政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/154539
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51758737      線上人數 : 571
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/154539


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/154539


    題名: 由歐盟Fack Ju Göhte案探討歐盟商標規則公序良俗條款之判斷
    The Public Policy and Accepted Principles of Morality Clause of the EU Trademark Regulation in Light of the CJEU Fack Ju Göhte Decision
    作者: 陳龍昇
    Chen, Lung-Sheng
    貢獻者: 法學院
    關鍵詞: 公共秩序;善良風俗;不予註冊;歐盟商標
    Public policy;Accepted principles of morality;Absolute refusal grounds;The EU trademark regulation;Fack Ju Göhte
    日期: 2023-01
    上傳時間: 2024-11-29 14:04:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 歐盟商標規則第7條第1項第（f）款規定，商標違反公共秩序或善良風俗者，不予註冊。公共秩序與善良風俗乃一抽象法律概念而不易判斷，其範圍界定需考量國內的風俗文化，解釋亦應謹慎為之以避免逾越表意與言論自由之範疇。是以，應依如何標準而認定，以避免流於個人主觀好惡，即為重要。2019年歐盟法院於「Fack Ju Göhte」判決就前揭規定之適用見解，對於歐盟商標實務具有相當重要性。公共秩序與善良風俗之概念會隨時間、社會環境、文化發展背景差異而有不同的範圍，在解釋時應採較為嚴格的定義，界定真正為斯時社會大眾所認知、接受的道德規範。審查申請註冊之商標是否有妨害公共秩序或違反善良風俗時，應就該商標之實際使用情形與各項客觀使用事證綜合考量，並依商標所用語言界定相關大眾，依商標使用時的社會環境，綜合考量所有事證，依一般合理相關大眾之認知，審酌系爭商標是否有牴觸一般合理社會大眾所能接受的道德觀感與社會價值。
    Article 7 (1)(f) of the EU trademark regulation provides an absolute refusal ground for the European Union Intellectual Property Office if a trademark is contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality. It is not easy to define the public order and accepted principles of morality since they are abstract legal concepts. The definition of its scope needs to consider the customs and culture of the society. The interpretation should be careful to avoid infringing the freedom of expression. As such, it is essential to establish object standards to determine the scope of the concepts. In 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union's "Fack Ju Göhte" judgment was of great importance to EU trademark practice because, for the first time, the court had a chance to deal with the issue of the application of the abovementioned statutes. The concepts of public order and good customs will change over time with the development of society and culture. Therefore they should be narrowly defined. Only what is both 'fundamental' and under the 'social consensus' would qualify as such. When deciding whether a trademark is contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality, all relevant factors should be considered. In other words, they should also be assessed objectively if the general and reasonable relevant public will conceive the trademark as immoral or being contradicted to the social standard.
    關聯: 中正財經法學, No.26, pp.99-147
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML13檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋