English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51714345      Online Users : 609
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153770


    Title: 沒有「言論」的言論自由──言論自由作為對抗特定管制的權利
    Freedom of Speech Without“Speech”: Freedom of Speech as Right Against Rules
    Authors: 程源中
    Cheng, Yuan-Chung
    Contributors: 政大法學評論
    Keywords: 言論自由的保障範圍;對抗特定管制的權利;範疇方法;表意行為;消極論證;政府不適格;言論的不定性;藝術與言論;不當動機
    Coverage of Freedom of Speech;Right Against Rules;Categorical Approach;Expressive Conduct;Negative Justification;Governmental Incompetence;Indeterminacy of Speech;Art and Speech;Illicit Motive
    Date: 2024-03
    Issue Date: 2024-09-12 14:26:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 美國言論自由法學存在兩種理解方式：言論自由作為保障特定行為的權利，或是言論自由作為對抗特定管制的權利。本文先從案例與學說切入，分別說明這兩種路徑的基礎何在，並主張言論自由作為對抗特定管制的權利是更合理而融貫的詮釋。觸發言論自由的關鍵問題並非「何謂言論？」，而是系爭管制的兩種特徵：管制的不當動機疑慮，以及管制對整體溝通環境的影響。接下來本文從規範性觀點指出，這樣的觸發模式是「政府不適格」和「言論的不定性」兩條件下的最佳方案，也可能是對民主憲政體制來說普遍有效的基礎模型，即便從我國的言論自由法制脈絡來看，亦不失為值得參考的模式。
    Two interpretations of the jurisprudence of freedom of speech exist in the United States: viewing freedom of speech as a right protecting actions or as a right against rules. This article commences with an examination of cases and theories to elucidate the underpinnings of these two approaches. It contends that construing freedom of speech as a right against rules presents a more coherent and reasonable interpretation. The pivotal question initiating free speech considerations is not“What is speech?”but rather the two features of the disputed regulation: its potential for illicit motives and its ramifications on the communicative environment. From a normative perspective, this article suggests that in the face of“governmental incompetence”and“indeterminacy of speech”, this triggering model emerges as an optimal solution, arguably serving as a universally effective foundational model for democratic constitutional systems. Even when considering the unique context of freedom of speech in our country, this model retains its value as a viable reference point.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 176, 277-368
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/102398202024030176005
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202024030176005
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    176-5.pdf1463KbAdobe PDF57View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback