Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158410
|
| Title: | 從認知行為取向伴侶治療觀點探討臺灣未婚伴侶角色義務與關係滿意度間的關聯
Exploring the Relationship between Role Obligations and Relationship Satisfaction among Unmarried Couples in Taiwan from a Cognitive Behavioral Perspective on Couples Therapy |
| Authors: | 周岱駿
Chou, Tai-Chun |
| Contributors: | 傅如馨
Fu, Trista Juhsin
周岱駿
Chou, Tai-Chun |
| Keywords: | 未婚伴侶
角色義務
關係滿意度
認知行為取向伴侶治療
Unmarried couples
Role obligations
Relationship satisfaction
Cognitive behavioral perspective on couples therapy |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-08-04 13:38:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以認知行為取向伴侶治療為理論框架，嘗試補齊：（1）對於親密關係角色義務的研究獨缺對未婚伴侶的認識、及（2）尚不清楚角色義務、或與角色有關之行為規範與伴侶關係滿意度關聯間的心理機制，尤其缺乏整合伴侶雙方個別認知、伴侶雙方差異與互動模式三者的研究等以上兩現有研究的缺遺。
本研究透過網路論壇與研究者所參與的群組，以問卷調查法向18至55歲、目前正與異性處於未婚親密關係者進行資料蒐集，共獲得333份有效問卷，其中男性填答者113名（33.9%），女性填答者220名（66.1%），全體填答者平均年齡為28.4歲。分析軟體以R為主，方法上則先以探索性因素分析了解未婚伴侶角色義務種類，再以逐步迴歸分析了解伴侶各角色義務與伴侶關係滿意度的關聯，最後以迴歸分析了解伴侶雙方差異與差異因應方式在角色義務與伴侶關係滿意度間的調節效果。結果顯示，本研究中的未婚親密伴侶，其角色義務包含「現代性義務」、「家族關係」與「性別角色」三種，其中現代性義務顯著正向預測伴侶關係滿意度、性別角色為顯著負向預測、家族關係則與之無關。而在調節分析的結果中，「接納」顯著調節現代性義務及家族關係與伴侶關係滿意度的關聯：僅有在接納低時，上述兩項伴侶角色義務才能正向預測伴侶關係滿意度，接納高時兩者則無關。而伴侶雙方的雙文化自我差異、及個人傳統性則顯著調節現代性義務與伴侶關係滿意度的關聯：僅有在差異低時，上述兩項伴侶角色義務才能正向預測伴侶關係滿意度，差異高時兩者則無關。又，差異因應方式的調節效果強於伴侶性格差異。最後，提出本文的研究限制，及未來在研究與實務工作上的建議。
Using the framework of cognitive behavioral couples therapy, this study aimed to address two major gaps in the existing literature: (1) the lack of understanding regarding role obligations in unmarried couples, and (2) the insufficient clarity about the psychological mechanisms linking role obligations—or role-related behavioral norms—with relationship satisfaction, especially the lack of research that integrates each partner’s individual cognition regarding role obligations, personality differences between partners, and their interaction patterns.
Questionnaire survey approach was adopted in this study. Questionnaires which were targeted at unmarried heterosexual couples aged 18-55 are distributed in online forums and private groups. 333 (113 males, 210 females, averaging 28.4 years old) valid questionnaires were collected. R was used as the primary tool in analyzing. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to understand the types of role obligations of unmarried couples. Then, stepwise regression analysis was used to understand the relationship between the role obligations in unmarried couples and relationship satisfaction. Finally, regression analysis was used to understand the moderating effect of the personality differences between partners and their interaction patterns between role obligations and relationship satisfaction. Result showed that the role obligations in unmarried couples were composed of three items: “modern obligations”, “family relationship”, and “gender role”. Among them, modern obligations significantly positively predicted relationship satisfaction, gender role was significantly negatively predicted, and family relationships were unrelated. In the results of the mediation analysis, "acceptance" significantly moderated the association between modern obligations and family relationships and relationship satisfaction: only when acceptance is low could the above two role obligations positively predicted relationship satisfaction, while when acceptance was high, the two were unrelated. The difference in bicultural self and personal traditionality of the partners significantly moderated the relationship between modern obligations and relationship satisfaction: only when the differences were low could the above role obligation positively predicted relationship satisfaction, while when the differences were high, the one was unrelated. Furthermore, the moderating effect of interaction patterns were stronger than that of personality differences between partners. Finally, the limitations of this study were put forward, as well as suggestions for future research and practice. |
| Reference: | 伊慶春、熊瑞梅（1994）。擇偶過程之社會網絡與婚姻關係：介紹人、婚姻配對、和婚姻滿意度之分析。載於伊慶春（編），台灣社會的民眾意向：社會科學的分析（頁 135-177）。中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究。
伊慶春（1991）。臺北地區婚姻調適的一些初步研究發現。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，1（2），151-173。
成功大學學生輔導處（2022）。個別諮商輔導人數及問題分類統計表。國立成功大學。
江靜儀（2012）。華人樂觀與悲觀特質之量表編製（系統編號：100CYCU5071072）［碩士論文，中原大學］。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
何冠瑩（2003）。大學生愛情關係之生氣表達、生氣滿意度對愛情滿意度的影響［未出版之碩士論文］。東吳大學。
吳麗娟（2003）。一個諮商員的專業成長：一個「人」的成長－從Human“doing”到Human“being。中華輔導學報，14，1-30。https://doi.org/10.7082/cargc.200309.0001
李雅惠（2005）。大學生同居態度、同居經驗與心理福祉之研究（系統編號：094NTNU5261036）［碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學］。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
李維倫、林耀盛（2019）。從文化心理學到人文臨床心理學：臨床心理學本土化論述與踐行。本土心理學研究，51，89-167。 https://doi.org/10.6254/iprcs.201906_(51).0003
沈瓊桃（2002）。多面向婚姻滿意量表之編製。中華心理衛生學刊，15（3），67-100
周玉真（2002）。成人個案求助心理諮商之問題內容分析。彰化師大輔導學報，23，49-76. https://doi.org/10.7040/gj.200206.0049
周岱駿（2021）。臺灣同居者的型態與同居者間的角色義務［未出版之碩士論文］。國立臺灣大學。
周岱駿（2022，10月29日）。利用「伴侶義務量表」測量台灣同居伴侶角色義務的適配性與量表的再建構［海報發表］。後疫情時代多樣態的諮商與輔導—多元文化與多元媒材，臺南市，臺灣。
岸見一郎、古賀史健（2014）。被討厭的勇氣：自我啟發之父「阿德勒」的教導［葉小燕譯］。究竟。（原著出版年：2013）
林火旺（2004）。倫理學。五南。
邱獻輝（2013）。男性的夫妻角色期待與實踐：親密暴力者vs.無親密暴力者。犯罪學期刊，16（2），61-92。
孫頌賢（2019）。愛在第二回合－伴侶與家族治療的實踐。應用心理研究，71，1-4。https://doi.org/10.3966/156092512019120071001
高旭繁、陸洛（2006）。夫妻傳統性／現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，25，47-100。https://doi.org/10.6254/2006.25.47
高旭繁、楊國樞（2011）。華人心理傳統性與心理現代性研究之回顧與前瞻。彰化師大教育學報，19，1-11。https://doi.org/10.6769/jencue.201106.0003
張思嘉、許詩淇、李惟新（2018）。「新好男人」、「新好女人」？當代華人婚姻關係中的角色義務。本土心理學研究，50，209-261。https://doi.org/10.6254/iprcs.201812_(50).0005
梁啟超（1956）。中國學術思想變遷之大勢。臺灣中華書局。
教育部（無日期）。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。2025年6月23日，取自https://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/
許詩淇（2015）。倫理本位文化中的親子角色義務與親子互動［博士論文，國立臺灣大學］。華藝線上圖書館。
許詩淇、黃囇莉（2009）。天下無不是的父母？－華人父母角色義務對親子衝突與親子關係的影響。中華心理學刊，51（3），295-317。https://doi.org/10.6129/cjp.2009.5103.02
陳宣惠（2016）。夫妻角色義務對幸福感的影響－以敬業貢獻為中介變項（系統編號：104NTNU5036051）［碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學］。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
郭士賢、張思嘉（2004）。華人生活世界中的多面向因果思維。本土心理學研究，21，233-267。https://doi.org/10.6254/iprcs.200406_(21).0006
費孝通（1991）。鄉土中國。三聯書店。
黃光國（2018）。內聖與外王：儒家思想的完成與開展。心理。
黃囇莉（2006）。人際和諧與衝突 : 本土化的理論與研究。揚智文化。
黃囇莉（2021）。華人親子間應得感、心理分離對情緒勒索之影響：以意識形態差異為例（系統編號：109NCCU5464003）［碩士論文，國立政治大學］。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
楊國樞（1994）。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存。載於楊國樞（編）， 中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點（65－120頁）。桂冠。
楊連謙、董秀珠（2019）。婚姻與家庭治療中再思主體間性。應用心理研究，71，39-79。https://doi.org/10.3966/156092512019120071003
楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華（1989）。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性：概念與測量。載與楊國樞、黃光國（編），中國人的心理與行為 （241-306頁）。桂冠。
楊國樞、劉奕蘭、張淑慧、王琳（2010）。華人雙文化自我的個體發展階段：理論建構的嘗試。中華心理學刊，52（2），113-132。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2010.5202.01
楊淑蘭（2019）。建構本土心理諮商（治療）模式之必要性與可能性。本土心理學研究，52，3-68。https://doi.org/10.6254/iprcs.201912_(52).0001
楊皓霖（2014）。夫妻角色分工共識對職家增益與家庭滿意度的影響：夫妻配對APIM模式之比較（系統編號：103NTU05318008）［碩士論文，國立臺灣大學］。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
楊靜利（2004）。同居的生育意涵與台灣同居人數估計。臺灣社會學刊，32，189-213。https://doi.org/10.6786/tjs.200406.0189
齊力（2003）。個人主義、集體主義與家族主義：三角關係的概念格局。市師社教學報，2，115-145。https://doi.org/10.7035/jse.200312.0115
鄭羽芯（2006）。大學生人際依附風格、情緒表達方式與愛情關係滿意度之相關研究（系統編號：094NTCTC328004）［碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學］。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
賴思伃、黃囇莉（2013）。無聲勝有聲？！－「不理」在青春期友誼中的意涵與歷程。中華輔導與諮商學報，36，1-32。
謝文宜、曾秀雲（2007）。探討伴侶關係滿意度及其相關因素：比較已婚夫妻、未婚情侶與同志伴侶的差異。台灣性學學刊，13（1），71-86。https://doi.org/10.6784/FJS.200704.0071
顏志龍、鄭中平（2020）。給論文寫作者的進階統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計Ⅱ。五南。
Abe, S., & Oshio, A. (2018). Does Marital Duration Moderate (Dis)Similarity Effects of Personality on Marital Satisfaction? Sage Open, 8(2), Article 2158244018784985. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784985
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
Antill, J. K. (1983). Sex Role Complementarity Versus Similarity in Married Couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(1), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.145
Ayub, N., Iqbal, S., Halford, W. K., & van de Vijver, F. (2023). Couples relationship standards and satisfaction in Pakistani couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12609
Bart, V. K. E., Sharavdorj, E., Boldbaatar, E., Munkhnasan, D., & Rieger, M. (2024). What shall I do? Similarities and differences in moral judgements between Austrian and Mongolian students. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 8(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-024-00141-x
Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Assessing relationship standards: The Inventory of Specific Relationship Standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(1), 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.10.1.72
Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S. L., & Sher, T. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.57.1.31
Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N. B., Kirby, J. S., & LaTaillade, J. J. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (3 ed., pp. 411-444). Guilford Press.
Beck, A. T. (1988). Love is never enough : how couples can overcome misunderstandings, resolve conflicts, and solve relationship problems through cognitive therapy. Harper & Row.
Bodenmann, G., Kessler, M., Kuhn, R., Hocker, L., & Randall, A. K. (2020). Cognitive-eehavioral and emotion-focused couple therapy: similarities and differences. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 2(3), e2741. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v2i3.2741
Bradbury, T. N., & Bodenmann, G. (2020). Interventions for couples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071519020546
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Buchtel, E. E., Guan, Y., Peng, Q., Su, Y., Sang, B., Chen, S. X., & Bond, M. H. (2015). Immorality East and West:Are Immoral Behaviors Especially Harmful, or Especially Uncivilized? Personality and Social Psychology Bullitin, 41(10), 1382-1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215595606
Chapman, A. L., & Dehle, C. (2002). Bridging theory and practice: A comparative analysis of integrative Behavioral couple therapy and cognitive behavioral couple therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9(2), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1077-7229(02)80008-6
Chan, Y. L., Gu, X., Ng, J. C. K., & Tse, C. S. (2016). Effects of dilemma type, language, and emotion arousal on utilitarian vs deontological choice to moral dilemmas in Chinese-English bilinguals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12123
Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y. Y., & Fu, J. H. Y. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923-940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.923
Corey, G. (2012). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy. Cengage Learning.
Curwen, B., Palmer, S., & Ruddell, P. (2018). The Cognitive Behaviour Framework. In B. Curwen, S. Palmer, & P. Ruddell (Eds.), Brief Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (Second Edition ed., pp. 7-24). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526447661
Dattilio, F. M. (2006). Restructuring Schemata From Family of Origin in Couple Therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20(4), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1891/jcpiq-v20i4a003
Dattilio, F. M. (2010). Cognitive－behavioral therapy with couples and families. Guilford.
DeRubeis, R. J., Webb, C. A., Tang, T. Z., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive Therapy. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies (3 ed., pp. 277-316). Guilford Press.
Deutchman, P., Kraft-Todd, G., Young, L., & McAuliffe, K. (2025). People Update Their Injunctive Norm and Moral Beliefs After Receiving Descriptive Norm Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 128(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000416
Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2010). Historical and philosophical bases of the cognitive-behavioral therapies. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (3 ed., pp. 3-38). Guilford Press.
Dworkin. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press.
Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(5), 715-720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.715
Epstein, N., & Baucom, D. H. (2002). Enhanced cognitive-behavioural therapy for couples: A contextual approach. American Psychological Association.
Epstein, N. B., Baucom, D. H., Hunt, W., & Taillade, J. J. L. (2004). Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy with couples. In F. W. Bond & W. Dryden (Eds.), Handbook of brief cognitive behaviour therapy (pp. 187-206). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Epstein, N. B., & Zheng, L. (2017). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 142-147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.004
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fowler, C., & Dillow, M. R. (2011). Attachment dimensions and the four horsemen of the apocalypse. Communication Research Reports, 28(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2010.518910
Furler, K., Gomez, V., & Grob, A. (2013). Personality similarity and life satisfaction in couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.03.002
Gehart, D. R. (2012). Mindfulness and Acceptance in Couple and Family Therapy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3033-9
Gottman, J. M. (1994a). What predicts divorce? : The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gottman, J. M. (1994b). Why marriages succeed or fail. Fireside.
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.169
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. W W Norton & Co.
Gottman, J. M., Schwartz, J., Abrams, D., & Abrams, R. C. (2019). Eight dates: Essential conversations for a lifetime of love. Workman Publishing.
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. Three Rivers Press.
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2012). What makes love last? How to build trust and avoid betrayal. Simon & Schuster.
Halford, W. K., Jarukasemthawee, S., Pisitsungkagarn, K., & Foophrateepsiri, W. (2024). Couple relationship standards in Thailand. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 13(3), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000235
Halford, W. K., Leung, P., Chan, H. C., Lau, C. W., Hiew, D., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2018a). Couple relationship standards and migration: Comparing Hong Kong Chinese with Australian Chinese. Family Process, 57(4), 996-1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12337
Halford, W. K., Leung, P. W. L., Chan, H.-C., Lau, C.-W., Hiew, D. N., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2018b). Relationship standards and relationship satisfaction in Chinese, Western, and intercultural couples living in Australia and Hong Kong, China. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 7(3-4), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000104
Halford, W. K., & Van de Vijver, F. (2020). Culture, couple relationship standards, and couple relationship education and therapy. In W. K. Halford & F. Van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural family research and practice (pp. 523-563). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815493-9.00017-X
Hatch, A. (2017). Saying “I Don’t” to Matrimony: An Investigation of Why Long-Term Heterosexual Cohabitors Choose Not to Marry. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1651-1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x15576200
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
Henrich, J., Blasi, D. E., Curtin, C. M., Davis, H. E., Hong, Z., Kelly, D., & Kroupin, I. (2023). A Cultural Species and its Cognitive Phenotypes: Implications for Philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 14(2), 349-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00612-y
Hiew, D. N., Halford, W. K., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Liu, S. (2015). The Chinese–Western Intercultural Couple Standards Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 816-826. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000090
Hong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2001). Toward a paradigm shift: From cross-cultural differences in social cognition to social-cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19(3), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.3.181.21471
Hong, Y. Y., Ip, G., Chiu, C. Y., Morris, M. W., & Menon, T. (2001). Cultural identity and dynamic construction of the self: Collective duties and individual rights in Chinese and American cultures. Social Cognition, 19(3), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.3.251.21473
Huber, C. H., & Milstein, B. (1985). Cognitive restructuring and a collaborative set in couples' work. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 13(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926188508250218
Iqbal, S., Ayub, N., van de Vijver, F., & Halford, W. K. (2019). Couple relationship standards in Pakistan. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 8(4), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000124
Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1998). Acceptance and change in couple therapy ─ A therapist's guide to transforming relationships. W W Norton & Co Inc.
Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Pagel, M. (1986). Predicting who will benefit from behavioral marital therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(4), 518-522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.4.518
Kant, I.（1967）。道德形上學探本［唐鉞重譯］。台灣商務印書館。（原著出版年：1785）
Kappen, G., Karremans, J. C., Burk, W. J., & Buyukcan-Tetik, A. (2018). On the Association Between Mindfulness and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: the Role of Partner Acceptance. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1543-1556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0902-7
Karnani, S. R., & Zelman, D. C. (2019). Measurement of emotional blackmail in couple relationships in Hong Kong. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 8(3), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000126
Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43(2), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/585327
Lute, M. (2015). The relationship between Gottman’sFour Horsemen of the Apocalypse, mindfulness,and relationship satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation)Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://knowledge.library.iup.edu/etd/511
Macklin, E. D. (1972). Heterosexual cohabitation among unmarried college students. Family Coordinator, 463-472.
Mairal, J. B. (2015). Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) as a third-wave therapy. Psicothema, 27(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.101
Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.49.4.554
Markey, P. M., & Markey, C. N. (2007). Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences: The complementarity of interpersonal traits among romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507079241
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
Minuchin, S., & Nichols, M. P.（2002）。結構取向之家族治療（劉婷譯）。載於 F. M. Dattilio（編），婚姻與家族治療：個案研究（164-202頁）。張老師。（原著出版年：1998）
Möller, A. T., & van der Merwe, J. D. (1997). Irrational beliefs, interpersonal perception and marital adjustment. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 15, 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025089809243
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory / Jum C. Nunnally. (2d ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nuyen, A. T. (2009). Moral obligation and moral motivation in Confucian role-based ethics. Dao, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9104-7
Rawls, J. (1971/ 2005). A theory of justice. Belknap Press.
Reeves, T. D., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2016). Contemporary Test Validity in Theory and Practice: A Primer for Discipline-Based Education Researchers. CBE life sciences education, 15(1), rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183
Ridley, C. A., Peterman, D. J., & Avery, A. W. (1978). Cohabitation: does it make for a better marriage? Family Coordinator, 129-136.
Roddy, M. K., Nowlan, K. M., Doss, B. D., & Christensen, A. (2016). Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy: Theoretical background, empirical research, and dissemination. Family Process, 55(3), 408-422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12223
Rouquette, A., & Falissard, B. (2011). Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(4), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.352
Sachdeva, S., Singh, P., & Medin, D. (2011). Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning. International Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 161-176, Article Pii 937990428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.568486
Satyanarayana, V. A., & Krishnamachari, S. (2022). Integrated cognitive-behavioral intervention reduced alcohol use and perpetration of intimate partner violence in a man with alcohol dependence syndrome: A case study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23297
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
Stoebenau, K., Bingenheimer, J. B., Kyegombe, N., Datar, R., & Ddumba-Nyanzi, I. (2023). Development of the Gender Roles and Male Provision Expectations Scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(6), 2403-2419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02479-1
Topkaya, N., Sahin, E., & Mehel, F. (2023). Relationship-specific irrational beliefs and relationship satisfaction in intimate relationships. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1257-1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01426-y
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
Vangelisti, A. L., & Daly, J. A. (1997). Gender differences in standards for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4(3), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00140.x
Weidmann, R., Purol, M. F., Alabdullah, A., Ryan, S. M., Wright, E. G., Oh, J., & Chopik, W. J. (2023). Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 104, Article 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378
Wright, J. H., Basco, M. R., & Thase, M. E. (2006). Learning cognitive-behavior therapy : an illustrated guide. American Psychiatric Association.
Wu, R., Liu, Z., Guo, Q. K., Cai, M. H., & Zhou, J. (2020). Couple Similarity on Personality, Moral Identity and Spirituality Predict Life Satisfaction of Spouses and Their Offspring. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(3), 1037-1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00108-8
Ye, F., Chen, J., Li, H., & Liu, H. J. (2025). Moral Judgment Among Chinese Urban and Rural Students: Exploring the Conflict Between the Personal and Moral Domains. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), Article 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020187
Zagefka, H., & Bahul, K. (2021). Beliefs that contribute to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. Family Journal, 29(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720956638
Zuberi, S. O. (2014). Reduction in dysfunctional thought processes by the use of cognitive behavioral interventions among Pakistani couples with marital dissatisfaction. Bahria Journal of Professional Psychology, 13(2), 85–97. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
109172009 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109172009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [輔導與諮商碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 200901.pdf | | 2569Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
