English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118575/149625 (79%)
Visitors : 79284415      Online Users : 53
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158336


    Title: 純電商在永續競爭中的綠色轉型策略分析: 以momo購物網為例
    An Analysis of Green Transformation Strategies for E-Commerce in Sustainable Competition—A Case Study of momoshop
    Authors: 吳尊寧
    Wu, Tzuen-Ning
    Contributors: 羅明琇
    Lo, Ming-Shiow
    吳尊寧
    Wu, Tzuen-Ning
    Keywords: 電商
    永續轉型
    綠色行銷
    共享價值
    永續供應鏈
    ESG
    永續價值鏈
    綠色商品
    綠活會員
    利害關係人
    商業模式創新
    綠色消費
    新零售
    e-commerce
    sustainability transformation
    green logistics
    circular packaging
    ESG governance
    sustainable supply chain
    shared value
    stakeholder theory
    business model innovation
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 13:02:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在全球氣候變遷與永續發展日益成為企業核心議題之際,企業如何回應環境挑戰並實踐永續轉型,成為企業經營策略的重要課題。而純電商平台如何結合技術創新與永續治理,實現綠色轉型,成為關鍵策略挑戰。本文以台灣指標性純電商平台──momo購物網為研究個案,透過綠色物流、循環包裝、綠色商品選品、顧客參與誘因設計與ESG治理制度等五大實踐面向,探討其永續轉型策略與實務表現。
    本研究採用次級資料分析與個案研究法,並結合四大理論架構進行探討。首先,永續價值鏈與永續供應鏈管理,提供評估企業從供應端至顧客端整體永續績效的視角;其次,根據資源基礎理論,說明momo如何透過自建物流、AI智慧裝箱與綠色會員制度等難以模仿的內部資源建構競爭優勢;共享價值理論,則闡明平台如何在創造經濟效益的同時兼顧社會與環境價值;最後,利害關係人理論則強調平台如何透過制定供應商永續標準、溝通ESG目標以回應多元利害關係人的期待。
    研究發現,momo已將永續實踐內嵌於平台營運核心,運用技術與制度設計促進綠色消費行為與供應鏈協同治理,不僅強化顧客終身價值與品牌忠誠度,亦展現出平台型企業整合多方利害關係、實現商業與永續共融的潛能。本文最後提出深化永續的商業模式創新之建議,強調電商平台在永續轉型路徑中,應持續強化其作為價值鏈整合者與行為轉化推動者之角色,以兼顧成長、責任與競爭力。
    In response to increasing global concerns over climate change and sustainable development, pure e-commerce platforms must address environmental challenges through strategic transformation. This study explores the sustainability transition of momo Shopping, a leading e-commerce platform in Taiwan, focusing on its green logistics, circular packaging, sustainable product selection, customer engagement mechanisms, and ESG governance.
    Employing secondary data analysis and a case study approach, this research integrates four theoretical frameworks: Sustainable Value Chain and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM), the Resource-Based View (RBV), Creating Shared Value (CSV), and Stakeholder Theory. The findings reveal that momo embeds sustainability into its core operations by leveraging internal resources—such as proprietary logistics systems, AI-powered packaging optimization, and the Green Living Membership program—to drive competitive advantage and customer loyalty. The platform also fosters shared value by aligning economic performance with environmental and social benefits, while actively engaging stakeholders through ESG practices and supplier sustainability standards.
    This study concludes that momo serves as an effective value chain integrator and behavioral change agent, offering insights into how pure e-commerce platforms can achieve business growth while fulfilling environmental and social responsibilities. It also suggests further opportunities for sustainable business model innovation (BMI) to reinforce long-term competitive positioning.
    Reference: 一、 中文文獻:
    momo富邦媒體科技股份有限公司。取自:https://corp.momoshop.com.tw/
    momo富邦媒體科技. (2023). 2023 ESG永續報告書. https://corp.momo.com.tw/en/file/csr/csrReport/momo_2023ESGreport(english).pdf
    富邦媒體科技. (2024). 2023年年報. https://corp.momo.com.tw/investor/reports
    環境部(2023)。網購包裝限制新制上路說明資料。取自:https://www.moenv.gov.tw/
    環境部.淨零綠生活資訊平台. (2024). 取自 https://greenlifestyle.moenv.gov.tw
    Finguider. (2024). Sea 冬海集團(SE)法說會財報分析 2024Q4 電話會議重點. Retrieved from https://finguider.cc/Article/ArticleIndex/1537
    統一超商.(2023)。2023年統一超商企業永續報告書。取自https://www.7-11.com.tw/company/csr/csrreports.aspx
    京東集團(2023)。《2023年環境、社會及治理(ESG)報告》。北京:京東集團。
    梁日威 (2023年7月18日). 電商平台如何以三大綠色策略發揮永續價值?|淨零行不行. 天下雜誌CSR. 。取自https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/43264
    黃筱晴(2024年3月17日)。全聯擴大綠色經濟 成立「永續委員會」執行4大永續計畫。500輯。取自 https://500times.udn.com/wtimes/story/123911/7837235
    張語屏(2024年9月16日)。亞馬遜「氣候友好承諾計畫」憑什麼底氣 讓品牌紛紛響應永續轉型?《uBrand x 聯合新聞網》。取自:https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/123660/8223210
    資策會產業情報研究所(MIC)。(2023年4月20日)。從電商大廠綠色布局看臺灣發展方向。經濟日報。取自 https://mic.iii.org.tw/industry.aspx?id=466&list=1
    Coupang Taiwan(2025年3月17日)。Coupang酷澎打造永續未來:以環保創新領航綠色電商。取自 https://tw.coupangcorp.com/archives/4300/
    家樂福公司(Carrefour Taiwan).(2022). Act for Food與食物轉型從i開始:實踐食物正義與在地永續. 取自 https://www.carrefour.com.tw/actforfood/
    全聯福利中心(2025年4月1日)。全店積分換購攻永續綠色經濟 百元加購價享受居家沙龍級髮品 橫掃法國全球永續美妝大獎 專櫃品牌「歐萊德O’right」35折起入手。取自 https://www.pxmart.com.tw/about-us/news/全聯新聞/279
    全聯福利中心(2022)。2022全聯永續報告書。取自 https://www.pxmart.com.tw/uploads/2022_419ebd2f37.pdf
    SAP(2023)。消費者永續趨勢與企業回應白皮書(台灣區)。取自:https://www.sap.com/taiwan/
    Circular Taiwan Foundation. (2023). 數位賦能與環保包材實踐包裝減量. https://circular-taiwan.org/case/momo-1/
    未來流通研究所(2024年)。2024台灣電商物流產業地圖:富昇物流與網家速配運能佔比揭露。取自 https://www.mirai.com.tw/2024-taiwan-e-commerce-logistics-industry-map/
    未來流通研究所(2025年)。【商業數據圖解】台灣「零售與電商全體次產業結構」年度數據總覽。取自 https://www.mirai.com.tw/overview-of-taiwans-retail-and-e-commerce-industry-structure/
    二、 英文文獻:
    Amazon. (2017). Amazon to Acquire Whole Foods Market. Retrieved from https://media.wholefoodsmarket.com/amazon-to-acquire-whole-foods-market/
    Amazon Advertising. Climate Pledge Friendly. Amazon Advertising. https://advertising.amazon.com/zh-tw/resources/ad-policy/climate-pledge-friendly
    Amazon. (2020). Climate Pledge Friendly. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Climate-Pledge-Friendly/b?ie=UTF8&node=21221607011
    Amazon. (2021). The Climate Pledge. Retrieved from https://www.aboutamazon.com/planet/climate-pledge
    Amazon. (2023a). Sustainable packaging. Retrieved from https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/environment/circular-economy/sustainable-packaging
    Amazon. (2023b). Amazon Second Chance. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/b?ie=UTF8&node=70673024011
    Amazon. (2024). Climate Pledge Friendly Certifications. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/b?node=121191123011
    Amazon. (2024a). Amazon meets 100% renewable energy goal. Retrieved from  https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/sustainability/amazon-renewable-energy-goal
    Amazon. (2024b). Electric delivery fleet. Retrieved from https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/environment/sustainable-transportation
    AWS. (2023). AWS Cloud sustainability. Retrieved from  https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/products-services/aws-cloud
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
    Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
    Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. (2023). Cradle to Cradle Certification. Retrieved from https://www.c2ccertified.org/
    Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (6th ed.). Pearson.
    Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
    Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
    Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614535786
    ISO. (1999). ISO 14024: Environmental labels and declarations — Type I environmental labelling — Principles and procedures. International Organization for Standardization.
    McKinnon, A. (2018). Decarbonizing logistics: Distributing goods in a low carbon world. Kogan Page Publishers.
    Ottman, J. A. (2011). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.
    Packsize International LLC. (2023). How AI is reshaping sustainable packaging. https://www.sdcexec.com/sustainability/packaging/article/22936637/packsize-international-llc-how-ai-is-reshaping-sustainable-packaging
    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
    Porter, M. E. (1979). How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review.
    Rakuten. (2018). Earth Mall with Rakuten: Online shopping to mainstream sustainable production and consumption [Sustainability Initiative]. Retrieved from https://global.rakuten.com/corp/innovation/sustainability/2018/0613/
    Rakuten Today. (2023). Earth Mall with Rakuten: Keywords for sustainable shopping [Blog Post]. Retrieved from https://rakuten.today/blog/earth-mall-with-rakuten-keywords-for-sustainable-shopping.html
    Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
    Sahakian, M., & Wilhite, H. (2014). Making practice theory practicable: Towards more sustainable forms of consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513505607
    Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
    Lim, S. F. W. T., Jin, X., & Srai, J. S. (2018). Consumer-driven e-commerce: A literature review, design framework, and research agenda on last-mile logistics models. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 308–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0081
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    112932074
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112932074
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    207401.pdf3936KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback