Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/154973
|
Title: | 從國軍睦鄰措施對地方民眾之影響分析 - 以陸軍北部地區單位為例 The Impact Analysis of Neighboring Measures by the Military of R.O.C. on Local Residents - A Case Study of a Certain Army Unit in the Northern Region |
Authors: | 林嵩峻 Lin, Sung-Chun |
Contributors: | 白仁德 Pai, Jen-Te 林嵩峻 Lin, Sung-Chun |
Keywords: | 鄰避效應 睦鄰措施 重要性-表現性分析法 偏最小平方法結構方程模型 NIMBY effect Neighboring Measures IPA PLS-SEM |
Date: | 2024 |
Issue Date: | 2025-01-02 11:35:28 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 國防部為取得國防事務工作順遂與地方民意支持的平衡下,透過睦鄰措施的方式來與地方居民取得共識,使地方居民能支持居家環境週遭軍事場址相關作業。然而,在年度睦鄰預算節節升高、擴大用途的趨勢中,是否能有效消弭地方軍民對居家周遭附近軍事場址厭惡,提升地方居民滿意度,藉以提升軍民關係,是為本研究之動機。 因此,本研究主要探討從國軍睦鄰措施對地方民眾之影響分析,以陸軍油料、彈藥設施等單位場址為範疇,採用問卷調查與深度訪談的方式,蒐集地方居民對於地方上睦鄰措施的認知、滿意度與重視程度、軍事機關對於睦鄰措施的想法與觀點。首先透過重要性-表現性分析法(IPA)方式分析居民對睦鄰措施的滿意程度與重視程度,據以作為提升改進之依據;後續搭配使用偏最小平方法的結構方程模型(PLS-SEM)探討睦鄰措施認知、滿意程度及重視程度之間的關聯性;最後運用深度訪談方式對軍事機關承辦人員訪談,並彙整其觀點。 研究結果顯示,地方居民對鄰避設施的不良觀感,藉由睦鄰措施的回饋與執行,可有效消弭部分負面情緒。當地方居民對睦鄰措施的認知程度越高,其重視程度與滿意程度會產生顯著正面影響。然而,受限於宣傳效果的不足,導致部分民眾不太清楚其睦鄰措施具體內容,進而降低相關認知程度、重視程度、滿意程度等指標。另外對於整體睦鄰措施的執行成效,以地方居民的觀點來評價,現行地方政府部分施政措施與地方民眾的期待是有相當大程度落差,顯現在未來仍然有精進與改善的空間,以使相關資源發揮最大之效益性。 基此,本研究提出結論與建議,包括宣傳效果的加強與擴大、睦鄰措施著重於生活品質改善、軍方稽核制度的修正等項目,以提升整體認知程度與滿意程度。本研究希冀能為相關機關提供政策參考依據,期盼後續睦鄰措施的運用能更為貼近地方民眾,使軍方、地方鄉鎮公所與地方民眾能達成雙贏和諧的局面。 The Ministry of National Defense seeks to balance effective defense operations with local public support by employing neighborly measures to reach a consensus with local residents. This approach aims to garner support for military activities surrounding residential areas. However, as the annual budget for neighborly measures continues to rise and expand in purpose, the effectiveness of these measures in alleviating local resentment towards nearby military sites and enhancing resident satisfaction becomes a key motivation for this study. This research primarily analyzes the impact of military neighborly measures on local communities, focusing on military sites such as army fuel and ammunition depots. It employs surveys and in-depth interviews to gather local residents' perceptions, satisfaction levels, and priorities regarding these measures, as well as the viewpoints of military agencies on them. Initially, the study utilizes IPA to assess residents' satisfaction and importance levels concerning neighborly measures, serving as a basis for improvement. Subsequently, it employs PLS-SEM to explore the relationships among awareness, satisfaction, and importance of these measures. Finally, in-depth interviews are conducted with military personnel involved in implementing these measures to compile their perspectives. The study's findings indicate that local residents' negative perceptions of nearby facilities can be effectively mitigated through feedback and implementation of neighborly measures. As residents' awareness of these measures increases, their perceived importance and satisfaction also show significant positive impacts. However, limited promotional effectiveness has resulted in some residents being unclear about the specific content of these measures, thereby reducing their awareness, importance, and satisfaction levels. Additionally, from the perspective of local residents evaluating the overall execution of neighborly measures, there exists a considerable gap between current government policies and community expectations, indicating potential areas for improvement. In summary, this study presents conclusions and recommendations including enhancing promotional effectiveness, focusing neighborly measures on improving quality of life, and revising military auditing systems to boost overall awareness and satisfaction. It is hoped that this research can provide relevant agencies with a policy reference framework and that future implementations of neighborly measures will be more aligned with local community needs, fostering a win-win harmonious situation among the military, local governments, and residents. |
Reference: | 一、專書: 丘昌泰(2006)。解析鄰避情結與政治。臺北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司 丘昌泰(2008)。公共政策:基礎篇(第四版)。臺北:巨流圖書公司。 吳明隆、張毓仁(2011)。SPSS(PASW)與統計應用分析(第二版)。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司 陳寬裕(2018)。結構方程模型分析實務:SPSS與Smart PLS的運用。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 陳向明(2024)。社會科學質的研究(第二版)。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 國防部(2020)。110年國防總檢討(ROC Quadrennial Defense Review)。臺北:國防部出版。 國防部(2023)。112年國防報告書(ROC National Defense Report)。臺北:國防部出版。 蕭文龍(2024)。統計分析入門與應用—SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 4(PLS-SEM)(第四版)。臺北:碁峯資訊股份有限公司。 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences(2nd edition). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M.(2017) . A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling(PLS-SEM). Washington DC:Sage Publications. Nunnally, J. C.(1978) . Psychometric Theory. New York:McGraw-Hill.
二、期刊論文: 王健民(2023)。從近期共軍聯合軍演──初探我防衛作戰之啟發。陸軍學術雙月刊,59(591),24-44。 丘昌泰(1999)。公害社區風險溝通之問題與對策。中興大學法商學報,34,19-58。 丘昌泰(2005)。鄰避情結與廠址設定。中國行政評論,14(3),33-64。 李永展、陳柏廷(1996)。從環境認知的觀點探討「鄰避」設施的再利用。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,1996(8),53-65。 李永展(1997)。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃,24(1),69-79。 李永展(1998)。鄰避設施衝突管理之研究。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,1998(9),33-44。 李永展、林啟賢(1998)。鄰避型公共設施之環境態度與更新接受意願之研究-以台北市為例。都市與計劃,25(2),133-153。 李尚嬪、廖秀玲、盧建余、陳建勝(2015)。從重要性績效分析(IPA)模式評估老化教育課程滿意度之研究-以壽險業為例。教育研究學報,49(2),167-182。 林倖如(2017)。社會福利設施之鄰避紛爭處理方法-兼介紹日本鄰避設施之居民合意形成程序。法令月刊,68(2),90-117 陳王琨、林文印、林忠銓(2011)。鄰避物業設施回饋比例的多準則決策評估。物業管理學報,2(2),35-44。 湯京平、翁偉達(2005)。解構鄰避運動-國道建設的抗爭與地方政治動員。公共行政學報,14,125-149。 楊宗憲、蘇倖慧(2011)。迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究。住宅學報,20(2),61-80。 劉仲矩(2011)。馬斯洛需求理論在網路書局使用者之驗證。行銷評論,8(3),405-422。 鐘國應(2016)。三軍聯訓基地周邊民眾「鄰避情節」與軍民關係之研究。復興崗學報,109,31-54。 Barich, Howard & Kotler, Philip(1991). A Framework for Marketing Image Management. Sloan Management Review:Cambridge,32(2),11-94. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 2, 295-336. Davis, F. D.(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3) , 319-339. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior:An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philosophy and Rhetoric,10(2),130-132. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50. George O. Rogers(1997). The Dynamics of Risk Perception: How Does Perceived Risk Respond to Risk Events? Risk Analysis,17(6),745-757. Halfacre,C.(2000). Regulating Contested Local Hazards:Is Constructive Dialogue Possible Among Participations in Community Risk Management. Policy Studies,28,646-667. Kaiser,H.F.(1958).The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika,23(3),187-200. John A. Martilla & John C. James(1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing,41(1),77-79. J. M. Hawes, & C. P. Rao(1985). Using Importance-Performance Analysis to Develop Health Care Marketing Strategies. Journal of Health Care Marketing,5(4),19-25. Lee,J., Ham,C.D. & Kim,M.(2013). Why People Pass along Online Video Advertising: From the Perspectives of the Interpersonal Communication Motives Scale and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Interactive Advertising,13(1),1-13. Myers,S.C.(2001). Capital Structure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,15,81-102. Ned Kock(2018). Should BOOTSTRAPPING be used in PLS-SEM? Toward Stable P-VALUE Calculation Methods. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling,1(2),1-12. Peter Hernon(1999). Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: An Assessment and Future Directions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,25(1),9-17. Venkatesh,V., Thong,J.Y., Xu,X.(2012). Consumer Acceptance and use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology. MIS Quarterly,36(1),157-178. William R. Freudenburg, Susan K. Pastor(1992). NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes. Journal of Social Issues,48(4),39-61.
三、研討會論文: 蕭代基(2001)。二十世紀台灣空氣污染問題與政策之變遷。2001年海峽兩案城市環境規劃與管理研討會。 廖坤榮、李建華(2001)。鄰避衝突管理-以嘉義縣鹿草焚化廠設置為例。中華公共事務管理學會第十一屆環境管理與都會發展研討會論文集。
四、學術論文: 何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施鄰避效果之研究。國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。未出版,臺北。 宋星瑤(2011)。具敏感性質設施鄰避效應影響因素研究與探討-以軍事設施為例。國立高雄第一科技大學運籌管理研究所碩士論文。未出版,高雄。 翁久惠(1993)。嫌惡性設施對生活環境品質影響之研究-以台北市內湖、木柵、士林三個垃圾焚化廠為例。國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。未出版,臺北。 陳秀鳳(2003)。從民眾的看法探討鄰避設施回饋金運用之問題-以高雄市小港、前鎮區為例。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。未出版,高雄。
五、譯著: 威廉·諾伊曼(2000)。社會研究方法-質化與量化取向,朱柔若(譯),臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。譯自Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, W. Lawrence Neuman , Pearson New International Edition.
六、法令規章 內政部(2019)。不動產說明書應記載及不得記載事項。台內地字第1080265601號令。 國防部(2023)。國軍訓場睦鄰工作要點。國訓資管字第11203652512號令。
七、政府文書 國防部(2021)。國防部所屬單位預算書表,取自:https://www.mnd.gov.tw/NewUpload/202104/110%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%9C%8B%E9%98%B2%E9%83%A8%E6%89%80%E5%B1%AC%E5%96%AE%E4%BD%8D%E6%B3%95%E5%AE%9A%E9%A0%90%E7%AE%97%E6%9B%B8%E8%A1%A8_400008.pdf 國防部(2022)。國防部所屬單位預算書表,取自:https://www.mnd.gov.tw/NewUpload/202204/111%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%9C%8B%E9%98%B2%E9%83%A8%E6%89%80%E5%B1%AC%E5%96%AE%E4%BD%8D%E6%B3%95%E5%AE%9A%E9%A0%90%E7%AE%97%E6%9B%B8%E8%A1%A8_213277.pdf。 |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 行政管理碩士學程 112921310 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112921310 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
131001.pdf | | 5108Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|