政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/156105
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114895/145933 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53862865      線上人數 : 747
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/156105


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156105


    題名: 論說謊 : 非字面謊言的挑戰
    On Lying: The Challenge of Non-Literal Lies
    作者: 黃鈺閔
    Huang, Yu-Min
    貢獻者: 鄭光明
    古秀鈴
    Cheng, Kuang-Ming
    Ku, Hsiu-Lin
    黃鈺閔
    Huang, Yu-Min
    關鍵詞: 說謊
    非字面說謊
    預設說謊
    承諾
    Emanuel Viebahn
    日期: 2025
    上傳時間: 2025-03-03 15:41:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文旨在探討非字面說謊對傳統說謊理論的挑戰。根據傳統觀點，說謊是指說話者說出自己相信為假的內容，因此通常局限於話語的字面意義。然而，Emanuel Viebahn（2017）對此傳統觀點提出異議。他認為，說謊不一定要說出相信為假的內容，而是可以通過展現具有命題的溝通行為來實現。為此，他提出以「承諾」（commit）取代「說出」（say）在說謊定義中的角色，同時以此區分說謊與誤導。基於此觀點，Viebahn發展了一種以「承諾」為基礎的說謊定義，為解釋非字面說謊提供了理論框架，進而挑戰傳統的說謊觀點。本文將深入探討這一說謊定義，並藉由分析以預設來說謊的案例，以及採用以非字面溝通行為（隱喻、反諷、寬鬆使用和誇飾）來說謊的例子，闡述其說謊理論及探究可能的困難。
    參考文獻: 【中文】
    古秀鈴 (2020)。〈語意脈絡主義〉，《華文哲學百科》（2021版本），王一奇（編）。URL=http://mephilosophy.ccu.edu.tw/entry.php?entry_name=語意脈絡主義。
    【英文】
    Bräuer, F. (2021). Common Ground, Conversational Roles and Epistemic Injustice. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu, 28(2), 399–419.
    Carson, T. L. (2006). The Definition of Lying. Noûs, 40(2), 284–306.
    Gaszczyk, G. (2022). Lying with Uninformative Speech Acts. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 52(7), 746-760.
    Hills, D. (2024). Metaphor. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 Edition). Stanford University, Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/metaphor/
    Krstić, V. (2021). Lying, Tell-Tale Signs, and Intending to Deceive. International Journal of Philosophy, 75(4), 475-498.
    Ku, H. L. (2014). What is Said by Metaphor. 東吳哲學學報, 第三十期, 35-53.
    Mahon, J. (2018). Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Lying. In J. r. Meibauer (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lying (pp. 32-55): Oxford Handbooks.
    Marsili, N. (2024). The Definition of Assertion: Commitment and Truth. Mind and Language, 39(4), 540-560.
    Marsili, N., & Löhr, G. (2022). Saying, Commitment, and the Lying – Misleading Distinction. Journal of Philosophy, 119(12), 687-698.
    Meibauer, J. (2014). Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface (Vol. 14): Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
    Meibauer, J. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Lying: Oxford Handbooks.
    Pepp, J. (2022). What Is the Commitment in Lying. Journal of Philosophy, 119(12), 673-686.
    Saul, J. M. (2012). Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics: Oxford University Press.
    Stokke, A. (2013). Saying too Little and Saying too Much. Critical notice of ‘Lying, Misleading and What is Said’, by Jennifer Saul. Disputatio, 5(35), 81-91.
    Stokke, A. (2016). Lying and Misleading in Discourse. Philosophical Review, 125(1), 83-134.
    Stokke, A. (2017). Metaphors and Martinis: A Response to Jessica Keiser. Philosophical Studies, 174(4), 853-859.
    Tonhauser, J. (2015). Are ‘Informative Presuppositions’ Presuppositions? Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(2), 77-101.
    van Elswyk, P. (2019). Deceiving Without Answering. Philosophical Studies, 177(5), 1157-1173.
    Viebahn, E. (2017). Non-literal Lies. Erkenntnis, 82(6), 1367-1380.
    Viebahn, E. (2020). Lying with Presuppositions. Noûs, 54(3), 731-751.
    Viebahn, E. (2021). The Lying-Misleading Distinction: A Commitment-Based Approach. Journal of Philosophy, 118(6), 289-319.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學系
    110154006
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110154006
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[哲學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    400601.pdf1572KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋