English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114105/145137 (79%)
Visitors : 52134995      Online Users : 35
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155255


    Title: 專家證人與智慧財產訴訟
    Expert Witness and Intellectual Property Litigation
    Authors: 莊弘鈺
    Chuang, Luke Hung-Yu
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Keywords: 專家證人;智慧財產訴訟;智慧財產案件審理法;商業事件審理法;聯邦證據規則
    Expert witness;Intellectual property litigation;Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act;Commercial Case Adjudication Act;Federal Rules of Evidence
    Date: 2024-10
    Issue Date: 2025-01-17 10:50:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 112年8月30日新修正施行的智慧財產案件審理法增設專家證人制度，擴大專家參與智慧財產案件審判程序，或將對於我國智慧財產訴訟實務產生影響。本文首將介紹修增此制度的立法目的，再介紹現行關於專家證人資格、應踐行程序、應揭露事項、權責義務的規範內容。嗣探討專家證人在我國智慧財產訴訟實務的現行狀況與存在情形，並借鏡我國商業事件審理法就專家證人的討論，及借鏡美國專家證人制度與智慧財產訴訟實務的觀點，而對我國現行規範加以比較。最後，則是試行探討此新設制度與我國既有民事訴訟制度的整合與互補，而達到此新設制度的立法目的及對智慧財產訴訟實務的助益。
    The recently revised Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, effective 30 August 2023, introduces a new expert witness system. This system encourages more experts to participate in intellectual property litigation proceedings, potentially significantly impacting legal practices. The article begins by outlining the background of the latest revisions and changes. It then explains the new system’s qualifications, procedures, disclosures, and obligations. After analyzing current and previous expert witness practices in intellectual property litigation, the article references and compares the Commercial Case Adjudication Act in Taiwan and the Federal Rules of Evidence and intellectual property legal practices in the United States. The final section discusses how the new system can be integrated into the existing civil litigation system to achieve its intended goals and benefit intellectual property litigation practices.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.353, pp.33-44
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/1025593135303
    DOI: 10.53106/1025593135303
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback