English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114895/145933 (79%)
Visitors : 53858141      Online Users : 8
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/156013
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156013


    Title: 機構投資人對公司創新價值之影響
    The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Economic Value of Innovation
    Authors: 梁翌柔
    Liang, Yi-Jou
    Contributors: 車倫周
    Cha, Yun-Ju
    梁翌柔
    Liang, Yi-Jou
    Keywords: 機構投資人
    創新
    創新經濟價值
    專注型投資人
    短暫型投資人
    股票市場反應
    專利授權
    經濟價值
    公司治理
    長期支持
    Institutional investors
    innovation
    economice value of innovation
    dedicated investors
    transient investors
    stock market reactions
    patent grants
    corporate governance
    long-term support
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2025-03-03 14:40:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討不同類型機構投資人對公司創新的影響,並使用股票市場對專利授權的反應衡量創新的經濟價值。依據 Bushee (2001)之分類方法,機構投資人分為: 1. 專注型投資人;2. 短暫型投資人;及 3. 準指數投資人。實證結果顯示,專注型投資人透過較長的持有期間和較強的監督力道,對創新價值有正面影響,而短暫型投資人則有負面影響。專注型投資人對創新價值之影響,對於發展階段成熟、成長機會大、競爭激烈的公司中具有更顯著的效果。
    This study examines the heterogenous impact of institutional investors on firm innovation, focusing on dedicated, transient, and quasi-indexer investors. Using marketable value of innovation following Kogan et al. (2017), we find that dedicated investors positively influence innovation through long-term support and governance, while transient investors negatively impact it. The positive effect of dedicated investors is stronger in firms with advanced stage of development, more growth opportunities, and intense competition.
    Reference: Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (2009). The 'Wall Street Walk' and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 2645–2685.
    Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.
    Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J., & Zingales, L. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277–304.
    Aguilar, L. A. (2013). Institutional investors: Power and responsibility. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2013-spch041913laahtm.
    Appel, I. R., Gormley, T. A., & Keim, D. B. (2016). Passive investors, not passive owners. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(1), 111–141.
    Bird, A., & Karolyi, S. A. (2017). Governance and taxes: Evidence from regression discontinuity. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 29–50.
    Burns, N., Kedia, S., & Lipson, M. (2010). Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 443–455.
    Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305–333.
    Bushee, B. J. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 207–246.
    Carleton, W. T., Nelson, J. M., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF. The Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1335–1362.
    Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.
    Connelly, B. L., Tihanyi, L., Certo, S. T., & Hitt, M. A. (2010). Marching to the Beat of Different Drummers: The Influence of Institutional Owners on Competitive Actions. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 784–813.
    Denis, D. J., & Mihov, V. T. (2003). The choice among bank debt, non-bank private debt, and public debt: Evidence from new corporate borrowings. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(1), 3–28.
    Dikolli, S. S., Kulp, S. L., & Sedatole, K. L. (2009). Transient institutional ownership and CEO contracting. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 737–770.
    Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 115–140.
    Edmans, A., & Manso, G. (2011). Governance through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders. Review of Financial Studies, 24(7), 2395–2428.
    Edmans, A. (2014). Blockholders and Corporate Governance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6(1), 23–50.
    Gaspar, J.-M., Massa, M., & Matos, P. (2005). Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), 135–165.
    Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156.
    Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1983). An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica, 51(1), 7–45.
    Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297–355.
    Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2010). Control of Corporate Decisions: Shareholders vs. Management. Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), 4115–4147.
    Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.-H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 632–654.
    Hirshleifer, D., & Suh, R. (1992). Risk, Managerial Effort, and Project Choice. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2(3), 308–345.
    Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Firms' Age, Process Innovation, and Productivity Growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), 541–559.
    Khan, M., Srinivasan, S., & Tan, L. (2017). Institutional Ownership and Corporate Tax Avoidance: New Evidence. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 101–122.
    Kim, S., & Lee, M. (2023). The Plant-Level View of an Industrial Policy: The Korean Heavy and Chemical Industry Drive. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 29252.
    Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712.
    Levit, D., & Malenko, N. (2011). Nonbinding Voting for Shareholder Proposals. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1579–1614.
    Li, D. (2011). Financial constraints, R&D investment, and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(9), 2974–3007.
    Lin, C., Ma, Y., & Xuan, Y. (2011). Ownership Structure and the Cost of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 416–431.
    Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860.
    Maug, E. (1998). Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade-Off Between Liquidity and Control? The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 65–98.
    Mueller, D. C. (1972). A Life Cycle Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(3), 199–219.
    Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate Governance. Blackwell Publishers.
    Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5(2), 4–16.
    Sakaki, H., & Jory, S. R. (2019). Institutional Investors’ Ownership Stability and Firms’ Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 103, 10–22.
    Sayili, K., Yilmaz, G., Dyer, D., & Küllü, A. M. (2017). Style investing and firm innovation. Journal of Financial Stability, 32, 17–29.
    Shi, W., Connelly, B. L., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). External corporate governance and financial fraud: Cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1268–1286.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.
    Tian, X., & Wang, T. Y. (2014). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255.
    Ye, & Yu. (2019). The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Innovation: New Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 19(8), 78–99.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    111357039
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111357039
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    703901.pdf850KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback