English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51664273      Online Users : 559
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153890


    Title: 創造空間:跨文化視野下移風易俗的社會想像
    Creating Space: Social Imaginary of Improving Local Mores in Cross-Cultural Perspective
    Authors: 林育民
    Lin, Yu-Min
    Contributors: 陳建綱
    馬愷之

    Cheng, Chien-Kang
    Marchal, Kai

    林育民
    Lin, Yu-Min
    Keywords: 社會想像
    風俗習慣
    跨文化哲學
    日常生活
    台灣脈絡
    Social Imaginary
    Local Mores
    Cross-cultural Philosophy
    Ordinary Thinking
    Taiwanese Context
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-10-04 10:29:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 改變社會當中風俗習慣的政策涉及多方面的自主行動者。本文提出「創造空間」的社會想像,作為調整風俗習慣與現代政府緊張關係的構想。創造空間的社會想像重視社會各層次自主行動者與現代政府的良善互動。「視野的拓展」、「相對化的理解與表達」、「利益的自我修養」分別是構成社會想像的三大支柱。首先,「視野的拓展」有助於民眾走出道德相對化的困境,以更為開放的眼光思考風俗習慣與政策。其次,「相對化的理解與表達」著眼於地方社會。透過將注意力收回自身,地方社會能夠以自己的角度思考過去與政府互動的經驗,並且以雙方都能夠理解的方式勾勒未來。最後,「利益的自我修養」讓個人菁英在衡量個人利益與公共利益時,能夠不排斥與公共利益有關的經驗,也能夠避免過度自我犧牲的風險。

    社會想像強調日常生活想法與哲學專業論述的對話。本文在哲學專業論述的探討中採取跨文化哲學途徑。透過廣泛討論丘濬、維勒曼、西季威克等不同文化脈絡的專業哲學論述,減少單一文化脈絡造成的盲點。以日常生活想法而言,本文則是將目光集中於台灣脈絡。藉由參考歷史、社會、人類學的研究,以及文人的書寫與記錄,本文不僅呈現出台灣脈絡當中的日常生活想法,也說明想法背後涉及的歷史脈絡。
    This Ph.D. dissertation examines the complex relationship between local mores and the authority of modern governance, proposing social imaginary for creating space to foster increased cooperation within this dynamic. The proposed social imaginary is underpinned by three fundamental values.

    The first, “expanding horizons,” encourages individuals to view the tensions between local mores and modern policies from a more comprehensive perspective. The second, “relative understanding and expression,” empowers local communities to articulate their perspectives in ways that are comprehensible to modern governmental frameworks. The third, “self-cultivation of interest,” enables social elites to maintain a balance between personal sacrifice and the cultivation of a genuine concern for public welfare. Together, these values emphasize the core concept of “creating space,” which involves integrating new ideas into established modes of thought and practice.

    This dissertation employs both “ordinary thinking” and “cross-cultural” approaches. By drawing on historical, social, and anthropological studies, alongside the writings and records of literati, the dissertation contextualizes everyday thinking within the broader historical landscape of Taiwan. Furthermore, by engaging in dialogues between ordinary thinking and philosophical discourses across different cultural contexts, the study seeks to uncover and address the blind spots inherent in each cultural framework.
    Reference: 參考文獻

    專書
    1.Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised Edition). London: Verso.
    2.Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: NLB.
    3.Andrade, Tonio. 2011. Lost Colony: The Untold Story of China's First Great Victory over the West. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    4.Bahm, Archie J. 1977. Comparative Philosophy: Western, Indian and Chinese Philosophies Compared. Albuquerque: World Books.
    5.Baron de Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. 1989. Montesquieu: The Spirit of the Laws (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). Anne M. Cohler, Basia C. Miller and Harold Stone Trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    6.Bentham, Jeremy. 1983. Constitutional Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    7.Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The MIT Press.
    8.Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1991. Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy: Essays in Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    9.Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1997. World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis, and the Imagination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    10.Cook, John W. 1999. Morality and Cultural Differences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    11.de Bary, William Theodore. 1981. Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart. New York: Columbia University Press.
    12.de Bary, William Theodore. 1983. The Liberal Tradition in China. New York: Columbia University Press.
    13.de Bary, William Theodore. 2004. Nobility and Civility: Asian Ideals of Leadership and the Common Good. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
    14.Etzioni-Halevy, Eva. 1983. Bureaucracy and Democracy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    15.Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan. 1937. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    16.Geertz, Clifford James. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    17.Hoebel, Edward Adamson. 1967. The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Havard University Press.
    18.Hume, David. 2007. A Treaties of Human Nature: A Critical Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    19.Hummel, Ralph P. 1994. The Bureaucratic Experience: A Critique of Life in the Modern Organization. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    20.Lloyd, G. E.R. 2015. Analogical Investigation: Historical Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    21.Malinowski, Bronisław. 2014. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    22.Mall, Ram Adhar. 2000. Intercultural Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
    23.Mill, John Stuart. 2003. Utilitarianism and On Liberty (Second Edition). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
    24.Mungello, David Emil. 1989. Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and The Origins of Sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    25.Neuman, William Lawrance. 2014. Social Research Methods (Seventh Edition). Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
    26.Putnam, Robert D.. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    27.Raju, Poolla Tirupati. 1962. Introduction to Comparative Philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
    28.Schelling, Thomas C. 2003. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
    29.Schneewind, J.B..1977. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    30.Schofield, Philip. 2006. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    31.Schuman, Howard and Stanley Presser. 1981. Questions and answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.
    32.Scott, James C. 2000. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    33.Shephard, John R. 1993. Statecraft and Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier 1600-1800. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    34.Shultz, Bart. 2017. The Happiness Philosophers: The Lives and Works of the Great Utilitarians. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    35.Sidgwick, Henry. 1962. Methods of Ethics (Seventh Edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    36.Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. 1979. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    37.Smith, Adam. 1984. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.
    38.Sumner, William Graham. 1906. Folkways: a study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Boston: Ginn and Co..
    39.Szonyi Micheal. 2017. The Art of Being Governed: Everyday Politics in Late Imperial China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    40.Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
    41.Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    42.Teng, Emma Jinhua (鄧津華). 2004. Taiwan Js Imagined Geography Chinese Colonial Travel Writing and Pictures, I683-I895. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
    43.Thaler, Richard H. and Cass R. Sunstein. 2021. Nudge: The Final Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    44.Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland. 1982. Utilitarian Confucianism: Ch’en Liang’s Challenge to Chu Hsi. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Asia Center.
    45.Velleman, J. David. 2009. How We Get Along. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    46.Velleman, J. David. 2015. Foundations for Moral Relativism (Second Expanded Edition). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
    47.Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    48.Wong, David B.(黃百銳). 2006. Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    49.Wong, Roy Bin (王國斌). 1997. China Transformed. New York: Cornell University Press.
    50.Wong, Young-tsu (汪榮祖). 2017. China's Conquest of Taiwan in the Seventeenth Century: Victory at Full Moon. Singapore: Springer.
    51.Yi-Fu, Tuan (段義孚). 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    52.Скачков, Пётр Емельянович. 1977. Очерки Истории Русского Китаеведения. Москва: Издательство «Наука».
    53.王汎森,2019,《思想是生活的一種方式:中國近代思想史的再思考》,台北:聯經出版社。
    54.丘濬原著,林冠群、周濟夫點校,1999,《大學衍義補》,北京:京華出版社。
    55.甘懷真,2022,《皇權、禮儀與經典詮釋:中國古代政治研究(增訂版)》,台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。
    56.朱熹原著,徐德明點校,2010,《朱子全書(修訂本)》,上海:上海古籍出版社。
    57.佐倉孫三原著,林美容等人校編,2017,《白話圖說臺風雜記─臺日風俗一百年》,台北:五南出版社。
    58.何乏筆,2021,《修養與批判:跨文化視野中的晚期傅柯》,新北市:聯經出版社。
    59.余英時,2023,《中國近世宗教倫理與商人精神(增訂版)》,新北市:聯經出版社。
    60.吳文星,2022,《日治時期台灣的社會領導階層(修訂版)》,台北:五南出版社。
    61.吳新榮原著,張良澤總編,2007,《吳新榮日記全集:第二冊(1938年)》,台南:國立台灣文學館。
    62.吳德功原著,李知灝選注,2013,《吳德功集》,台南:國立台灣文學館。
    63.李文卿,2012,《想像帝國─戰爭時期的台灣新文學》,台南:國立台灣文學館。
    64.李世偉,1999,《日據時代台灣儒教結社與活動》,台北;文津出版社。
    65.李焯然,2005,《丘濬評傳》,南京:南京大學出版社。
    66.卓克華,2007,《清代臺灣行郊研究》,台北縣:揚智文化。
    67.林文龍,1999,《台灣的書院與科舉》,台北:常民文化。
    68.林玉茹,2000,《清代竹塹地區的在地商人及其活動網絡》,台北:聯經出版社。
    69.林果顯,2005,《「中華文化復興運動推行委員會」之研究(1966-1975)─統治正當性的建立與轉變》,台北縣:稻鄉出版社。
    70.林柏維,1993,《台灣文化協會滄桑》,台北:臺原出版社。
    71.林滿紅,2018,《茶、糖、樟腦業與臺灣之社會經濟變遷(1860-1895)》,新北市:聯經出版社。
    72.柯志明,2003,《米糖相剋;日本殖民主義下台灣的發展與從屬》,台北:群學出版社。
    73.夏琳,1995,《閩海紀要》,台北:台灣銀行。
    74.烏丙安,2014,《民俗學原理》,長春:長春出版社。
    75.真德秀原著,朱人求校點,2010,《大學衍義》,上海:華東師範大學出版社。
    76.高丙中,2009,《中國民俗概論》,北京:北京大學出版社。
    77.康培德,2016,《殖民想像與地方流變:荷蘭東印度公司與臺灣原住民》,新北市;聯經出版社。
    78.張家綸,2017,《菁英如何改變社會:近代草屯之形成與人際網絡之轉變(1724-1945)》,新北市:稻鄉出版社。
    79.張崑將,2022,《台灣書院的傳統與現代》,台北:國立台灣大學人文社會高等研究院東亞儒學中心。
    80.畢萊德原著,宋剛譯,2017,《莊子四講》(Leçons sur Tchouang-tseu)台北:聯經出版社。
    81.連橫,1992,《台灣通史》,南投:台灣省文獻委員會。
    82.陳文松,2015,《殖民統治與「青年」;台灣總督府的「青年」教化政策》,台北:台灣大學出版中心。
    83.陳文松,2022,《白頭殼仔:洪元煌的人生組曲、殖民統治與草屯洪家》,台南:成大出版社。
    84.陳來,2010,《中國近世思想史研究(增訂版)》,北京:三聯書店。
    85.陳昭瑛,2000,《台灣儒學:起源、發展與轉化》,台北:正中書局。
    86.陳翠蓮,2008,《台灣人的抵抗與認同(1920-1950)》,台北;遠流出版社。
    87.陳鐵健、黃道炫,1992,《蔣介石與中國文化》香港:中華書局。
    88.曾旭正,2007,《台灣的社區營造》,台北縣:遠足文化。
    89.黃士毅編著,徐時儀、楊豔彙校,2014,《朱子語類彙校》,上海:上海古籍出版社。
    90.黃子寧,2022,《利益囡仔:臺灣基督長老教會的兒童教育與家庭教養(1865-1936)》,新北市:稻香出版社。
    91.黃宣衛,2022,《成為池上:地方的可能性》,新北市;左岸文化。
    92.黃慧貞,2007,《日治時期台灣「上流階層」興趣之探討─以《台灣人士鑑》為分析樣本》,新北市:稻鄉出版社。
    93.黃應貴,2012,《「文明」之路第一卷:「文明化」下布農文化傳統之形塑(1895-1945)》,台北:中研院民族所。
    94.劉述先,1995,《朱子哲學的發展與完成》,台北:學生書局。
    95.潘朝陽,2001,《明清台灣儒學論》,台北:台灣學生書局。
    96.鄭用錫,1992,《臺灣先賢詩文集彙刊:北郭園全集(中)》,台北市:龍文出版社。
    97.黎靖德編,王星賢點校,1986,《朱子語類》,北京:中華書局。
    98.駱香林原著,黃憲作選注,2013,《駱香林集》,台南:國立台灣文學館。
    99.謝其濬,2022,《做一件只有你能做的事:從一個人到一群人,鮮乳坊用一瓶牛奶改變一個產業》,台北:天下文化。
    100.鍾彩鈞,2018,《明代程朱理學的演變》,台北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。
    101.丸橋充拓,2020,《江南の発展 南宋まで―シリーズ中国の歴史(2)》,東京:岩波書店。
    102.大塚民俗學會,1994,《日本民俗事典(縮刷版)》,東京:弘文堂。
    103.水島治郎,2016,《ポピュリズムとは何か―民主主義の敵か、改革の希望か》,東京:中央公論新社。
    104.和歌森太郎,1956,《日本風俗史(上)》,東京:有斐閣。
    105.柳田國男,1964,《定本柳田國男集(第二十五卷)》,東京:筑摩書房。
    106.溝口雄三,1989,《方法としての中国》,東京:東京大学出版会。
    107.檀上寬,2020,《陸海の交錯 明朝の興亡―シリーズ中国の歴史(4)》,東京:岩波書店。

    專書篇章
    1.Ahren, Emily Martin. 1981. “The Thai Ti Kong Festival.” In The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society, eds. Emily Martin Ahren and Hill Gates. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    2.Feuchtwang, Stephan. 1974. “Domestic and Communal Worship in Taiwan.” In Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society, ed. Arthur P. Wolf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    3.Gowans, Christopher W. 2014. “Naturalism, Relativism, and the Authority of Morality.” In Moral Relativism and Chinese Philosophy: David Wong and His Critics. eds. Xiao Yang and Huang Yong. New York: State University of New York Press.
    4.Wiredu, Kwasi. 1997. “The Need for Conceptual Decolonization in African Philosophy.” In Philosophy and Democracy in Intercultural Perspective, eds Heinz Kimmerle and Franz M. Wimmer. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.
    5.Wolf, Arthur P. 1974. “Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors.” In Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society, ed. Arthur P. Wolf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    6.Yong, Huang. 2014. “Toward a Benign Moral Relativism: From the Agent/ Appraiser-Centered to the Patient-Centered.” In Moral Relativism and Chinese Philosophy: David Wong and His Critics. eds. Xiao Yang and Huang Yong. New York: State University of New York Press.
    7.丁仁傑,2022,〈大型地方性:台南西港刈香村際網絡再思考〉,載於《台灣史論叢民間信仰篇;進香、醮、祭與社會文化變遷》,謝國興主編,台北:台大出版中心。
    8.朱鴻林,2004,〈丘濬《大學衍義補》及其在十六、十七世紀的影響〉,載於《丘濬、海瑞評介集》,朱逸輝主編,海口:海南出版社。
    9.李世愉,2015,〈童試〉,載於《中國科舉制度通史:清代卷》,李世愉與胡平合著,上海:上海人民出版社。
    10.李世愉,2015,〈鄉試〉,載於《中國科舉制度通史:清代卷》,李世愉與胡平合著,上海:上海人民出版社。
    11.林文龍,2014,〈「開台進士」的歷史糾纏〉,載於《科舉制度在台灣》,陳益源、鄭大主編,台北:里仁。
    12.林美容,2022,〈由祭祀圈到信仰圈:台灣民間社會的地域構成與發展〉,載於《台灣史論叢民間信仰篇;進香、醮、祭與社會文化變遷》,謝國興主編,台北:台大出版中心。
    13.張炎憲,1986,〈臺灣新竹鄭氏家族的發展〉,載於《中國海洋發展史論文集(二)》,中國海洋發展史論文集編輯委員會主編,台北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。
    14.鄭道聰,2014,〈從王忠孝公集二則史料談明鄭時代台灣文教發展〉,載於《科舉制度在台灣》,陳益源、鄭大主編,台北:里仁。
    15.溝口雄三,1987,〈新体制の模索と新儒学の胎動〉,載於《儒教史》,戶川芳朗、蜂屋邦夫、溝口雄三合著,東京:山川出版社。

    期刊論文
    1.Boas, Franz. 1887. “The Occurrence of Similar Inventions in Areas Widely Apart.” Science. 9(224):485-486.
    2.Browne, Craig. 2019. “The Modern Political Imaginary and the Problem of Hierarchy.” Social Epistemology. 33(5):398-409.
    3.de Lazari-Radek, Katarzyna and Singer, Peter. 2013. “How much more demanding is utilitarianism than common sense morality?” Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 67(266):427-438.
    4.Holley, David M. 2002. “Sidgwick’s Problem” Ethical theory and moral practice. 15(1):45-65.
    5.Hung, Tzu-Chieh and Hung Tzu-Wei (洪子傑與洪子偉). 2020. “How China’s Cognitive Warfare Works: A Frontline Perspective of Taiwan’s Anti-Disinformation Wars.” Journal of Global Security Studies. 7(4):1-18.
    6.Kyriacou, Christos. 2015. “Critical Discussion of David Velleman, Foundations for Moral Relativism.” Ethic Theory and Moral Practice. 18(1):209-214.
    7.Monshipouri, Mahmood. 2019. “Reza Afshari and Cultural Relativism.” Human Rights Quarterly. 41(1): 204-208.
    8.Papadimitropoulous, Evangelos. 2022. “Freedom, Autonomy, Democracy: Castoriadis and the Commons.” Critique. 50(1):167-183.
    9.Sarkissian, Hagop. “Well-Functioning Daos and Moral Relativism.” Philosophy East and West. 72(1):230-247.
    10.Scarre, Geoffrey. 1998. “Is Act-Utilitarianism the 'Ethics of Fantasy'?” Journal of Applied Philosophy. 15(3):259-270.
    11.Shaver, Robert. 2020. “Sidgwick’s Distinction Passage.” Utilitas. 32(4):444-453.
    12.Skinner, G. William (施堅雅). 1964. “Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China: Part I.” The Journal of Asian Studies. 24(1):3-43.
    13.Steele, Meili. 2017. “Social Imaginaries and the Theory of the Normative Utterance.” Philosophy and Social Criticism. 43(10): 1045-1071.
    14.Straume, Ingerid. 2012. “The Survival of Politics.” Critical Horizons. 13(1): 113-133.
    15.Strauss, Claudia. 2006. “The Imaginary.” Anthropological Theory. 6(3):322-344.
    16.Winch, Peter. 1964. “Understanding a Primitive Society.” American Philosophical Quarterly. 1(4):307-324.
    17.余育婷,2016,〈鄭用錫詩歌特色重探〉,《政大中文學報》,2016-12(26):251-274。
    18.吳進安,2009,〈清朝台灣儒學中的朱子學意涵與詮釋〉,《漢學研究集刊》,2009-06 (8): 53-75。
    19.李文良,1996,〈日治初期臺灣林野經營之展開過程-以大嵙崁(桃園大溪)為例〉,《台灣史研究》,3(1):143-171。
    20.李文良,2000,〈日治時期臺灣總督府的林野支配與所有權-以「緣故關係」為中心〉,《台灣史研究》,5(2):35-54。
    21.李知灝,2013,〈社群的「現代」意義:以「櫟社」暨其詩人作品為研究中心〉,台灣文學研究,(5):95-135。
    22.官大偉,2020,〈在地視角下的文化地景保存:以菲律賓伊富高梯田為例〉,《地理學報》,(95):61-94。
    23.林玉茹,2004,〈戰爭、邊陲與殖民産業:戰時臺灣拓殖株式會社在東臺灣投資事業的布局〉,《近代史研究集刊》,(43):117-172。
    24.林朝成、盧其薇,2009,〈從鰲峰書院到海東書院:論清代臺灣朱子學的二個向度〉,《東華漢學》,2009(9):281-324。
    25.林維杰,2013,〈黎貴惇的朱子學及其仙佛思想〉,《台灣東亞文明研究學刊》,10(2):161-186。
    26.邱惠芬,2020,〈戰後臺灣朱子詩經學研究述評〉,《嘉大中文學報》,2020-03(13):41-72。
    27.張永儁,2001,〈朱熹「義利之辨」之倫理價值觀探源〉,《哲學與文化》,28(1):1-10。
    28.張修慎,2008,〈台灣的「現代性」、「鄉土文化」:與日本「近代的超 克」思想的對應〉,《人文集刊》,(7):117-152。
    29.張揚,〈丘濬經世之策及其哲學內核〉,《文物鑒定與鑒賞》,2018(14):46-51。
    30.陳彥軍、王宏海,2013,〈論《大學衍義補》在《大學》經世演進中的價值〉,《衡水學院學報》,13(5):95-99。
    31.陳潁峰,2019,〈環評需要什麼樣的公民參與?廢棄物填海造島政策中環評 公民共識會議的啟示〉,《科技醫療與社會》,(29):65-118。
    32.陳應琴,2008,〈《大學衍義補》的思想史價值〉,《寧夏大學學報(人文社會科學版)》,30(3):13-19。
    33.湯京平,2007,〈多元民主、政治吸納與政策回應:從台鹼汚染案檢視台灣環 保公益團體的政策角色〉,人文及社會科學集刊,19(1):93-127。
    34.黃克武,1984,〈清季重商思想與商人階層的興起〉,《思與言》,21(5):486-500。
    35.楊儒賓,2000,〈戰後台灣的朱子學研究〉,《漢學研究通訊》,19(4):572-580。
    36.蔡錦堂,1991,〈日據末期台灣人宗教信仰之變遷─以「家庭正廳改善運同」為中心〉,《思與言》,29(4):65-83。
    37.蘇碩斌,2011,〈活字印刷與臺灣意識:日治時期臺灣民族主義想像的社會機制〉,《新聞學研究》,(109):1-41。
    38.井上敏孝,2013,〈花蓮港築港事業に関する一考察―日本初の近代掘込式港湾建設と東台湾開発を中心に─〉,《土木学会論文集D2(土木史)》,69(1):82-89。

    網路資源
    1.Mill, James. 1825. “Supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica: On Government.” Liberty Fond: https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/mill-government (2024.3.27).
    2.王學新,2023,〈日治時期本島人進入「蕃地」開墾之例〉,國史館台灣文獻館:https://www.th.gov.tw/epaper/site/page/50/665,檢索日期:2023年11月12日。
    3.陳鳳麗,2021,〈黃芳彥出身南頭草屯首富之家,一家五兄弟都是醫生〉,自由時報:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3426088,檢索日期:2023年11月12日。
    4.葉榮鐘,2023,〈台灣近代民族運動史〉,國立清華大學圖書館葉榮鐘數位典藏資料庫:https://archives.lib.nthu.edu.tw/jcyeh/main-browse.htm,檢索日期:2023年11月12日。
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    105252505
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105252505
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    250501.pdf2193KbAdobe PDF1View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback