English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118260/149296 (79%)
Visitors : 77435670      Online Users : 422
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158416


    Title: 合宜工作與工作旺盛感關係之研究
    An Examination of the Relationship Between Decent Work and Thriving at Work
    Authors: 汪暐杰
    Wang, Wei-Chieh
    Contributors: 胡昌亞
    Hu, Chang-Ya
    汪暐杰
    Wang, Wei-Chieh
    Keywords: 合宜工作
    工作旺盛感
    Decent work
    Thriving at work
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 13:41:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討「合宜工作」(Decent Work) 對「工作旺盛感」(Thriving at Work) 的影響,並驗證 Ferraro 等人於 2018 提出的合宜工作問卷(Decent Work Questionaire, DWQ) 在臺灣文化情境下的適用性。研究以280位臺灣具工作經驗者為樣本,透過問卷調查以及利用統計軟體JASP進行分析驗證。結果顯示,「自我實現」、「工作發展機會」可顯著預測學習構面,而「自我實現」與「尊重-公平」則顯著預測活力構面。反之,制度保障相關構面預測力不顯著。研究支持DWQ在臺灣地區具良好信度,惟結構效度需在地化調整。
    This study examines the impact of Decent Work on Thriving at Work and validates the applicability of the Decent Work Questionnaire (DWQ), developed by Ferraro et al., within the cultural context of Taiwan. A sample of 280 working individuals in Taiwan was surveyed, and data were analyzed using JASP statistical software. The results indicate that self-fulfillment and access to work development opportunities significantly predict the learning dimension of thriving, while self-fulfillment and respect–fairness significantly predict the vitality dimension. In contrast, institutional factors such as job security and social protection showed no significant predictive power. The findings support the DWQ’s reliability; however, its structural validity requires localization adjustments. The study suggests that organizations can enhance employees’ psychological well-being and work performance by fostering a culture of fairness and providing career development opportunities.
    Reference: Kleine, A. K., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9-10), 973-999.
    Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of educational psychology, 99(2), 274.
    Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 37-61). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
    Bonnet, F., Figueiredo, J. B., & Standing, G. (2003). A family of decent work indexes. Int'l Lab. Rev., 142, 213.
    Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
    Dollard, M. F., & Winefield, A. H. (2002). Mental health: overemployment, underemployment, unemployment and healthy jobs. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 1(3), 170-195.
    Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016). The psychology of working theory. Journal of counseling psychology, 63(2), 127.
    Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., England, J. W., Blustein, D. L., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R.P., ... & Santos, E. J. (2017). The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale. Journal of counseling psychology, 64(2), 206.
    Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
    Feldman, M. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295-309.
    Ferraro, T., Pais, L., Rebelo Dos Santos, N., & Moreira, J. M. (2018). The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers. International Labour Review, 157(2), 243-265.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it's good to feel good. American scientist, 91(4), 330-335.
    Ghai, D. (2003). Decent work: Concept and indicators. Int'l Lab. Rev., 142, 113.
    ILO. (2013a). Decent work indicators: Guidelines for producers and users of statistical and legal framework indicators. ILO Manual, second version (Dec.). Geneva.
    ILO. (2008a). Decent work: Some strategic challenges ahead. Report of the Director-General,International Labour Conference, 97th Session. Geneva.
    ILO. (2008b). Measurement of decent work. Discussion paper for the Tripartite Meeting of Experts on the Measurement of Decent Work, 8–10 September. Geneva.
    ILO. (2001). Reducing the decent work deficit: A global challenge. Report of the Director-General, International Labour Conference, 89th Session. Geneva.
    ILO. (1999). Decent Work. Report of the Director-General, International Labour Conference, 87th Session. Geneva.
    Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004).
    Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808-827.
    Ma, Y., Autin, K. L., & Ezema, G. N. (2023). Validation of the Chinese decent work scale. Journal of Career Development, 50(1), 37-51.
    Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of organizational behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
    Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization science, 16(5), 537-549.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    110363094
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110363094
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    309401.pdf1046KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback