English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116896/147927 (79%)
Visitors : 64518497      Online Users : 148
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157757


    Title: 好討厭喔 (笑臉加愛心) : 文化背景對於使用矛盾表情符號的 社會心理動機與態度影響之研究
    I Hate It (Smiley with Heart) : Exploring Perceived Socio-Psychological Motives, Attitudes, and Cultural Impact on Incongruent Emoji Use
    Authors: 辛周妍
    Shin, Juyeon
    Contributors: 葉嘉炘
    Yeh, Chia-Hsin
    辛周妍
    Shin, Juyeon
    Keywords: Z世代
    表情符號使用
    不一致表情符號
    文化
    動機
    態度
    可供性
    使用與滿足理論
    電腦中介傳播
    Generation Z
    emoji use
    incongruent emojis
    culture
    motivation
    attitude
    affordance
    Uses and Gratification Theory
    computer-mediated communication (CMC)
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-07-01 14:44:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討Z世代使用表情符號時的社會心理認知動機與文意不一致之表情符號的使用態度，特別關注國家層面與情境層面的文化影響。本研究以使用與滿足理論及語言態度為基礎，採用準實驗設計，使用社群媒體風格的刺激材料，操控表情符號一致性與情緒強度。研究測試了六個動機變項（即獨特性的滿足需求、歸屬感、抒發情緒、尋求情緒支持、表達幽默、保全面子）及六個態度變項（理解力、適當性、創意性、採用度、好感度、智慧性）。結果顯示，與文意不一致表情符號使用與獨特性的滿足需求、歸屬感、幽默及保全面子等動機因子呈現顯著相關，而情緒釋放與尋求情緒支持等因子則與文意一致性表情符號使用呈現顯著相關。在態度方面，與文意不一致表情符號被認為更具創意性，但適當性與可理解性較低。其餘變項未顯示顯著效果。文化效果在情境層面（即線上空間個人主義）比國家層面（即集體主義與個人主義文化）更為顯著。年齡與性別等人口統計因素不顯著，而表情符號使用習慣則持續預測動機與態度。然而情緒強度則對使用表情符號之態度評價皆為負面影響，但與文意不一致表情符號配對時此效果得到緩解效果。整體而言，這些發現顯示Z世代將與文意不一致表情符號作為在公共數位空間中進行身份表達與自我呈現的策略工具，擴展了對表情符號功能的傳統理解。本研究揭示情境層面的文化取向比國家層面類別更具影響力，反映線上環境中的文化匯聚現象，同時提供對Z世代在線上空間中獨特隱私體驗的洞察。與文意不一致表情符號在情緒強度下的緩衝作用進一步突顯其在數位傳播中增強詮釋流暢性的潛力。實務意涵將在結論部分進一步討論。
    This study examined Generation Z’s perceived socio-psychological motivations and attitudes toward incongruent emoji use, with particular attention to cultural influences at both national and situational levels. Grounded in Uses and Gratifications Theory and the concept of language attitudes, the study employed a quasi-experimental design using social media-style stimuli in which emoji congruence and emotional intensity were manipulated. Six motivational (i.e., fulfilling a need for uniqueness, feeling a sense of belonging, releasing emotions, seeking emotional support, expressing humor, and saving one’s face) and six attitudinal variables (i.e., comprehensibility, appropriateness, creativity, adoptability, favorability, and intelligence) were tested. Results indicated that incongruent emoji use was significantly associated with motivations such as expressing uniqueness, belonging, humor, and saving face, while releasing emotions and seeking emotional support were more clearly linked to congruent emojis. In terms of attitudes, incongruent emojis were perceived as more creative but less appropriate and comprehensible. The remaining variables showed no significant effects. Cultural effects were more pronounced at the situational level (i.e., online space individualism) than the national level (i.e., collectivist vs. individualist cultures). Demographic factors like age and gender were non-significant, while emoji use habits consistently predicted both motivations and attitudes. Emotional intensity had a broadly negative effect on attitudes, but this was mitigated when paired with incongruent emojis. Overall, these findings suggest that Generation Z uses incongruent emojis as strategic tools for identity expression and self-presentation in public digital spaces, expanding traditional understandings of emoji affordances. The study reveals that situational-level cultural orientations are more influential than national-level categories, reflecting cultural convergence in online environments, while also providing insights into Generation Z's distinctive privacy experiences in online spaces. The buffering role of incongruent emojis under emotional intensity further highlights their potential for enhancing interpretive fluency in digital communication. Practical implications are further addressed in the conclusion section.
    Reference: Adobe. (2022). The Future of Creativity: 2022 U.S. Emoji Trend Report. In Adobe. Retrieved November 23, 2024, from https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:e9a97193-e287-4aac-b8ee-7d1e098ec9a2
    Akmal, S., Ulfah, N., & Fitria, N. (2022). Here comes the Acehnese Gen-Z! Language and Identity in Social Media Communication. In Communication today (Vol. 1, pp. 29–30). Syiah Kuala University Press.
    Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605
    Alnuzaili, E. S., Amin, M. W., Alghamdi, S. S., Malik, N. A., Alhaj, A. A., & Ali, A. (2024). Emojis as graphic equivalents of prosodic features in natural speech: evidence from computer-mediated discourse of WhatsApp and facebook. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2391646
    Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
    American Psychological Association. (2018). Emotional release. In APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/emotional-release
    Azad, I., Chhibber, S., & Tajhizi, A. (2023). How do different generations communicate on social media? A comparative analysis of language styles, emoji usage, and visual elements. Language, Technology, and Social Media., 1(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v1i2.61
    Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current research and future Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
    Bettelli, G., & Panzeri, F. (2023). "Irony is easy to understand ": The role of emoji in irony detection. Intercultural Pragmatics, 20(5), 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-5001
    Beyersmann, E., Wegener, S., & Kemp, N. (2022). That’s good news ☹. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, 35(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000342
    Bhalla, R., Tiwari, P., & Chowdhary, N. (2021). Digital Natives Leading the World: Paragons and Values of Generation Z. In Springer eBooks (pp. 3–23). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70695-1_1
    Blasko, D. G., Kazmerski, V. A., & Dawood, S. S. (2021). Saying what you don’t mean: A cross-cultural study of perceptions of sarcasm. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 75(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000258
    Boutet, I., LeBlanc, M., Chamberland, J. A., & Collin, C. A. (2021). Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106722
    Burge, J. (2017, July 17). 5 billion emojis sent daily on Messenger. Emojipedia. https://blog.emojipedia.org/5-billion-emojis-sent-daily-on-messenger/
    Capobianco, M. (2022, November 13). How different generations use emojis. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeed.com/mollycapobianco/different-generations-emoji-use
    Caspi, A., & Raz, G. (2024). Using emojis that alter the meaning of written messages to communicate interpersonal relations. Media Psychology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2024.2374778
    Castillo, A. J. M., Gavilan, P. M. T., Gida, C. A., Gonzalvo, J. B., Labrador, K. F. B., & Abacan, A. A. (2021). Prevalence of Individuality and Conformity as Behavioral Traits among Generation Z. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(3), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj249
    Chan, H., Wan, L. C., & Sin, L. Y. M. (2009). The contrasting effects of culture on consumer tolerance: interpersonal face and impersonal fate. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1086/597329
    Chen, Y., Yang, X., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2024). Individual differences in emoji comprehension: Gender, age, and culture. PLoS ONE, 19(2), e0297379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297379
    Conny, C., Yultisa, N., Wahyudin, R., & Rezeki, T. I. (2024). LINGUISTIC SHIFT AMONG GEN Z IN COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION. English Review Journal of English Education, 12(3), 959–970. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i3.10414
    comScore. (December 21, 2023). Most used social media platforms among Gen Z and internet users worldwide as of September 2023 [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1446950/gen-z-internet-users-social-media-use/
    Coronel-Molina, S. M. (2014). Definitions and critical literature review of language attitude, choice and shift; Samples of language attitude surveys. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 2(2), 25-77.
    Crawford, S. A., & Caltabiano, N. J. (2011). Promoting emotional well-being through the use of humour. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.577087
    Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776
    Dainas, A. R., & Herring, S. C. (2020). Chapter 4. Interpreting emoji pragmatics. In Pragmatics & beyond. New series (pp. 107–144). https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai
    Daniel, J. (2021). The Most Frequently Used Emoji of 2021. Unicode. https://home.unicode.org/emoji/emoji-frequency/
    De Leeuw, J., & Meijer, E. (2007). Introduction to multilevel analysis. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–75). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73186-5_1
    Demirel, Y., & Gülşen, M. (2023). The effect of Expressing emotions on the Psychological Well-Being of individuals suffering from chronic Musculoskeletal Diseases. New Emirates Medical Journal, 5. https://doi.org/10.2174/0250688205666230908111730
    Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307311611
    Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
    Doosje, S., Landsheer, J. A., De Goede, M. P. M., & Van Doornen, L. J. P. (2010). Humorous coping scales and their fit to a stress and coping framework. Quality & Quantity, 46(1), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9348-2
    Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-a). Enraged Face Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/pouting-face
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-b). Frowning Face Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/frowning-face
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-c). Pensive Face Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/pensive-face
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-d). Smiling Face Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/smiling-face
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-e). Smiling Face with Heart-Eyes Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/smiling-face-with-heart-eyes
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-f). Smiling Face with Hearts Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/smiling-face-with-hearts
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-g). Smiling Face with Smiling Eyes Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/smiling-face-with-smiling-eyes
    Emojipedia. (n.d.-h). Unamused Face Emoji Meaning. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from https://emojipedia.org/unamused-face
    Escouflaire, L. (2021). Signaling irony, displaying politeness, replacing words. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 44(2), 204–235. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00062.esc
    Fahlman, S. E. (2002). Smiley Lore :-). https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/sefSmiley.htm
    Fadhil, A., Schiavo, G., Wang, Y., & Yilma, B. A. (2018). The Effect of Emojis when interacting with Conversational Interface Assisted Health Coaching System. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (pp. 378–383). https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240965
    Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. In McKinsey&Company. https://www.drthomaswu.com/uicmpaccsmac/Gen%20Z.pdf
    Ganguli, R., Padhy, S. C., & Saxena, T. (2022). The characteristics and preferences of Gen Z: A review of multi-geography findings. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 79-98.
    Gawne, L., & McCulloch, G. (2019). Emoji as Digital Gestures. Language@Internet, 17. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/li/article/view/37786
    Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
    Guntuku, S. C., Li, M., Tay, L., & Ungar, L. H. (2019). Studying Cultural Differences in Emoji Usage across the East and the West. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3224
    Gupta, A., Pranathy, R. S., Binny, M., Chellasamy, A., Nagarathinam, A., Pachiyappan, S., & Bhagat, S. (2024). Voices of the Future: Generation Z’s views on AI’s ethical and social impact. In Studies in systems, decision and control (pp. 367–386). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51997-0_31
    Hand, C. J., Burd, K., Oliver, A., & Robus, C. M. (2022). Interactions between text content and emoji types determine perceptions of both messages and senders. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 8, 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100242
    Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. R. (2020). Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 3(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375629
    Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
    Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & Van Anders, S. M. (2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307
    Instagram Engineering. (2016, May 3). Machine learning for emoji trends. Medium. https://medium.com/@InstagramEng/machine-learning-for-emoji-trends-e676ac35e1d7
    Jacob, R. (2023). Unveiling the Dark Humour and Self-Image of Generation Z in a Polymedia Context. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 14, 215-26.
    Jeresano, E. M., & Carretero, M. D. (2022). Digital Culture and Social Media Slang of Gen Z. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 03(04), 11–25.
    King, J. (2024). Is a Lack of Digital Skills Keeping People from Receiving Emotional Support? Investigating the Digital Skills of Depressed Individuals Seeking Support in Online Communities [PhD dissertation]. University of California, Santa Barbara.
    Kozharinova, M., & Manovich, L. (2024). Instagram as a narrative platform. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i3.12497
    Köster, E. (2007). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 20(2), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002
    Krekhov, A., Emmerich, K., Fuchs, J., & Krueger, J. H. (2022). Interpolating Happiness: understanding the intensity gradations of face emojis across cultures. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517661
    Lee, I., Kim, J., Choi, B., & Hong, S. (2010). Measurement development for cultural characteristics of mobile Internet users at the individual level. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1355–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.009
    Liao, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Development of a Scale Measuring Emotional Catharsis through Illness Narratives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168267
    Liu, M. (2023). Are you really smiling? Display rules for emojis and the relationship between emotion management and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035742
    Lou, C., Tandoc, E. C., Jr, Hong, L. X., Pong, X. Y., Lye, W. X., & Sng, N. G. (2021). When motivations meet affordances: News consumption onTelegram. Journalism Studies, 22(7), 934–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1906299
    Luo, N. M., & Zhu, N. S. (2023). IS GENDER THE PRIMING FACTOR? EXAMINING EMOJI USERS’ BEHAVIOR IN WECHAT AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN CHINA. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 8(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.58885/ijssh.v08i2.155.ml
    Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of Self‐Uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861–1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01629.x
    Mahapatra, A., & Srivastava, J. (2013). Incongruity Versus Incongruity Resolution. In 2013 International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/socialcom.2013.10
    McDonald, L. (2024). Making sense of emoji. Philosophy, 99(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819124000135
    Mellinger, C., Fritzson, A., Park, B., & Dimidjian, S. (2023). Developing the sense of belonging scale and understanding its relationship to loneliness, need to belong, and general Well-Being outcomes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 106(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2279564
    Menon, D., & Meghana, H. (2021). Unpacking the uses and gratifications of Facebook: A study among college teachers in India. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100066
    Meyerhoff, M. (2018). Introducing sociolinguistics. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507922
    Okolo, B. A. (2002). Incongruency in discourse: a violation of the “Cooperative principle”? Meta Journal Des Traducteurs, 41(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.7202/003762ar
    Pan, W. (2012). Linguistic basis of humor in uses of Grice’s cooperative principle. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.20
    Park, J., Barash, V., Fink, C., & Cha, M. (2021). Emoticon Style: Interpreting differences in emoticons across cultures. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1), 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14437
    Parvaresh-Masoud, M., Abdollahyar, A., Molavi-Taleghani, Y., Salahi, S., & Farahmandnia, H. (2023). Exploring coping strategies of emergency medical technicians against COVID-19 stress: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1212769
    Pavalanathan, U., & Eisenstein, J. (2015). Emoticons vs. emojis on Twitter: A causal inference approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08480.
    Pfeifer, V. A., Armstrong, E. L., & Lai, V. T. (2021). Do all facial emojis communicate emotion? The impact of facial emojis on perceived sender emotion and text processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 107016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107016
    Prada, M., Rodrigues, D. L., Garrido, M. V., Lopes, D., Cavalheiro, B., & Gaspar, R. (2018). Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 1925–1934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.005
    Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (2016). Processing Fluency in Education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173
    Reinindra, A., Muniroh, D. D., & Imperiani, E. D. A. (2020). STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS SOUTH JAKARTA’S YOUTH LANGUAGE. Passage 2020, 8(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.17509/psg.v8i2.29810
    Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A. S., & Rubio, A. B. (2022). Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media & Society, 25(11), 3165–3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187
    Rothermund, K. (2003). Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence. Emotion, 3(3), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.223
    Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0301_02
    Schumpe, B. M., & Erb, H. (2015). Humans and uniqueness. Science Progress, 98(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685015x14205597448201
    Shabahang, R., Shim, H., Aruguete, M. S., & Zsila, Á. (2023). Adolescent sadfishing on social media: anxiety, depression, attention seeking, and lack of perceived social support as potential contributors. BMC Psychology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01420-y
    Shoichet, C. E. (2024, July 17). We asked how you use emojis. Here’s how different generations responded. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/17/us/emoji-day-use-across-generations-cec
    Siagian, N. R., & Yuliana, N. (2023). THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN GENERATION Z COMMUNICATION. Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation, 1(3), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.58860/ijari.v1i3.27
    Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent Self-Construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014
    Skovholt, K., Grønning, A., & Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace E-Mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 780–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063
    Statista. (2023, July 5). U.S. users mental health improvement through using emojis 2022, by generation. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1395642/us-users-mental-health-benefits-emojis-by-generation/
    Sun, J., Lasser, S., & Lee, S. K. (2022). Understanding emojis: Cultural influences in interpretation and choice of emojis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2036790
    The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2024, September 14). Generation Z’s mental health issues. https://www.aecf.org/blog/generation-z-and-mental-health
    The Culture Factor Group. (2023, October 16). Country Comparison Tool. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool
    Togans, L. J., Holtgraves, T., Kwon, G., & Zelaya, T. E. M. (2021). Digitally saving face: An experimental investigation of cross-cultural differences in the use of emoticons and emoji. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.016
    Walsh, L. C., Regan, A., Okabe-Miyamoto, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2024). Does putting down your smartphone make you happier? the effects of restricting digital media on well-being. PLoS ONE, 19(10), e0306910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306910
    Walther, J. B., & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307
    Weissman, B., & Tanner, D. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PloS one, 13(8), e0201727
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    112461019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112461019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101901.pdf59696KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback