English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116884/147915 (79%)
Visitors : 64468221      Online Users : 48
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157993


    Title: 公平交易法國內重要案例之評析—以欺罔或顯失公平行為為例
    Analysis of Important Competition Law Cases in Taiwan: Focusing on Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts Issues
    Authors: 吳秀明;楊宏暉;牛曰正
    Contributors: 地政系
    Keywords: 競爭法;欺罔;顯失公平
    Competition Law;Deceptive conducts;Obviously Unfair conducts
    Date: 2020-11
    Issue Date: 2025-07-14 11:09:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 公平法作為維護市場秩序的根本大法，適用於所有產業和經濟行為。也因此條文規定的抽象性，乃是公平法作為市場秩序的根本大法必然伴隨的現象。這樣的問題又特別存在於作為概括條款的公平法第25條當中。以「欺罔」和「顯失公平」作為規範內容的公平法第25條，一方面賦予競爭法主管機關一項有利的執法工具，打擊不當行為。但另一方面，主管機關也會因為規範的曖昧不明，疲於將執法資源分散於一些邊際案例，使更嚴重的案件無法獲得足夠關注。
    本研究中，將以涉及公平法第25條之行政法院判決作為研究對象，分析其中具有重要性之案件，釐清其中所體現之實務與理論上意義。並在必要範圍內與公平會之決定進行比較，以期能使本研究案之成果得以展現。本研究之主要目標有二：（1）使公平法第25條之規範架構得以更為明確；（2）針對較具有重要性之行為類型，能釐清其在適用時必須滿足的要件。以便未來執法機關在處理個案時，能有更明確的方向指引。
    The Fair Trade Act is a set of fundamental principles that maintain the market order and apply to all industrial and economic activities alike. Owing to this nature, ambiguities are inevitably prevalent in its provisions. This problem is particularly prominent in Article 25 of the Act, which serves as a general clause that regulates “deceptive and obviously unfair conducts.” The Article endows competition authorities with a useful instrument for enforcing the law and curbing illegal misconduct. Nevertheless, due to such ambiguities in the regulations, the authorities are often preoccupied with distributing law enforcement resources to certain marginal cases and fail to give the more severe cases their due attention.

    This study will focus on administrative court judgments pertaining to Article 25 of the Fair Trade Act, analyzing the representative cases among the subjects and elucidating the practical and theoretical implications attached to these precedent cases. Comparisons, wherever necessary, will be made against the decisions made by the Fair Trade Commission to illustrate the research outcomes. There are two main objectives: (1) to spell out the legal structure of Article 25 of the Fair Trade Act; and (2) to clarify the prerequisites that must be satisfied for the application of the Article concerning the more substantial types of conduct. In doing so, this study aims to provide law enforcement agencies with more well-defined guidelines for handling cases in the future.
    Relation: 公平交易委員會, FTC-109-G05, 109.04-109.11
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 研究報告

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML13View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback