Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156076
|
| Title: | 土地適宜性分析是否為臺灣光電區位之決策關鍵－以盤點農業綠能專區為例
Is Land Suitability Analysis the Key to Decision-Making on PV Location in Taiwan: Taking the Agricultural Green Energy Zone as an Example |
| Authors: | 陳奕樵
Chen, I-Chiao |
| Contributors: | 鄭安廷
Cheng, An-Ting
陳奕樵
Chen, I-Chiao |
| Keywords: | 太陽光電區位
土地適宜性分析
農業綠能專區
PV Location
Land Suitability Analysis
Agricultural Green Energy Zones |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-03-03 15:18:43 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討臺灣發展太陽光電的過程中，土地適宜性分析所扮演的角色，並以農業綠能專區為例，深入探討影響臺灣太陽光電區位決策的其他關鍵因素。
在全球追求減碳與能源轉型的背景下，臺灣積極推動再生能源，其中太陽光電因其對土地的需求，與農業用地產生了潛在的空間衝突，因此本研究的動機源於對傳統土地適宜性分析方法在光電選址中實際效用與限制的反思。研究中提出了兩個核心問題，首先探討土地適宜性分析應用於臺灣太陽光電設施選址時，可能發揮的功能與限制；其次，若土地適宜性分析存在局限性，則實際的光電區位規劃中，還有哪些因素需要被考量。
本研究透過訪談，蒐集來自專家學者、政府部門和非政府組織的想法，訪談內容則涵蓋土地適宜性分析的技術限制、農業綠能專區的政策成效與問題，及其盤點過程與相關爭議。研究結果顯示，土地適宜性分析在技術層面上存在諸多限制，例如評估準則的適用性、權重決定的主觀性等，並且許多抽象因素難以被納入分析。在實際應用中，該分析方法主要作為前期篩選區位的工具，但其成果與光電業者的實際需求存在落差。以農業綠能專區政策為例，饋線不足、土地整合不易和土地租金飆漲等問題，都顯示單純依賴土地適宜性分析難以解決實際問題。除了土地適宜性分析，影響臺灣太陽光電區位的因素還包括民眾態度與輿論、政府部門間的溝通協調，以及地方政府的推動誘因，這些因素分別對應到價值觀念、溝通過程和發展策略三個面向。
總結來說，本研究認為土地適宜性分析並非決定臺灣光電區位的關鍵因素。光電選址是一個複雜的過程，需要綜合考量科學工具、溝通過程、發展策略和價值觀念等多個面向。
This study explores land suitability analysis's role in Taiwan's solar photovoltaic (PV) development, using agricultural green energy zones as an example. It analyzes factors influencing solar PV location decisions amid global carbon reduction efforts. The research reflects on the effectiveness of land suitability analysis in site selection, considering social, economic, environmental, and political factors to optimize planning.
The study covers land suitability analysis, solar PV location, and agricultural green energy zones. Methods include literature reviews and interviews with experts, government, and NGOs. The results reveal technical limitations in land suitability analysis, like subjective criteria and data collection, with abstract factors (such as public attitudes) hard to include. It serves as a preliminary screening tool, but results differ from PV operators' needs. Issues like insufficient grid connections and land costs show it's hard to rely on solely. Factors affecting solar PV location include public opinion, government coordination, and local incentives, aligning with values, communication, and strategies.
In summary, this study believes that land suitability analysis is not a key factor in determining Taiwan's photovoltaic location. Photovoltaic site selection is a complex process that requires comprehensive consideration of multiple aspects such as scientific tools, communication processes, development strategies and values. |
| Reference: | 一、中文參考文獻
王筱雯、趙子元、連威迪、董安龍、林雨柔，2022，「台灣光電轉型「最小衝突」戰略：情境與土地規模等地選址模式」，『地理學報』，（103）：65-84。
台灣永續能源研究基金會，2011，『2011台灣氣候變遷民意調查』。
台灣永續能源研究基金會，2023，『2023第六屆台灣電力使用與能源轉型民意調查』。
立法院預算中心，2018，『106年度中央政府總決算審核報告整體評估報告』。
立法院預算中心，2021，『經濟部主管109年度單位決算評估報告』。
行政院，2017，『太陽光電2年推動計畫（修正版）』。
吳貞儀，2010，「權力與協作規劃：灣寶永續社區及公民環境主義的觀察與反思」，政治大學地政研究所學位論文：臺北。
吳鋼立，1998，「規劃思潮與公共利益概念的演變建構一個新的規劃典範來尋找公共利益」，『人與地』，15（11）：74-86。
周志龍，1997，「英國現代城鄉規劃思潮與專業教育的再結構」，『歐美研究』，27（3）：179-228。
周志龍，1999，「規劃理論的論爭與發展」，『都市與計劃』，26（2）：165-187。
林淑馨，2010，『質性研究：理論與實務』，臺北：巨流圖書公司。
柯宗鑫、張聖志，2024，「饋線跳脫是甚麼意思？饋線為什麼會跳脫？」，『台電月刊』，（733）：26-29。
袁方，2002，『社會研究方法』，臺北：五南圖書。
國家發展委員會、行政院環境保護署、經濟部、科技部、交通部、內政部、行政院農業委員會、金融監督管理委員會，2022，『臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明』。
黃書禮，2000，『生態土地使用規劃』，臺北：詹氏書局。
經濟部，2020，『能源轉型白皮書（核定本）』。
經濟部，2023，『臺灣2050淨零轉型「風電/光電」關鍵戰略行動計畫（核定本）』。
經濟部能源署，2019，『109年太陽光電6.5GW達標計畫（核定本）』。
經濟部能源署，2024，『經濟部能源署能源統計月報』。
戴伯芬，2006，「評介歐門汀葛爾的《規劃理論》：現代主義到後現代主義的跨界對話」，『國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報』，（13）：107-116。
韓佳佑，2016，『我國地面型太陽光電蘊藏量評估及用地建議』，核研所－能源經濟及策略研究中心。
韓培爾，2003，『社會科學研究方法Q&A』，臺北：風雲論壇。
二、外文參考文獻
Al Garni, H. Z., and Awasthi, A., 2017, “Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia”, Applied Energy, 206: 1225-1240.
Albrechts, L., 2009, “Strategic spatial planning revisited experiences from Europe”, Paper presented at the 3. BÖLGESEL KALKINMA VE YÖNETİŞİM SEMPOZYUMU, 61.
Albrechts, L., Alden, J., and da Rosa Pires, A., 2001, The changing institutional landscape of planning.
Azmi, R., Kacimi, I., and hicham, amar., 2018, Photovoltaic Site Suitability Analysis using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Sensitivity Analysis Methods with GIS and Remote Sensing in Southern Morocco: Case of Draa-Tafilatet Region.
Babbie, E. R., 1998, The practice of social research (8th ed), Wadsworth Pub. Co.
Babbie, E. R., 2013, The Practice of Social Research, Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Batley, R., and Stoker, G., 1991, Local Government in Europe: Trends And Developments, Macmillan Education UK.
Batty, M., 1994, “A Chronicle of Scientific Planning: The Anglo-American Modeling Experience”, Journal of the American Planning Association: 60(1).
Braune, I., Pinkwart, A., and Reeg, M., 2010, Application of multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems-A review of recent literature.
Brewer, J., Ames, D. P., Solan, D., Lee, R., amd Carlisle, J., 2015, “Using GIS analytics and social preference data to evaluate utility-scale solar power site suitability”, Renewable Energy, 81: 825-836.
Charabi, Y., and Gastli, A., 2011, “PV site suitability analysis using GIS-based spatial fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation”, Renewable Energy, 36(9): 2554-2561.
Choi, Y., Suh, J., and Kim, S.-M., 2019, “GIS-Based Solar Radiation Mapping, Site Evaluation, and Potential Assessment: A Review”, Applied Sciences, 9(9): Article 9.
Christensen, K. S., 1985, “Coping with Uncertainty in Planning”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 51(1).
Collins, M. G., Steiner, F. R., and Rushman, M. J., 2001, “Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: historical development and promising technological achievements”, Environmental management, 28: 611-621.
Couclelis, H., 1991, “Requirements for planning-relevant GIS: A spatial perspective”, Papers in Regional Science, 70(1): 9-19.
Davidoff, P., 1973, Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning.
Dear, M. J., 1986, “Postmodernism and Planning Environment and Planning D”, Society and Space, 4(3): 367-384.
Eadie, D. C., 1983, “Putting a Powerful Tool to Practical Use: The Application of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector”, Public Administration Review, 43(5): 133-147.
Easterling, K., 2001, Organization space: landscapes, highways, and houses in America, MIT Press.
Esping-Andersen, G., 1990, The Three Political Economies of the Welfare State.
Everest, T., Sungur, A., and Özcan, H., 2021, “Determination of agricultural land suitability with a multiple-criteria decision-making method in Northwestern Turkey”, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(5): 1073-1088.
Faludi, A., 1973, Planning Theory.
FAO of the UN., 1976, “A framework for land evaluation”, Soil Bulletin, 32.
Forester, J., 1980, “Critical Theory and Planning Practice”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3).
Forester, J., 1988, Planning in the Face of Power.
Forester, J., 1993, Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice, State University of New York Press.
Friedmann, J., 1973, Retracking America;: A theory of transactive planning.
Friend, J., and Jessop, N., 1977, Local Government and Strategic Choice (Routledge Revivals): An Operational Research Approach to the Processes of Public Planning, Routledge & CRC Press.
Georgiou, A., and Skarlatos, D., 2016, “Optimal site selection for sitting a solar park using multi-criteria decision analysis and geographical information systems”, Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 5(2): 321-332.
Golla, V., Badapalli, P. K., etikal, balaji, sivakumar, V. L., and Telkar, S. K., 2022, “Delineation of groundwater potential zones in semi-aridregion (Ananatapuram) using geospatial techniques”, Materials Today: Proceedings, 50: 600-606.
Healey, P., 1992, “A Planner’s Day: Knowledge and Action in Communicative Practice”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1).
Healey, P., 1996, “The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2): 217-234.
Healey, P., 1997, Collaborative Planning, Macmillan Education UK.
Healey, P., 2006, Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times.
Hillier, J., 2003, Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning.
Huang, J. P., Poh, K. L., and Ang, B. W., 1995, “Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling”, Energy, 20(9): 843-855.
Hudson, B. M., 1979, Comparison of Current Planning Theories: Counterparts and Contradictions.
IEA, 2022, World Energy Outlook 2022, Paris.
Innes, J. E., 1995, “Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3): 183-189.
Innes, J. E., 2001, “Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal.” pp. 147-161 in Classic Readings in Urban Planning, edited by Stein J., Routledge.
Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 1999, “Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1): 9-26.
IRENA, 2024, Renewable energy statistics 2024, Abu Dhabi.
Jacobs, J., 1961, The Death and Life of Great American Cities.
Kadam, A., Karnewar, A. S., Umrikar, B., and Sankhua, R. N., 2019, “Hydrological response-based watershed prioritization in semiarid, basaltic region of western India using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and AHP method”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(4): 1809-1833.
Kaufman, J. L., and Jacobs, H. M., 1987, “A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning”, Journal of The American Planning Association, 53(1): 23-33.
Klosterman, R. E., 1994, “Large-Scale Urban Models Retrospect and Prospect”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1): 3-6.
Kreukels, A., Salet, W., and Thornley, A., 2003, Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions, Routledge & CRC Press.
Krumholz, N., and Forester, J., 1990, Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector, Temple University Press.
Lindblom, C. E., 1959, “The Science of 'Muddling Through'”, Public Administration Review, 19(2): 79.
Liu, Q., Liu, G., and Huang, C., 2018, “Monitoring desertification processes in Mongolian Plateau using MODIS tasseled cap transformation and TGSI time series”, Journal of Arid Land, 10(1): 12-26.
Løken, E., 2007, “Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7): 1584-1595.
Malczewski, J., 2004, “GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview”, Progress in Planning, 62(1): 3-65.
Mastop, H., and Faludi, A., 1997, Evaluation of Strategic Plans: The Performance Principle.
McHarg, I. L., 1969, Design With Nature, New York: Natural History Press.
McMillan, J. H., and Schumacher, S., 2001, Research in education: A conceptual introduction, Longman.
Meyerson, M., and Banfield, E. C., 1955, Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest.
Moreno, D., and Seigel, M., 1988, “A GIS approach for corridor siting and environmental impact analysis”, Paper presented at the GIS/LIS ’88. Proceedings from the third annual international conference, San Antonio, Texas, November 30-December 2.
Munkhbat, U., and Choi, Y., 2021, “GIS-Based Site Suitability Analysis for Solar Power Systems in Mongolia”, Applied Sciences, 11(9): Article 9.
Nebey, A. H., Taye, B. Z., and Workineh, T. G., 2020, “Site Suitability Analysis of Solar PV Power Generation in South Gondar, Amhara Region”, Journal of Energy.
Nedovic-Budic, Z., 2000, “Geographic Information Science Implications for Urban and Regional Planning”, URISA Journal, 12.
Omann, I., 2004, MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION AID AS AN APPROACH.
Openshaw, S., 1999, “Geocyber Planning in the Digital Democracy of 2099.” pp. 425-436 in Geographical Information and Planning: European Perspectives, edited by Stillwell, J., Geertman, S. and Openshaw, S., Springer.
Ozbekhan, H., 1969, Toward a general theory of planning. Management and Behavioral Science Center, University of Pennsylvania.
Pickles, J., 1995, Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems, Routledge & CRC Press.
Pohekar, S. D., Ramachandran, M., and M. Ramachandran., 2004, “Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review”, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4): 365-381.
Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D. A., Munda, G., and Vreeker, R., 2006, “Selecting an Appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique for Renewable Energy Planning”, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1(2).
Reimer, M., Getimis, P., and Blotevogel, H., 2014, Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, Routledge.
Roy, B., and Vanderpooten, D., 1996, “The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5(1): 22-38.
Saaty, T. L., 2008, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83.
Scott, A. J., and Roweis, S. T., 1977, Urban Planning in Theory and Practice: A Reappraisal.
Steinitz, C., Parker, P., and Jordan, L., 1976, “On hand-drawn map overlays: an historical perspective and an alternative approach”, Landscape Architecture, 66: 444-455.
Stoms, D. M., Dashiell, S. L., and Davis, F. W., 2013, “Siting solar energy development to minimize biological impacts”, Renewable Energy, 57: 289-298.
Tahri, M., Hakdaoui, M., and Maanan, M., 2015, “The evaluation of solar farm locations applying Geographic Information System and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods: Case study in southern Morocco”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1354-1362.
Taoufik, M., Meriem, L., and Ahmed, F., 2021, “Land suitability analysis for solar farms exploitation using the GIS and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) – a case study of Morocco”, Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal, 24(2): 79-96.
Taylor, N., 1998, Urban Planning Theory since 1945, SAGE Publications Ltd.
Thomas, M. J., 1982, “The Procedural Planning Theory of A Faludi.” pp. 13-25 in Critical readings in planning theory, edited by Paris C., London: Pergamon press.
Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, T.-C., Lin, S.-Y., van Gasselt, S., Chen, C.-L., Hsu, C.-H., … Xie, Z.-S., 2019, “The Effects of Green Energy Production on Farmland: A Case Study in Yunlin County, Taiwan”, Land Use Change and Sustainability, 10.
Uyan, M., 2013, “GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28: 11-17.
van de Ven, D.-J., Westphal, M., González-Eguino, M., Gambhir, A., Peters, G., Sognnaes, I., McJeon, H., Hultman, N., Kennedy, K., Cyrs, T., and Clarke, L., 2021, “The Impact of U.S. Re-engagement in Climate on the Paris Targets”, Earth’s Future, 9(9).
Wang, H.-W., Dodd, A., and Ko, Y., 2022, “Resolving the conflict of greens: A GIS-based and participatory least-conflict siting framework for solar energy development in southwest Taiwan”, Renewable Energy, 197: 879-892.
Wu, G. C., Leslie, E., Allen, D., Sawyerr, O., Cameron, D. R., Brand, E., Cohen, B., and Olsen, A., 2019, Power of Place: Land Conservation and Clean Energy Pathways for California.
Yiftachel, O., 1989, “Towards a New Typology of Urban Planning Theories”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(1): 23-39.
Zimmermann, H.-J., and Gutsche, L., 2013, Multi-Criteria Analyse: Einführung in die Theorie der Entscheidungen bei Mehrfachzielsetzungen, Springer-Verlag.
三、網頁參考文獻
行政院農業委員會，2015年8月14日，「公告嚴重地層下陷地區內不利耕作得設置綠能設施之農業用地範圍」。
行政院農業委員會，2018年3月16日，「修正『嚴重地層下陷地區內不利農業經營得設置綠能設施之農業用地範圍』之第8區至第13區等6區得設置綠能設施之農業用地範圍，並自中華民國一百零七年五月十五日生效」。
行政院農業委員會，2019年8月14日，「不利農業經營區之劃設原則」。
李蘇竣，2023年7月13日，「經濟部『綠能發展區』政策欠法律依據 學界環團要求暫緩」，環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/237175
林吉洋，2023年12月25日，「巨大的空白支票：新名詞『綠能發展區』」，上下游。https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/west-coast-solar/ch05/
林吉洋，2023年12月25日，「你家不適合耕作：近八千公頃農地劃入低地力、不利耕作區」，上下游。https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/west-coast-solar/ch02/
林吉洋，2023年12月25日，「綠能與農漁爭地，能源政策往哪裡去？」，上下游。https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/west-coast-solar/ch07/
林吉洋，2023年5月3日，「【獨家】「漁電共生」髮夾彎，為補足 2025 年光電缺口，魚塭可逕直種電不養魚」，上下游。https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/185591/
林吉洋，2023年6月19日，「內政部放寬土地限制，綠能專區種電大放送，近百位學者聯署，批政府棄守國土永續原則」，上下游。https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/188091/
林雨佑，2022年11月11日，「當光電包圍漁村：七股漁電共生風波再起居民在抗議什麼」，報導者。https://www.twreporter.org/a/qigu-fishery-electricity-symbiosis
張朝欣，2020年8月18日，「上千公頃農地被列為『低地力』 麥寮民眾抗議不要能源專區」，中時新聞網。https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20200818004914-260402?chdtv
陳子萱，2023年8月16日，「台灣困局》農地篩選、廠商遴選、監督除役不明確 『低地力』圈地種電 綠能發展區爭議難解」，今周刊。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183027/post/202308160023/
黃書彥、林瑞興，2020年11月7日，「光電遇見生態─布袋鹽田發展太陽光電歷程」，農傳媒。https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/47431
黃浩珉、黃世澤、馬雨辰、江世民、方德琳、黃鈺婷，2024年5月13日，「光電目標連年跳票，農業綠能專區一開再開是解方嗎？8年併網面積僅18%，『不利耕作區』推動難關揭台灣地面型光電困局」報導者。https://www.twreporter.org/a/land-unsuitable-for-farming-photovoltaic
經濟部能源局，2023年4月28日，「光電(總統指示後續辦理情形)簡報」。
農委會（企劃處），2016年2月23日，「農委會公告不利耕作農地區位，以專區引導太陽能設施群聚發展」。
農委會（企劃處），2018年6月27日，「適時調整不利農業經營區 平衡養殖漁業及再生能源發展 已申請綠能設施未受影響」。
蔡維斌，2024年9月15日，「雲林綠能許可喊卡 張麗善揭背後原因強調『地方沒槓中央』」，聯合報。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
111257007 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111257007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 700701.pdf | | 5950Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
