English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51727058      Online Users : 605
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153532


    Title: 情感極化與投票抉擇:2021年公民投票之分析
    Examining Affective Polarization and Voting Behavior: A Study of the 2021 Referenda in Taiwan
    Authors: 陳冠臻
    Chen, Guan-Zhen
    Contributors: 陳陸輝
    Chen, Lu-Huei
    陳冠臻
    Chen, Guan-Zhen
    Keywords: 情感極化
    2021年台灣公投
    投票動員
    投票選擇
    Affective polarization
    2021 referenda in Taiwan
    Voter mobilization
    Voter choice
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 15:58:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文檢視選民對政黨的情感極化程度,對其公民投票中的投票意願與投票選擇之影響。由於台灣處於兩大黨競爭的政治環境,在2021年公投中,即便公投是針對議題的選擇,但從四個表決案中的提案者背景、政黨菁英辯論過程與政黨在各平台的動員行動,皆可見政黨試圖在非一般選舉中施展其影響力。其中,政黨支持者正是最受政黨影響的群體,政黨認同者容易因為長期支持特定政黨,產生對於偏好政黨與對立政黨的情感差異。然而,在政黨的介入下,本次公投的投票率卻僅有41%,代表有一部分的政黨認同者並未在公投中因動員而參與投票。因此本文欲探究國民黨與民進黨選民對政黨之間的情感極化程度,是否為導致支持者被動員與否的主要原因,以及情感極化是否與其投票選擇有關。
    本研究的資料來源為「台灣選舉與民主化調查」之「2021公民投票網路民調實驗平台調查案」,並以國民黨與民進黨認同者作為分析對象。
    本文發現,情感極化程度愈高的選民,其立場將更往其偏好政黨主張的立場靠攏。高情感極化不僅提升選民投票意願,同時使選民的議題態度更貼近其偏好政黨的立場。故情感是影響藍綠選民投票行為的重要因素。除了情感極化外,其他重要且常見的政治態度與社會背景變數亦於投票行為中發揮影響,如在投票參與模型中,議題態度、政治興趣、過去投票經驗、性別與年齡皆顯著影響選民投票意願。而政治信任、對總統執政表現的滿意度、統獨立場與身分認同也是構成選民整體投票立場之因素。
    This paper examines the impact of voters' affective polarization towards political parties on their voting participation and choice in referendums. Given Taiwan's political environment characterized by competition between two major parties, the 2021 referendum, although issue-based, saw clear attempts by political parties to exert influence. This is evident in the backgrounds of the proposers of the four ballot initiatives, the debates among party elites, and the mobilization efforts by the parties across various platforms. Party supporters are particularly susceptible to such influence, as those with strong party identification tend to develop emotional differences between their preferred party and opposing parties. However, despite party interventions, voter turnout in this referendum was only 41%, indicating that some party identifiers were not mobilized. This study seeks to explore whether the degree of affective polarization between Kuomintang (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) voters is a key factor influencing voter mobilization and whether this polarization is related to their voting choices.
    The data for this research comes from the "2021 Referendum Internet Survey Experiment Platform" under the "Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study" (TEDS), focusing on KMT and DPP voters. The findings indicate that as the degree of affective polarization increases, voters' positions align more closely with the stances of their preferred party. High affective polarization not only enhances voting intention but also aligns voters' issue attitudes more closely with those of their preferred party. Therefore, emotion plays a crucial role in influencing the voting behavior of blue and green camp voters. In addition to affective polarization, other significant and common political attitudes and social background variables also impact voting behavior. In the voting participation model, factors such as issue attitudes, political interest, past voting experience, gender, and age significantly affect voter turnout. Moreover, political trust, satisfaction with the president's performance, positions on unification versus independence, and Taiwanese/Chinese identity are also factors shaping voters' overall voting positions.
    Reference: I 中文部分
    中央選舉委員會,2021,〈110年全國性公民投票第17至20案公報〉,中央選舉委員會公民投票專區網站:https://web.cec.gov.tw/referendum/cms/123/36184,檢索日期:2023年9月15日。
    中央選舉委員會,2021,〈110年全國性公民投票第17至20案投票結果〉,中選會公民投票專區網站:https://web.cec.gov.tw/referendum/cms/p_result/36189,檢索日期:2023年9月15日。
    林瓊珠、蔡佳泓,2010,〈從成案到投票-2008年討黨產與入聯公投的公投意向與參與行爲〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,14(1): 1-31。
    徐永明、蔡佳泓、黃綉庭,2005,〈公民投票-台灣國家認同的新動力〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,2(1): 51-74。
    張佑宗、趙珮如,2006,〈社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(2): 1-38。
    盛治仁,2003,〈理性抉擇理論在政治學運用之探討〉,《東吳政治學報》,17: 21-51。
    莊文忠,2016,《選舉人性別投票統計改良之研究》,計畫編號:PG10505-0031,中央選舉委員會委託研究案。
    莊文忠,2020,《第15 任總統副總統及第 10 屆立法委員選舉投票統計分析》,中央選舉委員會委託研究案。
    莊文忠,2022,《110年全國性公民投票案第17案至 第20案投票統計分析》,中央選舉委員會委託研究案。
    陳陸輝,2021,《2020年至2024年「台灣選舉與民主化調查」四年期研究規劃(2/4):2021公民投票網路民調實驗平台調查案》,計畫編號:MOST 109-2740-H-004 -004 -SS4,台北:科技部補助專題研究計畫。
    蔡佳泓,2007,〈民主深化或政黨競爭?初探台灣2004年公民投票參與〉,《台灣政治學刊》,11(1): 109-145。
    鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇,2008,〈選舉事件與政治信任:以2004年總統選舉為例〉,《問題與研究》,47(3): 29-50。
    蕭怡靖,2014,〈從政黨情感溫度計解析台灣民眾的政治極化〉,《選舉研究》, 21(2): 1-42。

    II外文部分
    Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70(2): 542-555.
    Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies (41): 12-22.
    Abramowitz, Alan I., and Walter J. Stone. 2006. “The Bush Effect: Polarization, Turnout, and Activism in the 2004 Presidential Election.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(2): 141-154.
    Abrams, Samuel J., and Morris P. Fiorina. 2015. “Party Sorting: The Foundations of Polarized Politics.” In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, eds. James A. Thurber, and Antoine Yoshinaka. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Abreu, Maria, and Özge Öner. 2020. “Disentangling the Brexit Vote: The Role of Economic, Social and Cultural Contexts in Explaining the UK’s EU Referendum Vote.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52(7): 1434-1456.
    Aguiar-Conraria, Luís and Pedro C. Magalhães. 2010. “Referendum Design, Quorum Rules and Turnout.” Public Choice 144(12): 63-81.
    Aguiar-Conraria, Luís, and Pedro C. Magalhães. 2010. “Referendum Design, Quorum Rules and Turnout.” Public Choice 144(1-2): 63-81.
    Aldrich, J. H., Abramson, P. R., and Rohde, D. W. 2006. Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections. CQ Press.
    Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 246-278.
    Andersen, Kim, Camilla Bjarnøe, Erik Albæk, and Claes H. De Vreese. 2016. “How News Type Matters: Indirect Effects of Media Use on Political Participation Through Knowledge and Efficacy.” Journal of Media Psychology 28(3): 111-122.
    Arceneaux, Kevin, and David W. Nickerson. 2009. Who Is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-Analysis of 11 Field Experiments. American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 1-16.
    Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2): 117-150.
    Becker, Rolf. 2006. “Political Efficacy and Voter Turnout in East and West Germany.” German Politics 13(2): 317-340.
    Bond, Robert M., Christopher J. Fariss, Jason J. Jones, Adam D. I. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle, and James H. Fowler. 2012. “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.” Nature 489(7415): 295-298.
    Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan. 2013. “Civic Duty and Turnout in the UK Referendum on AV: What Shapes the Duty to Vote?” Electoral Studies 32(2): 265-273.
    Brewer, Marilynn B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55(3): 429-444.
    Brewer, Mark D. 2005. “The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2): 219-229.
    Bryce, James. 1995. The American Commonwealth. Indianapolis, Ind: Liberty Fund.
    Budge, Ian. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Carreras, Miguel. 2018. “Why No Gender Gap in Electoral Participation? A Civic Duty Explanation.” Electoral Studies (52): 36-45.
    Caruana, Nicholas J., R. Michael McGregor, and Laura B. Stephenson. 2015. “The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48(4): 771-789.
    Casal Bértoa, Fernando, and José Rama. 2021. “Polarization: What Do We Know and What Can We Do About It?” Frontiers in Political Science 3: 687695.
    Clarke, Harold D., Kornberg, Allan, and Stewart, Marianne C., 2004. "Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec," British Journal of Political Science 34(2): 345-355.
    Clarke, Paula J., Emma Truelove, Charles Hulme, and Margaret J. Snowling. 2013. Developing Reading Comprehension. First edition. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Cogburn, Derrick L., and Fatima K. Espinoza-Vasquez. 2011. “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing 10(1-2): 189-213.
    Côrte-Real, Paulo P. and Paulo T. Pereira. 2004. “The Voter Who Wasn’t There: Referenda, Representation and Abstention.” Social Choice and Welfare 22(2): 349-369.
    Cravens, Matthew D.. 2020. “Measuring the Strength of Voter Turnout Habits.” Electoral Studies (64): 102-117.
    Cronin, Thomas E. 1989. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    de Vreese, Claes H., and Hajo G. Boomgaarden. 2006. “Media Effects on Public Opinion about the Enlargement of the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(2): 419-436.
    Del Monte, Alfredo, Sara Moccia, and Luca Pennacchio. 2019. “Turnout and Voting Behaviour in Constitutional Referendums: A Regional Analysis of the Italian Case.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 6(1): 557-573.
    Del Monte, Alfredo, Sara Moccia, and Luca Pennacchio. 2019. “Turnout and Voting Behaviour in Constitutional Referendums: A Regional Analysis of the Italian Case.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 6(1): 557-573.
    Denver, David. 2003. Elections and Voters in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
    Downs, Anthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. “ Journal of Political Economy 65(2):135-150.
    Druckman, James N., and Matthew S. Levendusky. 2019. “What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?” Public Opinion Quarterly 83(1): 114-122.
    Druckman, James N., Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, Matthew Levendusky, and John Barry Ryan. 2020a. “Affective Polarization, Local Contexts and Public Opinion in America.” Nature Human Behaviour 5(1): 28-38.
    Druckman, James N., Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, Matthew Levendusky, and John Barry Ryan. 2020b. “The Political Impact of Affective Polarization: How Partisan Animus Shapes COVID-19 Attitudes.” PsyArXiv. preprint. https://osf.io/ztgpn (June 27, 2023).
    Dyck, Joshua J., and Nicholas R. Seabrook. 2010. “Mobilized by Direct Democracy: Short-Term Versus Long-Term Effects and the Geography of Turnout in Ballot Measure Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 91(1): 188-208.
    Esteban, Joan-Maria, and Debraj Ray. 1994. “On the Measurement of Polarization.” Econometrica 62(4): 819-851.
    Fieldhouse, Edward, David Cutts, and Jack Bailey. 2022. “Who Cares If You Vote? Partisan Pressure and Social Norms of Voting.” Political Behavior 44(3): 1297-1316.
    Fiorina, Morris P., and Samuel J. Abrams. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 563-588.
    Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel A. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2008. “Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings.” The Journal of Politics 70(2): 556-560.
    Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy Pope. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Longman.
    Fishburn, Peter C. and Steven J. Brams. 1983. “Paradoxes of Preferential Voting.” Mathematics Magazine 56(4): 207-214.
    Franklin, Mark N., Cees Van Der Eijk, and Michael Marsh. 1995. “Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht.” West European Politics 18(3): 101-117.
    Garrett R. Kelly, Shira Dvir Gvirsman, Benjamin K. Johnson, Yariv Tsfati, Rachel Neo, and Aysenur Dal. 2014. “Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization: Partisan Media Exposure and Affective Polarization.” Human Communication Research 40(3): 309-332.
    Garrett, R Kelly, Jacob A Long, and Min Seon Jeong. 2019. “From Partisan Media to Misperception: Affective Polarization as Mediator.” Journal of Communication 69(5): 490-512.
    Garry, John. 2013. “Emotions and Voting in EU Referendums.” European Union Politics 15(2): 235-254.
    Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94(3): 653-663.
    Gherghina, S., Racu, A., Giugăl, A., Gavriș, A., Silagadze, N., and Johnston, R.. 2019. “Non-Voting in the 2018 Romanian Referendum: The Importance of Initiators, Campaigning and Issue Saliency.” Political Science 71(3): 193-213.
    Gherghina, Sergiu, Alexandru Racu, Aurelian Giugăl, Alexandru Gavriș, Nanuli Silagadze, and Ron Johnston. 2019. “Non-voting in the 2018 Romanian referendum: the importance of initiators, campaigning and issue saliency.” Political Science 71(3): 193-213.
    Gherghina, Sergiu. 2019. “How Political Parties Use Referendums: An Analytical Framework.” East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 33(3): 677-690.
    Gidron, Noam, James F. Adams, and Will Horne. 2020. American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Gidron, Noam, Lior Sheffer, and Guy Mor. 2022. “The Israel Polarization Panel Dataset, 2019–2021.” Electoral Studies (80): 102512.
    Goldberg, Andreas C., and Pascal Sciarini. 2021. “Voter Turnout in Direct Democracy: A Joint Analysis of Individual, Referendum and Community Factors.” European Journal of Political Research 62(1): 25-46.
    Green, Donald P., Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, Conn. ; London: Yale University Press.
    Greene, Steven. 1999. “Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach.” Political Psychology 20(2): 393-403.
    Greene, Steven. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.” Social Science Quarterly 85(1): 136-153.
    Grönlund, Kimmo, and Maija Setälä. 2007. “Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout.” Comparative European Politics 5(4): 400-422.
    Hadjar, Andreas, and Michael Beck. 2010. “WHO DOES NOT PARTICIPATE IN ELECTIONS IN EUROPE AND WHY IS THIS?: A Multilevel Analysis of Social Mechanisms behind Non-Voting.” European Societies 12(4): 521-542.
    Hänska, Max, and Bauchowitz, Stefan. 2017. Tweeting for Brexit: how social media influenced the referendum. In Brexit, Trump and the Media, eds. Mair, John, Clark, Tor, Fowler, Neil, Snoddy, Raymond and Tait, Richard. Bury St Edmunds, UK : Abramis academic Publishing.
    Hare, Christopher, and Keith T. Poole. 2014. “The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics.” Polity 46(3): 411-429.
    Harteveld, Eelco, and Markus Wagner. 2022. “Does Affective Polarisation Increase Turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain.” West European Politics 46(4): 732-759.
    Hedrick, Samuel, and Sergiu Gherghina. 2021. “Why People Vote in Local Level Referendums: Comparing Germany and the United States.” European Politics and Society 22(5): 716-732.
    Hetherington, Marc J. 2008. “Turned Off or Turned On? How Polarization Affects Political Engagement.” In Red and Blue Nation?: Consequences and Correction of America's Polarized Politics, eds. Pietro S. Nivola, and David W. Brady. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Hobolt, Sara Binzer. 2006a. “Direct Democracy and European Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 153-166.
    Hobolt, Sara Binzer. 2006b. “How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums.” Party Politics 12(5): 623-647.
    Hobolt, Sara Binzer. 2009. “2 A Theory of Referendum Behaviour.” In Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, ed. Hobolt, Sara Binzer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Hobolt, Sara Binzer. 2009. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hollander, Saskia. 2019. The Politics of Referendum Use in European Democracies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    Hopmann, David Nicolas, Anke Wonneberger, Adam Shehata, and Jonas Höijer. 2016. “Selective Media Exposure and Increasing Knowledge Gaps in Swiss Referendum Campaigns.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28(1): 73-95.
    Huddy, Leonie, Lilliana Mason, and Lene Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1): 1-17.
    Huddy, Leonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22(1): 127-156.
    Hudson, Alexander. 2021. The Veil of Participation: Citizens and Political Parties in Constitution-Making Processes. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.
    Hunter, James D. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
    Inglehart, R.,and Norris, P. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique 21(4): 441-463.
    Iyengar, Shanto, and Masha Krupenkin. 2018. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect: Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Political Psychology (39): 201-218.
    Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3):405-431.”
    Iyengar, Shanto, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J. Westwood. 2019. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22(1): 129-146.
    Jennings, M. Kent, Laura Stoker, and Jake Bowers. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” The Journal of Politics 71(3): 782-799.
    Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. 2012. “Kulturkampf in Turkey: The Constitutional Referendum of 12 September 2010.” South European Society and Politics 17(1): 1-22.
    Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2006. “Role of The Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes.” Party Politics 12(5): 599-622.
    Larcinese, Valentino. 2007. “Voting over Redistribution and the Size of the Welfare State: The Role of Turnout.” Political Studies 55(3): 568-585.
    Layman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, and Juliana Menasce Horowitz. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 83-110.
    Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People’s Choice. Duell, Sloan & Pearce Press.
    Leduc, Lawrence. 2002. “Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 711-732.
    Leininger, Arndt, and Lea Heyne. 2017. “How Representative Are Referendums? Evidence from 20 Years of Swiss Referendums.” Electoral Studies (48): 84-97.
    Lelkes, Yphtach, and Sean J. Westwood. 2017. “The Limits of Partisan Prejudice.” The Journal of Politics 79(2): 485-501.
    Lelkes, Yphtach, Gaurav Sood, and Shanto Iyengar. 2017. “The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect.” American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 5-20.
    Lelkes, Yphtach. 2021. “Policy over Party: Comparing the Effects of Candidate Ideology and Party on Affective Polarization.” Political Science Research and Methods 9(1): 189-196.
    Levendusky, Matthew S. 2018. “Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?” The Journal of Politics 80(1): 59-70.
    Macwhirter, Iain. 2013. Road to Referendum. Glasgow: Cargo.
    Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128-145.
    Mason, Lilliana. 2018. “Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(S1): 866-887.
    McHarg, Aileen, Thomas J. Mullen, Alan C. Page, and Neil Walker. 2016. The Scottish Independence Referendum: Constitutional and Political Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Medeiros, Mike, and Alain Noël. 2014. “The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 47(7): 1022-1046.
    Mendelsohn, Matthew, and Andrew Parkin. 2001. Referendum Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    Milbrath, Lester W. 1981a. “Citizen Surveys as Citizen Participation Mechanisms.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17(4): 478-496.
    Milbrath, Lester W. 1981b. “Political Participation.” In The Handbook of Political Behavior s, ed. Samuel L. Long. Boston, MA: Springer.
    Miller, Arthur H., and Ola Listhaug. 1990. “Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 357-386.
    Morris, Dick. 2001. “Direct Democracy and the Internet.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34: 1033-1053.
    Neijens, Peter, Philip Van Praag, Willem Bosveld, and Jeroen Slot. 2007. “Turnout in Referendums: The Dutch Experience. An Analysis of Voter and Referendum Characteristics That Influence Turnout in Referendums.” In The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns, ed. Claes H. De Vreese. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    Nemčok, Miroslav, and Peter Spáč. 2019. “Referendum as a Party Tool: The Case of Slovakia.” East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 33(3): 755-777.
    Nemčok, Miroslav, Peter Spáč, and Petr Voda. 2019. “The Role of Partisan Cues on Voters’ Mobilization in a Referendum.” Contemporary Politics 25(1): 11-28.
    Nicholson, Stephen P. 2005. Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections, and Ballot Propositions. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
    Ondercin, Heather Louise, and Mary Kate Lizotte. 2021. “You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling: How Gender Shapes Affective Polarization.” American Politics Research 49(3): 282-292.
    Orhan, Yunus Emre. 2022. “The Relationship between Affective Polarization and Democratic Backsliding: Comparative Evidence.” Democratization 29(4): 714-735.
    Palfrey, Thomas R., and Keith T. Poole. 1987. “The Relationship between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 31(3): 511-530.
    Pattie, Charles, David Denver, James Mitchell, and Hugh Bochel. 1999. “Partisanship, National Identity and Constitutional Preferences: An Exploration of Voting in the Scottish Devolution Referendum of 1997.” Electoral Studies 18(3): 305-322.
    Pierce, Roy, Henry Valen, and Ola Listhaug. 1983. “Referendum Voting Behavior: The Norwegian and British Referenda on Membership in the European Community.” American Journal of Political Science 27(1): 43-63.
    Pirralha, André. 2017. “Political Participation and Wellbeing in the Netherlands: Exploring the Causal Links.” Applied Research in Quality of Life 12(2): 327-341.
    Qvortrup, Matt. 2014. “Referendums on Independence, 1860-2011.” The Political Quarterly 85(1): 57-64.
    Riker, William H., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 25-42.
    Robison, Joshua, and Rachel L. Moskowitz. 2019. “The Group Basis of Partisan Affective Polarization.” The Journal of Politics 81(3): 1075-1079.
    Rogowski, Jon C., and Joseph L. Sutherland. 2016. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.” Political Behavior 38(2): 485-508.
    Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Pub.
    Rudolph, Thomas J, and Marc J Hetherington. 2021. “Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 33(3): 591-606.
    Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Scarrow, Susan E. 2001. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation.” Comparative Political Studies 34(6): 651-665.
    Schneider, Gerald, and Patricia A. Weitsman. 1996. “The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests.” Comparative Political Studies 28(4): 582-607.
    Selb, Peter, Hanspeter Kriesi, Regula Hänggli, and Mirko Marr. 2009. “Partisan Choices in a Direct-Democratic Campaign.” European Political Science Review 1(1): 155-172.
    Serdült, Uwe, and Yanina Welp. 2012. “Direct Democracy Upside Down.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 8(1): 69-92.
    Smets, Kaat, and Carolien van Ham. 2013. “The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies 32(2): 344-359.
    Solivetti, Luigi M. 2020. “Political Partisanship versus Turnout in Italy’s 2016 Referendum.” Quality & Quantity 54(3): 709-734.
    Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Mark D. Brewer, and Mack D. Mariani. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
    Streicher, Tobias, Sascha L. Schmidt, and Dominik Schreyer. 2018. “Referenda on Hosting the Olympics: What Drives Voter Turnout?” Journal of Sports Economics 20(5): 627-653.
    Strickler, Ryan. 2018. “Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes toward Disagreement.” Political Research Quarterly 71(1): 3-18.
    Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. W. G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London ; New York: Published in cooperation with European Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press.
    Tawfik, Amal, Pascal Sciarini, and Eugène Horber. 2011. “Putting Voter Turnout in a Longitudinal and Contextual Perspective: An Analysis of Actual Participation Data.” International Political Science Review 33(3): 352-371.
    Tierney, Stephen. 2012. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    Topaloff, L. 2017. “The Rise of Referendums: Elite Strategy or Populist Weapon?” Journal of Democracy 28 (3): 127-140.
    Uleri, Pier Vincenzo. 2002. “On Referendum Voting in Italy: YES, NO or Non-vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 863-883.
    Vaccari, Cristian, and Augusto Valeriani. 2021. Outside the Bubble: Social Media and Political Participation in Western Democracies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Valentino, Nicholas A., Ted Brader, Eric W. Groenendyk, Krysha Gregorowicz, and Vincent L. Hutchings. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 73(1): 156-170.
    Valkovičová, Veronika. 2017. “Regrettably, It Seems that Breaking One Border Causes Others to Tumble’. Nationalism and Homonegativity in the 2015 Slovak Referendum.” Politique Européenne 55(1): 86-115.
    Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press.
    Vreese, Claes H. De, and Holli A. Semetko. 2004. “News Matters: Influences on the Vote in the Danish 2000 Euro Referendum Campaign.” European Journal of Political Research 43(5): 699-722.
    Ward, Dalston G., and Margit Tavits. 2019. “How Partisan Affect Shapes Citizens’ Perception of the Political World.” Electoral Studies (60): 102045.
    Weber, Till. 2021. “Negative Voting and Party Polarization: A Classic Tragedy.” Electoral Studies (71): 102335.
    Webster, Steven W., and Alan I. Abramowitz. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45(4): 621-647.
    Zorn, Thomas S., Dolores T. Martin. 1986. “Optimism and Pessimism in Political and Market Institutions.” Public Choice 49(2): 165-178.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    109252015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109252015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201501.pdf3349KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback