政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/155912

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/155912

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 114895/145933 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53867502 線上人數 : 929

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英語教學碩士在職專班 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/155912

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155912

題名:	運用聽力日誌與廣泛聽力對台灣高中生英語聽力及後設認知覺察力的影響 The Effects of Integrating Listening Journals with Extensive Listening Practice on Taiwanese High School Students’ EFL Listening Proficiency and Metacognitive Awareness
作者:	周佳慧 Chou, Chia-hui
貢獻者:	許麗媛 Hsu, Li-Yuan 周佳慧 Chou, Chia-hui
關鍵詞:	廣泛聽力聆聽日誌後設認知意識英語為外語(EFL) 聽力能力 Extensive listening Listening journals Metacognitive awareness EFL Listening proficiency
日期:	2025
上傳時間:	2025-03-03 13:44:27 (UTC+8)
摘要:	雖然廣泛聽力（extensive listening）在提升第二語言學習者聽力能力方面效果顯著，將聽力日誌整合至廣泛閱讀能夠增進大學生的後設認知意識，但在台灣高中情境下實施的相關研究，仍相對有限。本研究旨在探討使用聆聽日誌對台灣高中生英語聽力能力及後設認知意識的影響。研究招募了來自兩個班的73名參與者，並將其分為實驗組和控制組進行為期16週的研究。本研究還關注學生對這種教學方法的看法。數據來源包括標準化的聽力能力測試、學生英語聽力後設認知意識問卷，以及參與者所撰寫的聆聽日誌。研究結果顯示，經過16週的實驗，儘管實驗組在聽力能力測試中的表現從前測到後測有所改善，且後測分數略高於控制組，但兩組間的差異並不具有統計學上的顯著性。在後設認知意識的發展方面，問卷數據顯示，無論是實驗組還是控制組，在實驗前後均無顯著差異。至於學生對於維持廣泛聆聽日誌的態度，則出現了明顯的轉變。起初，他們將日誌視為壓力性的作業和英語考試，但隨著時間的推移，他們的動機逐漸提高，並開始認識到這項活動在提升聽力技巧方面的價值。 While extensive listening has been shown to enhance L2 learners' listening proficiency and the integration of listening journals within extensive reading frameworks has demonstrated potential in improving college students' metacognitive awareness, research on their application in high school contexts, particularly in Taiwan, remains limited. The present study examined the effects of using listening journals on Taiwanese high school students' EFL listening proficiency and metacognitive awareness. Seventy-three participants from two intact classes were recruited and divided into experimental and control groups for a 16-week study. The students' perceptions of this approach were also a focus of the study. Data were collected from multiple sources, including a standardized listening proficiency test, a questionnaire on students' English listening metacognitive awareness, and the listening journals created by the participants. The findings revealed that, the findings showed that after a 16-week experiment, although the experimental group showed some improvement from the pretest to the posttest on the listening proficiency test and scored slightly higher than the control group on the posttest, the differences were not statistically significant. Regarding the development of metacognitive awareness, the questionnaire data revealed no significant differences in either group before or after the experiment. As for students' attitudes toward keeping extensive listening journals, there was a noticeable shift in their perceptions. Initially, they viewed the journals as stressful assignments and English tests. However, over time, their motivation began to improve, and they started to recognize the value of the activity in enhancing their listening skills.
參考文獻:	References Alm, A. (2013). Extensive listening 2.0 with foreign language podcasts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 266 - 280. Al-Khresheh, M. H., & Alruwaili, S. F. (2024). Metacognition in listening comprehension: Analyzing strategies and gender differences among Saudi EFL university students. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2291954. Bourdeaud’hui, H., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2021). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness, motivation, and L1 students’ critical listening skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872474 Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember, A problem of metacognition. Advances in instructional psychology. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge University Press. Chang, A. C.-S., & Millett, S. (2013). The effect of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: some hard evidence. ELT Journal, 68(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct052 Chang, A. C., & Millett, S. (2016). Developing L2 listening fluency through extended listening-focused activities in an extensive listening programme. RELC Journal, 47(3), 349-362. Chen (2019). Guided listening with listening journals and curated materials: a metacognitive approach, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13:2, 133-146 Chemers, M. M., Hu, L.-t., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55 Cross, J (2011) Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal 65(4): 408–16. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge. Eastman, J.K. (1991). Learning to listen and comprehend: The beginning stages. System, 19, 179-187. Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners' problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down?. System, 32(3), 363-377. Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911 Gilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, A. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977-988. Gillham, B. (2007). Developing a Questionnaire. Bloomsbury Academic. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=aJbUAwAAQBAJ Gilliland, B. (2015). Listening logs for extensive listening practice. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 13–22). New York: Routledge. Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165–182. Graham, S. (2017). Research into practice: Listening strategies in an instructed classroom setting. Language Teaching, 50(1):107-119. Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT journal, 51(4), 361-369. Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75. Goh, C. C. M., & Centre, R. E. L. (2002). Teaching Listening in the Language Classroom. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=mqZbAAAACAAJ Goh C, Taib Y (2006) Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal 60(3): 222–32. Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive Instruction for Second Language Listening Development: Theory, Practice and Research Implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184 Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language awareness, 23(3), 255-274. Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2009). Listening strategies of Singaporean primary pupils. Language learning in new English contexts: Studies of acquisition and development, 55-74. Hsin-Yi , K. (2021). A Study on Taiwanese High School EFL Students’ Listening Metacognitive Awareness and Its Relationship with the Performance on Listening Comprehension. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136263 Hung, V. (n.d.). 111-2 English Learning Journal (Vivian Hung). Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qZbRhHIqQyh5nCzFudt9ZyhEbBlTHF3mFzFJYMdQ7Jw/edit?fbclid=IwAR0pOT2QUybprGrTJbkoUy2OvVQu8kAXMlt8gG11wT2IRuGqcdiD8lUM118 Imhof, M., & Janusik, L. A. (2006). Development and validation of the Imhof-Janusik listening concepts inventory to measure listening conceptualization differences between cultures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(2), 79-98. Johnson, I. W., Barker, R. T., & Pearce, C. G. (1995). Using Journals to Improve Listening Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9(4), 475-483. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/1050651995009004005 Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press. Ko, H.Y. (2021). A study on Taiwanese high school EFL students` listening metacognitive awareness and its relationship with the performance on listening comprehension. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136263 Lee, YJ., Cha, KW (2017). Listening Logs for Extensive Listening in a Self-regulated Environment. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 271–279. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1007/s40299-017-0347-0 Lin, C. Y., & Gan, X. N. (2014). Taiwanese college students’ use of English listening strategies and self-regulated learning. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(5), 57-65. LTTC, G. (2018). Score data summary for 2018 GEPT. Score Data Summary for 2018 GEPT. https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/files/20221102120632234.pdf Lynch, T. (2009). Teaching second language listening. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Mareschal, C (2007) Student perceptions of a self-regulatory approach to second language listening comprehension development. Unpublished PhD thesis. Available at www.ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/29447. Last accessed 4 February 2015. Mendelsohn, D. (2006). Learning how to listen using learning strategies. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martínez-Flor (Ed.), Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the four Language Skills (pp. 75-90). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197778.2.75 Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. Purpura, J.E. (1997), An Analysis of the Relationships Between Test Takers' Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use and Second Language Test Performance. Language Learning, 47: 289-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.91997009 Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test takers: a structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 15(3), 333-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500303 Reinders, H., & Cho, M. Y. (2010). Extensive listening practice and input-enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones. TESL-EJ: The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 14(2), 1–7. Renandya, W. A., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). “Teacher, the Tape Is Too Fast!” Extensive Listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65, 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq015 Richards, J. C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667152 Rivers, W.M., & Temperley, M.S., (1978). A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English as a Second Foreign Language. Oxford University Press, New York. Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and Researching Listening (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson. Ruan, Z. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863901 Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91. Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive Pedagogical Sequence for Less-Proficient Thai EFL Listeners: A Comparative Investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86–103. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0033688218754942 Tavakoli, M., Shahraki, S. H., & Rezazadeh, M. (2012). The relationship between metacognitive awareness and EFL listening performance: focusing on IELTS higher and lower scorers. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 24-37. Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496. Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 70-89. Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge. Vandergrift L, Tafaghodtari, MH (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: an empirical study. Language Learning 60(2): 470–97. Wallace M. P. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12685 Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What Influences Learning? A Content Analysis of Review Literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43. Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. C. M. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.2 Zhang, D. (2001). Singaporean secondary three students' metacognitive knowledge about English oral skills learning (Doctoral dissertation).
描述:	碩士國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班 110951010
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110951010
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
101001.pdf	1134Kb	Adobe PDF	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋