Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155912
|
Title: | 運用聽力日誌與廣泛聽力對台灣高中生英語聽力及後設認知覺察力的影響 The Effects of Integrating Listening Journals with Extensive Listening Practice on Taiwanese High School Students’ EFL Listening Proficiency and Metacognitive Awareness |
Authors: | 周佳慧 Chou, Chia-hui |
Contributors: | 許麗媛 Hsu, Li-Yuan 周佳慧 Chou, Chia-hui |
Keywords: | 廣泛聽力 聆聽日誌 後設認知意識 英語為外語(EFL) 聽力能力 Extensive listening Listening journals Metacognitive awareness EFL Listening proficiency |
Date: | 2025 |
Issue Date: | 2025-03-03 13:44:27 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 雖然廣泛聽力(extensive listening)在提升第二語言學習者聽力能力方面效果顯著,將聽力日誌整合至廣泛閱讀能夠增進大學生的後設認知意識,但在台灣高中情境下實施的相關研究,仍相對有限。本研究旨在探討使用聆聽日誌對台灣高中生英語聽力能力及後設認知意識的影響。研究招募了來自兩個班的73名參與者,並將其分為實驗組和控制組進行為期16週的研究。本研究還關注學生對這種教學方法的看法。數據來源包括標準化的聽力能力測試、學生英語聽力後設認知意識問卷,以及參與者所撰寫的聆聽日誌。 研究結果顯示,經過16週的實驗,儘管實驗組在聽力能力測試中的表現從前測到後測有所改善,且後測分數略高於控制組,但兩組間的差異並不具有統計學上的顯著性。在後設認知意識的發展方面,問卷數據顯示,無論是實驗組還是控制組,在實驗前後均無顯著差異。至於學生對於維持廣泛聆聽日誌的態度,則出現了明顯的轉變。起初,他們將日誌視為壓力性的作業和英語考試,但隨著時間的推移,他們的動機逐漸提高,並開始認識到這項活動在提升聽力技巧方面的價值。 While extensive listening has been shown to enhance L2 learners' listening proficiency and the integration of listening journals within extensive reading frameworks has demonstrated potential in improving college students' metacognitive awareness, research on their application in high school contexts, particularly in Taiwan, remains limited. The present study examined the effects of using listening journals on Taiwanese high school students' EFL listening proficiency and metacognitive awareness. Seventy-three participants from two intact classes were recruited and divided into experimental and control groups for a 16-week study. The students' perceptions of this approach were also a focus of the study. Data were collected from multiple sources, including a standardized listening proficiency test, a questionnaire on students' English listening metacognitive awareness, and the listening journals created by the participants. The findings revealed that, the findings showed that after a 16-week experiment, although the experimental group showed some improvement from the pretest to the posttest on the listening proficiency test and scored slightly higher than the control group on the posttest, the differences were not statistically significant. Regarding the development of metacognitive awareness, the questionnaire data revealed no significant differences in either group before or after the experiment. As for students' attitudes toward keeping extensive listening journals, there was a noticeable shift in their perceptions. Initially, they viewed the journals as stressful assignments and English tests. However, over time, their motivation began to improve, and they started to recognize the value of the activity in enhancing their listening skills. |
Reference: | References Alm, A. (2013). Extensive listening 2.0 with foreign language podcasts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 266 - 280. Al-Khresheh, M. H., & Alruwaili, S. F. (2024). Metacognition in listening comprehension: Analyzing strategies and gender differences among Saudi EFL university students. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2291954. Bourdeaud’hui, H., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2021). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness, motivation, and L1 students’ critical listening skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872474 Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember, A problem of metacognition. Advances in instructional psychology. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge University Press. Chang, A. C.-S., & Millett, S. (2013). The effect of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: some hard evidence. ELT Journal, 68(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct052 Chang, A. C., & Millett, S. (2016). Developing L2 listening fluency through extended listening-focused activities in an extensive listening programme. RELC Journal, 47(3), 349-362. Chen (2019). Guided listening with listening journals and curated materials: a metacognitive approach, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13:2, 133-146 Chemers, M. M., Hu, L.-t., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55 Cross, J (2011) Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal 65(4): 408–16. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge. Eastman, J.K. (1991). Learning to listen and comprehend: The beginning stages. System, 19, 179-187. Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners' problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down?. System, 32(3), 363-377. Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911 Gilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, A. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977-988. Gillham, B. (2007). Developing a Questionnaire. Bloomsbury Academic. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=aJbUAwAAQBAJ Gilliland, B. (2015). Listening logs for extensive listening practice. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 13–22). New York: Routledge. Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165–182. Graham, S. (2017). Research into practice: Listening strategies in an instructed classroom setting. Language Teaching, 50(1):107-119. Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT journal, 51(4), 361-369. Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75. Goh, C. C. M., & Centre, R. E. L. (2002). Teaching Listening in the Language Classroom. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=mqZbAAAACAAJ Goh C, Taib Y (2006) Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal 60(3): 222–32. Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive Instruction for Second Language Listening Development: Theory, Practice and Research Implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184 Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language awareness, 23(3), 255-274. Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2009). Listening strategies of Singaporean primary pupils. Language learning in new English contexts: Studies of acquisition and development, 55-74. Hsin-Yi , K. (2021). A Study on Taiwanese High School EFL Students’ Listening Metacognitive Awareness and Its Relationship with the Performance on Listening Comprehension. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136263 Hung, V. (n.d.). 111-2 English Learning Journal (Vivian Hung). Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qZbRhHIqQyh5nCzFudt9ZyhEbBlTHF3mFzFJYMdQ7Jw/edit?fbclid=IwAR0pOT2QUybprGrTJbkoUy2OvVQu8kAXMlt8gG11wT2IRuGqcdiD8lUM118 Imhof, M., & Janusik, L. A. (2006). Development and validation of the Imhof-Janusik listening concepts inventory to measure listening conceptualization differences between cultures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(2), 79-98. Johnson, I. W., Barker, R. T., & Pearce, C. G. (1995). Using Journals to Improve Listening Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9(4), 475-483. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/1050651995009004005 Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press. Ko, H.Y. (2021). A study on Taiwanese high school EFL students` listening metacognitive awareness and its relationship with the performance on listening comprehension. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136263 Lee, YJ., Cha, KW (2017). Listening Logs for Extensive Listening in a Self-regulated Environment. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 271–279. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1007/s40299-017-0347-0 Lin, C. Y., & Gan, X. N. (2014). Taiwanese college students’ use of English listening strategies and self-regulated learning. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(5), 57-65. LTTC, G. (2018). Score data summary for 2018 GEPT. Score Data Summary for 2018 GEPT. https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/files/20221102120632234.pdf Lynch, T. (2009). Teaching second language listening. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Mareschal, C (2007) Student perceptions of a self-regulatory approach to second language listening comprehension development. Unpublished PhD thesis. Available at www.ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/29447. Last accessed 4 February 2015. Mendelsohn, D. (2006). Learning how to listen using learning strategies. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martínez-Flor (Ed.), Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the four Language Skills (pp. 75-90). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197778.2.75 Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. Purpura, J.E. (1997), An Analysis of the Relationships Between Test Takers' Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use and Second Language Test Performance. Language Learning, 47: 289-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.91997009 Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test takers: a structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 15(3), 333-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500303 Reinders, H., & Cho, M. Y. (2010). Extensive listening practice and input-enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones. TESL-EJ: The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 14(2), 1–7. Renandya, W. A., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). “Teacher, the Tape Is Too Fast!” Extensive Listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65, 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq015 Richards, J. C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667152 Rivers, W.M., & Temperley, M.S., (1978). A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English as a Second Foreign Language. Oxford University Press, New York. Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and Researching Listening (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson. Ruan, Z. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863901 Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91. Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive Pedagogical Sequence for Less-Proficient Thai EFL Listeners: A Comparative Investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86–103. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0033688218754942
Tavakoli, M., Shahraki, S. H., & Rezazadeh, M. (2012). The relationship between metacognitive awareness and EFL listening performance: focusing on IELTS higher and lower scorers. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 24-37. Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496. Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 70-89. Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge. Vandergrift L, Tafaghodtari, MH (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: an empirical study. Language Learning 60(2): 470–97. Wallace M. P. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12685 Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What Influences Learning? A Content Analysis of Review Literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43. Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. C. M. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.2 Zhang, D. (2001). Singaporean secondary three students' metacognitive knowledge about English oral skills learning (Doctoral dissertation). |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 英語教學碩士在職專班 110951010 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110951010 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
101001.pdf | 1134Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|