English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114875/145929 (79%)
Visitors : 53857098      Online Users : 730
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155840


    Title: 地緣政治對國防支出與配置之影響 - 以北約國家為例
    The Impact of Geopolitics on Defense Spending and Allocation : A Case Study of NATO Countries
    Authors: 張智賢
    Chag, Chih-Hsien
    Contributors: 翁永和
    Weng, Yung-Ho
    張智賢
    Chag, Chih-Hsien
    Keywords: 國防支出與配置
    地緣政治風險
    Defense Spending and Allocation
    Geopolitical Risk
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2025-03-03 13:25:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「國防支出與配置」是指國家在面臨多元安全挑戰與地緣政治風險時,針對國防資源進行分配與運用的策略性決策,其目的在於保障國家主權、維持國防能力及應對安全威脅,其中國防支出配置項目統一區分為,設備(裝備)、人員、基礎建設及其他等4類。本研究以北約國家為研究樣本,從地緣政治風險作為切入點,並加入人均GDP等7項其他因素,探討這些因素對國防支出及其配置模式的影響力。從實證迴歸結果發現,「地緣政治風險」對國防總支出占GDP比例、設備(裝備)及其他類國防支出占比有正向顯著影響,而對人員類占比具有負向顯著影響;「人均GDP」與「中央政府支出」均對國防總支出占GDP比例、設備(裝備)、基礎建設及其他類國防支出占比有正向顯著影響,人員類占比具有負向顯著影響;「經濟開放程度」對國防總支出占GDP比例及設備(裝備)類國防支出占比有負向顯著影響,人員及基礎建設類占比具有正向顯著影響;「城市化程度」對國防總支出占GDP比例、設備(裝備)及基礎建設類國防支出占比有負向顯著影響,人員類占比具有正向顯著影響;「政體(民主指數)」對國防總支出占GDP比例、設備(裝備)及基礎建設類國防支出占比有負向顯著影響,人員及其他類占比具有正向顯著影響。
    "Defense spending and allocation" refers to the strategic decisions a nation makes to distribute and utilize defense resources in response to security challenges and geopolitical risks. Its goal is to safeguard sovereignty, maintain defense capabilities, and address threats. Defense spending is divided into four categories: equipment (armament), personnel, infrastructure, and others. This study examines NATO countries, focusing on geopolitical risk and seven additional factors, including national income, to analyze their impact on defense spending and allocation. The regression results show that "geopolitical risk" positively influences total defense spending as a percentage of GDP, as well as spending on equipment and other categories, but negatively affects personnel spending. "National income" and "central government expenditure" positively affect total defense spending, as well as spending on equipment, infrastructure, and other categories, but negatively impact personnel spending. "Economic openness" negatively affects total defense spending and equipment spending but positively influences personnel and infrastructure spending. "Urbanization" negatively impacts total defense spending, equipment, and infrastructure but positively affects personnel spending. Finally, "political regime (democracy index)" negatively influences total defense spending, equipment, and infrastructure, while positively affecting personnel and other categories.
    Reference: Becker, J., and Dunne, J. P. (2023). Military spending composition and economic growth. Defence and Peace Economics, 34(3), 259-271.
    Becker, J., and Malesky, E. (2017). The continent or the “grand large”? Strategic culture and operational burden-sharing in NATO. International studies quarterly, 61(1), 163-180.
    Becker, J., Benson, S., Dunne, J. P., and Malesky, E. J. (2022). Disaggregated Defense Spending: Introduction to Data and the Case for Systematic Use. SSRN.
    Bove, V., and Brauner, J. (2016). The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes. Defence and peace economics, 27(5), 609-625.
    Brauner, J. (2015). Military spending and democracy. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(4), 409-423.
    Caldara, D., and Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194-1225.
    Cameron, D. R. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American political science review, 72(4), 1243-1261.
    Deger, S., and Smith, R. (1983). Military expenditure and growth in less developed countries. Journal of conflict resolution, 27(2), 335-353.
    Desta, L. (2009). Determinants of military expenditure: The case of the post-Cold War years. The University of Texas at Dallas.
    Dunne, J. P., and Mohammed, N. A. (1995). Military spending in sub-saharan africa: Some evidence for 1967-85. Journal of Peace research, 32(3), 331-343.
    Dunne, P., and Perlo-Freeman, S. (2003). The demand for military spending in developing countries. International Review of Applied Economics, 17(1), 23-48.
    Emmanouilidis, K., and Karpetis, C. (2022). Cross–country dependence, heterogeneity and the growth effects of military spending. Defence and Peace Economics, 33(7), 842-856.
    George, J., and Sandler, T. (2021). EU demand for defense, 1990–2019: A strategic spatial approach. Games, 12(1), 13.
    Gupta, S., De Mello, L., and Sharan, R. (2001). Corruption and military spending. European journal of political economy, 17(4), 749-777.Becker, J., and Dunne, J. P. (2023). Military spending composition and economic growth. Defence and Peace Economics, 34(3), 259-271.
    Khan, K., Su, C. W., and Rizvi, S. K. A. (2022). Guns and blood: A review of geopolitical risk and defence expenditures. Defence and Peace Economics, 33(1), 42-58.
    Kofroň, J., and Stauber, J. (2024). Spending on personnel or equipment: panel analysis of military expenditures in the NATO countries 2005–2019. European Security, 1-25.
    Maizels, A., and Nissanke, M. K. (1986). The determinants of military expenditures in developing countries. World Development, 14(9), 1125-1140.
    Murdoch, J. C., and Sandler, T. (1982). A theoretical and empirical analysis of NATO. Journal of conflict resolution, 26(2), 237-263.
    Nikolaidou, E. (2008). The demand for military expenditure: Evidence from the EU15 (1961–2005). Defence and Peace Economics, 19(4), 273-292.
    Rosh, R. M. (1988). Third world militarization: Security webs and the states they ensnare. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32(4), 671-698.
    Sandler, T., and George, J. (2016). Military expenditure trends for 1960–2014 and what they reveal. Global Policy, 7(2), 174-184.
    Sipri. (2021). Sipri Yearbook 2021: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security.
    Stone, J. C. (2005). Planning defence budget allocations for Canada's Strategy 2020. Defence and Peace Economics, 16(3), 223-246.
    Sweidan, O. D. (2023). Geopolitical risk and military expenditures: Evidence from the US economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 9(2), 201-218.
    Sweidan, O. D. (2023). The effect of geopolitical risk on income inequality: Evidence from a panel analysis. Social Indicators Research, 167(1), 47-66.
    Tian, N., Lopes da Silva, D., Béraud-Sudreau, L., Liang, X., Scarazzato, L., and Assis, A. (2023). Developments in Military Expenditure and the Effects of the War in Ukraine. Defence and Peace Economics, 34(5), 547-562.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    112921314
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112921314
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    131401.pdf5786KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback