d5beea21396409eaac040f4f3f0acfb/Section_file/dc7fbc78fa474c6e8adbbe954f2fb4b8.pdf
Ma Ying-Jeou, “Inaugural Address,” May 20, 2008. (n.d.). USC US-China Institute. https://china.usc.edu/ma-ying-jeou-%E2%80%9Cinaugural-address%E2%80%9D-may-20-2008
Mainland Affairs Council (1992, August 1) Guanyu “yige Zhongguo” de hanyi [Concerning the meaning of “one China”]. https://www.mac.gov.tw/MAIRC/cp.aspx?n=C27526DD5572BD3A&s=52BDE7F6CFBF3BF5
Mainland Affairs Council. (n.d.). President Ma attends reception to mark 20th anniversary of Koo-Wang talks. https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=C62A6E4BD490D38E&sms=F56AA93EEC16ECD5&s=D9AF37C365C3BD39
Matsuda, Y. (2015). Cross-Strait Relations under the Ma Ying-jeou administration: From Economic to Political Dependence? Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 4(2), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2015.11869083
Norton, J. (2016, July 27). ‘One China,’ 5 Interpretations. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/07/one-china-5-interpretations
Office of the President. (n.d.). President Ma departs for Singapore to attend cross-strait leaders’ meeting. Mainland Affairs Council.
https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=FE07F9DA122E29D4&sms=3A4E63FA5107487D&s=4F595F07296B950F
Ogasawara, Y. (2001, March). Taiwanese identity and the “One China Principle”: policies of the Lee Teng-hui administration towards China. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. http://www.tufs.ac.jp/ts/personal/ogasawara/paper/epaper3.html
President Chen’s New Year’s Day message (excerpt : Cross-strait relations. (2003, January 1). Mainland Affairs Council of Republic of China (TAIWAN). https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=8A319E37A32E01EA&sms=2413CFE1BCE87E0E&s=F358D7C07CC927B5
President Hu Jintao Holds Telephone Talks with His U.S. Counterpart Bush(03/28/08). (2008, March 29). Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the United States of America. http://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zt/twwt/200803/t20080329_4913696.htm
Roy, D. (2005). Southeast Asia and China: balancing or bandwagoning? Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 27(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs27-2g
Saine, P., & Gold, M. (2013, November 15). Gambia to cut ties with Taiwan, China says unaware. Yahoo! News. https://www.yahoo.com/news/gambia-says-cut-diplomatic-ties-taiwan-051228296.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALhZu-GAcVvnARi0099qj0bBJJ-b2VguxJ28Y9Je_1BfoKvhCG9uzdGjm7tYZe562u1ctnjSgCm6fjxp6F_Evh1Ff46rW7p4UzBBgs7qiUPfXvFH3CBrdJ9CUWVU3Gv48K3vVj-OqYt2TX901vM0WFN0SZs4ojPNM3G9OOcOwZGN
Salman, M., & Geeraerts, G. (2015). Strategic hedging and China’s economic policy in the Middle East. China Report, 51(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009445515570440
Schubert, G., & Braig, S. (2012). How to face an embracing China? The DPP’s identity politics and cross-Strait relations during and after the Chen Shui-Bian era. In Taiwanese identity in the 21st century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives(pp. 72–94). Routledge.
Schubert, G., & Lee, C. (2022). Taiwan During the First Administration of Tsai Ing-wen: Navigating in Stormy Waters. Routledge Research on Taiwan Series.
Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, 19(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149
Shih, H. C. (2013, November 19). Taiwan declares ties with the Gambia ‘terminated.’ Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2013/11/19/2003577196
Smith, S. (2010). Strait thinking: China–Taiwan relations under Ma Ying-jeou. In Australian Strategic Policy Institute. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep03952
Snyder, G. H. (1984). The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics, 36(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010183
Songshan-Haneda Flight Resumes after Three Decades. (2010, November 1). Department of Information and Tourism, Taipei City Government. https://english.tpedoit.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=BB038C3B5A1F6F84&sms=DFFA119D1FD5602C&s=FE6C4F7A54D580A3
Su, C. (2009). Taiwan’s Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs (1st ed.). Routledge.
Su, C. (2020, August 15). Taiwan’s Strategic Shift: from Defensive to Offensive. United Daily News. http://fairwindsfoundation.org/en/event/Taiwan-Weekly/8/Taiwan's-Strategic-Shift：-From-Defensive-to-Offensive-/97
Support Taiwan’s meaningful participation in ICAO. (n.d.). Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China. https://subsite.mofa.gov.tw/igo/News_Content.aspx?n=6010&s=110615
Taiwan’s meaningful participation in UNFCCC has won increasing international support. (2011, October 14). Oficina Económica Y Cultural De Taipei En Chile 駐智利台北經濟文化辦事處. https://www.roc-taiwan.org/cl_es/post/287.html
Telci, İ., & Rakipoğlu, M. (2021). Hedging as a Survival Strategy for Small States: The Case of Kuwait. All Azimuth, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.960945
Tessman, B., & Wolfe, W. (2011). Great Powers and Strategic Hedging: The Case of Chinese Energy Security Strategy. International Studies Review, 13(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01022.x
Walt, S. M. (2019). The origins of alliances. In Cornell University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801469992
Waltz, K. N. (1980). Theory of International Politics. Political Science Quarterly, 95(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149594
Wang, T., & Tan, A. C. (2021). Balancing, bandwagoning or hedging: Taiwan’s strategic choices in the era of a rising China. Political Science, 73(1), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2021.1967765
Wang, V. W. (2002). The Chen Shui-Bian administrations mainland policy: toward a modus vivendi or continued stalemate? Politics Faculty Publications and Presentations, 20(3), 91. https://digitalcommons.ithaca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=politics_faculty_pubs
Wang, Y. (2022). Hedging Strategy: Concept, Behavior, and Implications for China-ASEAN Relations. East Asian Affairs, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2737557921500121
WHO-Introduction. (n.d.). Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). https://subsite.mofa.gov.tw/enigo/cp.aspx?n=6143
Wu, C. H. (2016). Taiwan’s Hedging against China. Asian Survey, 56(3), 466-487. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26364369
Wu, Y. S. (2012). The evolution of the KMT’s stance on the One China principle: National identity in flux. In Taiwanese identity in the 21st century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives (pp. 51–71). Routledge.
Wu, Y. S. (2015). Under the Shadow of a Rising China: Convergence toward Hedging and the Peculiar Case of Taiwan. In Globalization and Security Relations across the Taiwan Strait: In the shadow of China (1st ed., pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09787-2
Wu, Y. S. (2017). Pivot, Hedger, or Partner: Strategies of Lesser Powers Caught between Hegemons. In University of California Press eBooks (pp. 197–220). https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.38.k
Xi-Ma meeting: Transcript of China President Xi Jinping’s opening remarks. (2015, November 7). TODAYonline. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/transcript-china-president-xi-jinpings-speech-he-meets-taiwans-ma-jing-yeou
Zhong hua min guo yu xin jia po qian shu jing ji huo ban xie ding中華民國與新加坡簽署經濟夥伴協定. (2013, November 7). Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China.
https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=306&s=79433
“Two-state” theory considered Lee Teng-hui’s main political legacy. (2020, July 31). Taipei Representative Office, Bratislava 駐斯洛伐克台北代表處. https://www.roc-taiwan.org/sk_en/post/2331.html |
| 描述: | 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
111926010 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111926010 |
| 資料類型: | thesis |
| 顯示於類別: | [亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 601001.pdf | | 1325Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
