| Abstract: | 我國體育運動領域業務附隨時代推移、社會政經變遷及法令相繼調整，21世紀伊始，我國體育運動法規迭有補充修訂，復輔以《行政程序法》生效後，各種行政程序運作態樣多元而影響我國體育運動推展至鉅，其中旋即包含「行政規則」及「行政指導」等。本研究謹以《游泳池管理規範》、《技擊運動訓練館設置及輔導要點》及其他具有「行政指導」性質之「行政規則」發軔，雖係以前行政院體育委員會或現行教育部體育署「令」發布「行政規則」態樣處理，然其中若干規範卻似近乎「行政指導」，然「行政規則」及「行政指導」兩者應用上或有不同，本研究採擷「後結構主義」輔以「符號學」及「互文性」等理論作為研究取徑，且以「文獻分析」、「文件分析」及「個人經驗總結」等作為研究方法，本研究範疇，原則上僅以體育運動行政為主，本研究結論則以，法令規範本身，即應有堅固結構而避免不當解構，且應先行考量嗣後或有被解構之虞，然或若干「行政指導」卻係隱躲於「行政規則」當中，此或被認係為另一解構；「行政規則」及「行政指導」兩者規範態樣及效力均或不同，不宜混用，且或應各自明確清楚規範名稱、披露方式及規範態樣。
Since the begining of the 21st Century, many laws & orders regarding sports administration have been mended and adjusted along with the evolutions of the times, the changes in the social, political, and economic environment, and legal & related business in Taiwan. When the "Administrative Procedure Law" came into effect, various types of administrative procedure, especially the administrative guidances, have a huge impact on the promotion of related business in the sports administration in Taiwan. This study is based on the "Swimming Pool Management Regulation", "The Setup and Guidance Points of Combat Sports Training Halls ,and other "administrative rules" with the nature of the "administrative guidance". In terms of the legal system of the Regulation mentioned above, although it is in the form of "administrative rules" issued by the former Sports Committee of the Executive Yuan or the current ADMOE, its nature is more similar to "administrative guidance". What are the similarities & differences between the applications of "Administrative Rules" & "Administrative Guidance" to the administration of sports in Taiwan? This study adopts the theories of "post-structuralism" related to "semiotics" & "intertextuality" as the research approaches, and uses " literature analysis ", "document analysis" & "personal experience summary" as the research methods. The scope of this study is mainly focused on administrations in sports, in principle, it fails to mention the other administrations. The conclusion of this study is to explain that the laws & regulations themselves should have a solid structure to avoid improper deconstruction. At the beginning of their promulgation, the possibility of deconstruction should be considered first, or some “administrative guidance” may be hidden. Hiding in the "administrative rules" is a kind of deconstruction. More different normative forms and effects between the "administrative rules" and "administrative guidance" should not be used together, or they should each clearly define their names, disclosures, and normative forms. |
