English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116152/147188 (79%)
Visitors : 59567718      Online Users : 182
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157242


    Title: 以艾利森的概念模型檢視1988-2000年的美台軍售
    Examining US-Taiwan Weapon Transfers (1988-2000) by Allison’s Decision-Making Models
    Authors: 安凱樂
    Apperson, Caleb
    Contributors: 陳秉逵
    Chen, Ping-Kuei
    安凱樂
    Caleb Apperson
    Keywords: 對外軍售(FMS)
    先進武器系統
    軍售
    嚇阻
    格雷厄姆·艾利森
    組織過程模式
    政府政治模式
    Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
    Advanced Weapon Systems
    Arms Sales
    Deterrence
    Graham Allison
    Organizational Processes Model
    Government Politics Model
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-06-02 14:57:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文運用格雷厄姆 ·艾利森(Graham Allison)的「組織行為模式」與「政府政治模式」,探討1988年至2000年間美國對台軍售增加的現象。本研究透過探討國家安全利益、組織慣例以及跨機構談判如何影響美國在考量台灣防禦需求時的決策過程,藉此評估美國對台軍售背後的戰略動機。本研究結合歷史分析,斯德哥爾摩國際和平研究所(SIPRI)的觀察數據與專家訪談,深入探討美台軍售對美中台三邊關係的廣泛意涵。 本研究最後提出以下兩點主張:(1)美國持續對台軍售主要受到美國國防與外交政策體系中標準作業程序與既有制度慣例的影響,而非來自對戰略目標的刻意重新調整;(2)1990年代美台軍售升高的主要原因,來自於美國政府內部的跨機構競爭與官僚權力鬥爭,同時也受到台灣方面遊說行動的影響,這些遊說對國會決策產生一定影響。上述因素交織影響下,導致軍售政策結果更多反映內部分歧與外部壓力,而非一貫的戰略思維,進而影響軍售的種類與時機。本研究對於美國藉由軍售政策嚇阻台海衝突的成效以及台海安全方面有重要啟示。
    This thesis examines the increase in US arms sales to Taiwan between the years 1988 and 2000 by employing Graham Allison’s Organizational Processes and Government Politics Models. The goal of this study is to evaluate the strategic motivation behind US-Taiwan arms sales by exploring how national security interests, institutional routines, and interagency bargaining influence US decision-making relative to Taiwan’s defensive needs. To meet this goal, this study will employ historical analysis, Stockholm International Peace Research Institution (SIPRI) observational data, as well as expert interviews to provide a detailed analysis of the broader implications that US-Taiwan arms sales dynamics have for US-Taiwan-China relations. Ultimately, I argue according to two propositions: (1) Continuing US arms sales to Taiwan is influenced by the standard operating procedures and established practices within US defense and foreign policy institutions, rather than by a deliberate recalibration of strategic objectives. And (2) the escalation of US-Taiwan arms sales in the 1990s was driven by interagency competition and bureaucratic power struggles within the US government. These were compounded by Taiwanese lobbying efforts that influenced congressional decision-making. These combined dynamics led to policy outcomes shaped by internal discord and external pressure rather than a coherent strategic framework, affecting both arms sales types and timing. The results of this study aim to offer insight into the efficiency and security implications of the US arms sale policy toward deterring conflict across the Taiwan Strait.
    Reference: AIT Security Cooperation Officer (SCO) - Air Force Programs. Interview by author. Microsoft Teams, April 10, 2025.
    AIT. “Taiwan Relations Act.” Archive for the American Institute in Taiwan Website. Accessed March 2, 2025. https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/en/taiwan-relations-act.html.
    Achen, Christopher H., and Duncan Snidal. “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (January 1989): 143–69, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010405
    Adams, Gordon. “U.S. Global Engagement and the Military.” Great Decisions, 2018, 72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26593698.
    Achen, Christopher H., and Duncan Snidal. “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (January 1989): 143–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010405.
    Allison, Graham. “The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis.” Pearson Education, 2008.
    Allison, Graham. “The Thucydides Trap.” The Atlantic (2015): 1–6.
    Allison, Graham T., and Morton Halperin. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications.” British Journal of Political Science 16, no. 3 (1986): 48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010559.
    Anderson, Paul A. “Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28, no. 2 (June 1983): 201–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392618.
    Bendor, Jonathan, and Thomas H. Hammond. “Rethinking Allison’s Models.” The American Political Science Review 86, no. 2 (1992): 309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1964222.
    Bose, Meena. “The Steady Leadership of George H.W. Bush: A Review Essay of Destiny and Power.” Political Science Quarterly 131, no. 3 (September 1, 2016): 628. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12491.
    Brinkley, Douglas. “Democratic Enlargement: The Clinton Doctrine.” Foreign Policy, no. 106 (1997): 110. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149177.
    Bush, George H. W. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George H. W. Bush (1992–1993, Book II). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993.
    Chen, Ching-Chang. “When is China’s Military Modernization Dangerous? Constructing the Cross-Strait Offense-Defense Balance and U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan.” Journal of Pediatric, Maternal & Family Health-Chiropractic 45, no. 3 (2009): 69–119.
    Chen, Qimao. “The Taiwan Strait Crisis: Its Crux and Solutions.” Asian Survey 36, no. 11 (1996): 1055–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645635.
    Chen, Ping-Kuei, Scott L. Kastner, and William L. Reed. “A Farewell to Arms?: US Security Relations with Taiwan and the Prospects for Stability in the Taiwan Strait.” In Taiwan and China: Fitful Embrace, 1st ed., edited by Lowell Dittmer, 228. University of California Press, 2017.
    Cheng, Dean. “Getting Serious About Taiwan’s Air Power Needs.” Heritage Foundation, no. 2616 (2011): 1–8.
    Chiou, C. L. “Dilemmas in China’s Reunification Policy toward Taiwan.” Asian Survey 26, no. 4 (April 1986): 467–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2644159.
    Chong, Pin Lin. “The Military Balance in the Taiwan Straits.” The China Quarterly, no. 146 (1996): 577–95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/655481.
    Clifford, J. Garry. “Bureaucratic Politics.” The Journal of American History 77, no. 1 (1990): 163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2078648.
    Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17, no. 1 (March 1972): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088.
    Coyne, Christopher J., and Abigail R. Hall. “The Case Against a U.S.-Arms Monopoly.” Atlantic Economic Journal 42, no. 2 (June 2014): 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-014-9414-6.
    De Spiegeleire, Stephan, et al. “Reimagining Deterrence.” Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, March 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199287918.001.0001.
    Delaney, William P., “Air Defense of the United States: Strategic Missions and Modern Technology,” International Security 15, no. 1 (1990): 203, https://doi.org/10.2307/2538986.
    Dennis Van Vranken Hichey. “The Taiwan Strait Crisis of 1996: Implications for US Security Policy.” Journal of Contemporary China 7, no. 19 (11, 1998): 405-419. https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/taiwan-strait-crisis-0/0/000:00:00AM1996-implications-us/docview/213930638/se-2.
    Dennis Van Vranken Hickey. “U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan.” Asian Survey 26, no. 12 (1986): 1324–36, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351316521-6.
    Dorminey, Caroline, and A. Trevor Thrall. “The Role of Arms Sales in U.S. Foreign Policy.” Cato Institute, no. 836 (March 13, 2018): 1–27, https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23043.
    Douglas McCready. “Crisis Deterrence in the Taiwan Strait.” Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College (2003), 9. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep11316.
    Eales, Stewart C. “Democracy Promotion in the Post-Cold War Era.” The Army War College Review 2, no. 1 (2016): 11–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep11940.4.
    Elaine Sciolino. “Taiwan’s Lobbying in U.S.: Mixing Friendship and Hardball.” The New York Times, April 9, 1996, 4. https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/taiwans-lobbying-u-s-mixing-friendship-hardball/docview/430551587/se-2.
    Engel, Jeffrey A. “A Better World... but Don’t Get Carried Away: The Foreign Policy of George H. W. Bush Twenty Years On.” Diplomatic History 34, no. 1 (2010): 45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24916032.
    Eric Gomez and Benjamin Giltner. "Taiwan Arms Backlog, June 2024: First Arms Sales to the Lai Ching-te Administration and New Information about Delays." Cato at Liberty, July 9, 2024.
    Evan S. Medeiros et al., A New Direction for China’s Defense Industry (RAND Corporation, 2025), https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg334af.9.
    “Experiment to Use Patriot, ERINT, Corps SAM: ARMY’S MISSILE DEFENSE SHOP SETS UP MOUNTAIN TOP DIVISION.” Inside the Army 6, no. 13 (1994): 4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43976168.
    Fearon, James D. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” The American Political Science Review 88, no. 3 (1994): 577–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944796.
    Fearon, James D. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49, no. 3 (1995): 379–414. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903.
    Fearon, James. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, no. 1 (1997): 69.
    Feinstein, Lee. “Administration to Sell Advanced F-16 Fighters to Taiwan.” Arms Control Today 22, no. 7 (1992): 25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23624852.
    Former ROC Force Planning Official. Interview by author. In person, February 26, 2025.
    Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA). "1994 Taiwan Policy Review." Accessed April 3, 2025. https://fapa.org/1994-taiwan-policy-review/.
    Franklin, Daniel P. Pitiful Giants: Presidents in Their Final Terms. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
    Fravel, Taylor M. “Towards Civilian Supremacy: Civil-Military Relations in Taiwan’s Democratization.” Armed Forces & Society 29, no. 1 (2002): 68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45346975.
    Freedman, Lawrence. “Logic, Politics and Foreign Policy Processes: A Critique of the Bureaucratic Politics Model.” International Affairs 52, no. 3 (July 1976): 441. https://doi.org/10.2307/2616555.
    Gelb, Leslie H. “Arms Sales.” Foreign Policy, no. 25 (1976-1977): 13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1148021.
    Gomez, Eric, and Benjamin Giltner. “Taiwan Arms Backlog, June 2024: First Arms Sales to the Lai Ching-te Administration and New Information about Delays.” Cato at Liberty, July 9, 2024.
    Hall II, Jacob L. “FOREIGN MILITARY SALES: Building National Security One Shipment at a Time.” Defense Transportation Journal 71, no. 2 (2015): 8–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44123794.
    Hallman, Wesley., “Value of Foreign Military Sales Exceeds Profits,” National Defense 105, no. 803 (October 2020): 4–5, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27023131.
    Hartzler, Vicky., “Foreign Military Sales Essential to U.S. Defense,” National Defense 101, no. 755 (October 2016): 20, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27021546.
    Haseley, Donna. “FUTURE OF ARMY’S CORPS SAM, PATRIOT AND ERINT SHAKY IN DOD ‘BOTTOM-UP REVIEW.’” Inside the Army 5, no. 16 (1993): 1,18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43975072.
    Hickey, Dennis Van Vranken. “U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan.” Asian Survey 26, no. 12 (1986): 1324–36. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351316521-6.
    Hickey, Dennis Van Vranken. “The Taiwan Strait Crisis of 1996: Implications for US Security Policy.” Journal of Contemporary China 7, no. 19 (1998): 405–419.
    Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. “Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making.” British Journal of Political Science 16, no. 3 (July 1986): 269–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004415.
    Huang, Kwei-Bo. Interview by Author, National Chengchi University, 5/13/2025.
    Huang, Min Chuan, Chao Yen Wu, and Jang Ruey Tzeng. “Taiwan Air Force Logistics System of Research Governance.” Advanced Materials Research 393–395 (November 2011): 393–96. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.393-395.393.
    Inside the Pentagon. “Bush's Softening on F-16 Sale to Taiwan May Open Door to Other Such Sales.” Vol. 8, no. 32 (August 6, 1992): 13.
    Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns. Senate Report 105-167, 105th Cong., 2nd sess., 1998. https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/105th-congress/senate-report/167/2.
    Janssens, Ruud. “Detached Idealism and Endless Debates: The Foreign Policy of the Clinton Administration.” Atlantisch Perspectief 24, no. 7/8 (2000): 5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45279216.
    Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30, no. 2 (January 1978): 169.
    Jervis, Robert. "Deterrence Theory Revisited." World Politics 31, no. 2 (January 1979): 289–324.
    Jones, Seth G. “Foreign Military Sales and Other Programs and Procedures.” In Empty Bins in a Wartime Environment: The Challenge to the U.S. Defense Industrial Base. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), 2023, 17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep47098.6.
    Kan, Shirley A. “Taiwan: Major U.S. Arms Sales Since 1990*.” Current Politics and Economics of Northern and Western Asia 22, no. 1 (2013): 64.
    Kan, Shirley A. Taiwan: Major U.S. Arms Sales Since 1990. Congressional Research Service, 2015. https://d27r7ebsgu0es2.cloudfront.net/files/20150105_RL30957_02fd3b35f8b5350b67bd637e2e9421cb108c1f9b.html.
    Kastner, Scott L., War and Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Columbia University Press, 2022.
    Kastner, Scott L., William Reed, and Ping-Kuei Chen. “Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response.” Security Studies 28, no. 4 (2019): 123.
    Keohane, Robert. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 4 (1988): 379–396.
    Kim, Colonel Jason. Interview by author. Microsoft Teams, March 13, 2025.
    Kluver, Randolph. “Rhetorical Trajectories of Tiananmen Square.” Diplomatic History 34, no. 1 (2010): 71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2009.00833.x.
    Krause, Keith. “The Political Economy of the International Arms Transfer System: The Diffusion of Military Technique via Arms Transfers.” International Journal 45, no. 3 (1990): 689. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40202695.
    Kuwashima, Kenichi. “How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?” Annals of Business Administrative Science 13, no. 4 (2014): 215–30. https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.13.215.
    Lai, David. “Arms Sales to Taiwan: Enjoy the Business While It Lasts.” Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2010.
    Lailari, Guermantes. Interview by author. In person, March 15, 2025.
    Lee, Do Young. “Strategies of Extended Deterrence: How States Provide the Security Umbrella.” Security Studies 30, no. 5 (2021): 761–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2021.2010887.
    Lee, Wei-Chin., “US Arms Transfer Policy to Taiwan: From Carter to Clinton,” Journal of Contemporary China 9, no. 23 (March 2000): 70, https://doi.org/10.1080/106705600112056.
    Levy, Jack S. “Organizational Routines and the Causes of War.” International Studies Quarterly 30, no. 2 (June 1986): 219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600676.
    Lewis, Jenny. “Graham T Allison’s ‘The Essence of Decision.’” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 12, no. 2 (April 1, 2007): 119. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581907780279576.
    Lima, Rafael Costa, Humberto Moreira, and Thierry Verdier. “Centralized Decision Making and Informed Lobbying.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 9, no. 4 (November 2017): 324–355. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26598486.
    Lindsay, James M., “Congress and Foreign Policy: Why the Hill Matters.” Political Science Quarterly 107, no. 4 (December 1, 1992): 607–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2152287.
    Lindsay James M., and Randall B. Ripley. “How Congress Influences Foreign and Defense Policy.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 47, no. 6 (March 1994): 31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824424.
    Mahnken, Thomas G. and Timothy D. Hoyt, “Missile Proliferation and American Interests,” SAIS Review 10, no. 1 (March 1990): 102, https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.1990.0023.
    Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974, 115.
    Mazarr, Michael J., “Understanding Deterrence.” RAND Corporation, January 1, 2018. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep19896.
    Mearsheimer, John J. “Taiwan’s Dire Straits.” The National Interest, no. 130 (2014): 29–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44153277.
    Morrow, James D., “Signaling Difficulties with Linkage in Crisis Bargaining.” International Studies Quarterly 36, no. 2 (1992): 153–172.
    Mulvenon, James. "Chinese and Mutually Assured Destruction: Is China Getting MAD?" In Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice, 239–59. 2004.
    O’Hanlon, Michael., “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” International Security 25, no. 2 (October 2000): 51–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560453.
    Oneal John R., “The Rationality of Decision Making during International Crises.” Polity 20, no. 4 (June 1988): 598–622. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234897.
    Oyez. Ex Parte Quirin. Accessed January 17, 2025. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/317us1.
    Pierre, Andrew J. “Arms Sales: The New Diplomacy.” Foreign Affairs 60, no. 2 (1981): 266, https://doi.org/10.2307/20041080.
    Poro, Jeffrey D., “A Role for Arms Control? Air Defense.” Arms Control Today 14, no. 6 (1984): 4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23623077.
    Powell, Robert. “Nuclear Deterrence Theory, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Missile Defense.” International Security 27, no. 4 (April 2003): 90. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951108.
    Qingmin, Zhang, and Eric Hyer, “US ‘Dual Track’ Policy: Arms Sales and Technology Transfer to China Mainland and Taiwan,” Journal of Contemporary China 10, no. 26 (February 2001): 101, https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560123882.
    Quackenbush, Stephen L. “Deterrence Theory: Where Do We Stand?” Review of International Studies 37, no. 2 (April 2011): 751. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000896.
    Ren, Yue., “China’s Dilemma in Cross-Strait Crisis Management,” Asian Affairs: An American Review 24, no. 3 (1997): 131–51, https://www.jstor.org/stable/30172715.
    Retired US Navy Rear Admiral. Interview by author. Zoom, February 28, 2025.
    Robinson, Thomas W., “America in Taiwan’s Post Cold-War Foreign Relations,” The China Quarterly 148, no. Special Issue: Contemporary Taiwan (1996): 1344-1345, https://www.jstor.org/stable/655527
    Romberg, Alan D. “Richard C. Bush, At Cross Purposes: U.S.-Taiwan Relations Since 1942: Armonk, New York, M.E. Sharpe, 2004, 304 p.” China Perspectives 2005, no. 4 (August 1, 2005). https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.506.
    Sagan, Scott D. “The Perils of Proliferation: Organization Theory, Deterrence Theory, and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons.” International Security 18, no. 4 (1994): 66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539178.
    Schelsinger, Stephen. “The End of Idealism: Foreign Policy in the Clinton Years.” World Policy Journal 15, no. 4 (1998): 39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209596.
    Schnakenberg, Keith E., “Informational Lobbying and Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 61, no. 1 (January 2017): 131. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12249.
    Schweizer, Peter. Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win. New York: HarperCollins, 2022.
    Shambaugh, David. “Taiwan’s Security: Maintaining Deterrence Amid Political Accountability.” The China Quarterly 148 (December 1996): 1297, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000050633.
    Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), SIPRI Arms Transfers Database (2022). Accessed February 7, 2025. https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers.
    Skidmore, David, and William Gates. “After Tiananmen: The Struggle Over U.S. Policy Toward China in the Bush Administration.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 27, no. 3 (n.d.): 514–39.
    Thrall, A. Trevor, and Caroline Dorminey. “The Role of Arms Sales in U.S. Foreign Policy.” Cato Institute, no. 836 (March 13, 2018): 1–27, https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23043.
    U.S. Congress. Arms Export Control Act [Public Law 90–629]. As Amended Through P.L. 118–31, Enacted December 22, 2023. Accessed March 13, 2025. § 36(b), 29.
    U.S. Department of State, “22 CFR § 120.4 - Commodity Jurisdiction,” Code of Federal Regulations, accessed March 13, 2025, 466, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-I/part-120.
    Walt, Stephen M. “Two Cheers for Clinton’s Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 79, no. 2 (2000): 66. https://doi.org/10.2307/20049641.
    Waltz, Kenneth N., “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security 25, no. 1 (2000): 5–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772.
    West, Michael J., and Aurelio Insisa, “Reunifying Taiwan with China through Cross-Strait Lawfare,” The China Quarterly 257 (March 2024): 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023000735.
    Wu, Charles Chong-Han., “Taiwan’s Hedging against China: The Strategic Implications of Ma Ying-Jeou’s Mainland Policy.” Asian Survey 56, no. 3 (2016): 466–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26364369.
    Wu, Shang-su. “The Survival of Mobile Firepower: An Uncertain Factor in Taiwan’s Asymmetrical Defense.” Asia Policy 18, no. 4 (October 2023): 114. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.a911627.
    Wu, Joshua Su-Ya. “Economics, Lobbying, and U.S. Congressional Support for Taiwan: Buying American Support, 2002–2006.” Asian Survey 49, no. 2 (March 1, 2009): 388. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2009.49.2.380.
    Yarhi-Milo, Keren, Alexander Lanoszka, and Zack Cooper, “To Arm or to Ally? The Patron’s Dilemma and the Strategic Logic of Arms Transfers and Alliances.” International Security 41, no. 2 (Fall 2016): 90–139.
    Yuan, Jingdong., “The United States and Stability in the Taiwan Strait.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 79, no. 2 (2023): 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2178176.
    Zhong, Houtao. "US Arms Sales Pushing Taiwan Toward Abyss." China Daily, August 18, 2023. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202308/18/WS64dea225a31035260b81cc63.html.
    Zhu, Zhiqun., “Battle Without Gunfire: Taiwan and the PRC’s Lobbying Competition in the United States,” Asian Perspective 24, no. 1 (2000): 55-56, https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2000.0036.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交學系
    112253026
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112253026
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302601.pdf1730KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback