政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153676
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51748777      線上人數 : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/153676


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153676


    題名: 自甘冒險的法理與定位－以日法台之比較為中心
    The Theoretical Position of Assumption of Risk: A Comparative Study of Japan, France, and Taiwan
    作者: 張韻琪
    貢獻者: 法學院
    關鍵詞: 自甘冒險;風險承擔;被害人同意;減責;減免責;過失相抵
    Assumption of risk;Acceptation of risk;Consent of victim;Partial exemption;Exemption;Comparative negligence
    日期: 2024-03
    上傳時間: 2024-09-10 13:20:29 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國學說自外國法繼受自甘冒險概念，實務亦受學說影響，於運動 傷害案件大量適用自甘冒險法理。然而，值得進一步探究者為，各學說 建構之自甘冒險法理是否有所異同？實務上除運動傷害以外，尚有何些 案例適用自甘冒險？為何多於運動傷害案例才適用自甘冒險？比較法 上除了積極適用自甘冒險之國家外，是否亦有排拒自甘冒險適用的國 家，其又基於何種理由？於侵權行為損害賠償法體系中引入自甘冒險概 念，於法政策上有何辯證？ 本文考據日本法和法國法之繼受經驗，提出以下想法：加害人遵從 某特定活動之行為規範而行動，不應視為有過失或違法，無需徵引自甘 冒險法理以否定責任。其次，導入自甘冒險概念，於我國實務上已產生 「將運動神聖化」之副作用，與實務對兒童嬉戲事故案件之處理相比， 更屬昭然。最後，擴大自甘冒險適用，意味削弱對被害人人身之保護， 也和時代發展傾向背道而馳。 建議我國實務未來於處理包含運動傷害事件之各種侵權事件時，不 再以自甘冒險為由否定責任，應於個案中考慮各該活動之規則、層級、 目的、當事人年齡、經驗和實力之差距、當事人的關係等因素以判斷加害人是否須負責。於立法論上，也可思考於職業運動事故之無過失責任 化、擴大責任保險適用之可能性。
    Taiwan's legal doctrine has adopted the concept of "assumption of risk" from foreign legal doctrines, and this concept has had a significant influence on Taiwanese legal practice, particularly in cases of sports-related injuries. However, there are still questions worth further exploring. First, are there differences among Taiwanese legal doctrines in the construction of this legal principle? Second, aside from sports-related injuries, in what other types of cases have Taiwanese courts applied “assumption of risk”? Why does the court apply this doctrine primarily to sports-related cases? Third, besides legal systems who positively embrace this concept, are there any legal systems who deny the necessity of this concept in their tort law? What reasons underlie such rejections? Fourth, what can be said from the point of view of legal policy concerning the adoption of this concept? This paper, referring to the experiences of Japanese and French law of their inheritance and application of this concept, make the following three arguments: Firstly, if a tortfeasor complies with the rules of a specific activity, his actions should not be considered negligent, and there should be no need to invoke “assumption of risk” as a basis of denial of his responsibility. Secondly, the introduction of this concept in Taiwanese tort law seems to have unintended consequences, which can be called the “sanctification of sports” in court practice. This is evident when compared to children-playing-related injuries. Thirdly, expanding the application of “assumption of risk” means weakening the protection of personal injury victims. This result seems to go against the trends of societal development. For these reasons, this paper suggests that in the future, when dealing with various tort cases, Taiwanese courts need not to invoke the concept of “assumption of risk.” Instead, consideration should be given to factors such as the rule, level and purpose of the event, and also the disparities in the age, experience and strength of the parties involved, as well as their relationships, to determine whether the tortfeasor should be held responsible. On a legislative level, it is also worth considering the possibility of a non-fault liability in professional sports accidents along with an expansion of liability insurance.
    關聯: 臺北大學法學論叢, No.129, pp.59-140
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML70檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋